Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania

P. A. Ndakidemi A D , F. D. Dakora B E , E. M. Nkonya C , D. Ringo D and H. Mansoor D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Applied Science, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Keizersgracht, District 6, PO Box 652, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.

B Research and Technology Promotion, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Keizersgracht, PO Box 652, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.

C International Food Policy Research Institute, PO Box 28565, Kampala, Uganda.

D Selian Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 6024, Arusha, Tanzania.

E Corresponding author. Email: dakoraf@cput.ac.za

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(4) 571-577 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03157
Submitted: 29 July 2003  Accepted: 9 February 2005   Published: 20 April 2006

Abstract

On-farm experiments were conducted in farmers’ fields at 12 different sites in the 2 districts of Moshi and Rombo in northern Tanzania during the 2000–01 cropping season to study the effects of (brady)rhizobial inoculation in combination with P supply on growth and grain yields of soybean and common bean, and to assess the economic returns of these different technologies to farmers. A low level of N was included as an indicator of endogenous soil N status. The treatments included (brady)rhizobial inoculation, N fertilisation (30 kg N/ha as urea), P application [26 kg P/ha as triple super phosphate (TSP)], (brady)rhizobial inoculation + P fertilisation (26 kg/ha as TSP) and unfertilised uninoculated control. The study was conducted as a randomised complete block design with each of the 12 farmers’ fields as a replicate. At harvest, plant growth of soybean and common bean was significantly (P≤0.05) greater with (brady)rhizobial inoculation compared with N and P supply or uninoculated control in the 2 districts. Relative to uninoculated unfertilised plots, grain yields of common bean were markedly (P≤0.05) increased by 60–78% from inoculation alone, and 82–95% from inoculation + 26 kg P/ha; with soybean there was 127–139% increase in grain yield from inoculation alone, and 207–231% from inoculation + P. Thus, the combined application of bacterial inoculants and P fertiliser to field plants of soybean and common bean significantly (P≤0.05) increased biomass production and grain yield compared with the single use of N and P or (brady)rhizobial strains. From economic analysis, the increase in grain yield with inoculation translated into a significantly (P≤0.05) higher marginal rate of return and dollar profit for soybean and common bean farmers in northern Tanzania. With common bean, there was a 66 and 92% increase, respectively, in dollar profit with inoculation at Moshi and Rombo districts respectively relative to control; these profit margins rose to 84 and 102% with provision of supplemental P (26 kg P/ha). With soybean, however, the increase in profit with inoculation was much larger, about 140 and 153% at Rombo and Moshi, respectively, and these rose to 224 and 250% with P supply.

Additional keywords: biological nitrogen fixation, (brady)rhizobia, dollar profit, legume inoculation, marginal rate of return.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Directorate of Research and Development in the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security Tanzania, through TARP II project. This study was also partially funded by the International Atomic Energy Agency through project number RAF/5045. The National Research Foundation of South Africa and the Cape Peninsula University of Technology are thanked for financial support to FDD. The technical assistance of Mrs. Scholastica Masenge and extension staff in Moshi and Rombo districts are also appreciated.


References


Amijee F, Giller KE (1998) Environmental constraints to nodulation and nitrogen fixation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Tanzania I. A survey of soil fertility and root nodulation. African Crop Science Journal 6, 159–169. open url image1

Anderson GD (1974) Bean responses to fertilizers on Mt Kilimanjaro in relation to soil and climatic conditions. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 39, 272–288. open url image1

Anyango B, Wilson KJ, Beynon JL, Giller KE (1995) Diversity of rhizobia nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris L. in two Kenyan soils of contrasting pHs. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 4016–4021. open url image1

Cassman KG, Whitney AS, Fox RL (1981) Phosphorus requirement of soybean and cowpea as affected by mode of N nutrition. Agronomy Journal 73, 17–22. open url image1

Chowdhury MS, Msumali GP, Malekela GP (1983) Need for seasonal inoculation of soybean with rhizobia at Morogoro, Tanzania. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 1, 219–228. open url image1

da Silva PM, Tsai SM, Bonetti R (1993) Response to inoculation and N fertilization for increased yield and biological nitrogen fixation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant and Soil 152, 123–130.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dakora FD (1984) Nodulation and nitrogen fixation by groundnut in amended and unammended field soils in Ghana. In ‘Biological nitrogen fixation in Africa’. (Eds H Ssali, SO Keya) pp. 324–339. (Nairobi-Rhizobium MIRCEN: Nairobi)

Dakora FD (1994) Nodulation gene induction and genetic control in the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. South African Journal of Science 90, 596–599. open url image1

Dakora FD, Keya SO (1997) Contribution of legume nitrogen fixation to sustainable agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 809–817.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

de Mooy CJ, Pesek J (1966) Nodulation response of soybean to added phosphorus, potassium and calcium salts. Agronomy Journal 58, 275–280. open url image1

Frey S, Blum LK (1994) Effect of pH on competition for nodule occupancy by type I and type II strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv phaseoli. Plant and Soil 163, 157–164.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gemell LG, Roughley RJ (1993) Field evaluation in acid soils of strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli selected for their tolerance or sensitivity to acid soil factors in agar medium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25, 1447–1452.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Giller KE, Amijee F, Brodrick SJ, Edje OT (1998) Environmental constraints to nodulation and nitrogen fixation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Tanzania II. Response to N and P fertilisers and inoculation with Rhizobium. African Crop Science Journal 6, 171–178. open url image1

Graham PH, Draeger KJ, Ferrey ML, Conroy MJ, Hammer BE, Martinez E, Aarons SR, Quinto C (1994) Acid pH tolerance in strains of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium and initial studies on the basis for acid tolerance of Rhizobium tropici UMR 1899. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 40, 198–207. open url image1

Hungria M, Vargas MAT (2000) Environmental factors affecting N2 fixation in grain legumes in the tropics, with an emphasis on Brazil. Field Crops Research 65, 151–164.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hungria M, Andrabe DS, Chuire LMde O, Megias M (1999) Characterization of new efficient and competitive strains for the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop in Brazil. In ‘Highlights on nitrogen fixation research’. (Eds F Martinez, G Hernandez) pp. 251–254. (Plenum Press: New York)

Hungria M, Andrabe DS, Chuire LMde O, Agustin P, Francisco JGM, Megias M (2000) Isolation and characterization of new efficient and competitive bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rhizobia from Brazil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1515–1528.
Crossref |
open url image1

Israel DW (1987) Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiology 84, 835–840. open url image1

Mushi CS (1997) Annual report — bean breeding. National Bean Program, Selian Agricultural Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania.

Ndakidemi PA, Nyaky AS, Mkuchu M, Woomer PL (1998) Fertilization and inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris in Arusha, Tanzania. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th congress of the African Association for Biological Nitrogen Fixation’. (Ed. FD Dakora) pp. 166–167. (University of Cape Town: Cape Town)

Pereira PAA, Bliss FA (1987) Nitrogen fixation and plant growth of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different levels of phosphorus availability. Plant and Soil 104, 79–84.
Crossref |
open url image1

Sa NMH, Scotti MRML, Paiva E, Franco AA, Dobereiner J (1993) Selection and characterization of Rhizobium sp. strains stable and capable of fixing nitrogen in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista de Microbiologia 24, 38–48. open url image1

Salema MP, Chowdhury MS (1980) Rhizobial inoculation and fertilizer effect on soybean in presence of native rhizobia. Beitrage zur Tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinarmedizin 18, 245–250. open url image1

Sanchez PA (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295, 2019–2020.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Sanginga N, Thottappilly G, Dashiell K (2000) Effectiveness of rhizobia nodulating recent promiscuous soybean selection in the moist savanna of Nigeria. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 32, 127–133.
Crossref |
open url image1

Smaling EMA, Fresco LO, de Jager A (1996) Classifying, monitoring and improving soil nutrient stocks and flows in African agriculture. Ambio 25, 492–496. open url image1

Smithson JB, Edje OT, Giller KE (1993) Diagnosis and correction of soil nutrient problems of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in the Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 233–240. open url image1

Ssali H (1988) Rhizobium phaseoli inoculation trials on farmers’ fields in Kenya. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal 53, 151–157. open url image1

Ssali H, Keya SO (1982) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yield of beans inoculated with Rhizobium phaseoli. Kenya Journal of Science and Technology (B) 3, 87–89. open url image1

Ssali H, Keya SO (1983) The effect of phosphorus on nodulation, growth and dinitrogen fixation by beans. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 1, 135–144. open url image1

Ssali S, Keya SO (1986) The effects of phosphorus and nitrogen fertiliser level on nodulation, growth and dinitrogen fixation of three bean cultivars. Tropical Agriculture 63, 105–109. open url image1

Stoorvogel JJ, Smaling EMA, Janssen BH (1993) Calculating soil nutrient balances in Africa at different scales. I. Supra national scale. Fertiliser Research 35, 227–235.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tauer LW (1989) Economic impact of future biological nitrogen fixation technologies on United States agriculture. Plant and Soil 119, 261–270.
Crossref |
open url image1

Vargas MAT, Graham PH (1989) Cultivar and pH effects on competition for nodule sites between isolates of Rhizobium in beans. Plant and Soil 115, 197–200. open url image1

Woomer PL, Karanja NK, Mekki EI, Mwakalobe B, Tembo H, Nyika M, Nkwiine C, Ndakidemi P, Msumali G (1997) Indigenous population of rhizobia, legume response to inoculation and farmers awareness of inoculants in East and Southern Africa. Proceedings of the African Crop Science Conference 3, 297–308. open url image1

Wortman CS, Allen DJ (1994) African production bean environments: their definition, characteristics and constraints. Network on bean research in Africa. Occasional paper series no. 11. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.