Stress-strain properties of individual Merino wool fibres are minor contributors to variations in staple strength induced by genetic selection and nutritional manipulation
A. N. Thompson A B C and P. I. Hynd AA School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
B Present address: Sheep Industries, Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: andrew.thompson@agric.wa.gov.au
Animal Production Science 49(8) 668-674 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08203
Submitted: 21 July 2008 Accepted: 7 April 2009 Published: 27 July 2009
Abstract
This paper investigates the contribution of single fibre stress-strain properties to variations in staple strength induced by both selective breeding for staple strength and nutritional manipulation. Merino weaners (n = 40), selected from ‘sound’ and ‘tender’ lines of staple strength selection flocks, were allocated to feeding regimes designed to induce liveweight changes simulating typical Mediterranean seasonal changes. Average staple strength differed by 5 N/ktex between ‘sound’ and ‘tender’ selection flocks and 18 N/ktex between extreme nutritional treatments. The force-extension properties of individual wool fibres (n = 100 per sheep) were measured using a single fibre strength meter. After normalising for differences in fibre cross-sectional area at the point of break, the key parameters used to describe the stress-strain curve for each fibre were: Young’s modulus (GPa), yield stress (MPa), stress at 15% strain (MPa), stress at break (MPa), strain at break (%) and work to break (MPa).
The average stress-strain properties of single fibres differed widely between individual sheep. Stress at break ranged from 163 to 235 MPa (44% range), strain at break ranged from 21 to 44% (103% range) and work to break from 43 to 71 MPa (65% range). There were no significant differences in any of the single fibre properties between the staple strength selection flocks, nor was there any significant interaction (P > 0.05) between staple strength selection flock and nutritional regimes. Nutritional regime had a significant effect on stress at break, strain at break and work to break, but none of the single fibre stress-strain properties removed any appreciable variance in staple strength over and above that accounted for by differences in along- and between-fibre diameter variation. There appears to be little scope for improvement of single fibre stress-strain properties as a means of increasing staple strength in normal production environments. Selection directly for staple strength or indirectly using the fibre diameter variability traits is an effective method to improve staple strength.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Mrs S. Doran and Ms L. Kingdom for their technical assistance, the staff from the Wool Laboratory, Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, South Perth and Dr E. J. Speijers for assistance with statistical analysis of the data. This project was funded by Australian wool growers through the International Wool Secretariat.
Andrews MW
(1964) The fracture mechanism of wool fibres under tension. Textile Research Journal 34, 831–835.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bastawisy AD,
Onions WJ, Townsend PO
(1961) Some relationships between the properties of fibres and their behaviour in spinning using the Ambler Superdraft method. Journal of the Textile Institute 52, T1–T20.
| Crossref |
Bray AR,
Smith MC, Merrick NC
(1993) Wool growth responses of Romney rams selected for high or low wool strength to nutrient supplementation in winter. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53, 323–326.
Burgmann VD
(1959) Some effects of sheep nutrition on the mechanical constants of wool. Textile Research Journal 29, 901–906.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman BM
(1969) A review of the mechanical properties of keratin fibres. Journal of the Textile Institute 60, 181–207.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Collins JD, Chaikin M
(1965) The longitudinal rheological behaviour of non-uniform fibres. Textile Research Journal 35, 679–693.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Feughelman M
(1994) A model for the mechanical properties of the α-keratin cortex. Textile Research Journal 64, 236–239.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Feughelman M
(2002) Natural protein fibres. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 83, 489–507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Gourdie RG,
Orwin DFG,
Randford S, Ross DA
(1992) Wool fibre tenacity and its relationship to staple strength. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1759–1776.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greeff JC,
Ritchie AJM, Lewis R
(1997) Lessons learnt from staple strength resource flocks. Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 12, 714–718.
Hearle JWS
(2000) A critical review of the structural mechanics of wool and hair fibres. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 27, 123–138.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Hearle JWS
(2003) A total model for the structural mechanics of wool. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 51, 95–117.
Hearle JWS
(2007) Protein fibres: structural mechanics and future opportunities. Journal of Materials Science 42, 8010–8019.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Hunter L,
Leeuwner W,
Smuts S, Strydom MA
(1983) The correlation between staple strength and single fibre strength for sound and tender wools. SAWTRI Technical Report No 514, 1–15.
Huson M, Turner P
(2001) Intrinsic strength of wool: effects of transgenesis, season and bloodlines. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 49, 62–72.
Hynd PI
(1994) Follicular determinants of the length and diameter of wool fibres. 1. Comparison of sheep differing in fibre length/diameter ratio at two levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1137–1147.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson N, Downes AM
(1979) The fibre diameter profile of wool staples from individual sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 163–171.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leeder JD
(1986) The cell membrane complex and its influence on the properties of wool fibres. Wool Science Review 63, 3–35.
Mason P
(1964) The fracture of wool fibres. Part 1: The viscoelastic nature of the fracture properties. Textile Research Journal 34, 747–754.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Masters DG,
Mata G,
Liu SM, Peterson AD
(1998) Influence of liveweight, liveweight change, and diet on wool growth, staple strength and fibre diameter in young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 269–277.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Orwin DFG,
Ranford SL, Geenty KG
(1988) Relationship of staple strength and other fleece characteristics of Romney wool to fibre length after carding. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 409–414.
Peterson AD,
Gherardi SG, Doyle PT
(1998) Components of staple strength in fine and broad wool merino hoggets run together in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1181–1186.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plate DEA,
Robinson GA, Rottenbury RA
(1987) The effect of staple strength and position of staple weakness of greasy wool on worsted spinning. Journal of the Textile Institute 78, 269–280.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roberts NF,
James JFP, Burgmann VD
(1960) Tenderness in fleece wool. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions 51, T935–T952.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scobie DR,
Walls RJ,
Markham LJ,
Woods JL, Bray AR
(1996) Wool fibre tenacity in Romney sheep genetically different in staple tenacity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1203–1212.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson AN, Hynd PI
(1998) Wool growth and fibre diameter changes in young Merino sheep genetically different in staple strength and fed different levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 889–898.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson AN,
Schlink AC,
Peterson AD, Hynd PI
(1998) Follicle abnormalities and fibre shedding in Merino weaners fed different levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 49, 1173–1179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Townsend PP,
Matto AR, Clegg PC
(1973) How fibre length and strength influences worsted spun yarns. Textile Month 58, 44–47.
Williams OB, Chapman RE
(1966) Additional information on dyebanding technique of wool growth measurement. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 32, 298–300.
Zimmermann M, Höcker H
(1996) Typical fracture appearance of broken wool fibres after simulated sunlight irradiation. Textile Research Journal 66, 657–660.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |