A survey of stockperson attitudes and youngstock management practices on Australian dairy farms
Laura Field
A * , Megan Verdon B , Ellen Jongman A and Lauren Hemsworth A
A
B
Abstract
The attitudes of stockpeople towards their animals directly affects the human–animal relationship, in turn affecting stockperson behaviour and animal welfare and productivity. Little is known about the attitudes of Australian stockpeople towards dairy youngstock under their care.
We aimed to explore Australian stockperson attitudes and management practices associated with calf management and reported replacement heifer outcomes.
A convenience sample surveying 91 Australian dairy stockpeople was used to explore common calf-rearing practices, as well as attitudes of stockpeople towards youngstock and current issues in youngstock welfare and management on Australian dairy farms.
Management of both replacement and non-replacement calves varied considerably by farm, and reported practices did not correlate with herd management or demographic data. Factor analysis identified nine principal components related to attitudes towards primiparous heifer and calf welfare and management practices. Variables calculated from these components rarely correlated with demographic factors; however, female respondents were more likely to have positive attitudes towards current issues in calf management (P = 0.013). Several correlations were found between the component variables. Participants who believed it was difficult to use higher-welfare practices to manage the herd were less likely to believe their trusted advisors valued these practices (P < 0.001), or believe these practices were important themselves (P < 0.001). These participants were more likely to believe that early lactation heifers were difficult to handle (P < 0.001), and less likely to believe that it was important to separate cows and calves for calf health (P = 0.006). Respondents who believed that heifers were difficult to handle in early lactation were more likely to believe heifers on their farm were underperforming (P < 0.001).
Factors external to farm demographics appear to shape the attitudes of Australian stockpeople and on-farm dairy youngstock management decisions. Attitudes towards youngstock appear to be linked to on-farm cultures, particularly the perceived difficulty of performing tasks linked to good welfare outcomes, and the perceived value placed on these practices by trusted advisors.
The results indicate that further research using a more representative sample is needed to better understand those responsible for Australian dairy youngstock management and the key drivers behind their management choices, to best tailor approaches to encouraging implementation of best practice on-farm.
Keywords: calf management, calf welfare, convenience sampling, cow-calf separation, dairy calves, stockperson attitudes, surplus calf pathways, youngstock.
References
Abuelo A, Havrlant P, Wood N, Hernandez-Jover M (2019) An investigation of dairy calf management practices, colostrum quality, failure of transfer of passive immunity, and occurrence of enteropathogens among Australian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 8352-8366.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alston M, Clarke J, Whittenbury K (2017) Gender relations, livelihood strategies, water policies and structural adjustment in the Australian dairy industry. Sociologia Ruralis 57, 752-768.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alston M, Clarke J, Whittenbury K (2018) Contemporary feminist analysis of Australian farm women in the context of climate changes. Social Sciences 7(2), 16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alvåsen K, Roth A, Jansson Mörk M, Hallén Sandgren C, Thomsen PT, Emanuelson U (2014) Farm characteristics related to on-farm cow mortality in dairy herds: a questionnaire study. Animal 8, 1735-1742.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bach A (2011) Associations between several aspects of heifer development and dairy cow survivability to second lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1052-1057.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Balzani A, Hanlon A (2020) Factors that influence farmers’ views on farm animal welfare: a semi-systematic review and thematic analysis. Animals 10, 1524.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Bertenshaw C, Rowlinson P, Edge H, Douglas S, Shiel R (2008) The effect of different degrees of ‘positive’ human–animal interaction during rearing on the welfare and subsequent production of commercial dairy heifers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114, 65-75.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bolton SE, von Keyserlingk MAG (2021) The dispensable surplus dairy calf: is this issue a ‘Wicked Problem’ and where do we go from here? Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8, 660934.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ (2000) Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, 273-288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Busch G, Weary DM, Spiller A, von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) American and German attitudes towards cow–calf separation on dairy farms. PLoS ONE 12, e0174013.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cantor MC, Neave HW, Costa JHC (2019) Current perspectives on the short- and long-term effects of conventional dairy calf raising systems: a comparison with the natural environment. Translational Animal Science 3, 549-563.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cardoso CS, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ (2017) Brazilian citizens: expectations regarding dairy cattle welfare and awareness of contentious practices. Animals 7, 89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Coleman GJ, McGregor M, Hemsworth PH, Boyce J, Dowling S (2003) The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82, 189-200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Croyle SL, Belage E, Khosa DK, LeBlanc SJ, Haley DB, Kelton DF (2019) Dairy farmers’ expectations and receptivity regarding animal welfare advice: a focus group study. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 7385-7397.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
De Paula Vieira A, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2010) Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behavior of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3079-3085.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Doughty AK, Coleman GJ, Hinch GN, Doyle RE (2017) Stakeholder perceptions of welfare issues and indicators for extensively managed sheep in Australia. Animals 7, 28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Duve LR, Weary DM, Halekoh U, Jensen MB (2012) The effects of social contact and milk allowance on responses to handling, play, and social behavior in young dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6571-6581.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Enticott G, O’Mahony K, Shortall O, Sutherland L-A (2022) ‘Natural born carers’? Reconstituting gender identity in the labour of calf care. Journal of Rural Studies 95, 362-372.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Field LA, Hemsworth LM, Jongman E, Patrick C, Verdon M (2023) Contact with mature cows and access to pasture during early life shape dairy heifer behaviour at integration into the milking herd. Animals 13, 2049.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fukasawa M, Kawahata M, Higashiyama Y, Komatsu T (2017) Relationship between the stockperson’s attitudes and dairy productivity in Japan. Animal Science Journal 88, 394-400.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Green KE (1996) Sociodemographic factors and mail survey response. Psychology & Marketing 13, 171-184.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Heleski CR, Mertig AG, Zanella AJ (2015) Stakeholder attitudes toward farm animal welfare. Anthrozoös 19, 290-307.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S (2000) Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2821-2831.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S, Dowling S (2002) The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, 68-78.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Herzog HA (2007) Gender differences in human–animal interactions: a review. Anthrozoös 20, 7-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hötzel MJ, Cardoso CS, Roslindo A, von Keyserlingk MAG (2017) Citizens’ views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: does providing information increase acceptability? Journal of Dairy Science 100, 4150-4160.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Jansen J, van den Borne BHP, Renes RJ, van Schaik G, Lam TJGM, Leeuwis C (2009) Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers’ attitudes and behaviour. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92, 210-223.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jensen MB, Vestergaard KS, Krohn CC, Munksgaard L (1997) Effect of single versus group housing and space allowance on responses of calves during open-field tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 109-121.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kauppinen T, Valros A, Vesala KM (2013) Attitudes of dairy farmers toward cow welfare in relation to housing, management and productivity. Anthrozoos 26, 405-420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kielland C, Skjerve E, Østerås O, Zanella AJ (2010) Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. Journal of Dairy Science 93(7), 2998-3006.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Knight S, Vrij A, Cherryman J, Nunkoosing K (2004) Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoös 17, 43-62.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kolstrup CL (2012) What factors attract and motivate dairy farm employees in their daily work? Work 41, 5311-5316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Le Neindre P (1989) Influence of rearing conditions and breed on social behaviour and activity of cattle in novel environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23, 129-140.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Maller CJ, Hemsworth PH, Ng KT, Jongman EJ, Coleman GJ, Arnold NA (2005) The relationships between characteristics of milking sheds and the attitudes to dairy cows, working conditions, and quality of life of dairy farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 363-372.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meagher RK, Daros RR, Costa JHC, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ, Weary DM (2015) Effects of degree and timing of social housing on reversal learning and response to novel objects in dairy calves. PLoS ONE 10, e0132828.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Meagher RK, Beaver A, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG (2019) Invited review: a systematic review of the effects of prolonged cow–calf contact on behavior, welfare, and productivity. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 5765-5783.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Mee JF (2020) Denormalizing poor dairy youngstock management: dealing with ‘farm-blindness’. Journal of Animal Science 98, S140-S149.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Munoz CA, Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Campbell AJD, Doyle RE (2019) Positive attitudes, positive outcomes: the relationship between farmer attitudes, management behaviour and sheep welfare. PLoS ONE 14, e0220455.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Napolitano F, Bragaglio A, Sabia E, Serrapica F, Braghieri A, De Rosa G (2020) The human−animal relationship in dairy animals. Journal of Dairy Research 87, 47-52.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Neave HW, Sumner CL, Henwood RJT, Zobel G, Saunders K, Thoday H, Watson T, Webster JR (2022) Dairy farmers’ perspectives on providing cow–calf contact in the pasture-based systems of New Zealand. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 453-467.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Palczynski LJ, Bleach ECL, Brennan ML, Robinson PA (2022) Youngstock management as ‘the key for everything’? Perceived value of calves and the role of calf performance monitoring and advice on dairy farms. Frontiers in Animal Science 3, 835317.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Panamá Arias JL, Spinka M (2005) Associations of stockpersons’ personalities and attitudes with performance of dairy cattle herds. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50, 226-234.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Peyraud JL, Comeron EA, Wade MH, Lemaire G (1996) The effect of daily herbage allowance, herbage mass and animal factors upon herbage intake by grazing dairy cows. Annales de Zootechnie 45, 201-217.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Proudfoot KL, Huzzey JM (2022) A first time for everything: the influence of parity on the behavior of transition dairy cows. JDS Communications 3, 467-471.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ritter C, Hötzel MJ, von Keyserlingk MAG (2022) Public attitudes toward different management scenarios for “surplus” dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 5909-5925.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Roadknight N, Mansell P, Jongman E, Courtman N, McGill D, Hepworth G, Fisher A (2021) Blood parameters of young calves at abattoirs are related to distance transported and farm of origin. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 9164-9172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Roadknight N, Jongman E, Mansell P, Courtman N, McGill D, Hepworth G, Fisher A (2022) Prevalence of failure of passive immunity transfer in Australian non-replacement dairy calves. Australian Veterinary Journal 100, 292-295.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rousing T, Bonde M, Badsberg JH, Sørensen JT (2004) Stepping and kicking behaviour during milking in relation to response in human–animal interaction test and clinical health in loose housed dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 88, 1-8.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sachs C, Allen P, Terman AR, Hayden J, Hatcher C (2014) Front and back of the house: socio-spatial inequalities in food work. Agriculture and Human Values 31, 3-17.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Seabrook MF, Wilkinson JM (2000) Stockpersons’ attitudes to the husbandry of dairy cows. Veterinary Record 147, 157-160.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Sowell BF, Mosley JC, Bowman JGP (2000) Social behavior of grazing beef cattle: implications for management. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sutherland MA, Huddart FJ (2012) The effect of training first-lactation heifers to the milking parlor on the behavioral reactivity to humans and the physiological and behavioral responses to milking and productivity. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6983-6993.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Taylor N, Signal TD (2005) Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös 18, 18-27.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Van De Stroet DL, Calderón Díaz JA, Stalder KJ, Heinrichs AJ, Dechow CD (2016) Association of calf growth traits with production characteristics in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 8347-8355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Schuppli CA, Weary DM (2013) Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: the case of early cow–calf separation. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 6105-6116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ventura BA, von Keyserlingk MAG, Wittman H, Weary DM (2016) What difference does a visit make? Changes in animal welfare perceptions after interested citizens tour a dairy farm. PLoS ONE 11, e0154733.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Verdon M (2021) A review of factors affecting the welfare of dairy calves in pasture-based production systems. Animal Production Science 62, 1-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Verdon M (2023) A review of factors affecting the welfare of weaned replacement heifers in pasture-based dairy production systems. Animal Production Science 63, 723-741.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Vicic V, Saliba AJ, Campbell MA, Xie G, Quinn JC (2022) Producer practices and attitudes: non-replacement male calf management in the Australian dairy industry. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9, 979035.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Vogels Z, Chuck GM, Morton JM (2013) Failure of transfer of passive immunity and agammaglobulinaemia in calves in south-west Victorian dairy herds: prevalence and risk factors. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 150-158.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Wagner K, Barth K, Hillmann E, Palme R, Futschik A, Waiblinger S (2013) Mother rearing of dairy calves: Reactions to isolation and to confrontation with an unfamiliar conspecific in a new environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147, 43-54.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman G (2002) The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79, 195-219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M-V, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB (2006) Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 185-242.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wikman I, Hokkanen A-H, Pastell M, Kauppinen T, Valros A, Hänninen L (2013) Dairy producer attitudes to pain in cattle in relation to disbudding calves. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 6894-6903.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Zhang J, Deng LX, Zhang HL, Hua GH, Han L, Zhu Y, Meng XJ, Yang LG (2010) Effects of parity on uterine involution and resumption of ovarian activities in postpartum Chinese Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1979-1986.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
