ImmuneDEX: updated genomic estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values for Australian Angus cattle
Antonio Reverter A D , Brad C. Hine B , Laercio Porto-Neto A , Pamela A. Alexandre A , Yutao Li A , Christian J. Duff C , Sonja Dominik B and Aaron B. Ingham AA CSIRO Agriculture & Food, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia.
B CSIRO Agriculture & Food, F.D. McMaster Laboratory, Chiswick, New England Highway, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
C Angus Australia, 86 Glen Innes Road, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: tony.reverter-gomez@csiro.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21054
Submitted: 5 February 2021 Accepted: 11 June 2021 Published online: 17 August 2021
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Context: Immune competence is a proxy trait for general disease resistance and is based on combined measures of an animal’s ability to mount both a cell-mediated immune response (Cell-IR) and an antibody-mediated immune response (Ab-IR). On the basis of previously described arithmetic, we combined these measures into a single proxy trait for immune competence, named ImmuneDEX (IDEX).
Aims: Using a population of 3715 Australian Angus steers (n = 2395) and heifers (n = 1320) with genotypes for 45 364 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, we provide the latest genomic estimates of heritability and genetic correlations for IDEX and the components Cell-IR and Ab-IR immune competence phenotypes. Accuracy and bias of genomic predictions of breeding values are also presented and discussed.
Methods: Measures of Cell-IR, Ab-IR and IDEX were analysed jointly in a tri-variate genomic restricted maximum-likelihood model that contained the fixed effects of contemporary group with 80 levels, the linear covariates of age at measurement and change in skin thickness at control site, and the random polygenic (genomic estimated breeding value, GEBV) and residual effects. Following Method LR procedures, we estimate accuracy, bias and dispersion of genomic predictions using a cross-validation scheme based on five year-of-birth cohorts.
Key results: We report genomic restricted maximum-likelihood model estimates of heritability of 0.247 ± 0.040 for Cell-IR, 0.326 ± 0.059 for Ab-IR, 0.275 ± 0.046 for IDEX. While a small positive genetic correlation (rg) was estimated between Cell-IR and Ab-IR (rg = 0.138 ± 0.095), strongly positive estimates were obtained between IDEX and Cell-IR (rg = 0.740 ± 0.044) and between IDEX and Ab-IR (rg = 0.741 ± 0.036). Averaged across the five validation sets, the accuracy of GEBV for Cell-IR, Ab-IR and IDEX was 0.405, 0.443 and 0.411 respectively. Also, some significant bias or dispersion can be expected depending on the cohort used as the validation population.
Conclusions: Consistent with previous findings, immune competence phenotypes are moderately heritable and accurate GEBV can be generated to allow the selection of cattle with an improved ability to mount a general immune response.
Implications: Our analyses suggest that ImmuneDEX will provide a tool to underpin long-term genetic strategies aimed at improving the immune competence of Australian Angus cattle in production systems, which, in turn, is expected to reduce the incidence of disease and our reliance on antibiotics to treat disease.
Keywords: beef cattle, heritability, immune competence, genomic predictions, accuracy.
References
Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, Zhang Y, Reich CM, Mason BA, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Reverter A, Herd RM, Tier B, Graser H-U, Goddard ME (2013) Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake, carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3088–3104.| Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake, carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus and composite beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23658330PubMed |
de Roos AP, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179, 1503–1512.
| Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18622038PubMed |
Dominik S, Porto-Neto LR, Duff CJ, Byrne AI, Hine BC, Ingham A, Colditz IG, Reverter A (2019) A method for developing a breeding objective trait from multiple components using the example of immune competence in Australian Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 23, 402–405.
Goddard M, Hayes B (2009) Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 381–391.
| Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19448663PubMed |
Hine BC, Bell AM, Niemeyer DOD, Duff CJ, Butcher NM, Dominik S, Ingham AB, Colditz I (2019) Immune competence traits assessed during the stress of weaning are heritable and favourably genetically correlated with temperament traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97, 4053–4065.
| Immune competence traits assessed during the stress of weaning are heritable and favourably genetically correlated with temperament traits in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31581299PubMed |
Karoui S, Carabano MJ, Diaz C, Legarra A (2012) Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 44, 39
| Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23216664PubMed |
Legarra A, Reverter A (2018) Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 50, 53
| Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30400768PubMed |
Pérez-Enciso M, Misztal I (2011) Qxpak.5: old mixed model solutions for new genomics problems. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 202
| Qxpak.5: old mixed model solutions for new genomics problems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21612630PubMed |
Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ (1998) Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56, 15–33.
| Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reverter A, Hine BC, Porto-Neto L, Li Y, Duff CJ, Dominik S, Ingham AB (2021) ImmuneDEX: a strategy for the genetic improvement of immune competence in Australian Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 99, skaa384
| ImmuneDEX: a strategy for the genetic improvement of immune competence in Australian Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33677583PubMed |
Simeone R, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Legarra A (2011) Evaluation of the utility of diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix as a diagnostic tool to detect mislabelled genotyped animals in a broiler chicken population. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 386–393.
| Evaluation of the utility of diagonal elements of the genomic relationship matrix as a diagnostic tool to detect mislabelled genotyped animals in a broiler chicken population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21906184PubMed |
VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4414–4423.
| Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18946147PubMed |
Wilkie B, Mallard B (1999) Selection for high immune response: an alternative approach to animal health maintenance? Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 72, 231–235.
| Selection for high immune response: an alternative approach to animal health maintenance?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10614513PubMed |