Determination of range enrichment for improved hen welfare on commercial fixed-range free-range layer farms
Carolyn de Koning A C , Soressa M. Kitessa A , Reza Barekatain A and Kelly Drake A BA South Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
B Present address: Royal New Zealand SPCA, Animal Welfare Science and Education Department, PO Box 15349, New Lynn, Auckland 0640, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: Carolyn.dekoning@sa.gov.au
Animal Production Science 59(7) 1336-1348 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17757
Submitted: 3 November 2017 Accepted: 21 August 2018 Published: 17 September 2018
Abstract
An observational study on range enrichment was conducted on three commercial fixed-range, free-range layer farms comprising four flocks in South Australia (flock sizes ranged from 3000 to 11 700 hens). Two strategies were compared; a ‘standard’ Control treatment, typical of the type of range used in the commercial industry and a highly ‘enriched’ treatment. Both treatments were implemented on the same range with no subdivisional fences. The highly enriched side of the range incorporated shade shelters, alongside a continuum of additional enrichment structures (e.g. dust baths, peck objects and hay bales). Range treatments were investigated to determine the effects on motivating hens to use the range more effectively, and their potential to lead to a decrease in abnormal behaviours, such as injurious feather pecking and cannibalism. Additionally, two farms with high levels of tree coverage were also observed. Farms were visited monthly for 6 months. At each visit several measures were recorded live: the numbers of hens out on the range, location of hens on the range and plumage score of birds outdoors and indoors. Enrichment structure utilisation on the range was measured via video recordings and continuous counts of the number of hen visits to enrichment structures within 1 h. It was found that more hens used the ‘enriched’ side of the range, in comparison with the ‘standard’ Control range treatment (P ≤ 0.01). Overhead cover provided by constructed shelters and dust bathing pits were instrumental in enticing birds out onto the range (306 ± 27 s.e.m. and 366 ± 24 s.e.m., average number hen visits). Hay bales were also highly utilised (116 ± 14 s.e.m., average number hen visits), even though the hen numbers attracted to the hay bales were not as high as shelters and dust baths. It was also observed on one property that natural cover provided by trees attracted the greatest number of hens (1652 ± 358 s.e.m., average number of hen visits). Prevailing weather conditions and the age of the flock strongly influenced the number of hens utilising the range outdoors. Furthermore, hens outside on the range had better plumage scores with lower feather loss and decreased areas of bare skin compared with birds scored in the shed.
Additional keywords: behaviour, plumage, shade, shelter.
References
AECL (2006) Australian Egg Corporation Limited. Annual Report 2006. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. pp. 1–54.AECL (2016) Australian Egg Corporation Limited. Annual Report 2016. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. pp. 1–59.
Bestman MWP, Wagenaar JP (2003) Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livestock Production Science 80, 133–140.
| Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bilcik B, Keeling LJ (1999) Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. British Poultry Science 40, 444–451.
| Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Borland E, Hazel S, Glatz P, Rodda B, Rimington H, Wyatt S, Miao Z (2010) Attracting laying hens into range areas using shelterbelts. In ‘Proceedings of the 21st Australian poultry science symposium’. (Ed P Selle) p. 134. (University of Sydney: Sydney)
Bright A, Brass D, Clachan J, Drake KA, Joret A (2011) Canopy cover is correlated with reduced injurious feather pecking in commercial flocks of free-range laying hens. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 20, 329–338.
Chielo LI, Pike T, Cooper J (2016) Ranging behaviour of commercial free-range laying hens. Animals 6, 28
Collias NE, Collias EC (1967) A field study of the Red jungle Fowl in North-Central India. The Condor 69, 360–386.
| A field study of the Red jungle Fowl in North-Central India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cronin G, Hartcher K, Hemsworth P (2015) Effects of rearing on inappropriate conflict behaviours that predispose feather pecking and subsequent plumage, and cannibalism. Final Project Report 1US111, Australian Egg Corporation Limited, Sydney.
Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Rosati A, Paoletti A, Caporali S, Castellini C (2014) Effect of range enrichment on performance, behavior and forage intake of free-range chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23, 137–145.
| Effect of range enrichment on performance, behavior and forage intake of free-range chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
El-Lethey H, Aerni V, Jungi TW, Wechsler B (2000) Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions. British Poultry Science 41, 22–28.
| Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Evans CS, Evans L, Marler P (1993) On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in avian vocal system. Animal Behaviour 46, 23–38.
| On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in avian vocal system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gentle MJ, Hunter LN (1991) Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var domesticus. Research in Veterinary Science 50, 95–101.
| Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var domesticus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Glatz P, Runge G (2017) Managing fowl behaviour – a best practice guide to help manage feather pecking and cannibalism in pullet, layer and breeder flocks. Australian Eggs, Sydney.
Glatz PC, Ru YJ, Miao ZH, Wyatt SK, Rodda BJ (2005) Integrating poultry into a crop and pasture farming systems. International Journal of Poultry Science 4, 187–191.
| Integrating poultry into a crop and pasture farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grigor P, Hughes B (1993) Does cover affect dispersal and vigilance in free-range domestic fowls. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th European symposium on poultry welfare’. (Eds CJ Savory, BO Hughes) pp. 246–247. (Edinburgh, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW): Wheathampstead)
Harlander-Matauschek A, Felsenstein K, Niebuhr K, Troxler J (2006) Influence of pop hole dimensions on the number of laying hens outside on the range. British Poultry Science 47, 131–134.
| Influence of pop hole dimensions on the number of laying hens outside on the range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hegelund L, Sorensen JT, Kjaer JB, Kristensen IS (2005) Use of the range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover. British Poultry Science 46, 1–8.
| Use of the range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huber-Eicher B, Audigé L (1999) Analysis of risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in laying hen growers. British Poultry Science 40, 599–604.
| Analysis of risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in laying hen growers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeling L, Hughes B, Dun P (1988) Performance of free-range laying hens in a polythene shed and their behavior on range. Farm Building Progress 94, 21–28.
Kram YA, Mantey S, Corbo JC (2010) Avian cone photoreceptors tile the retina of five independent, self-organising mosaics. PLos ONE 5.
Lambton SL, Knowles TG, Yorke C, Nicol CJ (2010) Risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 123, 32–42.
| Risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lambton SL, Knowles TG, Yorke C, Nicol CJ (2015) The risk factors affecting the development of vent pecking and cannibalism in free-range and organic laying hens. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 24, 101–111.
| The risk factors affecting the development of vent pecking and cannibalism in free-range and organic laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larsen H, Rault J-L (2014) Go outside and play? Behavioural time budget of free range laying hens in a natural shrub structure. In ‘Proceedings of the 25th Australian poultry science symposium’.(Ed. P Selle) pp. 113–116. (University of Sydney: Sydney)
Larsen H, Cronin GM, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Smith CL, Hemsworth PH, Rault J-L (2017) Individual ranging behavior patterns in commercial free-range layers as observed through RFID tracking. Animals (Basel) 7, 21
| Individual ranging behavior patterns in commercial free-range layers as observed through RFID tracking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maxwell EG (1949) EC1704 revised 1949 evergreen planting suggestions. Historical materials from University of Nebraska – Lincoln Extension 2693. Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/2693 [Verified 20 September 2017]
Nagle TA, Glatz PC (2012) Free range hens use the range more when the outdoor environment is enriched. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25, 584–591.
| Free range hens use the range more when the outdoor environment is enriched.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nicol CJ, Potzsch C, Lewis K, Green LE (2003) Matched concurrent case control study of risk factors for feather pecking hens on free range commercial farms in the UK. British Poultry Science 44, 515–523.
| Matched concurrent case control study of risk factors for feather pecking hens on free range commercial farms in the UK.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rault R-L, van de Wouw A, Hemsworth P (2013) Fly the coop! Vertical structures influence the distribution and bahaviour of laying hens in an outdoor range. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 423–426.
| Fly the coop! Vertical structures influence the distribution and bahaviour of laying hens in an outdoor range.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rault R-L, Hemsworth P, Cronin G (2016) Free range hen welfare: Characterisation of ‘outdoor’ and ‘indoor’ hens and physical features in the range. Final Project Report, AECL Publication No. 1UM121A, Sydney.
Rodenburg TB, Van Krimpen MM, De Jong IC, De Haas EN, Kops MS, Riedstra BJ, Nordquist RE, Wagenaar JP, Bestman M, Nicol CJ (2013) The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifiying the underlying principles. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 361–374.
| The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifiying the underlying principles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rodriguez-Aurrekoetxea A, Estevez I (2016) Use of space and its impact on the welfare of laying hens in a commercial free-range system. Poultry Science 95, 2503–2513.
| Use of space and its impact on the welfare of laying hens in a commercial free-range system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tauson R, Svensson SA (1980) Influence of plumage conditions on hen’s feed requirement. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 35–39.
Thear K (1990) In ‘Free-range poultry’. (Farming Press: Ipswich)
van Liere DW (1992) Dust bathing as related to proximal and distal feather lipids in laying hens. Behavioural Processes 26, 177–188.
| Dust bathing as related to proximal and distal feather lipids in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vestergaard KS, Skadhaugeb E, Lawsona LG (1997) The stress of not being able to perform dust bathing in laying hens. Physiology & Behavior 62, 413–419.
| The stress of not being able to perform dust bathing in laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woolworths (2012) Available at http://www.woolworthslimited.com.au/page/A_Trusted_Company/Responsibile_Sourcing/Animal_Welfare/ [Verified 27 February 2015]
Zeltner E, Hirt H (2003) Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hen runs in a free-range system. British Poultry Science 44, 533–537.
| Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hen runs in a free-range system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zeltner E, Hirt H (2008a) Factors involved in the improvement of the use of hen runs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114, 395–408.
| Factors involved in the improvement of the use of hen runs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zeltner E, Hirt H (2008b) A note on fear reaction of three different genetic strains of laying hens to a simulated hawk attack in the hen run of a free-range system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113, 69–73.
| A note on fear reaction of three different genetic strains of laying hens to a simulated hawk attack in the hen run of a free-range system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
