Biometric measurement of static space required by weaned piglets kept in groups of eight during 6 weeks
M. Fels A C , K. Konen A , E. Hessel B and N. Kemper A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.
B Thünen Institute of Agricultural Technology, Bundesallee 47, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
C Corresponding author. Email: michaela.fels@tiho-hannover.de
Animal Production Science 59(7) 1327-1335 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17445
Submitted: 3 July 2017 Accepted: 5 June 2018 Published: 10 August 2018
Abstract
Adequate space allocation is deemed to be an important criterion for animal welfare in modern pig farming. However, it is not a simple matter to determine how much space a group of pigs needs, and precise, animal-based data about the floor area needed by the body dimensions of group-housed pigs in different weight categories are currently lacking. So as to collect biometric data on the static space of weaned pigs kept in groups and to evaluate current spatial requirements, an automatic measurement of the floor area covered by the pigs’ bodies within groups was performed. Consequently, the resulting free space in a pen, available for (non-) locomotor behaviours, was calculated. In three batches, two groups of eight piglets each were formed after weaning. Using three-dimensional cameras that recorded a piglets’ pen from top view and a software for image analysis, the exact static space of a group considering different body positions was measured and specified in square centimetres. Measurements were taken weekly for a total period of 6 weeks per batch. The area covered by the bodies of a group of eight piglets increased almost linearly with increasing average bodyweight (R 2 = 0.99, n = 1645 images). The highest mean static space was measured in Week 6 (1.54 m2, average bodyweight: 25.2 kg) when 100% of piglets were lying with less than 50% huddling. When 100% of piglets within a group were lying, more than 50% huddling reduced the mean static space to 1.4 m2 (P < 0.05). When all pigs of a group were lying, significantly more space was covered than in situations when all pigs of a group were standing (1.54 m2 vs 1.36 m2, P < 0.05). Exclusively in Week 1, when piglets were lying with more than 50% huddling, the space covered by the group was slightly reduced compared with the situation when 100% of piglets were standing. By the automatic method, realistic results on the static space of piglets kept in groups were achieved. Space requirements of the largest animals in the most space-demanding body positions should be the basis for space recommendations for nursery pigs.
Additional keywords: body space, pig, static space requirement.
References
Anonymous (2003) ‘Swine care handbook.’ (National Pork Board: Des Moines, IA) Available at http://porkcdn.s3.amazonaws.com/sites/all/files/documents/Resources/04010.pdf [Verified 3 July 2017]Anonymous (2008a) ‘Model code of practice for the welfare of animals. Pigs.’ 3rd edn. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Anonymous (2008b) ‘Council Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs.’ Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:047:0005:0013:EN:PDF [Verified 30 June 2017]
Anonymous (2008c) ‘Tierschutzverordnung Switzerland (TSchV).’ Available at http://www.gesetze.ch/inh/inhsub455.1.htm [Verified 30 June 2017]
Anonymous (2014) ‘Code of practice for the care and handling of pigs.’ (National Farm Animal Care Council: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada)
Anonymous (2016) Tierschutznutztierhaltungsverordnung (TierSchNutztV). Available at http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschnutztv/ [Verified 30 June 2017]
Arey DS, Edwards SA (1998) Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livestock Production Science 56, 61–70.
| Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Averós X, Brossard L, Dourmad JY, De Greef KH, Edge HL, Edwards SA, Meunier-Salaün MC (2010) Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs. Animal 4, 777–783.
| Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baxter SH (1984) Parturition and lactation. In ‘Intensive pig production: environmental management and design’. pp. 431–443. (Granada Technical Books: London)
Briese A, Hartung J (2009) Measurement of floor space allowance of Lohmann Silver hens using biometric data. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 122, 241–248.
Callahan SR, Cross AJ, DeDecker AE, Lindemann MD, Estienne MJ (2017) Effects of group-size–floor space allowance during the nursery phase of production on growth, physiology, and hematology in replacement gilts. Journal of Animal Science 95, 201–211.
Cho JH, Kim IH (2011) Effect of stocking density on pig production. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 13688–13692.
| Effect of stocking density on pig production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dewey CE, Straw BE (2006) Herd examination. In ‘Diseases of swine’. (Eds BE Straw, J Zimmerman, S D’Allaire, DJ Taylor) pp. 3–14. (Blackwell Publishing: IA)
Dong GZ, Pluske JR (2007) The low feed intake in newly-weaned pigs: problems and possible solutions. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20, 440–452.
| The low feed intake in newly-weaned pigs: problems and possible solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
EFSA (2005) Opinion of the scientific panel on animal health and welfare on a request from the commission related to welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effects of different space allowances and floor types. EFSA Journal 268, 1–19.
Ekkel ED, Spoolder HAM, Hulsegge I, Hopster H (2003) Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 19–30.
| Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fels M, Hartung J, Hoy S (2014) Social hierarchy formation in piglets mixed in different group compositions after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 152, 17–22.
| Social hierarchy formation in piglets mixed in different group compositions after weaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fels M, Sange MD, Kemper N (2016) Planimetric measurement as a method for scientific assessment of space requirements of young suckling piglets in the creep area. Livestock Science 191, 37–42.
| Planimetric measurement as a method for scientific assessment of space requirements of young suckling piglets in the creep area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fritschen RD, Muehling AJ (1987) Space requirements for swine. In ‘Pork industry handbook 55’. pp. 1–4. (Cooperative Extension Service, Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN)
Geers R (2007) 2. Lying behaviour (location, posture & duration). In ‘On farm monitoring of pig welfare’. (Eds A Verlarde, R Geers) pp. 19–24. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
Giersberg MF, Kemper N, Fels M (2015) Planimetric measurement of floor space covered by fattening rabbits and breeding does in different body positions and weight classes. Livestock Science 177, 142–150.
| Planimetric measurement of floor space covered by fattening rabbits and breeding does in different body positions and weight classes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Giersberg MF, Hartung J, Kemper N, Spindler B (2016) Floor space covered by broiler chickens kept at stocking densities according to Council Directive 2007/43/EC. Veterinary Record 179, 124
| Floor space covered by broiler chickens kept at stocking densities according to Council Directive 2007/43/EC.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gonyou HW, Brumm MC, Bush E, Deen J, Edwards SA, Fangman T, McGlone J, Meunier-Salaun M, Morrison RB, Spoolder H, Sundberg PL, Johnson AK (2006) Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. Journal of Animal Science 84, 229–235.
| Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Nash J, Giri K, Butler KL, Tilbrook AJ, Morrison RS (2013) Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4953–4964.
| Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hoy S (2012) ‘Schweinezucht und Ferkelerzeugung.’ (Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany)
Kim KH, Kim KS, Kim JE, Kim DW, Seol KH, Lee SH, Chae BJ, Kim YH (2017) The effect of optimal space allowance on growth performance and physiological responses of pigs at different stages of growth. Animal 11, 478–485.
| The effect of optimal space allowance on growth performance and physiological responses of pigs at different stages of growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kornegay ET, Notter DR, Bartlett HS, Lindemann MD (1985) Variance of body weights and daily weight gains of weaner pigs housed at various stocking densities in confinement. Animal Production 41, 369–373.
| Variance of body weights and daily weight gains of weaner pigs housed at various stocking densities in confinement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kulke K, Spindler B, Beyerbach M, Freytag S, Habig C, Kemper N (2017) Planimetrische Untersuchungen bei Putenhähnen der Linie B.U.T.6 in der Aufzucht- und Mastperiode. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 130, 266–272.
McGlone JJ, Newby BE (1994) Space requirements for finishing pigs in confinement: behavior and performance while group size and space vary. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 331–338.
| Space requirements for finishing pigs in confinement: behavior and performance while group size and space vary.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McGlone J, Pond W (2003) ‘Pig production: biological principles and applications.’ (Thomson, Delmar Learning: Clifton Park, NY)
Nakamura K, Tanaka T, Nishida K, Uetake K (2011) Behavioral indexes of piglet welfare: comparison of indoor and outdoor housing systems. Animal Science Journal 82, 161–168.
| Behavioral indexes of piglet welfare: comparison of indoor and outdoor housing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pastorelli G, Musella M, Zaninelli M, Tangorra F, Corino C (2006) Static spatial requirements of growing-finishing and heavy pigs. Livestock Science 105, 260–264.
| Static spatial requirements of growing-finishing and heavy pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Petherick JC (1983) A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. In ‘Farm animal housing and welfare’. (Eds SH Baxter, MR Baxter, JAD MacCormack) pp. 103–120. (Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, The Netherlands)
Petherick JC, Baxter SH (1981) Modelling the static spatial requirements of livestock. In ‘Modelling, design and evaluation of agricultural buildings, CIGR section 2 seminar’. (Ed. JAD McCormack) pp. 75–82. (Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit: Aberdeen, UK)
Petherick JC, Phillips CJC (2009) Space allowances for confined livestock and their determination from allometric principles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, 1–12.
| Space allowances for confined livestock and their determination from allometric principles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rohrmann S (2004) ‘Untersuchungen zum Verhalten, zur Haltung und zu den Körpermaßen von Ebern. Doctoral Thesis, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Scipioni R, Martelli G, Volpelli LA (2009) Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 117–137.
| Assessment of welfare in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spicer HM, Aherne FX (1987) The effects of group size/stocking density on weanling pig performance and behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19, 89–98.
| The effects of group size/stocking density on weanling pig performance and behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spindler B, Giersberg MF, Briese A, Kemper N, Hartung J (2016) Spatial requirements of poultry assessed by using a colour-contrast method (Koba-Plan). British Poultry Science 57, 23–33.
| Spatial requirements of poultry assessed by using a colour-contrast method (Koba-Plan).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spoolder HAM, Aarnink AAJ, Vermeer HM, van Riel J, Edwards SA (2012) Effect of increasing temperature on space requirements of group housed finishing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138, 229–239.
| Effect of increasing temperature on space requirements of group housed finishing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner S, Dahlgren M, Arey D, Edwards S (2002) Effect of social group size and initial live weight on feeder space requirement of growing pigs given food ad libitum. Animal Science 75, 75–83.
| Effect of social group size and initial live weight on feeder space requirement of growing pigs given food ad libitum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waiblinger S (2009) Animal welfare and housing. In ‘Food safety assurance and veterinary public health, vol. 5. Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks’. (Eds FJM Smulders, B Algers) pp. 79–102. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, Netherlands)
Walker R (2015) ‘Swine: planning swine facilities, RFAA082.’ (UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida) Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/aa082 [Verified 30 June 2017]
Whittaker AL, Van Wettere WH, Hughes PE (2012) Space requirements to optimize welfare and performance in group housed pigs: a review. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 7, 48–54.
| Space requirements to optimize welfare and performance in group housed pigs: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolter BF, Ellis M, Curtis SE, Parr EN, Webel M (2000) Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2062–2067.
| Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
