Modelling preference and diet selection patterns by grazing ruminants: a development in a mechanistic model of a grazing dairy cow, MINDY
P. Gregorini A D , J. J. Villalba B , F. D. Provenza B , P. C. Beukes A and J. M. Forbes C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Feed and Farm Systems Group, DairyNZ, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
B Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
C Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
D Corresponding author. Email: Pablo.Gregorini@dairynz.co.nz
Animal Production Science 55(3) 360-375 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14472
Submitted: 3 April 2014 Accepted: 9 July 2014 Published: 5 February 2015
Abstract
The work presented here represents additions to the mechanistic and dynamic model of a grazing dairy cow (MINDY). The additions include a module representing preference and selection, based on two theories, namely, post-ingestive feedback and discomfort. The model was evaluated by assessing its ability to simulate patterns of preference and selection in response to a variety of feeding management. The improvements detailed here enable a realistic simulation of patterns of food selection by grazing ruminants, based on a range of feeding situations from different studies with cattle and sheep. These simulations indicate that the concepts encoded in MINDY capture several of the underlying biological mechanisms that drive preferences and selective behaviour. Thus, simulations using MINDY allow prediction of daily and diurnal patterns of selection based on preference, derived from some post-ingestive feedbacks and total discomfort. Estimates of herbage intake and parallel measurements of ingestive behaviour, rumen function and metabolism in grazing ruminants pose experimental and technical difficulties, and matching these processes to animal preference and selective behaviour is a greater challenge. As a consequence, advances in knowledge of foraging behaviour and dietary choice are slow and costly. On completion of more thorough testing, MINDY can be used as a tool for exploratory mechanistic research, to design and organise experimental programs to address a range of factors that control intake and its ecology, helping advance knowledge faster and at a low cost.
Additional keywords: dietary choice, forging behaviour, model.
References
Allen MS (1996) Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 74, 3063–3075.Allen MS (2000) Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1598–1624.
| Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXltVGgtb0%3D&md5=7693c3ac690cb2658c2d61f9f0532dd8CAS | 10908065PubMed |
Allen MS, Bradford BJ, Harvatine KJ (2005) The cow as a model to study food intake regulation. Annual Review of Nutrition 25, 523–547.
| The cow as a model to study food intake regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXpvF2mt7s%3D&md5=dfd309a1e25b58f6ffcd0b388813c7c5CAS | 16011477PubMed |
Allen V, Batello C, Berretta E, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, McIvor J, Milne J, Morris C, Peeters A (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.
| An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Baldwin RL (1995) ‘Modeling ruminant digestion and metabolism.’ (Springer: London, UK)
Baumont R, Cohen-Salmon D, Prache S, Sauvant D (2004) A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 5–28.
| A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bergman CM, Fryxell JM, Gates CC, Fortin D (2001) Ungulate foraging strategies: energy maximizing or time minimizing? Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 289–300.
| Ungulate foraging strategies: energy maximizing or time minimizing?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Betteridge K, Andrewes W, Sedcole J (1986) Intake and excretion of nitrogen, potassium and phosporus by grazing steers. The Journal of Agricultural Science 106, 393–404.
| Intake and excretion of nitrogen, potassium and phosporus by grazing steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackburn H, Kothmann M (1991) Modelling diet selection and intake for grazing herbivores. Ecological Modelling 57, 145–163.
| Modelling diet selection and intake for grazing herbivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blundell J, Bellisle F (2013) ‘Satiation, satiety and the control of food intake: theory and practice.’ (Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK)
Bowman J, Sowell B (1997) Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75, 543–550.
Brereton A, Holden N, McGilloway D, Carton O (2005) A model describing the utilization of herbage by cattle in a rotational grazing system. Grass and Forage Science 60, 367–384.
| A model describing the utilization of herbage by cattle in a rotational grazing system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chapman DF, Parsons AJ, Cosgrove GP, Baker DJ, Marotti DM, Venning KJ, Rutter SM, Hill J, Thomson AN (2007) Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance. Crop Science 47, 399–415.
| Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chilibroste P, Soca P, Mattiauda D, Bentancur O, Robinson P (2007) Short term fasting as a tool to design effective grazing strategies for lactating dairy cattle: a review. Animal Production Science 47, 1075–1084.
| Short term fasting as a tool to design effective grazing strategies for lactating dairy cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clark C, Waghorn G, Gregorini P, Woodward S, Clark D, Dairy NZH (2010) Diurnal pattern of urinary and faecal nitrogen excretion by dairy cows fed ryegrass pasture twice daily indoors. Advances in Animal Biosciences 2, 269
Cooper S, Kyrizakis I, Nolan J (1995) Diet selection in sheep: the role of the rumen environment in the selection of a diet from two feeds that differ in their energy density. The British Journal of Nutrition 74, 39–54.
| Diet selection in sheep: the role of the rumen environment in the selection of a diet from two feeds that differ in their energy density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXnt1Ckt7k%3D&md5=06354aff466f6ee303e5604ce2f0347cCAS | 7547828PubMed |
Cooper S, Kyriazakis I, Oldham J (1996) The effects of physical form of feed, carbohydrate source, and inclusion of sodium bicarbonate on the diet selections of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1240–1251.
Emmick DL (2007) ‘Foraging behavior of dairy cattle on pastures.’ (ProQuest: Logan, UT)
Forbes J (2001) Consequences of feeding for future feeding. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology 128, 461–468.
Forbes JM (2003) The multifactorial nature of food intake control. Journal of Animal Science 81, E139–E144.
Forbes J (2007a) ‘Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals.’ (CABI: Wallingford, UK)
Forbes JM (2007b) A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort. Nutrition Research Reviews 20, 132–146.
| A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19079866PubMed |
Forbes JM (2007c) ‘Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals.’ (CABI: Wallingford, UK)
Forbes JM, Provenza FD (2000) Integration of learning and metabolic signals into a theory of dietary choice and food intake. In ‘Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction’. (Ed. PB Cronje) pp. 3–19. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Fortin D, Fryxell JM, Pilote R (2002) The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison. Ecology 83, 970–982.
| The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Francis S, Chapman D, Doyle P, Leury B (2006) Dietary preferences of cows offered choices between white clover and ‘high sugar’and ‘typical’ perennial ryegrass cultivars. Animal Production Science 46, 1579–1587.
| Dietary preferences of cows offered choices between white clover and ‘high sugar’and ‘typical’ perennial ryegrass cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freer M, Moore A, Donnelly J (1997) GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises – II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises – II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Furness JB, Rivera LR, Cho H-J, Bravo DM, Callaghan B (2013) The gut as a sensory organ. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1010, 729–740.
| The gut as a sensory organ.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Galli J, Cangiano CA, Fernandez HH (1999) CONPAST 3.0. Un modelo de simulacion del comportamiento ingestivo y consumo de bovinos en pastoreo. In ‘CONPAST 3.0’. (Ed. CA Cangiano) pp. 67–106. (INTA Balcarce: Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Ginane C, Bonnet M, Baumont R, Revell DK (2015) Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis. Animal Production Science 55, 247–260.
| Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregorini P (2011) Estado interno. Estímulos que motivan el consumo y ciertas conductas ingestivas de rumiantes en pastoreo. In ‘Produccion Animal en Pastoreo’. 2nd edn. (Eds CA Cangiano, A Brizuela) pp. 291–320. (Institutol Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria: EEA Balcarce, Balcarce, Argentina)
Gregorini P (2012) Diurnal grazing pattern: its physiological basis and strategic management. Animal Production Science 52, 416–430.
Gregorini P, Gunter S, Masino C, Beck P (2007) Effects of ruminal fill on short‐term herbage intake rate and grazing dynamics of beef heifers. Grass and Forage Science 62, 346–354.
| Effects of ruminal fill on short‐term herbage intake rate and grazing dynamics of beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregorini P, Soder K, Kensinger R (2009) Effects of rumen fill on short-term ingestive behavior and circulating concentrations of ghrelin, insulin, and glucose of dairy cows foraging vegetative micro-swards. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2095–2105.
| Effects of rumen fill on short-term ingestive behavior and circulating concentrations of ghrelin, insulin, and glucose of dairy cows foraging vegetative micro-swards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXlsFymsrY%3D&md5=a5f983da2f9ce6eb7d622a7d8333cc8bCAS | 19389967PubMed |
Gregorini P, Beukes PC, Romera AJ, Levy G, Hanigan MD (2013) A model of diurnal grazing patterns and herbage intake of a dairy cow, MINDY: model description. Ecological Modelling 270, 11–29.
| A model of diurnal grazing patterns and herbage intake of a dairy cow, MINDY: model description.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hagen EH, Roulette CJ, Sullivan RJ (2013) Explaining human recreational use of ‘pesticides’: the neurotoxin regulation model of substance use vs. the hijack model and implications for age and sex differences in drug consumption. Frontiers in Psychiatry 4,
| Explaining human recreational use of ‘pesticides’: the neurotoxin regulation model of substance use vs. the hijack model and implications for age and sex differences in drug consumption.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtFCnt78%3D&md5=3f2e2f80c4ee6c479bdc79e0cb16ae17CAS | 24204348PubMed |
Hanigan M, Appuhamy J, Gregorini P (2013) Revised digestive parameter estimates for the Molly cow model. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3867–3885.
| Revised digestive parameter estimates for the Molly cow model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmtValsbY%3D&md5=af82f40a0dbc822bc05bf33622ff8578CAS | 23587389PubMed |
Hill J, Chapman D, Cosgrove G, Parsons A (2009) Do ruminants alter their preference for pasture species in response to the synchronization of delivery and release of nutrients? Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 418–427.
| Do ruminants alter their preference for pasture species in response to the synchronization of delivery and release of nutrients?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hodgson J (1979) Nomenclature and definitions in grazing studies. Grass and Forage Science 34, 11–17.
| Nomenclature and definitions in grazing studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hughes R (1993) ‘Diet selection: an interdisciplinary approach to foraging behavior.’ (Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK)
Hughes R (2009) ‘Diet selection: an interdisciplinary approach to foraging behaviour.’ (Blackwell Scientific Publications: London, UK)
Hughes B, Duncan I (1988) The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36, 1696–1707.
| The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
James SM, Kyriazakis I (2002) The effect of consumption of foods that differ in energy density and/or sodium bicarbonate supplementation on subsequent diet selection in sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 88, 81–90.
| The effect of consumption of foods that differ in energy density and/or sodium bicarbonate supplementation on subsequent diet selection in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmsF2ms7g%3D&md5=c0280eef96a22a47449cf000189ab29fCAS | 12117431PubMed |
Jensen P, Toates F (1993) Who needs behavioural needs? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 161–181.
| Who needs behavioural needs? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kyriazakis I (2003) ‘What are ruminant herbivores trying to achieve through their feeding behaviour and food intake. International symposium on the nutrition of herbivores.’ In ‘Matching herbivores nutrition to ecosystems biodiversity’. (Eds L t Mannetje, L Ramirez-Avilez, CA Sandoval-Castro, JC Ku-Vera) pp. 154–173. (Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan: Merida, Mexico)
Kyriazakis I, Tolkamp BJ, Emmans G (1999) Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58, 765–772.
| Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nsVynsQ%3D%3D&md5=585019d6f4b1a7b394de22f32a4c48d4CAS | 10817142PubMed |
Loehle C, Rittenhouse LR (1982) An analysis of forage preference indices. Journal of Range Management 35, 316–319.
| An analysis of forage preference indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mangel M, Clark CW (1986) Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology 67, 1127–1138.
| Towards a unified foraging theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maslan A, Niv Y (2012) ‘Learning what to learn.’ Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~yael/InnovationArticle.pdf [Verified 20 November 2013]
Meuret M, Provenza F (2014) When art and science meet: integrating herders’ knowledge with science of foraging for managing rangelands. Range Ecology and Management
| When art and science meet: integrating herders’ knowledge with science of foraging for managing rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | in press.
Meuret M, Provenza F (2015) How French shepherds create meal sequences to stimulate intake and optimise use of forage diversity on rangeland. Animal Production Science 55, 309–318.
| How French shepherds create meal sequences to stimulate intake and optimise use of forage diversity on rangeland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Niv Y, Chan S (2011) On the value of information and other rewards. Nature Neuroscience 14, 1095
| On the value of information and other rewards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtV2gtrjM&md5=846dbf100c9c70356cdfa4b715f2d28dCAS | 21878921PubMed |
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263, 641–646.
| Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvit1OrsQ%3D%3D&md5=71c1e2e8515ad10e562261482ca92f2fCAS | 17747657PubMed |
Parsons AJ, Thornley JHM, Newman J, Penning PD (1994) A mechanistic model of some physical determinants of intake rate and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward. Functional Ecology 8, 187–204.
| A mechanistic model of some physical determinants of intake rate and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinheiro Machado Filho L, Martins D’Ávila L, da Silva Kazama D, Bento L, Kuhnen S (2014) How sustainable is grain supplementation of grazing dairy cows on family farms in the south of Brazil? Animals 4, 463–475.
Provenza FD (1995) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management Archives 48, 2–17.
| Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Provenza FD (2000) Science, myth, and the mangement of natural resources. Rangelands 22, 33–36.
Provenza FD, Scott CB, Phy TS, Lynch JJ (1996) Preference of sheep for foods varying in flavors and nutrients. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2355–2361.
Provenza FD, Villalba JJ, Cheney CD, Werner SJ (1998) Self-organization of foraging behaviour: from simplicity to complexity without goals. Nutrition Research Reviews 11, 199–222.
| Self-organization of foraging behaviour: from simplicity to complexity without goals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FjvF2gtA%3D%3D&md5=20050365052c674c8f71b82e164dc08aCAS | 19094247PubMed |
Provenza FD, Villalba JJ, Dziba L, Atwood SB, Banner RE (2003) Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity. Small Ruminant Research 49, 257–274.
| Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rearte D, Pieroni G (2001) ‘Supplementation of temperate pastures, XIX international grassland congress: grassland ecosystems: an outlook into the 21st century.’ 11–21 February 2001. Brazilian Society of Animal Husbandry, 2001, Sao Pedro, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rook A, Dumont B, Isselstein J, Osoro K, WallisDeVries M, Parente G, Mills J (2004) Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biological Conservation 119, 137–150.
| Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutter SM (2006) Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: current theory and future application. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 17–35.
| Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: current theory and future application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rykiel EJ (1996) Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling 90, 229–244.
| Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scott BA, Camacho A, Golder H, Molfino J, Kerrisk KL, Lean I, Garcia SC, Chaves AV, Hall E, Clark CEF (2014) The nutritive value of pasture ingested by dairy cows varies within a herd. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium’. (Ed. J Roche) pp. 343–346. (Conference Secretariat, EPP Events: Hamilton, New Zealand)
Searle KR, Hunt LP, Gordon IJ (2010) Individualistic herds: individual variation in herbivore foraging behavior and application to rangeland management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 122, 1–12.
| Individualistic herds: individual variation in herbivore foraging behavior and application to rangeland management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Senft R, Coughenour M, Bailey D, Rittenhouse L, Sala O, Swift D (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37, 789–799.
| Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheahan A, Boston R, Roche J (2013) Diurnal patterns of grazing behavior and humoral factors in supplemented dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3201–3210.
| Diurnal patterns of grazing behavior and humoral factors in supplemented dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjtlyktbo%3D&md5=d8dc46afeed208adc45b65471fab8148CAS | 23453522PubMed |
Smith GP (1996) The direct and indirect controls of meal size. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 20, 41–46.
| The direct and indirect controls of meal size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287ptlSisg%3D%3D&md5=757358e7b10d85f9a45f71b4c098c214CAS | 8622828PubMed |
Tolkamp B, Kyriazakis I, Oldham J, Lewis M, Dewhurst R, Newbold J (1998) Diet choice by dairy cows. 2. Selection for metabolizable protein or for ruminally degradable protein? Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2670–2680.
| Diet choice by dairy cows. 2. Selection for metabolizable protein or for ruminally degradable protein?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXntF2rt7c%3D&md5=3ddd38075450a30e1f17ab3398b06e96CAS | 9812272PubMed |
van Wieren S (1996) Do large herbivores select a diet that maximizes short-term energy intake rate? Forest Ecology and Management 88, 149–156.
| Do large herbivores select a diet that maximizes short-term energy intake rate?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Villalba JJ, Provenza FD (1999) Effects of food structure and nutritional quality and animal nutritional state on intake behaviour and food preferences of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 145–163.
| Effects of food structure and nutritional quality and animal nutritional state on intake behaviour and food preferences of sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Villalba JJ, Provenza FD, Catanese F, Distel RA (2015) Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals. Animal Production Science 55, 261–271.
| Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woodward S (1998) Dynamical systems models and their application to optimizing grazing management. In ‘Agricultural systems modelling and simulation’. (Eds RMa Peart, RB Curry) pp. 419–474. (Marcel Dekker: New York)
Woodward S, Waugh C, Roach C, Fynn D, Phillips J (2013) Are diverse species mixtures better pastures for dairy farming? In ‘Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association.’ (Ed. D Swain) pp. 79–83. (New Zealand Grassland Association)
Yearsley JM, Villalba JJ, Gordon IJ, Kyriazakis I, Speakman JR, Tolkamp BJ, Illius AW, Duncan AJ (2006) A theory of associating food types with their postingestive consequences. American Naturalist 167, 705–716.
| A theory of associating food types with their postingestive consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16671014PubMed |
