Temporal dynamics in the foraging decisions of large herbivores
Daniel Fortin A C , Jerod A. Merkle A , Marie Sigaud A , Seth G. Cherry B , Sabrina Plante A , Amélie Drolet A and Myriam Labrecque A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Département de Biologie, Université Laval, 1045 Avenue. de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
B Prince Albert National Park, Parks Canada, C.P. 100, Waskesiu Lake, SK S0J 2Y0, Canada.
C Corresponding author. Email: daniel.fortin@bio.ulaval.ca
Animal Production Science 55(3) 376-383 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14428
Submitted: 20 March 2014 Accepted: 13 May 2014 Published: 5 February 2015
Abstract
The foraging decisions involved in acquiring a meal can have an impact on an animal’s spatial distribution, as well as affect other animal species and plant communities. Thus, understanding how the foraging process varies over space and time has broad ecological implications, and optimal foraging theory can be used to identify key factors controlling foraging decisions. Optimality models are based on currencies, options and constraints. Using examples from research on free-ranging bison (Bison bison), we show how variations in these model elements can yield strong spatio-temporal variation in expected foraging decisions. First, we present a simple optimal foraging model to investigate the temporal scale of foraging decisions. On the basis of this model, we identify the foraging currency and demonstrate that such a simple model can be successful at predicting animal distribution across ecosystems. We then modify the model by changing (1) the forager’s option, from the selection of individual plants to the selection of food bites that may include more than one plant species, (2) its constraints, from being omniscient to having incomplete information of resource quality and distribution and (3) its currency, from the maximisation of energy intake rate (E) to the maximisation of the ratio between E and mortality risk (u).We also show that, where the maximisation of E fails, the maximisation of E/u can explain the circadian rhythm in the diet and movements of bison. Simple optimal foraging-theory models thus can explain changes in dietary choice of bison within a foraging patch and during the course of a day.
Additional keywords: contingency model of optimal diet, foraging behaviour, human–wildlife conflicts, resource consumer interactions.
References
Adler FR, Kotar M (1999) Departure time versus departure rate: how to forage optimally when you are stupid. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1, 411–421.Agreil C, Fritz H, Meuret M (2005) Maintenance of daily intake through bite mass diversity adjustment in sheep grazing on heterogeneous and variable vegetation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91, 35–56.
| Maintenance of daily intake through bite mass diversity adjustment in sheep grazing on heterogeneous and variable vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Bautista LM, Muñoz-Pulido R (1995) Path use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions. Animal Behaviour 49, 1367–1379.
| Path use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Babin J-S, Fortin D, Wilmshurst JF, Fortin M-E (2011) Energy gains predict the distribution of plains bison across populations and ecosystems. Ecology 92, 240–252.
| Energy gains predict the distribution of plains bison across populations and ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21560694PubMed |
Bailey DW, Sims PL (1998) Association of food quality and locations by cattle. Journal of Range Management 51, 2–8.
| Association of food quality and locations by cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bailey DW, Gross JE, Laca EA, Rittenhouse LR, Coughenour MB, Swift DM, Sims PL (1996) Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. Journal of Range Management 49, 386–400.
| Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (2004) Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 271, 1491–1496.
| Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Belovsky G (1984) Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models. American Naturalist 124, 97–115.
| Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bergman CM, Fryxell JM, Gates CG (2000) The effect of tissue complexity and sward height on the functional response of wood bison. Functional Ecology 14, 61–69.
| The effect of tissue complexity and sward height on the functional response of wood bison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blanchard P, Fritz H (2007) Induced or routine vigilance while foraging. Oikos 116, 1603–1608.
| Induced or routine vigilance while foraging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christianson D, Creel S (2008) Risk effects in elk: sex-specific responses in grazing and browsing due to predation risk from wolves. Behavioral Ecology 19, 1258–1266.
| Risk effects in elk: sex-specific responses in grazing and browsing due to predation risk from wolves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Courant S, Fortin D (2010) Foraging decisions of bison for rapid energy gains can explain the relative risk to neighboring plants in complex swards. Ecology 91, 1841–1849.
| Foraging decisions of bison for rapid energy gains can explain the relative risk to neighboring plants in complex swards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20583724PubMed |
Courant S, Fortin D (2012) Time allocation of bison in meadow patches driven by potential energy gains and group size dynamics. Oikos 121, 1163–1173.
| Time allocation of bison in meadow patches driven by potential energy gains and group size dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Creel S, Winnie JA (2005) Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Behaviour 69, 1181–1189.
| Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cuthill IC, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR, Haccou P, Iwasa Y (1990) Starlings exploiting patches: the effect of recent experience on foraging decisions. Animal Behaviour 40, 625–640.
| Starlings exploiting patches: the effect of recent experience on foraging decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dumont B, Hill DRC (2001) Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size. Ecological Modelling 141, 201–215.
| Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dumont B, Petit M (1998) Spatial memory of sheep at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60, 43–53.
| Spatial memory of sheep at pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dussault C, Pinard V, Ouellet JP, Courtois R, Fortin D (2012) Avoidance of roads and selection for recent cutovers by threatened caribou: fitness-rewarding or maladaptive behaviour? Proceedings. Biological Sciences 279, 4481–4488.
| Avoidance of roads and selection for recent cutovers by threatened caribou: fitness-rewarding or maladaptive behaviour?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Farnsworth KD, Illius AW (1996) Large grazers back in the fold: generalizing the prey model to incorporate mammalian herbivores. Functional Ecology 10, 678–680.
Farnsworth KD, Illius AW (1998) Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model. Functional Ecology 12, 74–81.
| Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D (2001) An adjustment of the extended contingency model of Farnsworth and Illius (1998). Functional Ecology 15, 138–139.
| An adjustment of the extended contingency model of Farnsworth and Illius (1998).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D (2002) Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information. Ecological Modelling 153, 279–290.
| Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D (2003) Searching behavior and use of sampling information by free-ranging bison (Bos bison). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 194–203.
Fortin D, Andruskiw M (2003) Behavioral response of free-ranging bison to human disturbance. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 804–813.
Fortin D, Fortin M-E (2009) Group-size-dependent association between food profitability, predation risk and distribution of free-ranging bison. Animal Behaviour 78, 887–892.
| Group-size-dependent association between food profitability, predation risk and distribution of free-ranging bison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D, Fryxell JM, Pilote R (2002) The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison. Ecology 83, 970–982.
| The temporal scale of foraging decisions in bison.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D, Fryxell JM, O’Brodovich L, Frandsen D (2003) Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: the applicability of energy maximization principles. Oecologia 134, 219–227.
Fortin D, Boyce MS, Merrill EH (2004a) Multi-tasking by mammalian herbivores: overlapping processes during foraging. Ecology 85, 2312–2322.
| Multi-tasking by mammalian herbivores: overlapping processes during foraging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fortin D, Boyce MS, Merrill EH, Fryxell JM (2004b) Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores. Oikos 107, 172–180.
| Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frankland PW, Bontempi B (2005) The organization of recent and remote memories. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 6, 119–130.
| The organization of recent and remote memories.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXoslOjsg%3D%3D&md5=765e82edf87f8ee3c51c5c6f0b919b93CAS | 15685217PubMed |
Fryxell JM (1997) Evolutionary dynamics of habitat use. Evolutionary Ecology 11, 687–701.
| Evolutionary dynamics of habitat use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1997) ‘Individual behavior and community dynamics.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York, NY)
Fussmann GF, Loreau M, Abrams PA (2007) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Functional Ecology 21, 465–477.
| Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ganskopp D, Cruz R (1999) Selective differences between naive and experienced cattle foraging among eight grasses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 293–303.
| Selective differences between naive and experienced cattle foraging among eight grasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ginane C, Bonnet M, Baumont R, Revell DK (2015) Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis. Animal Production Science 55, 247–260.
| Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Griffin PC, Griffin SC, Waroquiers C, Mills LS (2005) Mortality by moonlight: predation risk and the snowshoe hare. Behavioral Ecology 16, 938–944.
| Mortality by moonlight: predation risk and the snowshoe hare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gross JE, Shipley LA, Hobbs NT, Spalinger DE, Wunder BA (1993) Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology 74, 778–791.
| Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gude JA, Garrott RA, Borkowski JJ, King F (2006) Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem. Ecological Applications 16, 285–298.
| Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16705980PubMed |
Hobbs NT, Gross JE, Shipley LA, Spalinger DE, Wunder BA (2003) Herbivore functional response in heterogeneous environments: a contest among models. Ecology 84, 666–681.
| Herbivore functional response in heterogeneous environments: a contest among models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hochman V, Kotler BP (2007) Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian ibex under perceived risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology 18, 368–374.
| Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian ibex under perceived risk of predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Illius AW, FitzGibbon C (1994) Costs of vigilance in foraging ungulates. Animal Behaviour 47, 481–484.
| Costs of vigilance in foraging ungulates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Inoue T (1983) Foraging strategy of a non-omniscient predator in a changing environment (I) Model with a data window and absolute criterion. Researches on Population Ecology 25, 81–104.
| Foraging strategy of a non-omniscient predator in a changing environment (I) Model with a data window and absolute criterion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jung HG, Koong LJ (1985) Effects of hunger satiation on diet quality by grazing sheep. Journal of Range Management 38, 302–305.
| Effects of hunger satiation on diet quality by grazing sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Latombe G, Fortin D, Parrott L (2014) Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf. Journal of Animal Ecology 83, 185–198.
| Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23859231PubMed |
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619–640.
| Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist 100, 603–609.
| On optimal use of a patchy environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McLoughlin PD, Dunford JS, Boutin S (2005) Relating predation mortality to broad-scale habitat selection. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 701–707.
| Relating predation mortality to broad-scale habitat selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Merkle JA, Fortin D, Morales JM (2014) A memory-based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use. Ecology Letters 17, 924–931.
| A memory-based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cjhtVCnuw%3D%3D&md5=591ed0d3532846365dbff855b1b6e5fdCAS | 24811575PubMed |
Moore BD, Foley WJ (2005) Tree use by koalas in a chemically complex landscape. Nature 435, 488–490.
| Tree use by koalas in a chemically complex landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksVeisrk%3D&md5=e071d9ab66f480ea63843e7237a432cdCAS | 15917807PubMed |
Moore BD, Wiggins NL, Marsh KJ, Dearing MD, Foley WJ (2015) Translating physiological signals to changes in feeding behaviour in mammals and the future effects of global climate change. Animal Production Science 55, 272–283.
| Translating physiological signals to changes in feeding behaviour in mammals and the future effects of global climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morales JM, Fortin D, Frair JL, Merrill EH (2005) Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology 20, 301–316.
| Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Newman JA, Parsons AJ, Thornley JHM, Penning PD, Krebs JR (1995) Optimal diet selection by a generalist grazing herbivore. Functional Ecology 9, 255–268.
| Optimal diet selection by a generalist grazing herbivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Norris KH, Barnes RF, Moore JE, Shenk JS (1976) Predicting forage quality by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Animal Science 43, 889–897.
Provenza FD, Gregorini P, Carvalho PCF (2015) Synthesis: foraging decisions link plants, herbivores, and human beings. Animal Production Science 55, 411–425.
| Synthesis: foraging decisions link plants, herbivores, and human beings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richardson H, Verbeek NAM (1986) Diet selection and optimization by northwestern crows feeding on Japanese littleneck clams. Ecology 67, 1219–1226.
| Diet selection and optimization by northwestern crows feeding on Japanese littleneck clams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Scarnecchia DL, Nastis AS, Malechek JC (1985) Effects of forage availability on grazing behavior of heifers. Journal of Range Management 38, 177–180.
| Effects of forage availability on grazing behavior of heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shipley LA, Blomquist S, Danell K (1998) Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 1722–1733.
| Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sih A (2005) Predator–prey space use as an emergent outcome of a behavioral response race. In ‘Ecology of predator–prey interactions’. (Eds P Barbosa, I Castellanos) pp. 240–255. (Oxford University Press: New York)
Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Animal Behaviour 61, 379–390.
| Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spalinger DE, Hobbs NT (1992) Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. American Naturalist 140, 325–348.
| Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mzjt1KgtQ%3D%3D&md5=fdec0f43a26438c71619c482a4f4daffCAS | 19426061PubMed |
Staddon JER (1983) ‘Adaptive behavior and learning.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) ‘Foraging theory.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ)
Tinker MT, Mangel M, Estes JA (2009) Learning to be different: acquired skills, social learning, frequency dependence, and environmental variation can cause behaviourally mediated foraging specializations. Evolutionary Ecology Research 11, 841–869.
Tolon V, Dray S, Loison A, Zeileis A, Fischer C, Baubet E (2009) Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear. Canadian Journal of Zoology 87, 1129–1137.
| Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Valeix M, Loveridge AJ, Chamaille-Jammes S, Davidson Z, Murindagomo F, Fritz H, Macdonald DW (2009) Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use. Ecology 90, 23–30.
| Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3hsl2isw%3D%3D&md5=ddfc83590ef74775a06c64c95a188afbCAS | 19294909PubMed |
van Gils JA, De Rooij SR, Van Belle J, Van der Meer J, Dekinga A, Piersma T, Drent R (2005) Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 105–119.
| Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. Prey choice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Gils JA van der Geest M Leyrer J Oudman T Lok T Onrust J de Fouw J van der Heide T van den Hout PJ Spaans B Dekinga A Brugge M Piersma T 2013
Villalba JJ, Provenza FD, Catanese F, Distel RA (2015) Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals. Animal Production Science 55, 261–271.
| Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wollrab S, de Roos AM, Diehl S (2013) Ontogenetic diet shifts promote predator-mediated coexistence. Ecology 94, 2886–2897.
| Ontogenetic diet shifts promote predator-mediated coexistence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24597233PubMed |
