Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Metabolic and endocrine profiles of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland. 1. Relationships between body condition score at calving and metabolic profiles during the transition period

P. Soca A D , M. Carriquiry A , M. Claramunt B , V. Gestido A and A. Meikle C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Production and Pasture, School of Agronomy, Universidad de la Republica, Ruta 3 Km. 363, Paysandu, Uruguay.

B Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de la Republica, Ruta 3 Km. 363, Paysandu, Uruguay.

C Laboratory of Nuclear Techniques, School of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de La Republica, Laplaces, 1550, Montevideo, Uruguay.

D Corresponding author. Email: psoca@fagro.edu.uy

Animal Production Science 54(7) 856-861 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13250
Submitted: 15 June 2013  Accepted: 17 September 2013   Published: 3 December 2013

Abstract

The body condition score (BCS) at calving has been postulated as the main factor in the interaction of nutrition and reproduction in beef-cow ecosystems. The objective of the present study was to analyse the effect of BCS at calving on endocrine and metabolic profiles during the transition period in primiparous Hereford cows (n = 56) grazing native grassland. Cow BCS was registered and plasma insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and metabolites (concentrations of urea, albumin, cholesterol, total protein, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA)) were determined in plasma from –30 to +45 days postpartum (DPP). The effect of BCS at calving (low ≤3.5 and moderate ≥4; 1–8 visual scale) on BCS evolution and hormone and metabolite concentrations were analysed using a time repeated-measures analysis. Cow BCS, NEFA, urea and IGF-I profiles were affected (P < 0.05) by the BCS at calving and DPP interaction, while insulin tended (P = 0.06) to be affected only by BCS at calving. The low-BCS cows presented a smaller loss of BCS during the prepartum than did moderate-BCS cows, and a delayed BCS recovery during the postpartum. The increase in plasma NEFA was greater (P < 0.05) and started earlier during the prepartum period in the low-BCS cows. Protein concentrations increased during prepartum to +30 DPP, while albumin and urea concentrations were maintained until calving and decreased during the postpartum. Urea concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) during prepartum in low-BCS cows. Concentrations of IGF-I and insulin were greater (P < 0.05) in moderate- than low-BCS cows during prepartum, but did not differ between the groups after calving. No effects were observed in calf weight or milk production at +45 DPP. The association between BCS during prepartum and at calving with the endocrine and metabolic profiles (positive: insulin, IGF-I; negative: NEFA and urea) reflected a better nutritional status and plasticity to negative energy balance on moderate cows. This different endocrine milieu did not affect calf weight and/or milk production. In conclusion, the BCS at calving affected the metabolic and endocrine profile during the transition period of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland.


References

Adrien ML, Mattiauda DA, Artegoitia VM, Carriquiry M, Motta G, Bentancur O, Meikle A (2012) Nutritional regulation of body condition score at the initiation of the transition period in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows under grazing conditions: milk production, resumption of postpartum ovarian cyclicity and metabolic parameters. Animal 6, 292–299.
Nutritional regulation of body condition score at the initiation of the transition period in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows under grazing conditions: milk production, resumption of postpartum ovarian cyclicity and metabolic parameters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xjs1agtg%3D%3D&md5=9aa4708efc5774ef591f844950621277CAS | 22436187PubMed |

AOAC (2000) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 17th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD)

Astessiano AL, Pérez-Clariget R, Quintans G, Soca P, Carriquiry M (2012) Effects of a short-term increase in the nutritional plane before the mating period on metabolic and endocrine parameters, hepatic gene expression and reproduction in primiparous beef cows on grazing conditions. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 96, 535–544.
Effects of a short-term increase in the nutritional plane before the mating period on metabolic and endocrine parameters, hepatic gene expression and reproduction in primiparous beef cows on grazing conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xpt12isb4%3D&md5=90d763a861b19a6f1bd685f97a9bdcaaCAS | 21658134PubMed |

Berretta E, Risso D, Montossi F, Pigurina G (2000) Campos in Uruguay. In ‘Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology’. (Eds G Lemaire, J Hogdson, A de Moraes, C Nabinger, P.C. Carvalho) pp. 377–394. (CAB International: Curitiba Parana, Brazil)

Blanc F, Broquier F, Agabriel J, D’Hour P, Chiliard Y (2006) Adaptive abilities of the females and sustainability of ruminant livestock systems. A review. Animal Research 55, 489–510.
Adaptive abilities of the females and sustainability of ruminant livestock systems. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bossis I, Wetteman RP, Welty SD, Vizcarra JD, Spicer J, Diskin MG (1999) Nutritionally induced anovulation in beef heifers: ovarian and endocrine function preceding cessation of ovulation. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1536–1546.

Cassady J, Maddock T, Di Contanzo A, Lamb GS (2009) Initial body condition score affects hormone and metabolite response to nutritional restriction and repletion in yearling postpubertal beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2262–2273.
Initial body condition score affects hormone and metabolite response to nutritional restriction and repletion in yearling postpubertal beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnvVCjsbk%3D&md5=74935be9e051b417c04523f1ad9b0de5CAS | 19359502PubMed |

Chagas LM, Bass JJ, Blache D, Burke CR, Linsday D, Lucy M, Martin G, Meir S, Rhodes FM, Roche JR, Thatcher W, Webb R (2007) Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4022–4032.
Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleqtb0%3D&md5=e4a57373707d8e5ca576cfc0d123f291CAS | 17699018PubMed |

Chilliard Y, Bocquier F, Doreau M (1998) Digestive and metabolic adaptations of ruminants to undernutrition, and consequences on reproduction. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 38, 131–152.
Digestive and metabolic adaptations of ruminants to undernutrition, and consequences on reproduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1czgt1Kntg%3D%3D&md5=2b020124c710f24c6c8f33a6ccf2e3b9CAS | 9638788PubMed |

Ciccioli NH, Wettemann RP, Spicer LJ, Lents CA, White FJ, Keisler DH (2003) Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3107–3120.

Freetly HC, Ferrell CR, Jenkins TG (2005) Nutritionally altering weight gain patterns of pregnant heifers and young cows changes the time that feed resources are offered without any differences in production. Journal of Animal Science 83, 916–926.

Haydock KP, Shaw NH (1975) The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yields of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 663–670.

Hess BW, Lake SL, Scholljegerdes EJ, Weston TR, Nayigihugu V, Molle JDC, Moss GE (2005) Nutritional controls of beef cows reproduction. Journal of Animal Science 83, 90–106.

Houghton PL, Lemenager RP, Horstman LA, Hendrix KS, Moss GE (1990) Effects of body composition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1438–1446.

Lake SL, Scholljegerdes EJ, Nayigihugu V, Murrieta CM, Atkinson RL, Rule DC, Robinson TJ, Hess BW (2006) Effects of body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat on adipose tissue lipogenic activity of lactating beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 84, 397–404.

Lalman DL, Williams JE, Hess BW, Thomas MG, Keisler DH (2000) Effect of dietary energy on milk production and metabolic hormones in thin, primiparous beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 78, 530–538.

Littell RC, Henry C, Ammerman J (1998) Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1216–1231.

Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh A, Muchenje V, Dzama K, Raats JG (2007) Assessing the nutritional status of beef cattle: current practices and future prospects. African Journal of Biotechnology 6, 2727–2734.

Remppis S, Steingass H, Gruber L, Schenkel H (2011) Effects of energy intake on performance, mobilization and retention of body tissue, and metabolic parameters in dairy cows with special regard to effects of pre-partum nutrition on lactation. A review. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 24, 540–572.
Effects of energy intake on performance, mobilization and retention of body tissue, and metabolic parameters in dairy cows with special regard to effects of pre-partum nutrition on lactation. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlvFWlurg%3D&md5=e5f31025e63f40c9e020badb68442d64CAS |

Roberts AJ (2008) Assessment of insulin-like growth factor -1 as an indicator of competence for rebreeding in first calf heifers. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science 59, 2008

Robinson JJ, Sinclair KD, Randel RD, Sykes AR (1999) Nutritional management of the female ruminant: mechanistic approaches and predictive models. In ‘Nutritional ecology of herbivores. Proceedings of the Vth international symposium on the nutrition of herbivores’. pp. 550–603. (American Society of Animal Science: Savoy, IL)

Scarlato SA, Faber C, Do Carmo M, Soca P (2011) Foraging behavior of beef cows grazing native pasture: I. Effect of breed and herbage allowance on grazing and ruminating time. In ‘Anales/proceedings: IX international rangeland congress. Diverse Rangelands for a Sustainable Society Vol. 1’. p. 657.

Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller R, Berardinelli JG, Custer EE (1990) Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68, 799–816.

Soca P, Carriquiry M, Keisler DH, Claramunt M, Do Carmo M, Olivera-Muzante J, Rodríguez M, Meikle A (2013) Reproductive and productive responses to suckling – restriction treatments and flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows. Animal Production Science 53, 283–291.
Reproductive and productive responses to suckling – restriction treatments and flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjsVymurY%3D&md5=6397b2e104fcd86400a657c9f89f9861CAS |

Vizcarra J, Ibañez W, Orcasberro R (1986) Repetibilidad y reproductibilidad de dos escalas para estimar la condición corporal de vacas Hereford. Investigaciones Agronómicas 7, 45–50.

Vizcarra JA, Wettemann RP, Spitzer JC, Morrison DG (1998) Body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain influence luteal activity and concentrations of glucose, insulin, and nonesterified fatty acids in plasma of primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 927–936.

Waterman R, Butler R (2010). Metabolic signals of the beef cows in negative energy balance. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th grazing livestock nutrition conference’. (Eds BW Hess, T Del Curto, JGP Bowman, RC Waterman). pp. 91–101. (Western Section – American Society of Animal Science: Champaign, IL)

Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White FJ, Rubio I (2003) Nutritional and suckling mediated anovulation in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 48–59.

Williams JH, Anderson DC, Kress DD (1979) Milk production in Hereford cattle, I. Effects of separation interval on weigh-suckle-weigh milk production estimates. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1438–1442.

Yoshida K, Murao K, Imachi H, Cao WM, Yu X, Li J, Ahmed RAM, Kitanaka N, Wong NCW, Unterman TG, Magnuson MA, Ishida T (2007) Pancreatic glucokinase is activated by insulin-like growth factor-I. Endocrinology 148, 2904
Pancreatic glucokinase is activated by insulin-like growth factor-I.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmt1ajur4%3D&md5=1de6280e60e86e5303c4b3bdc8184b4eCAS | 17317782PubMed |