Metabolic and endocrine profiles of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland. 2. Effects of body condition score at calving, type of suckling restriction and flushing on plasmatic and productive parameters
P. Soca A D , M. Carriquiry A , M. Claramunt B , G. Ruprechter C and A. Meikle CA Department of Animal Production and Pasture, School of Agronomy, Universidad de la Republica, Ruta 3 Km. 363, Paysandu, Uruguay.
B Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de la Republica, Ruta 3 Km. 363, Paysandu, Uruguay.
C Laboratory of Nuclear Techniques, School of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de La Republica, Laplaces, 1550, Montevideo, Uruguay.
D Corresponding author. Email: psoca@fagro.edu.uy
Animal Production Science 54(7) 862-868 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13251
Submitted: 15 June 2013 Accepted: 17 September 2013 Published: 3 December 2013
Abstract
The objective of the present experiment was to analyse the effect of body condition score (BCS) at calving, type of suckling restriction and flushing on metabolic and endocrine profiles, and productive and reproductive responses of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland. Primiparous beef (n = 56) cows in anestrus classified by BCS at calving (low ≤3.5 and moderate ≥4; 1–8 visual scale) were assigned randomly to four treatments in a two by two factorial arrangement of type of suckling restriction and flushing. Type of suckling restriction started at 55 ± 10 days postpartum (DPP ± s.e.m.; Day 0 = initiation of the treatment) and consisted of applying nose plates to calves for 12 days (i.e. TS treatment) or 5 days of isolation of the cow–calf pair, followed by applying nose plates to calves for 7 days as calves were reunited with their mothers (i.e. IS treatment). Immediately after the suckling restriction treatments were finished, the breeding season started, and each cow received (flushing group) or not (control group) 2 kg/day (fresh basis) of whole-rice middling for 22 days. The BCS was superior in moderate-BCS cows through the experiment. The type of suckling restriction did not affect any plasma parameter, but insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations increased in all cows during suckling restriction. Cholesterol concentration was affected by flushing × day interaction (P < 0.05), while insulin and IGF-I concentrations were affected by the interaction among BCS at calving, flushing and days (P < 0.03). Flushing increased cholesterol concentration in both BCS groups at calving, while insulin and IGF-I concentrations increased during flushing only in moderate-BCS cows. Suckling restriction, flushing, and BCS at calving did not affect calf weight or milk production. Moderate BCS cows had a shorter postpartum anestrous interval (PPI) (98 vs 123 DPP; P < 0.01). Isolated type of suckling reduced postpartum anestrous interval when compared with TS treatment (97 vs 115 DPP, P < 0.05). Early pregnancy rate was greater in flushed than in control cows (0.8 vs 0.55, P < 0.01) and in moderate-BCS cows than in low-BCS cows (0.84 vs 0.46, P < 0.01). Total pregnancy rate was also greater in flushed and moderate cows and tended to be affected by the interaction between flushing and BCS at calving (P = 0.06; flushed cows: moderate = 1 vs low = 0.5, P < 0.08; and control cows: moderate = 0.8 vs low = 0.4, P < 0.09). These results confirmed the great value of suckling restriction and flushing during post-calving and relevance of BCS at calving as a link between energetic nutrition and metabolic and reproductive processes in primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland.
Additional keywords: body condition at calving, flushing, metabolic response, suckling.
References
Alvarez-Rodríguez J, Palacio J, Sanz A (2010) Metabolic and luteal function in winter-calving Spanish beef cows as affected by calf management and breed. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94, 385–394.AOAC (2000) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 17th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD)
Astessiano AL, Pérez-Clariget R, Quintans G, Soca P, Carriquiry M (2012) Effects of a short-term increase in the nutritional plane before the mating period on metabolic and endocrine parameters, hepatic gene expression and reproduction in primiparous beef cows on grazing conditions. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 96, 535–544.
Berretta E, Risso D, Montossi F, Pigurina G (2000) Campos in Uruguay. In ‘Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology’. (Eds G Lemaire, J Hogdson, A de Moraes, C Nabinger, PC Carvalho) pp. 377–394. (CAB International: Curitiba, Parana, Brazil)
Blanc F, Broquier F, Agabriel J, D’Hour P, Chiliard Y (2006) Adaptive abilities of the females and sustainability of ruminant livestock systems. A review. Animal Research 55, 489–510.
Cooke RF, Reis MM, Bohnert D, Vanconcelos JLM (2012) Plasma progesterone concentration in beef heifers receiving exogenous glucose, insulin, or bovine somatotropin. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3266–3273.
Dhuyvetter DV, Caton JS (1996) Manipulation of reproduction and lactation with supplementation in beef cattle. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd grazing livestock nutrition conference. Proceedings of the Western Section – American Society of Animal Science. Vol. 47 (Suppl. 1)’. (Eds MB Judkins, T McCollum III) pp. 83–93.
Fernández-Foren A, Abecia JA, Vázquez MI, Forcada F, Sartore I, Carriquiry M, Meikle A, Sosa C (2011) Restricción alimenticia en ovinos: respuesta endocrino-metabólica dependiente de las reservas corporales. ITEA 107, 257–271.
Haydock KP, Shaw NH (1975) The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 663–670.
Hess BW, Lake SL, Scholljegerdes EJ, Weston TR, Nayigihugu V, Molle JDC, Moss GE (2005) Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction. Journal of Animal Science 83, 90–106.
Khireddine B, Grimard B, Ponter AA, Ponsart C, Boudjenah H, Mialot JP, Sauvant D, Humblot P (1998) Influence of flushing on LH secretion, follicular growth and the response to estrus synchronization treatment in suckled beef cows. Theriogenology 49, 1409–1423.
Lake SL, Scholljegerdes EJ, Nayigihugu V, Murrieta CM, Atkinson RL, Rule DC, Robinson TJ, Hess BW (2006) Effects of body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat on adipose tissue lipogenic activity of lactating beef cows1. Journal of Animal Science 84, 397–404.
León HV, Hernández-Cerón J, Keisler DH, Gutierrez CG (2004) Plasma concentrations of leptin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and insulin in relation to changes in body condition score in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 82, 445–451.
McGowan M, Galloway D, Taylor E, Entwistle K, Johnston P (1995) ‘The veterinary examination of bulls.’ (Australian Association of Cattle Veterinarians: Eight Mile Plains, Qld)
Mulliniks JT, Kemp ME, Valverde-Saenz SI, Gardner CM, Cox SH, Cibils A, Hawkins DE, Petersen MK (2008) Reproduction in young postpartum range cows supplemented with glucogenic precursors. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science 59, 118–121.
Quintans G, Banchero G, Carriquiry M, López C, Baldi F (2010) Effect of body condition and suckling restriction with and without presence of the calf on cow and calf performance. Animal Production Science 50, 931–938.
Rhoads RP, Kim JW, Leury BJ, Baumgard LH, Segoale N, Frank SJ, Bauman DE, Boisclair YR (2004) Insulin increases the abundance of the growth hormone receptor in liver and adipose tissue of periparturient dairy cows. The Journal of Nutrition 134, 1020–1027.
Scarlato S, Faber AC, Do Carmo M, Soca P (2011). Foraging behavior of beef cows grazing native pasture: I. Effect of breed and herbage allowance on grazing and ruminating time. In ‘Anales/proceedings: IX international rangeland congress, Rosario, Argentina. Diverse Rangelands for a Sustainable Society’. p. 657.
Sinclair KD, Molle G, Revilla R, Roche JF, Quintans G, Marongiu L, Sanz A, Mackey DR, Diskin MG (2002) Ovulation of the first dominant follicle arising after day 21 post partum in suckling beef cows. Animal Science 75, 115–126.
Soca P, Claramunt M, Do Carmo M (2007) Sistemas de cría vacuna en ganadería pastoril sobre campo nativo sin subsidios: propuesta tecnológica para estabilizar la producción de terneros con intervenciones de bajo costo y de fácil implementación. Revista Ciencia Animal 3, 3–22.
Soca P, Carriquiry M, Keisler DH, Claramunt M, Do Carmo M, Olivera-Muzante J, Rodríguez M, Meikle A (2013) Reproductive and productive responses to suckling-restriction treatments and flushing in primiparous grazing beef cows. Animal Production Science 53, 283–291.
Soca P, Carriquiry M, Claramunt M, Gestido V, Meikle A (2014) Metabolic and endocrine profiles of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland. 1. Relationships between body condition score at calving and metabolic profiles during the transition period. Animal Production Science 54, 856–861.
| Metabolic and endocrine profiles of primiparous beef cows grazing native grassland. 1. Relationships between body condition score at calving and metabolic profiles during the transition period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Spicer L, Chase J, Rutter L (2002) Relationship between serum insulin-like growth factor-I and genotype during the postpartum interval in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, 716–722.
Stagg K, Spicer L, Sreenan J, Roche JF, Diskin MG (1998) Effect of calf isolation on follicular wave dynamics, gonadotropin and metabolic hormone changes, and interval to first ovulation in beef cows fed either of two energy levels postpartum. Biology of Reproduction 59, 777–783.
Stevenson JS, Lamb GC, Hoffman DP, Minton JE (1997) Interrelationship of lactation and postpartum anovulation in suckled and milked cows. Livestock Production Science 50, 57–74.
Taverne M, Szenci O, Szétag J, Piros A (1985) Pregnancy diagnosis in cows with linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning: a preliminary note. The Veterinary Quarterly 7, 264–270.
Vieira FVR, Lopes CN, Cappellozza BI, Scarpa AB, Cooke RF, Vasconcelos JLM (2012) Effects of intravenous glucose infusion and nutritional balance on serum concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids, glucose, insulin, and progesterone in nonlactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3047–3055.
Vizcarra J, Ibañez W, Orcasberro R (1986) Repetibilidad y reproductibilidad de dos escalas para estimar la condición corporal de vacas Hereford. Investigaciones Agronómicas 7, 45–47.
Vizcarra J, Wettemann RP, Spitzer JC, Morrison DG (1998) Body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain influence luteal activity and concentrations of glucose, insulin, and nonesterified fatty acids in plasma of primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 927–936.
Waterman R, Butler R (2010) Metabolic signals of the beef cows in negative energy balance. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th grazing livestock nutrition conference’. (Eds BW Hess, T Del Curto, JGP Bowman, RC Waterman) pp. 93–102. (Western Section – American Society of Animal Science: Champaign, IL)
Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White FJ, Rubio I (2003) Nutritional and suckling mediated anovulation in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 48–59.
Williams GL, Stanko RL (2000) Dietary fats as reproductive nutraceuticals in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1–12.
Williams JH, Anderson DC, Kress DD (1979) Milk production in Hereford cattle, I. Effects of separation interval on weigh–suckle–weigh milk production estimates. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1438–1442.
Yoshida K, Murao K, Imachi H, Cao WM, Yu X, Li J, Ahmed RAM, Kitanaka N, Wong NCW, Unterman TG, Magnuson MA, Ishida T (2007) Pancreatic glucokinase is activated by insulin-like growth factor-I. Endocrinology 148, 2904
