CROSS-SECTION BALANCING AND THERMOCHRONOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MESOZOIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE EASTERN OTWAY BASIN

Abstract

Recent advances in cross-section balancing software have simplified the application of basic geometric constraints to the analysis of basin development. Geometric analysis of field and seismic data allows the user to verify initial interpretations and also elucidates important information about the structural evolution of a basin. Principally, computerised balancing and restoration of cross-sections assists in constraining:

the amount of crustal extension;

trap geometries, particularly fault geometries through time;

the geometry of key horizons at any time, revealing basin morphology and migration paths;

the time and amount of maximum burial and hence hydrocarbon migration; and

the likely mechanisms involved in basin evolution. In turn, these parameters can be used to further assess hydrocarbon prospectivity by providing useful data for lithospheric modelling.

This study utilises 2D cross-section balancing software (Geosec™) to decompact, balance and restore a series of regional onshore-offshore cross-sections based on both reflection seismic data in the Torquay Embayment and field mapping in the Otway Ranges. The thickness of eroded strata has been constrained by Apatite Fission Track and Vitrinite Reflectance analyses. The resulting section restoration suggests that the eastern Otway Basin experienced extension of 26 per cent in the Early Cretaceous and that the Otway Ranges were subjected to −8 per cent shortening during mid-Cretaceous inversion and −4 per cent shortening during Mio-Pliocene inversion.

The structural style of the Otway Ranges and Torquay Embayment is typified by steep, relatively planar, en echelon, N and NE-dipping Early Cretaceous extension faults that were subsequently inverted and eroded during the Cenomanian and Mio-Pliocene. The structural style of the region shows strong similarities with oblique- rift analogue models suggesting that the extensional history of the region was strongly controlled by prevailing basement fabric.

Lower Cretaceous source rocks in the eastern Otway Basin reached maximum maturity prior to mid-Cretaceous inversion with the exception of parts of the Torquay Embayment which may not have experienced significant uplift and erosion at this time. The lack of subsidence in the eastern Otway Basin prevented the deposition of significant amounts of Upper Cretaceous sediments which are proven reservoirs in the western Otway Basin and Gippsland Basin. Subsequent Tertiary burial was insufficient, in most regions, to allow the source rocks re-enter the oil generation window.