Register      Login
The APPEA Journal The APPEA Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
RESEARCH ARTICLE

EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THIN OIL COLUMN RESERVOIRS IN AUSTRALIA

H. R. Irrgang

The APPEA Journal 34(1) 64 - 78
Published: 1994

Abstract

Thin oil columns represent a common and important class of hydrocarbon reserve which are notoriously difficult to evaluate and produce. This paper provides case studies of examples of these reservoirs in Australia and summarises the production methods, well performance and recovery efficiencies.

Thin oil column reservoirs are defined here as reservoirs which will cone both water and gas when produced at commercial rates. The oil zone can have a pancake or rim geometry. Examples within Australia include Bream and Snapper (Gippsland Basin), South Pepper and Chervil (Carnarvon Basin), Chookoo (Eromanga Basin) and Taylor (Surat Basin).

Parameters which are particularly important in defining the performance of these reservoirs are: horizontal and vertical permeability, column height, stratigraphie dip, well spacing, and oil viscosity. High horizontal permeability is more critical than in other reservoir types as it controls the effectiveness of gravitational forces in opposing coning and other unwanted flows by reducing pressure gradients. Low vertical permeability mitigates coning but can limit across strike drainage in dipping strata. Oil viscosity is also particularly important, even when the mobility ratio is favourable, as it controls the gas/oil ratio and water cut during coning.

As coning (by definition) is inevitable the key production issue is gas cap management. The main options are:

Limit gas coning by controlling completion depth and production rates.Allow gas cap shrinkage and 'chase' the oil column upwards via recompletions.Reinject gas to control gas-oil contact position.

For the latter two options in particular, ultimate reserves are a strong function of the capacity of the installed production facilities, especially offshore, where fixed operating costs are high. When gas cap management is not compromised, reserves increase with higher total fluid withdrawal rates. Examples of the various gas cap management and production strategies are included.

Both horizontal (South Pepper, Bream) and conventional (Chookoo, Taylor) completion techniques have been applied to thin oil column reservoirs in Australia. Horizontal completions can increase productivity, mitigate coning and increase the well drainage areas (particularly if drilled across dip in heterogeneous reservoirs). However, horizontal completions are particularly vulnerable to poor cement jobs, natural fractures and undesirable fluid contact movements.

A variety of other completion techniques have been tried worldwide in thin oil columns with mixed success. These include multiple completions in the water, oil and/or gas to allow separate production, and injection of fluids to make permeability barriers or alter relative permeability.

A number of scaling rules are included to assist in using offset field data for evaluation of thin oil column reservoirs. Improved understanding of these complex reservoirs will maximise their economic potential.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ93005

© CSIRO 1994

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation

View Dimensions