Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The APPEA Journal The APPEA Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Non peer reviewed)

Climate change litigation: directors’ duties, legal developments and risk management

Louise Camenzuli A * and Andrew Korbel A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

* Correspondence to: louise.camenzuli@corrs.com.au

The APPEA Journal 62 S226-S229 https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ21074
Accepted: 26 February 2022   Published: 13 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of APPEA.

Abstract

Climate change is being repositioned in commercial, financial and legal spheres as a matter that requires board-level strategic attention. With a broad-ranging consensus that climate change risks are material and reasonably foreseeable, activists are pursuing a myriad of legal challenges seeking to hold government and companies to account. As the law develops, a number of trends are emerging which will require companies and directors to adapt their response to climate-change-related risks. In particular, directors are required to adequately inform themselves as to the broader physical and economic consequences of climate change, to critically evaluate the implications for financial performance and risk management, to adapt their company’s strategic response, and disclose and report relevant information to stakeholders. These requirements need to be managed amid significant uncertainties and complexities about the impacts of climate change, and also as to realistic emissions reduction targets, offsetting, innovation, measurement and reporting methodologies. This paper outlines climate litigation trends to assist in equipping boards, directors and general counsel to understand and engage with their company’s exposure. In particular, we consider claims against government which are of relevance to companies, including challenges to project approvals on climate change grounds; as well as potential actions against companies, directors and advisors in respect of fiduciary duties, disclosures and greenwashing.

Keywords: climate change, climate change duty of care, climate change litigation, climate litigation, climate litigation trends, climate risk, climate risk management, climate-related financial disclosures, climate-related risk, directors’ duties, due care and diligence, emissions reduction target, financial disclosures, greenhouse gas emissions, greenwashing, net zero target, risk management.

Dr Louise Camenzuli is the Head of Environment and Planning at Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Louise is a Planning and Environment Law specialist, with particular expertise in land use and zoning laws, infrastructure agreements and major road, light rail, heavy rail, telecommunications, water and other infrastructure projects. She has acted on numerous extractive industry projects, including mining, coal seam gas extraction and quarrying projects and renewable energy projects, and regularly advises on climate-change-related law and policy.

Andrew Korbel is a Partner within the Commercial Litigation practice group at Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Andrew is an experienced litigator and has been a trusted advisor to both the private sector and government for more than 20 years. He works with clients to resolve complex and high-value commercial disputes, and protects their interests in inquiries and investigations, including by acting for senior executives and directors in their dealings with regulators. Andrew has closely followed, and written and presented widely on, climate litigation both globally and in Australia, as it has developed and transformed over recent years.


References

Aljughaiman AA, Cao ND, Albarrak MS (2021) The impact of greenhouse gas emission on corporate’s tail risk. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
The impact of greenhouse gas emission on corporate’s tail risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2020] NSWLEC 152.

IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Eds V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, A Pirani, SL Connors, C Pean, S Berger, N Caud, Y Chen, L Goldfarb, MI Gomis, M Huang, K Leitzell, E Lonnoy, JBR Matthews, TK Maycock, T Waterfield, O Yelekci, R Yu, B Zhou) (Cambridge University Press) Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/

McVeigh v Retail Employees Superannuation Trust [2019] FCA 14.

Milieudefensie et al. v Royal Dutch Shell plc, No C/09/571932/HA ZA 19-379 (District Court of The Hague, 26 May 2021).

Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560.

Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2021] FCA 774.

The Environment Centre NT Inc v Minister for Resources and Water [2021] FCA 1121.

The Environment Centre NT Inc v Minister for Resources and Water (No 2) [2021] FCA 1635.

Urgenda Foundation v The Netherlands, No C/09/456689/HA ZA 13-1397 (District Court of The Hague, 24 June 2015).

Urgenda Foundation v The Netherlands, No 200.178/245/01 (Court of Appeal of The Hague, 9 October 2018).