Register      Login
The APPEA Journal The APPEA Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Non peer reviewed)

Looking down the (oil) barrel of a class action?

Anne Freeman A * and Tom Griffith B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Piper Alderman, Level 23, Governor Macquarie Tower, 1 Farrer Place, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

B Piper Alderman, Level 16, 70 Franklin Street, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

* Correspondence to: afreeman@piperalderman.com.au

The APPEA Journal 62 S21-S24 https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ21024
Accepted: 4 March 2022   Published: 13 May 2022

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of APPEA.

Abstract

Class actions against oil and gas companies are nothing new. More than 15 years ago, Esso settled the action against it by businesses suffering property damage and economic loss from that damage following the Longford gas explosion for $A32.5 million. There have been other class actions following oil spills, and others by shareholders for alleged breaches of continuous disclosure obligations. With the focus of investors increasingly on climate change disclosure, and some courts now finding expanded duties of care owed in relation to climate change, oil and gas companies can expect to see more actions in the future, including claims of ‘greenwashing’, like the one issued by a shareholder against Santos in August 2021 relating to statements made in Santos’ 2020 annual report. This paper provides some practical tips for companies facing class action proceedings, including preparatory steps which can be taken, such as establishing internal and external teams, dealing with insurers, as well as preserving and locating relevant documents. It provides recommendations about appropriate internal and external communication about the claim so as to avoid issues like waiver of legal professional privilege and PR problems, and it addresses some enquiries which should be made about opponents, as well as the judge assigned to the matter. Specific considerations arise in funded class actions, in light of recent regulatory changes. Early checks should be made as to whether the litigation funder holds an Australian Financial Services Licence and whether the funding arrangement has been properly established as a managed investment scheme.

Keywords: class actions, climate change disclosure, climate change litigation, defending class actions, greenwashing claims, regulation of litigation funders, shareholder activism.

Anne Freeman is a Partner in Piper Alderman’s litigation practice team, of which she is co-leader, and is based in the firm’s Sydney office. She has practised in New South Wales, South Australia and the United Kingdom. Anne regularly advises on joint venture issues and contractual and other disputes including allegations of breaches of Competition and Consumer Act, ASIC Act and Corporations Act. Anne is currently acting in the defence of a class action in the Federal Court of Australia. She also has acted for the representative claimant in a shareholder class action claim. Anne has been a presenter at two APPEA conferences. Anne was previously on the Board of the Energy Policy Institute of Australia.

Tom Griffith is a Partner based in Piper Alderman’s Adelaide office. He has significant experience in regulatory hearings and enquiries, corporate fraud investigations, disputes involving breach of fiduciary duties, defamation and reputation management and in Corporations Law and ACCC matters. Tom has a diverse practice, including employment disputes, advising in respect of directors’ duties and corporate governance, administrative law review and intellectual property disputes. Tom is currently conducting the defence of an employment-related class action in the Federal Court in respect of alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act and relevant Awards. Tom has also acted on two mergers of ASX-listed resources companies by scheme of arrangement, and regularly provides advice to ASX-listed resources clients on contractual disputes, and regulatory investigations.


References

Corporations Amendment (Litigation Funding) Regulations, 2020 (Cth).

Mileudefensie et al v Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Hague District Court C/09/571932/HAZA 19-379 (26 May 2021).

Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment & Ors (Sharma by her litigation representative) [2021] FCA 560.

Minister for the Environment & Ors v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35 (appeal).