Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
The APPEA Journal The APPEA Journal Society
Journal of Australian Energy Producers
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Non peer reviewed)

MAZ depth-velocity modelling and imaging with azimuthal anisotropy*

Sergey Birdus A , Erika Angerer B and Iftikhar Abbasi C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CGGVeritas 38 Ord Street, West Perth, WA, 6005. Email: Sergey.Birdus@cggveritas.com

B OMV Trabrennstrasse 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria. Email: Erika.Angerer@omv.com

C OMV Yemen Exploration Gmbh. Faj Attan, Beirut Street, Hadda Zone, 15361 Sanaa, Yemen. Email: Iftikhar.Abbasi@omv.com

The APPEA Journal 50(2) 723-723 https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ09087
Published: 2010

Abstract

Processing of multi and wide-azimuth seismic data faces some new challenges, and one of them is depth-velocity modelling and imaging with azimuthal velocity anisotropy.

Analysis of multi-azimuth data very often reveals noticeable fluctuations in moveout between different acquisition directions.

They can be caused by several factors:

  1. real azimuthal interval velocity anisotropy associated with quasi-vertical fractures or present day stress field within the sediments;

  2. short-wavelength velocity heterogeneities in the overburden;

  3. TTI (or VTI) anisotropy in the overburden; or,

  4. random distortions due to noise, multiples, irregularities in the acquisition geometry, etc.

In order to build a velocity model for multi-azimuth pre-stack depth migration (MAZ PSDM) taking into account observed azimuthal anisotropy, we need to recognise, separate and estimate all the effects listed above during iterative depth-velocity modelling.

Analysis of seismic data from a full azimuth 3D seismic land survey revealed the presence of strong spatially variable azimuthal velocity anisotropy that had to be taken into consideration. Using real data examples we discuss major steps in depth processing workflow that took such anisotropy into account: residual moveout estimation in azimuth sectors; separation of different effects causing apparent azimuthal anisotropy (see A–D above); iterative depth-velocity modelling with azimuthal anisotropy; and, subsequent MAZ anisotropic PSDM.

The presented workflow solved problems with azimuthal anisotropy in our multi-azimuth dataset. Some of the lessons learned during this MAZ project are relevant to every standard narrow azimuth seismic survey recorded in complex geological settings.

Keywords: depth imaging, velocity modelling, azimuthal anisotropy, multi-azimuth seismic

Sergey Birdus is a depth processing supervisor with CGGVeritas in Perth. After receiving PhD in geophysics from Kiev University in 1986 he worked as a lecturer for Kiev University, a researcher in R&D departments of major Russian service geophysical companies and in several positions with Paradigm Geophysical in Moscow and Perth before joining CGGVeritas in 2006. Sergey is involved in challenging depth processing projects throughout Asia-Pacific region.

Erika Angerer is a Senior Geophysicist with OMV, Vienna. Erika received an Engineering Degree in applied geophysics at the Miming University of Leoben, Austria and PhD in geophysics at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

Since then she worked as a geophysicist with WesternGeco in London and a research geophysicist with CGG in London before joining OMV in 2005.

Iftikhar Abbasi has worked as G&G Team Leader for OMV Yemen since August 2009.

After receiving MSc in geophysics from Quaid-e-Azam University in Pakistan in 1994 Iftikhar worked as a junior geophysicist for OGDCL, Pakistan, Senior Geoscientist and Team Leader for Schlumberger in AbuDhabi and in several positions for OMV Pakistan and OMV Yemen.