Articles citing this paper
cfArticle2ecfc1291681887$funcTITLE@501f9fb0
Ellen van Wilgenburg A B , Raoul A. Mulder A and Mark A. Elgar A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: ellenv@unimelb.edu.au
Australian Journal of Zoology 54(2) 117-122 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO05075
Submitted: 15 December 2005 Accepted: 8 March 2006 Published: 11 May 2006
6 articles found in Crossref database.
Collective displays as signals of relative colony size: meat ants, Iridomyrmex purpureus, are economical with the truth
Orbell Penelope A.,
Potter Jessica R., Elgar Mark A.
Animal Behaviour. 2020 159 p.29
Ant social network structure is highly conserved across species
Kay Tomas,
Motes-Rodrigo Alba,
Royston Arthur,
Richardson Thomas O.,
Stroeymeyt Nathalie, Keller Laurent
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2024 291(2027).
Colony characteristics influence the risk of nest predation of a polydomous ant by a monotreme
VAN WILGENBURG ELLEN, ELGAR MARK A.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2007 92(1). p.1
Mosaic structure of native ant supercolonies
Seppä P.,
Johansson H.,
Gyllenstrand N.,
Pálsson S., Pamilo P.
Molecular Ecology. 2012 21(23). p.5880
Colony fusion causes within-colony variation in a parthenogenetic ant
Kellner Katrin,
Barth Benjamin, Heinze Juergen
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2010 64(5). p.737
The Influence of Relatedness, Neighbourhood and Overall Distance on Colony Mate Recognition in a Polydomous Ant
Wilgenburg Ellen van
Ethology. 2007 113(12). p.1185