Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Intracolony relatedness and polydomy in the Australian meat ant, Iridomyrmex purpureus

Ellen van Wilgenburg A B , Raoul A. Mulder A and Mark A. Elgar A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: ellenv@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 54(2) 117-122 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO05075
Submitted: 15 December 2005  Accepted: 8 March 2006   Published: 11 May 2006

Abstract

In polydomous ants, individuals belonging to a single colony occupy a variable number of neighbouring nests. Polydomy is frequently associated with polygyny and species are often both facultatively polydomous and facultatively polygynous. In this study we test the generality of this association by investigating the genetic and spatial structure of polydomous colonies of Iridomyrmex purpureus in New South Wales, Australia. Genetic analysis of 15 colonies revealed high relatedness within all but one of the colonies, indicating that the workers are mostly produced by one, singly inseminated queen. Polydomy in this population therefore is not associated with polygyny. Intriguingly, our behavioural data suggests that the colony with low within-colony relatedness had been recently formed by colony fusion. While genotypes were not distributed homogenously throughout this newly formed colony, there was an obvious exchange of genotypes between the nests of the two former colonies. During 2 years of field observations in which we observed 140 colonies comprising over 1000 nests, we observed colony fusion only twice. We discuss these findings in relation to the current theories on the relationship between polydomy and polygyny.


Acknowledgments

We thank Emile van Lieshout for help in the field and Ian and Linda Mclean for their generosity in permitting fieldwork on their property. We are grateful to Dr K. Ingram for providing us with microsatellite primers. This research was supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship awarded by the Australian Government, a Melbourne International Research Scholarship awarded by the University of Melbourne, the Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund and the Joyce W. Vickery Scientific Research Fund of the Linnean Society of New South Wales.


References

Adcock, G. J. , and Mulder, R. A. (2002). Polymorphic microsatellite loci for paternity analysis in the Madagascar paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone mutata: Aves). Molecular Ecology Notes 2, 287–289.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bourke A. F. G., and Franks N. R. (1995). ‘Social Evolution in Ants.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton.)

Boutin-Ganache, I. , Raposo, M. , Raymond, M. , and Descepper, C. F. (2001). M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques 31, 1–3.
Elmes G. W., and Keller L. (1993). Distribution and ecology of queen number in ants of the genus Myrmica. In ‘Queen Number and Sociality in Insects’. (Ed. L Keller.) pp. 294–307. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Ettershank, G. , and Ettershank, J. A. (1982). Ritualised fighting in the meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 21, 97–102.
Herbers J. M. (1993). Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In ‘Queen Number and Sociality in Insects’. (Ed. L Keller.) pp. 262–293. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Herbers, J. M. , and Banschbach, V. S. (1999). Plasticity of social organization in a forest ant species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45, 451–465.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rosengren R., Sundström L., and Fortelius W. (1993). Monogyny and polygyny in Formica ants: the results of alternative dispersal tactics. In ‘Queen Number and Sociality in Insects’. (Ed. L. Keller.) pp. 308–333. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Ross, K. G. , and Fletcher, D. J. C. (1985). Comparative study of genetic and social structure in two forms of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17, 349–356.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seppä, P. , and Pamilo, P. (1995). Gene flow and population viscosity in Myrmica ants. Heredity 74, 200–209.


Sundström, L. (1993). Genetic population structure and sociogenetic organisation in Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33, 345–354.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Wilgenburg, E. , van Lieshout, L. , and Elgar, M. A. (2005). Conflict resolution strategies in meat ants Iridomyrmex purpureus: ritualised displays versus lethal fighting. Behaviour 142, 701–716.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |