Habitats associated with vehicle collisions with wild pigs
James C. Beasley A E , Tracy E. Grazia B , Paul E. Johns C and John J. Mayer DA Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, PO Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802, USA.
B USDA Forest Service – Savannah River, PO Box 700, New Ellenton, South Carolina 29809, USA.
C Carolina Wildlife Consultants, 2441 Williston Road, Aiken, South Carolina 29803, USA.
D Savannah River National Laboratory, SRNS LLC, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina 29808, USA.
E Corresponding author. Email: beasley@srel.uga.edu
Wildlife Research 40(8) 654-660 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13061
Submitted: 3 April 2013 Accepted: 25 January 2014 Published: 27 February 2014
Abstract
Context: Over the past few decades, the frequency of wild pig–vehicle collisions (WPVCs) and number of human fatalities associated with these accidents have increased with expanding populations of this species, particularly in regions outside its native distribution.
Aims: To better understand this widespread and growing human safety threat, we quantified habitat attributes associated with 311 WPVC locations occurring between 1983 and 2012 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina, USA, to test the hypothesis that WPVCs occur more frequently in areas proximal to preferred habitats (i.e. riparian and bottomland hardwood habitats).
Methods: At each collision site, we measured the distance to the nearest wetland and stream, as well as the composition of habitats within 100-m and 1699-m buffers. We then contrasted habitat attributes associated with collision sites with those from randomly selected locations along the same roads, to identify habitat characteristics contributing to a higher incidence of these accidents.
Key results: WPVCs were non-randomly distributed across both spatial scales measured, with collisions occurring more frequently in areas of preferred habitat for this species. Specifically, collisions occurred in areas closer to streams and containing less pine forest than at random locations at both spatial scales evaluated.
Conclusions: Similar to vehicle accidents with other ungulate species, our study suggested that vehicle collisions involving wild pigs are spatially clustered around preferred habitat types. Management efforts to reduce vehicle collisions with wild pigs should be focussed in areas where roadways bisect preferred habitats such as stream crossings and bottomland hardwood or other riparian habitats.
Implications: These data will aid in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce the frequency and impacts of WPVCs in areas of high wild-pig densities. However, given the paucity of data on WPVC mitigation, additional research is needed to quantify the efficacy of various methods (e.g. signage, fencing, underpasses) at reducing the frequency and severity of collisions with this species.
Additional keywords: boar, feral hog, habitat attributes, invasive species, road kill, Sus scrofa.
References
Balčiauskas, L. (2009). Distribution of species-specific wildlife–vehicle accidents on Lithuanian roads, 2002–2007. Estonian Journal of Ecology 58, 157–168.| Distribution of species-specific wildlife–vehicle accidents on Lithuanian roads, 2002–2007.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barrios-Garcia, M. N., and Ballari, S. A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14, 2283–2300.
| Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blake, J. I., Mayer, J. J., and Kilgo, J. C. (2005). Industrial operations and current land use. In ‘Ecology and Management of a Forested Landscape: Fifty Years on the Savannah River Site’. (Eds J. C. Kilgo and J. I. Blake.) pp. 12–18. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). ‘Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer–Verlag: New York, NY.)
Chruszcz, B., Clevenger, A. P., Gunson, K. E., and Gibeau, M. L. (2003). Relationships among grizzly bears, highways, and habitat in the Banff–Bow Valley, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81, 1378–1391.
| Relationships among grizzly bears, highways, and habitat in the Banff–Bow Valley, Alberta, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Clevenger, A. P., Chruszcz, B., and Gunson, K. E. (2001). Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife–vehicle collisions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 646–653.
Colino-Rabanal, V. J., Bosch, J., Muñoz, M. J., and Peris, S. J. (2012). Influence of new irrigated croplands on wild boar (Sus scrofa) road kills in NW Spain. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 35, 247–252.
Conover, M. R., Pitt, W. C., Kessler, K. K., DuBow, T. J., and Sanborn, W. A. (1995). Review of human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 407–414.
Crouch, L. C. (1983). Movements of and habitat utilization by feral hogs at the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. M. S. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Dickson, J. G., Mayer, J. J., and Dickson, J. D. (2001). Wild hogs. In ‘Wildlife of Southern Forests: Habitat and Management’. (Ed. J. G. Dickson.) pp. 191–208. (Hancock House Publishers: Blaine, WA.)
Dodd, C. K., Barichivich, W. J., and Smith, L. L. (2004). Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reduction wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida. Biological Conservation 118, 619–631.
| Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reduction wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fliflet, H. R. (2012). Spatial and temporal variation in moose (Alces alces) road crossings. M. Sc. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Gaines, K. F., Porter, D. E., Dyer, S. A., Wein, G. R., Pinder, J. E., and Brisbin, I. L. (2004). Using wildlife as receptor species: a landscape approach to ecological risk assessment. Environmental Management 34, 528–545.
| Using wildlife as receptor species: a landscape approach to ecological risk assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15747408PubMed |
Glista, D. J., DeVault, T. L., and DeWoody, J. A. (2009). A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landscape and Urban Planning 91, 1–7.
| A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gloyne, C. C., and Clevenger, A. P. (2001). Cougar Puma concolor use of wildlife crossing structures on the Trans-Canada highway in Banff National Park, Alberta. Wildlife Biology 7, 117–124.
Groot Bruinderink, G. W. T. A., and Hazebroek, E. (1996). Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe. Conservation Biology 10, 1059–1067.
| Ungulate traffic collisions in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hubbard, M. W., Danielson, B. J., and Schmitz, R. A. (2000). Factors influencing the location of deer–vehicle accidents in Iowa. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64, 707–712.
| Factors influencing the location of deer–vehicle accidents in Iowa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hughes, T. W. (1985). Home range, habitat utilization, and pig survival of feral swine on the Savannah River Plant. M. S. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Huijser, M. P., McGowen, P., Fuller, J., Hardy, A., Kociolek, A., Clevenger, A. P., Smith, D., and Ament, R. (2008). Wildlife-vehicle collision reduction study. Report to Congress. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Huijser, M. P., Holland, T. D., Blank, M., Greenwood, M. C., McGowen, P. T., Hubbard, B., and Wang, S. (2009). The comparison of animal detection systems in a test bed: a quantitative comparison of system reliability and experiences with operation maintenance. Report to the Federal Highway Administration and the Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, MT.
Inbar, M., Shanas, U., and Izhaki, I. (2002). Characterization of road accidents in Israel involving large animals. Israel Journal of Zoology 48, 197–206.
| Characterization of road accidents in Israel involving large animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kurz, J. C., and Marchinton, R. L. (1972). Radiotelemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina. The Journal of Wildlife Management 36, 1240–1248.
| Radiotelemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Land, D., and Lotz, M. (1996). Wildlife crossing designs and use by Florida panthers and other wildlife in southwest Florida. In ‘Highways and Movement of Wildlife: Improving Habitat Connections and Wildlife Passageways across Highway Corridors’. (Eds G. Evink, D. Ziegler, P. Garret and J. Berry.) pp. 323–328. (Florida Department of Transportation: Tallahassee, FL.)
Landes, D. (2009). Wild boar car crashes cost more than elk wrecks: Swedish study. The Local. http://www.thelocal.se/17166/20090126/. [Accessed 11 November 2009]
Malo, J. E., Suárez, F., and Díez, A. (2004). Can we mitigate animal–vehicle accidents using predictive models? Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 701–710.
| Can we mitigate animal–vehicle accidents using predictive models?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mayer, J. J. 2005. Wild hog. In ‘Ecology and Management of a Forested Landscape: Fifty Years on the Savannah River Site’. (Eds J. J. Kilgo and J. I. Blake.) pp. 374–379. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)
Mayer, J. J., and Brisbin, I. L. Jr (2008). ‘Wild Pigs in the United States: Their History, Comparative Morphology, and Current Status.’ 2nd edn. (The University of Georgia Press: Athens, GA.)
Mayer, J. J., and Brisbin, I. L. Jr. (Eds) (2009). ‘Wild Pigs: Biology, Damage, Control Techniques and Management.’ SRNL-RP-2009-00869. (Savannah River National Laboratory: Aiken, SC.)
Mayer J. J. Johns P. E. (2007 ).
McGuire, T. M., and Morrall, J. F. (2000). Strategic highway improvements to minimize environmental impacts within the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 27, 523–532.
| Strategic highway improvements to minimize environmental impacts within the Canadian Rocky Mountain National Parks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer, E. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of deer warning signs. Final report KTRAN:KU-03-6. The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Myers, W. L., Chang, W. Y., Germaine, S. S., Vander Haegen, W. M. and Owens, T. E. (2008). An analysis of deer– and elk–vehicle collision sites along state highways in Washington State. Publication WA-RD 701.1. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA.
Okarma, H., Jedrzejewska, B., Jedrzejewski, W., Krasinski, Z. A., and Milkowski, L. (1995). The roles of predation, snow cover, acorn crop, and man-related factors on ungulate mortality in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Acta Theriologica 40, 197–217.
Pojar, T. M., Prosence, R. A., Reed, D. F., and Woodward, T. N. (1975). Effectiveness of a lighted, animated deer crossing sign. The Journal of Wildlife Management 39, 87–91.
| Effectiveness of a lighted, animated deer crossing sign.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pokorny, B. (2006). Roe deer–vehicle collisions in Slovenia: situation, mitigation strategy and countermeasures. Veterinarski Arkiv 76, S177–S187.
Primi, R., Pelorosso, R., Ripa, M. N., and Amici, A. (2009). A statistical GIS-based analysis of wild boar (Sus scrofa) traffic collisions in a Mediterranean area. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 649–651.
Reed, M. B., Swanson, M. T., Gaither, S., Joseph, J. W., and Henry, W. R. (Eds) (2002). ‘Savannah River Site at Fifty.’ (US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.)
Rogers, E. (2004). An ecological landscape study of deer vehicle collisions in Kent County, Michigan. Report by White Water Associates Inc. Prepared for Kent County Road Commission, Grand Rapids, MI.
Romin, L. A., and Bissonette, J. A. (1996). Deer vehicle collisions: status of state monitoring activities and mitigation efforts. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24, 276–283.
Schley, L., Dufrene, M., Krier, A., and Frantz, A. C. (2008). Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 589–599.
| Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Seiler, A. (2005). Predicting locations of moose–vehicle collisions in Sweden. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 371–382.
| Predicting locations of moose–vehicle collisions in Sweden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singer, F. J., Otto, D. K., Tipton, A. R., and Hable, C. P. (1981). Home ranges, movements, and habitat use of European wild boar in Tennessee. The Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 343–353.
| Home ranges, movements, and habitat use of European wild boar in Tennessee.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van der Ree, R., Heinze, D., McCarthy, M., and Mansergh, I. (2009). Wildlife tunnel enhances population viability. Ecology and Society 14, 7.
West, B. C., Cooper, A. L., and Armstrong, J. B. (2009). Managing wild pigs: a technical guide. Human-Wildlife Interactions Monograph 1, 1–55.
White, D. L., and Gaines, K. F. (2000). The Savannah River Site: site description, land use and management history. Studies in Avian Biology 21, 8–17.
