Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR23097 > Fulltext
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 51(10)

Response of white-tailed deer to removal of invasive wild pigs

Matthew T. McDonough https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6253-7324 A * , Robert A. Gitzen A , Stephen J. Zenas A , Mark D. Smith A , Kurt C. VerCauteren B and Stephen S. Ditchkoff A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

B United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.

* Correspondence to: mtm0075@auburn.edu

Handling Editor: Aaron Wirsing

Wildlife Research 51, WR23097 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23097
Submitted: 11 August 2023  Accepted: 19 September 2024  Published: 2 October 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

With the range expansion of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America during the past decades, there has been an increasing concern with how wild pigs affect native species. An abundance of research on their impacts has been through the lens of damage to anthropogenic resources and plant communities. However, quantitative research on how wild pigs affect populations of native animal species is an understudied topic.

Aims

Our goal was to assess how wild pigs affect white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at a population level by measuring changes in deer abundance as wild pigs are removed. White-tailed deer are an economically valuable game species in North America, and negative impacts of wild pigs on their populations could have trickle-down impacts on conservation funding for all wildlife.

Methods

On three treatment areas (34.07–55.31 km2) and one control area (25.10 km2), we used N-mixture models to compare data from camera-trap surveys of white-tailed deer before and after wild pigs were removed from treatment areas.

Key results

We removed 1851 pigs from the treatment sites between May 2019 and March 2021. We found that wild pigs did not significantly affect white-tailed deer abundance, but that white-tailed deer were 1.12 (1.02–1.23; 95% CL) times as likely to be detected when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with when no pigs were removed. Although results from similar analyses on separate age and sex classes of white-tailed deer exhibited similar results, analyses of impacts on immature males differed.

Conclusions

Our overall results are congruent with those of other research that suggest that wild pigs affect white-tailed deer behaviour at a local scale, although eliminating pigs from an area does not appear to quickly lead to increased abundance of deer.

Implications

Although the interspecific interactions between white-tailed deer and wild pigs are unlikely to lead to a decline in the population of white-tailed deer, removing wild pigs may decrease the behavioural implications of these interactions.

Keywords: camera survey, density estimate, detection, interspecific interaction, invasive species, N-mixture model, white-tailed deer, wild pig.

References

Ballari SA, Cuevas MF, Ojeda RA, Navarro JL (2015) Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a protected area of Argentina: the importance of baiting. Mammal Research 60, 81-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barrett RH (1982) Habitat preferences of feral hogs, deer, and cattle on a Sierra Foothill Range. Journal of Range Management 35, 342-346.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beasley JC, Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ, Smith MD, Vercauteren KC (2018) Research priorities for managing invasive wild pigs in North America. The Journal of Wildlife Management 82, 674-681.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bengsen AJ, Gentle MN, Mitchell JL, Pearson HE, Saunders GR (2014) Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus scrofa in Australia. Mammal Review 44, 135-147.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bevins SN, Pedersen K, Lutman MW, Gidlewski T, Deliberto TJ (2014) Consequences associated with the recent range expansion of nonnative feral swine. BioScience 64, 291-299.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bieber C, Ruf T (2005) Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1203-1213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bolds SA, Lockaby BG, Kalin L, Ditchkoff SS, Smith MD, VerCauteren KC (2022) Wild pig removal reduces pathogenic bacteria in low-order streams. Biological Invasions 24, 1453-1463.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bradley EA, Lockaby G (2021) Invasive wild pigs: a significant disturbance in coastal forests. Forests 12, 1042.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1974) Interference competition and niche theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 71, 3073-3077.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Conover M (2011) Impacts of deer on society. In ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer’. (Ed. DG Hewitt) pp. 399–408. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Cope JT, Alvord BF, Drake AE (1962) Rainfall distribution in Alabama. Progress report series number 84. Auburn University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, AL, USA.

De Steven D, Toner MM (2004) Vegetation of Upper Coastal Plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework. Wetlands 24, 23-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dewitz J, US Geological Survey (2021) National land cover database (NLCD) 2019 products (ver. 2.0, June 2021). US Geological Survey data release.

DeYoung CA (2011) Population dynamics. In ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer’. (Ed. DG Hewitt) pp. 147–180. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

DeYoung RW, Miller KV (2011) White-tailed deer behavior. In ‘Biology and management of white-tailed deer’. (Ed. DG Hewitt) pp. 311–351. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Ditchkoff SS, Welch ER, Jr, Lochmiller RL, Masters RE, Starry WR (2001) Age-specific causes of mortality among male white-tailed deer support mate-competition theory. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65, 552-559.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ditchkoff SS, Mayer JJ (2009) Wild pig food habits. In ‘Wild pigs: biology, damage, control techniques and management’. (Eds JJ Mayer, IL Brisbin) pp. 105–143. (Savannah River National Laboratory: Aiken, SC, USA)

Ditchkoff SS, Bodenchuk MJ (2020) Management of wild pigs. In ‘Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management’. (Eds KC Vercauteren, JC Beasley, SS Ditchkoff, JJ Mayer, GJ Roloff, BK Strickland) pp. 175–198. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Dzięciołowski RM, Clarke CMH, Frampton CM (1992) Reproductive characteristics of feral pigs in New Zealand. Acta Theriologica 37, 259-270.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

D’amore A, Kirby E, McNicholas M (2009) Invasive species shifts ontogenetic resource partitioning and microhabitat use of a threatened native amphibian. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19, 534-541.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Eaton L, Sloman KA, Wilson RW, Gill AB, Harborne AR (2016) Non-consumptive effects of native and invasive predators on juvenile Caribbean parrotfish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 99, 499-508.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Elston JJ, Hewitt DG (2010) Intake of mast by wildlife in Texas and the potential for competition with wild boars. The Southwestern Naturalist 55, 57-66.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Faas CJ, Weckerly FW (2010) Habitat interference by axis deer on white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 698-706.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fay AS, Zenas SJ, Smith MD, Ditchkoff SS (2023) Impacts of wild pigs on acorn availability as a food source for native wildlife. Wildlife Research 50, 1123-1130.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ferretti F, Sforzi A, Lovari S (2011) Behavioural interference between ungulate species: roe are not on velvet with fallow deer. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, 875-887.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Fiske IJ, Chandler RB (2011) unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 1-23.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Freed LA, Cann RL (2009) Negative effects of an introduced bird species on growth and survival in a native bird community. Current Biology 19, 1736-1740.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Galetti M, Camargo H, Siqueira T, Keuroghlian A, Donatti CI, Jorge MLSP, Pedrosa F, Kanda CZ, Ribeiro MC (2015) Diet overlap and foraging activity between feral pigs and native peccaries in the Pantanal. PLoS ONE 10, e0141459.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Garabedian JE, Cox KJ, Vukovich M, Kilgo JC (2023) Co-occurrence of native white-tailed deer and invasive wild pigs: evidence for competition? Ecosphere 14, e4435.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garcelon DK, Ryan KP, Schuyler PT (2005) Application of techniques for feral pig eradication on Santa Catalina Island, California. In ‘Proceedings of the Sixth California Islands Symposium’. (Eds DK Garcelon, CA Schwemm) pp. 331–340. (Institute for Wildlife Studies: Arcata, CA, USA)

Gilbert NA, Clare JDJ, Stenglein JL, Zuckerberg B (2021) Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera-trap data. Conservation Biology 35, 88-100.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gray SM, Roloff GJ, Montgomery RA, Beasley JC, Pepin KM (2020) Wild pig spatial ecology and behavior. In ‘Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management’. (Eds KC VerCauteren, JC Beasley, SS Ditchkoff, JJ Mayer, GJ Roloff, BK Strickland) pp. 33–56. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Hegel CGZ, Santos LR, Marinho JR, Marini MÂ (2019) Is the wild pig the real ‘big bad wolf’? Negative effects of wild pig on Atlantic Forest mammals. Biological Invasions 21, 3561-3574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Holtfreter RW, Williams BL, Ditchkoff SS, Grand JB (2008) Feral Pig detectability with game cameras. In ‘Proceedings of the annual conference: southeast association of fish and wildlife agencies’. (Eds A Eversole, K Wong, L Muller, J Petty) pp. 17–21. (Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies: Corpus Christi, Texas, USA)

Ilse LM, Hellgren EC (1995) Resource partitioning in sympatric populations of collared peccaries and feral hogs in Southern Texas. Journal of Mammalogy 76, 784-799.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jolley DB, Ditchkoff SS, Sparklin BD, Hanson LB, Mitchell MS, Grand JB (2010) Estimate of herpetofauna depredation by a population of wild pigs. Journal of Mammalogy 91, 519-524.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Joseph LN, Elkin C, Martin TG, Possingham HP (2009) Modeling abundance using N-mixture models: the importance of considering ecological mechanisms. Ecological Applications 19, 631-642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Keever AC (2014) Use of N-mixture models for estimating white-tailed deer populations and impacts of predator removal and interspecific competition. MSc thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Keever AC, McGowan CP, Ditchkoff SS, Acker PK, Grand JB, Newbolt CH (2017) Efficacy of N-mixture models for surveying and monitoring white-tailed deer populations. Mammal Research 62, 413-422.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kéry M (2018) Identifiability in N-mixture models: a large-scale screening test with bird data. Ecology 99, 281-288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kilgo JC, Vukovich M, Cox KJ, Larsen M, Mims TT, Garabedian JE (2023) Assessing whole-sounder removal versus traditional control for reducing invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations. Pest Management Science 79, 3033-3042.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Kirkpatrick RL, Pekins PJ (2002) Nutritional value of acorns for wildlife. In ‘Oak forest ecosystems: ecology and management for wildlife’. (Eds WJ McShea, W Healy) pp. 173–181. (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA)

Lewis AA (2021) Pigs by the sounder: wild pigs, whole sounder removal, and their effects on deer and turkey. MSc thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

Lewis AA, Williams BL, Smith MD, Ditchkoff SS (2022) Shifting to sounders: whole sounder removal eliminates wild pigs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 46, e1260.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Loggins RE, Wilcox JT, Van Vuren DH, Sweitzer RA (2002) Seasonal diets of wild pigs in oak woodlands of the central coast region of California. California Fish and Game 88, 28-34.
| Google Scholar |

Mayer JJ, Brisbin IL (2009) Wild pigs: introduction. In ‘Wild pigs: biology, damage, control techniques and management’. (Eds JJ Mayer, IL Brisbin) pp. 1–2. (Savannah River National Laboratory: Aiken, SC, USA)

McClure ML, Burdett CL, Farnsworth ML, Sweeney SJ, Miller RS (2018) A globally distributed alien invasive species poses risks to United States imperiled species. Scientific Reports 8, 5331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

McDonough MT (2023) Population response of eastern wild turkeys and white-tailed deer to removal of wild pigs. MSc thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.

McDonough MT, Ditchkoff SS, Smith MD, Vercauteren KC (2022) A review of the impacts of invasive wild pigs on native vertebrates. Mammalian Biology 102, 279-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McKinley WT (2002) Evaluating infrared camera and other census techniques for white-tailed deer in Mississippi. MSc thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.

Miller KV, Marchinton RL (1995) Harvest strategies. In ‘Quality whitetails: the why and how of quality deer management’. (Eds KV Miller, RL Marchinton) pp. 47–57. (Stackpole Books: Mechanicsburg, PA, USA)

Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 232-237.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Outcalt KW, Brockway DG (2010) Structure and composition changes following restoration treatments of longleaf pine forests on the Gulf Coastal Plain of Alabama. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 1615-1623.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Brien P, Vander Wal E, Koen EL, Brown CD, Guy J, van Beest FM, Brook RK (2019) Understanding habitat co-occurrence and the potential for competition between native mammals and invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) at the northern edge of their range. Canadian Journal of Zoology 97, 537-546.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pérez Carusi LC, Beade MS, Miñarro F, Vila AR, Giménez-Dixon M, Bilenca DN (2009) Relaciones espaciales y numéricas entre venados de las Pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus celer) y chanchos cimarrones (Sus scrofa) en el refugio de vida silvestre Bahía Samborombón, Argentina. Ecologia Austral 19, 63-71 [In Spanish with abstract in Spanish and English].
| Google Scholar |

Perez Carusi LC, Beade MS, Bilenca DN (2017) Spatial segregation among pampas deer and exotic ungulates: a comparative analysis at site and landscape scales. Journal of Mammalogy 98, 761-769.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Price Tack JL (2019) Coyotes, deer, and hunters: applied ecology for informing deer and hunter management. MSc thesis, Auburn University, AL, USA.

Royle JA (2004) N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60, 108-115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Sanguinetti J, Kitzberger T (2010) Factors controlling seed predation by rodents and non-native Sus scrofa in Araucaria araucana forests: potential effects on seedling establishment. Biological Invasions 12, 689-706.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Strickland BK, Smith MD, Smith AL (2020) Wild pig damage to resources. In ‘Invasive wild pigs in North America: ecology, impacts, and management’. (Eds KC Vercauteren, JC Beasley, SS Ditchkoff, JJ Mayer, GJ Roloff, BK Strickland) pp. 143–174. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)

Sugiura N (1978) Further analysis of the data by Akaike’s Information Criterion and the finite corrections. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 7, 13-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Taylor RB, Hellgren EC (1997) Diet of feral hogs in the western South Texas plains. The Southwestern Naturalist 42, 33-39.
| Google Scholar |

Taylor RB, Hellgren EC, Gabor TM, Ilse LM (1998) Reproduction of feral pigs in southern Texas. Journal of Mammalogy 79, 1325-1331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tolleson DR, Rollins D, Pinchak WE, Ivy M, Heirman A (1993) Impact of feral hogs on ground nesting gamebirds. In ‘Feral swine: a compendium for resource managers’. (Eds CW Hanselka, JF Cadenhead) pp. 76–83. (Texas Agricultural Extension Service: San Angelo, TX, USA)

Ward RJ, Griffiths RA, Wilkinson JW, Cornish N (2017) Optimising monitoring efforts for secretive snakes: a comparison of occupancy and N-mixture models for assessment of population status. Scientific Reports 7, 18074.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Webb SL, Gee KL, Strickland BK, Demarais S, DeYoung RW (2010) Measuring fine-scale white-tailed deer movements and environmental influences using GPS collars. International Journal of Ecology 2010, 459610.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |