Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Temporal effects of relative hunter activity on adult male white-tailed deer habitat use

Colby B. Henderson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-6148 A * , Stephen Demarais A , Bronson K. Strickland A , William T. McKinley B and Garrett M. Street C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Deer Ecology and Management Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9690, MS 39762, USA.

B Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, PO Box 451, Jackson, MS 39211, USA.

C Quantitative Ecology and Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, PO Box 9690, MS 39762, USA.

* Correspondence to: colbyhenderson45@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Tom Sullivan

Wildlife Research 51, WR22145 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR22145
Submitted: 17 November 2021  Accepted: 27 April 2023  Published: 6 July 2023

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Predation risk, whether from large carnivores or humans, is a primary driver of movement and habitat selection for ungulates. Throughout much of the geographical range of white-tailed deer, predation risk during autumn and winter is driven by hunters; however, information about how deer respond to hunting pressure during a long hunting season is lacking.

Aims

We aimed to determine how differences in daily temporal exposure to hunting risk affected habitat selection of adult male white-tailed deer.

Methods

We deployed GPS collars on 42 adult male white-tailed deer during the 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 firearm hunting seasons in Mississippi, USA. GPS collars provided fine-scale spatial and temporal information regarding habitat use of our study area.

Key results

We showed a mismatch between what hunters and deer selected; landscape characteristics selected most by hunters were least selected by deer during the day, which we believe has never been documented. Fine-scale temporal analysis showed that deer selected for some areas (food plots) as much as five times more often during the night, when no hunting risk was present, than during the day, when risk was present.

Conclusions

Habitat selection by deer varies depending on the amount of risk that is present. Even in a high-risk heavily hunted area, adult male white-tailed deer can recognise external cues on the landscape, and shift habitat selection both spatially and temporally to favour areas that present less risk.

Implications

This study, to our knowledge, provides the first evidence that white-tailed deer actively selected for habitat characteristics that hunters were not utilising. To minimise the effectiveness of risk-avoidance behaviours used by deer, we suggest hunters moderate temporal hunting effort across time to decrease the risk to which deer are exposed, thereby minimising the response by deer.

Keywords: habitat selection, hunting, Odocoileus virginianus, resource selection function, risk, risk avoidance, temporal, white-tailed deer.

References

Altendorf KB, Laundré JW, López González CA, Brown JS (2001) Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 82, 430-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD (2011) A reassessment of the predation risk allocation hypothesis: a comment on lima and bednekoff. The American Naturalist 177, 143-146.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benhaiem S, Delon M, Lourtet B, Cargnelutti B, Aulagnier S, Hewison AJM, Morellet N, Verheyden H (2008) Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Animal Behaviour 76, 611-618.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Benson JF, Sikich JA, Riley SPD (2016) Individual and population level resource selection patterns of mountain lions preying on mule deer along an urban-wildland gradient. PLoS ONE 11, e0158006.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Brown JS (1999) Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1, 49-71.
| Google Scholar |

Brown JS, Arel Y, Abramsky Z, Kotler BP (1992) Patch use by gerbils (Gerbillus allenbyi) in sandy and rocky habitats. Journal of Mammalogy 73, 821-829.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. Journal of Mammalogy 80, 385-399.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197, 1035.
| Google Scholar |

Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 129-136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Creel S, Winnie JA, Jr. (2005) Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Behaviour 69, 1181-1189.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Creel S, Winnie J, Jr., Maxwell B, Hamlin K, Creel M (2005) Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86, 3387-3397.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63, 1802-1813.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dewitz J (2019) National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2016 Products (ver. 2.0, July 2020) [Data set]. U.S. Geological Survey data release. doi:10.5066/P96HHBIE

Drimaj J, Kamler J, Plhal R, Janata P, Adamec Z, Homolka M (2021) Intensive hunting pressure changes local distribution of wild boar. Human-Wildlife Interactions 15, 22-31.
| Google Scholar |

Edwards SL, Demarais S, Watkins B, Strickland BK (2004) White-tailed deer forage production in managed and unmanaged pine stands and summer food plots in Mississippi White-tailed deer forage production in managed and unmanaged pine stands and summer food plots in Mississippi. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32, 739-745.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Edwards SL, Demarais S, Spencer R (2014) State agency and university cooperative wildlife research: Mississippi’s 37-year success story. Journal of Southeast Association of Fisher and Wildlife Agencies 1, 122-126.
| Google Scholar |

Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Functional Ecology 21, 1003-1015.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gehr B, Bonnot NC, Heurich M, Cagnacci F, Ciuti S, Hewison AM, Hofer E (2020) Stay home, stay safe – site familiarity reduces predation risk in a large herbivore in two contrasting study sites. Journal of Animal Ecology 89, 1329-1339.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Gillies CS, Hebblewhite M, Nielsen SE, Krawchuk MA, Aldridge CL, Frair JL, Saher DJ, Stevens CE, Jerde CL (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 887-898.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Godvik IMR, Loe LE, Vik JO, Veiberg V, Langvatn R, Mysterud A (2009) Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. Ecology 90, 699-710.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hehman MW, Fulbright TE (1997) Use of warm-season food plots by white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 1108-1115.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Henderson CB, Demarais S, Street GM, Strickland BK, McKinley WT (2020) Fine-scale vegetation use by white-tailed deer in a forested landscape during hunting season. Journal of Forest Research 25, 439-443.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hochman V, Kotler BP (2007) Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian Ibex under perceived risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology 18, 368-374.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jayakody S, Sibbald AM, Gordon IJ, Lambin X (2008) Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. Wildlife Biology 14, 81-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jin S, Yang L, Danielson P, Homer C, Fry J, Xian G (2013) A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sensing of Environment 132, 159-175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Johnson MK, Dancak KD (1993) Effects of food plots on white-tailed deer in Kisatchie National Forest. Journal of Range Management 46, 110-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Karns G, Lancia R, DePerno CS, Conner MC (2012) Impact of hunting pressure on adult male white-tailed deer behavior. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 66, 120-125.
| Google Scholar |

Keegan TW, Johnson MK, Nelson BD (1989) American jointvetch improves summer range for white-tailed deer. Journal of Range Management 42, 128-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Keuling O, Massei G (2021) Does hunting affect the behavior of wild pigs? Human–Wildlife Interactions 15, 44-55.
| Google Scholar |

Kohler SL, McPeek MA (1989) Predation risk and the foraging behavior of competing stream insects. Ecology 70, 1811-1825.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lendrum PE, Anderson CR, Jr., Long RA, Kie JG, Bowyer RT (2012) Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development. Ecosphere 3, 1-19.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lima SL, Bednekoff PA (1999) Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. The American Naturalist 153, 649-659.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619-640.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Little AR, Demarais S, Gee KL, Webb SL, Riffell SK, Gaskamp JA, Belant JL (2014) Does human predation risk affect harvest susceptibility of white-tailed deer during hunting season? Wildlife Society Bulletin 38, 797-805.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Little AR, Webb SL, Demarais S, Gee KL, Riffell SK, Gaskamp JA (2016) Hunting intensity alters movement behaviour of white-tailed deer. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 360-369.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lone K, Loe LE, Meisingset EL, Stamnes I, Mysterud A (2015) An adaptive behavioural response to hunting: surviving male red deer shift habitat at the onset of the hunting season. Animal Behaviour 102, 127-138.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Manly BFL, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2007) ‘Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies.’ (Springer Science & Business Media)

Marantz SA, Long JA, Webb SL, Gee KL, Little AR, Demarais S (2016) Impacts of human hunting on spatial behavior of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 94, 853-861.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

MDWFP (2020) Mississippi White-tailed Deer Simulated Mean Conception Date Map. Available at mdwfp.com/wildlife-hunting/deer-program/deer-breeding-date-map

Meiners T, Obermaier E (2004) Hide and seek on two spatial scales – vegetation structure effects herbivore oviposition and egg parasitism. Basic and Applied Ecology 5, 87-94.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mich PM, Wolfe LL, Sirochman TM, Sirochman MA, Davis TR, Lance WR, Miller MW (2008) Evaluation of intramuscular butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine and nasal oxygen insufflation for the chemical immobilization of white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 39, 480-487.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ofstad EG, Markussen SS, Sæther B-E, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Haanes H, Røed KH, Herfindal I (2020) Opposing fitness consequences of habitat use in a harvested moose population. Journal of Animal Ecology 89, 1701-1710.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ordiz A, Støen O-G, Sæbø S, Kindberg J, Delibes M, Swenson JE (2012) Do bears know they are being hunted? Biological Conservation 152, 21-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Padié S, Morellet N, Hewison AJM, Martin J-L, Bonnot N, Cargnelutti B, Chamaillé-Jammes S (2015) Roe deer at risk: teasing apart habitat selection and landscape constraints in risk exposure at multiple scales. Oikos 124, 1536-1546.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Paolini KE, Strickland BK, Tegt JL, VerCauteren KC, Street GM (2018) Seasonal variation in preference dictates space use in an invasive generalist. PLoS ONE 13(7), e0199078.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ranglack DH, Proffitt KM, Canfield JE, Gude JA, Rotella J, Garrott RA (2017) Security areas for elk during archery and rifle hunting seasons. The Journal of Wildlife Management 81, 778-791.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/

Rempel RS, Rodgers AR (1997) Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 525-530.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Roberts AM, Liebgold EB (2008) The effects of perceived mortality risk on habitat selection in a terrestrial salamander. Behavioral Ecology 19, 621-626.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77, 2075-2085.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Severinghaus CW (1949) Tooth development and wear as criteria of age in white-tailed deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 13, 195-216.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Simoneaux TN, Cohen BS, Cooney EA, Shuman RM, Chamberlain MJ, Miller KV (2016) Fine-scale movements of adult male white-tailed deer in northeastern Louisiana during the hunting season. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 3, 210-219.
| Google Scholar |

Street GM, Weckerly FW, Schwinning S (2013) Modeling forage mediated aggregation in a gregarious ruminant. Oikos 122, 929-937.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Street GM, Fieberg J, Rodgers AR, Carstensen M, Moen R, Moore SA, Windels SK, Forester JD (2016) Habitat functional response mitigates reduced foraging opportunity: implications for animal fitness and space use. Landscape Ecology 31, 1939-1953.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tvardikova K, Fuchs R (2012) Tits recognize the potential dangers of predators and harmless birds in feeder experiments. Journal of Ethology 30, 157-165.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer (2017–2018) Published crop-specific data layer, USDA-NASS, Washington, DC. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/ [accessed March 2017; verified March 2017]

Verdolin JL (2006) Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60, 457-464.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Visscher DR, Macleod I, Vujnovic K, Vujnovic D, Dewitt PD (2017) Human risk induced behavioral shifts in refuge use by elk in an agricultural matrix. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41, 162-169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |