Partnering and engaging with Traditional Owners in conservation translocations
Dorian Moro A , Rebecca West B * , Cheryl Lohr C , Ruth Wongawol A and Valdera Morgan AA
B
C
Abstract
Conservation translocations are increasing in number and so too is the interest and expectation from Traditional Owners (TOs) that they will be involved in management occurring on their Country.
Our objectives were to identify the levels of past TO engagement as experienced through the western and TO lenses, examine the key steps, challenges and opportunities that emerged from survey responses, and also to provide a case study of a conservation translocation that describes Indigenous involvement to support a reintroduction of golden bandicoots (Isoodon auratus) in Australia from Martu Country (Western Australia) to Wongkumara and Maljangapa Country (New South Wales).
The key questions the surveys sought to address to western practitioners were as follows: (1) what types of TO involvement were observed; (2) if TOs were not involved in the translocation, was there a reason; and (3) for each translocation project where TOs were involved, (a) why was this engagement sought by their agency; (b) what worked well in terms of involvement and partnerships; and (c) how could these partnerships be improved? From a TO lens, perspectives were sought with a survey addressing the following questions: (1) how were you involved in the translocation; (2) why was it important to you and your community; and (3) ow would you like to be involved in the future?
Of 208 Australian translocations, 27% involved TOs. The following four themes emerged from the survey responses: the need to recognise and adopt the cultural dimension of conservation translocations on Indigenous Country, maintain on-Country relationships between western practitioners and TOs, enable co-ownership of projects, and maintain community links between western and TO practitioners. The golden bandicoot translocation partnership provided a foundation for TO engagement across generations, setting the scene for long-term and future translocation collaboration opportunities.
The perspectives of all participants involved in conservation translocations highlighted a common theme: the need to support TOs to be engaged fairly, to be culturally safe during their engagement, and to enable them to be part of a wider project and community team. The case study highlighted a sequential approach for engaging the TO organisation and supporting TOs to work alongside western practitioners to capture, record and transport animals from their Country to a new (reintroduction) site.
We provide suggestions for non-Indigenous managers and practitioners to consider a cultural dimension to conservation translocations when engaging TOs.
Keywords: Aboriginal, conservation translocation, Indigenous, Martu, Matuwa, partnership, reintroduction, traditional ecological knowledge, Traditional Owner.
References
Abecasis RC, Schmidt L, Longnecker N, Clifton J (2013) Implications of community and stakeholder perceptions of the marine environment and its conservation for MPA management in a small Azorean island. Ocean & Coastal Management 84, 208-219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Armstrong DP, Moro D, Hayward MW, Seddon PJ (2015) Introduction: the development of reintroduction biology in New Zealand and Australia. In ‘Advances in reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna’. (Eds DP Armstrong, MW Hayward, D Moro, PJ Seddon) pp. 1–6. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Austin BJ, Vigilante T, Cowell S, Dutton IM, Djanghara D, Mangolomara S, Puermora B, Bundamurra A, Clement Z (2017) The Uunguu monitoring and evaluation committee: intercultural governance of a land and sea management programme in the Kimberley, Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 18, 124-133.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Barber M, Jackson S (2017) Identifying and categorizing cobenefits in state-supported Australian indigenous environmental management programs: international research implications. Ecology and Society 22, 11.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bennett NJ, Dearden P (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy 44, 107-116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bennett NJ, Di Franco A, Calo A, Nethery E, Niccolini F, Milazzo M, Guidetti P (2019) Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conservation Letters 12, e12640.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1692-1702.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10, 1251-1262.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bessarab D, Ng’andu B (2010) Yarning about yarning as a legitimate method in indigenous research. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies 3, 37-50.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beyerl K, Putz O, Breckwoldt A (2016) The role of perceptions for community-based marine resource management. Frontiers in Marine Science 3, 238.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bradley J (2001) Landscapes of the mind, landscapes of the spirit: negotiating a sentient landscape. In ‘Working on country: contemporary indigenous management of Australia’s Lands and Coastal Regions’. (Eds R Baker, J Davies, E Young) pp. 295–308. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT (Eds) (2019) ‘Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.’ (IPBES Secretariat: Bonn, Germany) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3831673
Cisternas J, Wehi PM, Haupokia N, Hughes F, Hughes M, Germano JM, Longnecker N, Bishop PJ (2019) ‘Get together, work together, write together’: a novel framework for conservation of New Zealand frogs. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 43, 3392.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 8812-8819.
| Google Scholar |
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (2022) Threatened species strategy action plan 2022–2032. (DCCEEW: Canberra, ACT, Australia) Available at https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/action-plan [Verified March 2023]
Fabre P, Bambridge T, Claudet J, Sterling E, Mawyer A (2021) Contemporary Rāhui: placing Indigenous, conservation, and sustainability sciences in community-led conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology 27, 451-463.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hedge P, Bessen B (Eds) (2019) AMSA Indigenous Workshop: summary report – promoting collaborative partnerships for sea country research and monitoring in Western Australia. Report from Workshop Organising Committee to the Australian Marine Sciences Association and the National Environmental Science Program. Marine Biodiversity Hub, AMSA Indigenous Workshop Organising Committee.
Hill R, Davies J, Bohnet IC, Robinson CJ, Maclean K, Pert PL (2015) Collaboration mobilises institutions with scale-dependent comparative advantage in landscape-scale biodiversity conservation. Environmental Science & Policy 51, 267-277.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jefferson RL, Bailey I, Laffoley DA, Richards JP, Attrill MJ (2014) Public perceptions of the UK marine environment. Marine Policy 43, 327-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kitson JC, Cain AM, Johnstone MNTH, Anglem R, Davis J, Grey M, Kaio A, Blair S-R, Whaanga D (2018) Nurihiku cultural water classification system: enduring partnerships between people, disciplines and knowledge systems. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52, 511-525.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Leiper I, Zander KK, Robinson CJ, Carwadine J, Moggridge BJ, Garnett ST (2018) Quantifying current and potential contributions of Australian indigenous peoples to threatened species management. Conservation Biology 32, 1038-1047.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lohr CA, Nilsson K, Sims C, Dunlop J, Lohr MT (2021) Habitat selection by vulnerable golden bandicoots in the arid zone. Ecology and Evolution 11, 10644-10658.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McLean M, Warner B, Markham R, Fischer M, Walker J, Klein C, Hoeberechts M, Dunn DC (2023) Connecting conservation & culture: the importance of Indigenous Knowledge in conservation decision-making and resource management of migratory marine species. Marine Policy 155, 105582.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McLeod I, Schmider J, Creighton C, Gillies C (2018) Seven pearls of wisdom: advice from Traditional Owners to improve engagement of local Indigenous people in shellfish ecosystem restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration 19, 98-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Michel P, Dobson-Waitere A, Hohaia H, McEwan A, Shanahan DF (2019) The reconnection between mana whenua and urban freshwaters to restore the mouri/life force of the Kaiwharawhara. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 43, 3390.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Muhic J, Abbott E, Ward MJ (2012) The warru (Petrogale lateralis MacDonnell Ranges Race) reintroduction project on the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands, South Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 13, 89-92.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ottewell K, Dunlop J, Thomas N, Morris K, Coates D, Byrne M (2014) Evaluating success of translocations in maintaining genetic diversity in a threatened mammal. Biological Conservation 171, 209-219.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Parker KA (2008) Translocations: providing outcomes for wildlife, resource managers, scientists, and the human community. Restoration Ecology 16, 204-209.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pedler RD, West RS, Read JL, Moseby KE, Letnic M, Keith DA, Ryall SR, Kingsford RT (2018) Conservation challenges and benefits of multispecies reintroductions to a national park–a case study from New South Wales, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 24, 397-408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ramos SC (2018) Considerations for culturally sensitive traditional ecological knowledge research in wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 42, 358-365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rayne A, Byrnes G, Collier-Robinson LNT, Hollows J, McIntosh A, Ramsden M, Rupene M, Tamati-Elliffe P, Thoms C, Steeves T (2020) Centring Indigenous knowledge systems to re-imagine conservation translocations. People and Nature 2, 512-526.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Renwick AR, Robinson CJ, Garnett ST, Leiper I, Possingham HP, Carwardine J (2017) Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: an Australian case-study. PLoS ONE 12, e0173876.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Rick K, Byrne M, Cameron S, Cooper SJB, Dunlop J, Hill B, Lohr C, Mitchell NJ, Moritz C, Travouillon KJ, von Takach B, Ottewell K (2023) Population genomic diversity and structure in the golden bandicoot: a history of isolation, extirpation, and conservation. Heredity 131, 374-386.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Schley HL, West IF, Williams CK (2022) Advancing wildlife policy of eastern timber wolves and lake sturgeon through traditional ecological knowledge. Sustainability 14, 3859.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Warburton NM, Travouillon KJ (2016) The biology and palaeontology of the Peramelemorphia: a review of current knowledge and future research directions. Australian Journal of Zoology 64, 151-181.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Whyte KP (2013) On the role of traditional ecological knowledge as a collaborative concept: a philosophical study. Ecological Processes 2, 7.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Woodward E, Hill R, Harkness P, Archer R (Eds) (2020) ‘Our knowledge our way in caring for country: Indigenous-led approaches to strengthening and sharing our knowledge for land and sea management. Best practice guidelines from Australian experiences.’ (NAILSMA and CSIRO: Cairns, Qld, Australia) doi:10.25607/OBP-1565
Zurba M, Ross H, Izurieta A, Rist P, Bock E, Berkes F (2012) Building co-management as a process: problem solving through partnerships in Aboriginal country, Australia. Environmental Management 49, 1130-1142.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |