Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR24046
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)
Contents Vol 51(7)

Citizen science delivers high-value biosecurity surveillance and reporting capability

Erin Roger https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-132X A * , Andrew Turley https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-586X A , Callum Waite https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0474-0122 A , Shandiya Balasubramaniam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-9964 A , Cameron Slatyer https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1042-9460 A and J. Andrew Pearce https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8749-7352 B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Atlas of Living Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

B Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

* Correspondence to: erin.roger@csiro.au

Handling Editor: Stephanie Shwiff

Wildlife Research 51, WR24046 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR24046
Submitted: 19 March 2024  Accepted: 28 May 2024  Published: 25 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Early surveillance and the detection of incursions of species of biosecurity concern are a crucial component of an effective biosecurity system. Citizen science represents an opportunity to engage communities in biosecurity, and to provide mechanisms for citizen scientists to contribute to both monitoring the spread of species already present in country, and reporting new incursions.

Aims

To present an example of how citizen science is being used for environmental biosecurity surveillance in Australia and showcase the value of large data services such as the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), as a connector between citizen science and management.

Methods

We detail how the alert email system was set up, using a bespoke solution implemented in the R programming language. The system works by querying the ALA database for species that match lists provided by management authorities. Alerts can be sent out at national, state/territory and local government scales, as well as defined spatial areas such as national park estates.

Key results

Twelve months in, the top source for alerts comes from iNaturalist (a popular global biodiversity citizen-science platform), with other contributions from a set of biodiversity-reporting applications. Over a 12-month period, the alerts service has provided notifications for over 150 species, including the first public record of an invasive species in Australia.

Conclusions

Systems such as the Biosecurity Alerts Service, provide impact through the connection between communities and decision-making.

Implications

Our findings showed how the advancement of citizen science is interconnected with the advancement of research infrastructure and will ultimately lead to greater scientific and management value of citizen-science data.

Keywords: biodiversity, biosecurity, citizen science, conservation management, ecology, introduced species, invasive species, taxonomy.

References

Aronsson M, Strand ME, Dettki H, Illander H, Olsson J (2023) Practice, pathways and lessons learned from building a digital data flow with tools: focusing on alien invasive species, from occurrence via measures to documentation. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 7, e112337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Atlas of Living Australia (2023) ‘National framework for the sharing of restricted access species data in Australia.’ (Atlas of Living Australia: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Belbin L, Wallis E, Hobern D, Zerger A (2021) The Atlas of Living Australia: history, current state and future directions. Biodiversity Data Journal 9, e65023.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bradshaw CJA, Hoskins AJ, Haubrock PJ, Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Leroy B, Andrews L, Page B, Cassey P, Sheppard AW, Courchamp F (2021) Detailed assessment of the reported economic costs of invasive species in Australia. NeoBiota 67, 511-550.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Byers JE, Smith RS, Pringle JM, Clark GF, Gribben PE, Hewitt CL, Inglis GJ, Johnston EL, Ruiz GM, Stachowicz JJ, Bishop MJ (2015) Invasion expansion: time since introduction best predicts global ranges of marine invaders. Scientific Reports 5(1), 12436.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cadotte MW, Yasui SLE, Livingstone S, MacIvor JS (2017) Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? Biological Invasions 19(12), 3489-3503.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Caley P, Welvaert M, Barry S (2020) Crowd surveillance: estimating citizen science reporting probabilities for insects of biosecuirty concern. Journal of Pest Science 93(1), 543-550.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Carnegie AJ, Nahrung HF (2019) Post-border forest biosecurity in Australia: response to recent exotic detections, current surveillance and ongoing needs. Forests 10(4), 336.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ceccaroni L, Bibby J, Roger E, Flemons P, Michael K, Fagan L, Oliver JL (2019) Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4(1), 29.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chandler M, See L, Copas K, Bonde AMZ, López BC, Danielsen F, Legind JK, Masinde S, Miller-Rushing AJ, Newman G, Rosemartin A, Turak E (2017) Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation 213, 280-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Crall AW, Newman GJ, Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Waller DM, Graham J (2010) Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions 12(10), 3419-3428.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière A-C, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles J-M, Bradshaw CJA, Courchamp F (2021) High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592(7855), 571-576.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Diprose G, Kannemeyer R, Edwards P, Greenaway A (2022) Participatory biosecurity practices: myrtle rust an unwanted pathogen in Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer 78(3), 175-185.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Douch JK, Poupa AM (2021) Citizen science data opens multiple avenues for iridovirus research and prompts first detection of invertebrate iridescent virus 31 in Australia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 183, 107619.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gaertner M, Wilson JRU, Cadotte MW, MacIvor JS, Zenni RD, Richardson DM (2017) Non-native species in urban environments: patterns, processes, impacts and challenges. Biological Invasions 19(12), 3461-3469.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hoffmann BD, Broadhurst LM (2016) The economic cost of managing invasive species in Australia. NeoBiota 31, 1-18.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hulme PE, Ikeda T, Vandvik V, Blanchard R, Camacho-Cervantes M, Herrera I, Koyama A, Morales CL, Munishi LK, Pallewatta PKTNS, Per E, Pergl J, Ricciardi A, Xavier RO (2023) Chapter 3. Drivers affecting biological invasions. In ‘Thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services’. (Eds HE Roy, A Pauchard, P Stoett, T Renard Truong) (IPBES Secretariat: Bonn, Germany)

Meentemeyer RK, Dorning MA, Vogler JB, Schmidt D, Garbelotto M (2015) Citizen science helps predict risk of emerging infectious disease. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13(4), 189-194.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mesaglio T, Callaghan CT (2021) An overview of the history, current contributions and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia. Wildlife Research 48(4), 289-303.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Morris WK, Piirainen E (2023) An automated early warning biosecurity alert system for Finland. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 7, e111424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Noé N, Adriaens T, D’hondt B, Reyserhove L, Desmet P, Oldoni D (2022) LIFE RIPARIAS early alert: using GBIF-mediated data to better manage invasive alien species. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 6, e93879.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pagad S, Genovesi P, Carnevali L, Schigel D, McGeoch MA (2018) Introducing the global register of introduced and invasive species. Scientific Data 5(1), 170202.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Pocock MJO, Tweddle JC, Savage J, Robinson LD, Roy HE (2017) The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PLOS ONE 12(4), e0172579.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pocock MJO, Adriaens T, Bertolino S, Eschen R, Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Roy HE, Teixeira H, de Groot M (2024) Citizen science is a vital partnership for invasive alien species management and research. iScience 27(1), 108623.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Poland TM, Rassati D (2019) Improved biosecurity surveillance of non-native forest insects: a review of current methods. Journal of Pest Science 92(1), 37-49.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Probert AF, Wegmann D, Volery L, Adriaens T, Bakiu R, Bertolino S, Essl F, Gervasini E, Groom Q, Latombe G, Marisavljevic D, Mumford J, Pergl J, Preda C, Roy HE, Scalera R, Teixeira H, Tricarico E, Vanderhoeven S, Bacher S (2022) Identifying, reducing, and communicating uncertainty in community science: a focus on alien species. Biological Invasions 24(11), 3395-3421.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at https://www.R-project.org/

Roger E, Kinsela AS (2023) Science communication is integral to attracting widespread participation in bushfire recovery citizen science. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11, 1156078.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Roger E, Kellie D, Slatyer C, Brenton P, Torresan O, Wallis E, Zerger A (2023) Open access research infrastructures are critical for improving the accessibility and utility of citizen science: a case study of Australia’s national biodiversity infrastructure, the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA). Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 8(1), 56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schacher A, Roger E, Williams KJ, Stenson MP, Sparrow B, Lacey J (2023) Use-specific considerations for optimising data quality trade-offs in citizen science: recommendations from a targeted literature review to improve the ssability and utility for the calibration and validation of remotely sensed products. Remote Sensing 15(5), 1407.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Theobald E, Ettinger AK, Burgess HK, DeBey LB, Schmidt NR, Froehlich HE, Wagner C, HilleRisLambers J, Tewksbury J, Harsch MA, Parrish JK (2015) Global change and local solutions: tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation 181, 236-244.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thomas ML, Gunawardene N, Horton K, Williams A, O’Connor S, McKirdy S, van der Merwe J (2017) Many eyes on the ground: citizen science is an effective early detection tool for biosecurity. Biological Invasions 19(9), 2751-2765.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vall-llosera M, Woolnough AP, Anderson D, Cassey P (2017) Improved surveillance for early detection of a potential invasive species: the alien rose-ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri in Australia. Biological Invasions 19(4), 1273-1284.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

von Gönner J, Herrmann TM, Bruckermann T, Eichinger M, Hecker S, Klan F, Lorke J, Richter A, Sturm U, Voigt-Heucke S, Brink W, Liedtke C, Premke-Kraus M, Altmann C, Bauhus W, Bengtsson L, Büermann A, Dietrich P, Dörler D, Eich-Brod R, Ferschinger L, Freyberg L, Grützner A, Hammel G, Heigl F, Heyen NB, Hölker F, Johannsen C, Kluß T, Kluttig T, Knobloch J, Munke M, Mortega K, Pathe C, Soßdorf A, Stämpfli T, Thiel C, Tönsmann S, Valentin A, Wagenknecht K, Wegener R, Woll S, Bonn A (2023) Citizen science’s transformative impact on science, citizen empowerment and socio-political processes. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 5(1), 11-33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Welvaert M, Caley P (2016) Citizen surveillance for environmental monitoring: combining the efforts of citizen science and crowdsourcing in a quantitative data framework. Springer Plus 5(1), 1890.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Westgate M, Waite C, Balasubramaniam S (2023) koel: Email alerts based on records from a biodiversity data resource. R package version 0.1.0. Available at https://github.com/AtlasOfLivingAustralia/koel

Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (2001) ‘A toolkit of best prevention and management practices for alien invasive species. xvii, 228, 0-85199-569-1.’ CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UK)