Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR23125
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 51(7)

Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) distribution in Uruguay

N. Zambra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4484-5676 A B and R. Ungerfeld https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-2105 B *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centro Universitario Regional Noreste, Universidad de la República, Tacuarembó, Uruguay.

B Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.

* Correspondence to: rungerfeld@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Stephanie Shwiff

Wildlife Research 51, WR23125 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR23125
Submitted: 22 February 2023  Accepted: 7 June 2024  Published: 27 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Sus scrofa is a species that easily adapts to diverse environments and climatic zones. In urban and suburban spaces, its presence negatively impacts soil, crops, and animal production, posing health risks for other animals and even humans. Declared a national pest in Uruguay, it is one of the main predators of sheep. A deeper knowledge of its habitat, current distribution, and the environmental factors that influence its locations is required to develop an adequate programme to control its population.

Aims

To determine the spatial distribution of wild boars in Uruguay and its association with environmental factors concerning livestock production, on the basis of a survey administered to farmers.

Methods

The survey was completed by 2360 farmers, gathering information on the presence of wild boars and other wildlife animals on their farms, methods used for wild boar control, economic damages caused by the species, number of sheep, and types of land-cover besides pastures (native woodlands, shelter forests, pine plantations, and eucalyptus plantations).

Key results

Farms located in the Northeast region, with native woodlands and/or pine plantations, and larger than 500 ha were more likely to report the presence of wild boars. The presence of eucalyptus plantations did not affect the presence of wild boars in any region of the country. While the presence of sheep, free- ranging dogs, or wild boars on neighbouring farms affected the presence of wild boars, the existence of eucalyptus plantations showed no effect across any region of the country. On the other hand, the presence of wild boars increased in association with the presence of pampas foxes (Lycalopex gymnocercus).

Conclusions

These results provide valuable information regarding the current distribution of an invasive exotic ungulate, and factors influencing the probability of reporting its presence.

Implications

This information will serve as a starting point for future research analysing additional ecological and farm characteristics, as well as management strategies in sheep farms aimed at detecting, evading, dissuading and/or controlling this predatory species on the basis of its behaviour and environmental preferences.

Keywords: environment, exotic species, farmers, invasive species, omnivore, pine plantations, sheep predator, survey.

References

Aguirre F, Nouhra E, Urcelay C (2021) Native and non-native mammals disperse exotic ectomycorrhizal fungi at long distances from pine plantations. Fungal Ecology 49, 101012.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Andrade-Núñez MJ, Aide TM (2010) Effects of habitat and landscape characteristics on medium and large mammal species richness and composition in northern Uruguay. Zoologia (Curitiba) 27, 909-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ballari SA, Barrios-García MN (2014) A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Review 44, 124-134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barasona JA, Carpio A, Boadella M, Gortazar C, Piñeiro X, Zumalacárregui C, Vicente J, Viñuela J (2021) Expansion of native wild boar populations is a new threat for semi-arid wetland areas. Ecological Indicators 125, 107563.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA (2012) Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14, 2283-2300.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Battocchio D, Iacolina L, Canu A, Mori E (2017) How much does it cost to look like a pig in a wild boar group? Behavioural Processes 138, 123-126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Brazeiro A (2015) Biodiversidad, conservación y desarrollo en Uruguay. In ‘Eco-Regiones de Uruguay: Biodiversidad, Presiones y Conservación. Aportes a la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad’. (Ed. A Brazeiro) pp. 10–15. (Facultad de Ciencias: Montevideo, Uruguay)

Brazeiro A, Achkar M, Toranza C, Bartesaghi L (2020) Agricultural expansion in Uruguayan grasslands and priority areas for vertebrate and woody plant conservation. Ecology and Society 25, 15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Information theory and log-likelihood models: a basis for model selection and inference. In ‘Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach’. (Eds K Burnham, D Anderson) pp. 49–97. (Springer: New York, United States)

Caruso N, Lucherini M, Fortin D, Casanave EB (2016) Species-specific responses of carnivores to human-induced landscape changes in central Argentina. PLoS ONE 11, e0150488.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Caruso N, Valenzuela AEJ, Burdett CL, Luengos Vidal EM, Birochio D, Casanave EB (2018) Summer habitat use and activity patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa in rangelands of central Argentina. PLoS ONE 13, e0206513.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Choquenot D, Ruscoe WA (2003) Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of wild pigs. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 14-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cravino A, Brazeiro A (2021) Grassland afforestation in South America: local scale impacts of eucalyptus plantations on Uruguayan mammals. Forest Ecology and Management 484, 118937.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cuevas MF, Novillo A, Campos C, Dacar MA, Ojeda RA (2010) Food habits and impact of rooting behaviour of the invasive wild boar, Sus scrofa, in a protected area of the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 74, 1582-1585.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cuevas MF, Ojeda RA, Dacar MA, Jaksic FM (2013) Seasonal variation in feeding habits and diet selection by wild boars in a semi-arid environment of Argentina. Acta Theriologica 58, 63-72.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cuevas MF, Ballari SA, Ojeda RA, Skewes O (2021) Wild boar invasion in Argentina and Chile: ecology, impacts, and distribution. In ‘Biological invasions in the South American Anthropocene’. (Eds FM Jaksic, SA Castro) pp. 203–229. (Springer Nature: Switzerland)

da Rosa CA, de Almeida Curi NH, Puertas F, Passamani M (2017) Alien terrestrial mammals in Brazil: current status and management. Biological Invasions 19, 2101-2123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

DGF (2021) Cartografía Nacional Forestal 2021. Dirección General Forestal. Available at https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/publicaciones/cartografia-nacional-forestal-2021 [Accessed 21 January 2022]

DIEA (2019) Anuario Estadístico de DIEA 2019. Oficina de Estadísticas Agropecuarias (DIEA), Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Uruguay. Available at https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/publicaciones/anuario-estadistico-diea-2019 [Accessed 21 August 2023]

Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65, 169.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dürr S, Dhand NK, Bombara C, Molloy S, Ward MP (2017) What influences the home range size of free-roaming domestic dogs? Epidemiology and Infection 145, 1339-1350.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dykstra AM, Baruzzi C, VerCauteren K, Strickland B, Lashley M (2023) Biological invasions disrupt activity patterns of native wildlife: an example from wild pigs. Food Webs 34, e00270.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

EGN (2016) Encuesta Ganadera Nacional. Banco Central del Uruguay (BCU) – Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca, Uruguay. Available at https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/datos-y-estadisticas/estadisticas/resultados-encuesta-ganadera-nacional-2016 [Accessed 21 August 2023]

García G, Vergara J, Lombardi R (2011) Genetic characterization and phylogeography of the wild boar Sus scrofa introduced into Uruguay. Genetics and Molecular Biology 34, 329-337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Garza SJ, Tabak MA, Miller RS, Farnsworth ML, Burdett CL (2018) Abiotic and biotic influences on home-range size of wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Journal of Mammalogy 99, 97-107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Greco I, Fedele E, Salvatori M, Rustichelli MG, Mercuri F, Santini G, Rovero F, Lazzaro L, Foggi B, Massolo A, De Pietro F, Zaccaroni M (2021) Guest or pest? Spatio-temporal occurrence and effects on soil and vegetation of the wild boar on Elba island. Mammalian Biology 101, 193-206.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hernández C, Sade S, Rau J (2017) Dieta del jabalí (Sus scrofa), invasor biológico reciente del parque nacional puyehue, sur de Chile. Mastozoología Neotropical 24, 467-473.
| Google Scholar |

INUMET (2021) Características climáticas. Instituto Uruguayo de Meteorología. Available at https://www.inumet.gub.uy/clima/estadisticas-climatologicas/caracteristicas-climaticas [Accessed 14 December 2021]

Johann F, Handschuh M, Linderoth P, Dormann CF, Arnold J (2020) Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecology 20, 4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lantschner M-V, Rusch V, Hayes JP (2012) Do exotic pine plantations favour the spread of invasive herbivorous mammals in Patagonia? Austral Ecology 38, 338-345.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M (2000) 100 of the World’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group, IUCN, Auckland, New Zeland.

Marcos A, Carpinetti B, Ferro N, Aronowicz T, Dassa L (2020) Percepción del impacto de cerdos cimarrones (jabalíes) sobre la producción agropecuaria de Argentina. Revista Veterinaria 31, 131-136.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mayer JJ (2009) Biology of wild pigs: wild pig physical characteristics. In ‘Wild pigs: biology, damage, control techniques and management’. (Eds JJ Mayer, IL Brisbin Jr) pp. 25–50. (Savannah River National Laboratory: South Carolina)

McDonough MT, Ditchkoff SS, Smith MD, Vercauteren KC (2022) A review of the impacts of invasive wild pigs on native vertebrates. Mammalian Biology 102, 279-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Meek PD (1999) The movement, roaming behaviour and home range of free-roaming domestic dogs, Canis lupus familiaris, in coastal New South Wales. Wildlife Research 26, 847-855.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

MGAP (2018a) Resultados de la Encuesta Ganadera Nacional 2016. Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca. Available at https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/datos-y-estadisticas/estadisticas/resultados-encuesta-ganadera-nacional-2016 [Accessed 14 December 2021]

MGAP (2018b) Superficie en hectáreas de bosque nativo por departamento (2016). Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca. Available at https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/sites/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/files/2020-01/Datos%20de%20superficie%20forestal%20al%202018.pdf [Accessed 28 January 2022]

Morais TA, Rosa CA, Azevedo CS, Viana-Junior AB, Santos P, Passamani M (2019) Factors affecting space use by wild boars (Sus scrofa) in high-elevation tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Zoology 97, 971-978.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

National Decree N° 463/982 (1982) Declaración de plaga nacional al jabalí europeo, autorizándose su libre caza en todo el territorio nacional [Declaration of a national pest to the european boar, authorizing its free hunting throughout the national territory]. National Registry of Laws and Decrees, Vol. 2, Semester: 2, Year: 1982. p. 1101. Available at https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/decretos/463-1982 [Accessed 28 September 2023]

Oliver W, Brisbin I, Takahashi S (1993) The Eurasian Wild Boar, Sus scrofa. In ‘Boars, peccaries, and hippos: status survey and conservation action plan’. (Ed. WLR Oliver) pp. 112–121. (IUCN - The World Conservation Union: Gland, Switzerland)

OTU (2021) Indicadores. Observatorio Territorio Uruguay. Available at https://otu.opp.gub.uy/filtros/buscar_indicadores [Accessed 28 January 2022]

Podgórski T, Bas G, Jedrzejewska B, Sönnichsen L, Sniezko S, Jedrzejewski W, Okarma H (2013) Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area. Journal of Mammalogy 94, 109-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33, 43-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Skewes O, Jaksic FM (2015) History of the introduction and present distribution of the European Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Chile. Mastozoología Neotropical 22, 113-124.
| Google Scholar |

Stillfried M, Gras P, Busch M, Börner K, Kramer-Schadt S, Ortmann S (2017) Wild inside: Urban wild boar select natural, not anthropogenic food resources. PLoS ONE 12, e0175127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Virgós E (2002) Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) occurrence in highly fragmented Mediterranean landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 430-435.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wesson G (2008) Feral pig (Sus scrofa) survival, home range, and habitat use at Lowndes county wildlife management area Alabama. Master of Science thesis, Auburn University, United States. Available at https://etd.auburn.edu//handle/10415/1108

Zambra N, Piaggio J, Ungerfeld R (2022) Characteristics of sheep farms and livestock practices that influence sheep predation in Uruguay. Mastozoología Neotropical 29, e0566.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |