Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR07020
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 34(4)

Conservation risks of exotic chukars (Alectoris chukar) and their associated management: implications for a widely introduced phasianid

Randy T. Larsen A D , Jerran T. Flinders A , Dean L. Mitchell B and Ernest R. Perkins C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 275 WIDB, BYU, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

B Upland Game Program Coordinator, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, PO Box 146301, Salt Lake City, UT 84114, USA.

C Upland Game Advisory Council, 3087 Maxine Drive, Layton, UT 84040, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: randy_larsen@byu.edu

Wildlife Research 34(4) 262-270 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07020
Submitted: 20 February 2007  Accepted: 22 May 2007   Published: 28 June 2007

Abstract

Chukars (Alectoris chukar) have been widely introduced throughout the world. Their introductions and associated management for sport hunting have the potential to affect native ecosystems in a variety of ways. Our specific objectives were: (1) to document species using water developments designed to benefit chukar populations to determine whether, and at what prevalence, exotic species appear to use, and presumably benefit from, additional watering points; (2) to describe chukar diet with specific reference to cheatgrass and other exotic plant seeds; and (3) to determine whether chukars are a likely vector for dispersal of cheatgrass and/or other plant seeds via passage through the gut. In total, 27 different wildlife species were photographed across all 36 sampled water developments. Three exotic species were photographed to include chukars, rock dove (Columba livia), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes), with the latter two species photographed at only two and one site respectively. Mean number of species photographed (5.69 ± 1.09) ranged from 1 to 13, but was estimated near 10 after accounting for sampling time. Cheatgrass seed was found in 76.3% of crops and constituted 45.2% of dry weight. Thirteen plants germinated from 503 chukar faecal droppings. We found no evidence of widespread use of water points designed for chukars by other exotic species or dispersal of cheatgrass seed via passage through the gut. Chukars appear (at least initially) benign and they are not likely to be major vectors in plant seed dispersal. Furthermore, chukars could foster localised plant diversity in that they consume large quantities of primarily exotic plant seed and do not show a propensity for dispersal of seeds through faecal droppings.


Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Utah Upland Game Advisory Committee for their support and volunteer time along with Travis Proctor and other members of the Utah Chukar and Wildlife Foundation. The Nevada Chukar Foundation, Carson Valley Chukar Club, Water for Wildlife Foundation, Pershing County Chukars Unlimited, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Brigham Young University, Pheasants Forever, and Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife are thanked for financial support of this research. Additionally, anonymous reviewers are thanked for their insightful criticism.


References

Alcorn, J. R. , and Richardson, F. (1951). The chukar partridge in Nevada. Journal of Wildlife Management 15, 265–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ali S. , and Ripley S. D. (2001). ‘Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan.’ (Oxford University Press: New Delhi.)

Alkon, P. U. , Degen, A. A. , Pinshow, B. , and Shaw, P. J. (1985). Phenology, diet, and water turnover rates of Negev Desert chukars. Journal of Arid Environments 9, 51–61.
Benolkin P. J. (1988). Strategic placement of artificial watering devices for use by chukar partridge. In ‘Wildlife Water Development Symposium’. (Eds G. K. Tsukamoto and S. J. Stiver.) pp. 59–62. (Las Vegas, NV.)

Billings W. D. (1990). Bromus tectorum, a biotic cause of ecosystem impoverishment in the Great Basin. In ‘Patterns and Processes of Biotic Impoverishment’. (Ed. G. M. Woodell.) pp. 301–302. (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

Billings W. D. (1994). Ecological impacts of cheatgrass and resultant fire on ecosystems in the western Great Basin. In ‘Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands’. (Eds S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen.) pp. 22–30. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Boise, ID.)

Brown D. E. (1997). Water for wildlife: belief before science. In ‘Symposium on Environmental, Economic, and Legal Issues Related to Rangeland Water Development’. pp. 9–16. (The Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology, Arizona State University: Tempe, AZ.)

Broyles, B. (1995). Desert wildlife water developments: questioning use in the southwest. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 663–675.
Broyles B. (1997). Reckoning real costs and secondary benefits of artificial game waters in southwestern Arizona. In ‘Symposium on Environmental, Economic, and Legal Issues Related to Rangeland Water Development’. pp. 236–253. (The Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology, Arizona State University: Tempe, AZ.)

Broyles, B. , and Cutler, T. L. (1999). Effect of surface water on desert bighorn sheep in the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Arizona. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 1082–1088.
Chatterton N. J. (1994). Fructan metabolism and cool-temperature growth in cheatgrass. In ‘Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands’. (Eds S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen.) pp. 333–336. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Boise, ID.)

Christensen G. C. (1952). ‘An Ecological Study of the Chukar Partridge in Western Nevada.’ (University of Nevada: Reno, NV.)

Christensen G. C. (1954). The Chukar partridge in Nevada. Biological Bulletin No. 1. Nevada Fish and Game Commission, Carson City, Nevada.

Christensen G. C. (1970). The chukar partridge: its introduction, life history, and management. Biological Bulletin No. 4. Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada.

Christensen G. C. (1996). Chukar (Alectoris chukar). In ‘The Birds of North America’. No. 258. (Eds A. Poole and F. Gill.) (The Academy of Natural Sciences: Philadelphia, PA, & The American Ornithologists’ Union: Washington, DC.)

Churchwell, R. , Ratti, J. T. , and Endelmann, F. (2004). Comparison of fall and winter food habits for sympatric chukar and gray partridge in Hells Canyon of Idaho and Oregon. Northwest Science 78, 42–47.
Cook C. W. , and Harris L. E. (1968). Nutritive value of seasonal ranges. Bulletin No. 472. Utah State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Logan, Utah.

Cox G. W. (1999). ‘Alien Species in North America and Hawaii: Impacts on Natural Ecosystems.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Cramp S. , and Simmons K. E. L. (Eds) (1980). ‘Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Cutler, T. L. , and Swann, D. E. (1999). Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27, 571–581.
D’Antonio C. M. , Meyerson L. A. , and Denslow J. (2001). Exotic species and conservation: research needs. In ‘Conservation Biology Research Priorities for the Next Decade’. (Eds M. E. Soulé and G. H. Orians.) pp. 59–80. (Island: Washington, DC.)

Dayani, A. (1986). Fall food items utilized by chukars in central Alborz protected region, Iran. Linzer Biologische Beitraege 18, 95–99.
Dement’ev G. P. , and Gladkov N. A. (1952). ‘Birds of the Soviet Union.’ (Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd. 1967: Jerusalem.)

Devos J. C. Jr , Ballard W. B. , and Rosenstock S. S. (1997). Research design considerations to evaluate efficacy of wildlife water developments. In ‘Symposium on Environmental, Economic, and Legal Issues Related to Rangeland Water Development’. pp. 606–612. (The Center for the Study of Law, Science and Technology, Arizona State University: Tempe, AZ.)

Dice L. R. (1943). ‘The Biotic Provinces of North America.’ (University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI.)

Etchécopar, R. D. (1955). L’acclimation des oiseaux en France au cours des 100 dernieres annees. La Terre et al Vie 102, 42–53.
Fenneman N. M. (1931). ‘Physiography of the Western United States.’ (McGraw-Hill Co.: New York, NY.)

Galbreath D. S. , and Moreland R. (1953). The chukar partridge in Washington. Biological bulletin No. 11. Washington State Game Department, Washington.

Goebel, C. J. , and Berry, G. (1976). Selectivity of range grass seeds by local birds. Journal of Range Management 29, 393–395.
Lever C. (1977). ‘The Naturalized Animals of the British Isles.’ (Hutchinson and Company: London.)

Lever C. (1987). ‘Naturalized Birds of the World.’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.)

Long J. L. (1981). ‘Introduced Birds of the World; the Worldwide History, Distribution, and Influence of Birds Introduced to New Environments.’ (Universe Books: New York.)

Lowry J. H. J. , Ramsey R. D. , Boykin K. , Bradford D. , Comer P. , et al. (2005). Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project: final report on land cover mapping methods. RS/GIS Laboratory, Logan, Utah.

Mack, R. N. (1981). Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronical. Agro-Ecosystems 7, 145–165.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mack R. N. (1989). Temperate grasslands vulnerable to plant invasions: characteristics and consequences. In ‘Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective’. (Ed. J. A. Drake.) pp. 155–179. (John Wiley: London.)

Magurran A. E. (1988). ‘Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Mayland H. F. , Murray R. B. , and Shewmaker G. E. (1994). Forage yield and quality trends of annual grasses in the Great Basin. In ‘Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands’. (Eds S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen.) pp. 387–391. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Boise, ID.)

Myers J. H. , and Bazley D. (2003). ‘Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Naifa L. (1995). Ecological investigations of chukar partridge in northwest China. In ‘Annual Review of World Pheasant Association’. pp. 44–48.

Nasri, M. , and Doescher, P. S. (1995). Effect of temperature on growth of cheatgrass and Idaho fescue. Journal of Range Management 48, 406–409.
Nevada Department of Wildlife (1999). Wildlife water development atlas. Nevada Division of Wildlife, Reno, Nevada.

Novak, S. J. , and Mack, R. N. (2001). Tracing plant introduction and spread: genetic evidence from Bromus (cheatgrass). Bioscience 51, 114–122.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pellent M. , and Hall C. (1994). Distribution of two exotic grasses on intermountain rangelands: status in 1992. In ‘Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands’. (Eds S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen.) pp. 109–112. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Ogden, UT.)

Peterson L. (2001). ‘Alectoris chukar.’ Animal Diversity Web. (University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI.) Available at: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu. [Accessed 28 June 2006.]

Pyke D. A. , and Novak S. J. (1994). Cheatgrass demography–establishment attributes, recruitment, ecotypes, and genetic variability. In ‘Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands’. (Eds S. B. Monsen and S. G. Kitchen.) pp. 12–21. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Boise, ID.)

Roemer, G. W. , Donlan, C. J. , and Courchamp, F. (2001). Golden eagles, feral pigs, and insular carnivores: how exotic species turn native predators into prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 791–796.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Rosenstock S. S. , O’Brien C. S. , Waddell R. B. , and Rabe M. J. (2004). Studies of wildlife water developments in southwestern Arizona: wildlife use, water quality, wildlife diseases, wildlife mortalities, and influences on native pollinators. Bulletin No. 8. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona.

Ryan, C. S. (1906). On European and other birds liberated in Victoria: presidential address. Emu 5, 110–119.
Schulter D. , and Ricklefs R. E. (1993). Species diversity: an introduction to the problem. In ‘Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives’. (Eds R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter.) pp. 1–10. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago.)

Scott M. (1994). Nevada Division of Wildlife 300 gallon guzzler design. Nevada Department of Wildlife, Reno, Nevada.

Stewart, G. , and Hull, A. C. (1949). Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) – an ecologic intruder in southern Idaho. Ecology 30, 58–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Whisenant S. G. (1990). Changing fire frequencies on Idaho’s Snake River Plains: ecological and management implications. In ‘Symposium on Cheatgrass Invasion, Shrub Die-off, and Other Aspects of Shrub Biology and management’. (Eds E. D. McArthur, E. M. Romney, S. D. Smith and P. T. Tueller.) pp. 4–10. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: Las Vegas, NV.)

Williams, G. R. (1950). Chukar in New Zealand. New Zealand Science Review 8, 2–6.
Yanushevich A. I. (1966). Acclimatization of animals in the USSR. In ‘Proceedings of a Conference on Acclimatization of Animals in the USSR, Frunze, 10–15 May 1963’ (P.S.T.: Jerusalem.)

Zembal R. L. (1977). ‘The Feeding Habits of the Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar) in the Argus and Coso Mountains of California.’ (California State University: Long Beach, CA.)

Zouhar K. (2003). Bromus tectorum. In ‘Fire Effects Information System’. (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.) Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us. [Accessed 28 June 2006.]