Penetration of remnant edges by noisy miners (Manorina melanocephala) and implications for habitat restoration
Michael F. Clarke A B and Joanne M. Oldland AA Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: M.Clarke@latrobe.edu.au
Wildlife Research 34(4) 253-261 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR06134
Submitted: 11 October 2006 Accepted: 23 May 2007 Published: 28 June 2007
Abstract
The noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) is a large, communally breeding colonial native honeyeater renowned for aggressively excluding virtually all other bird species from areas they occupy. In the woodlands of southern and eastern Australia, numerous studies have identified the domination of remnants by noisy miners as having a profound negative effect on woodland bird communities. Despite this, very little is known about the habitat characteristics that make domination of a site by noisy miners more likely. This study investigated the depth from edges that noisy miners penetrated into large woodland remnants (>48 ha) within Victoria and attempted to identify habitat characteristics that influenced the depth to which they penetrated. Penetration depth differed significantly across four broad habitat types but commonly ranged from 150 m to more than 300 m from the remnant edge. If noisy miners colonise a site, their capacity to penetrate in from a remnant edge has implications for the size that remnants need to be (>36 ha) to contain any core ‘noisy-miner-free’ habitat and the width that habitat corridors need to be to avoid domination by noisy miners (>600 m). Broad differences in habitat type and the abundance of noisy miners at a site were the most powerful predictors of penetration distance. The density of canopy trees on a site was the only other habitat variable contributing to the most parsimonious model of penetration depth. Decreasing density of trees was associated with increasing penetration depth by noisy miners.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Australian Research Council to Dr Michael Clarke. We are grateful to Rick Taylor for providing unpublished data. David and Ruth Read provided vital local knowledge and warm hospitality in Gippsland. Thank you to Merilyn Grey and Ian Davidson for their knowledgeable input. This paper also benefited greatly from the constructive comments of Damon Oliver, Carla Catterall and Ralph Mac Nally. Finally, we are grateful to Daniel Hesketh, Lauren Brown and Monica Hersburgh for assisting in the field.
Barrett, G. W. , Ford, H. A. , and Recher, H. F. (1994). Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 245–256.
Brooker, L. (2002). The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landscape and Urban Planning 60, 185–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Catterall, C. P. , Kingston, M. B. , and Park, K. (1997). Use of remnant forest habitat by birds during winter in subtropical Australia: patterns and processes. Pacific Conservation Biology 3, 262–274.
Chevan, A. , and Sutherland, M. (1991). Hierarchical partitioning. American Statistician 45, 90–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dow, D. D. (1977). Indiscriminate interspecific aggression leading to almost sole occupancy of space by a single species of bird. Emu 77, 115–121.
Ford, H. A. , and Bell, H. (1981). Density of birds in eucalypt woodland affected to varying degrees by dieback. Emu 81, 202–208.
Ford, H. A. , Barrett, G. W. , Saunders, D. A. , and Recher, H. F. (2001). Why have birds in the woodlands of southern Australia declined? Biological Conservation 97, 71–88.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garrott, R. A. , White, P. J. , and Vanderbilt-White, C. A. (1993). Overabundance: an issue for conservation biologists? Conservation Biology 7, 946–949.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Loyn, R. H. , Runnalls, R. G. , Forward, G. W. , and Tyers, J. (1983). Territorial bell miners and other birds affecting populations of insect prey. Science 221, 1411–1412.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, 58–62.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robinson, D. (1991). Threatened birds in Victoria: their distributions, ecology and future. Victorian Naturalist 108, 67–77.
Trzcinski, M. K. , Fahrig, L. , and Merriam, G. (1999). Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9, 586–593.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watson, J. , Freudenberger, D. , and Paull, D. (2001). An assessment of the focal-species approach for conserving birds in variegated landscapes in southeastern Australia. Conservation Biology 15, 1364–1373.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilkins, S. , Keith, D. A. , and Adam, P. (2003). Measuring success: evaluating the restoration of a grassy eucalypt woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia. Restoration Ecology 11, 489–503.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |