Likelihood of implementing fuel reduction treatments on nonindustrial private forest lands
Anusha Shrestha
A C , Robert K. Grala A , Stephen C. Grado A , Scott D. Roberts A and Jason S. Gordon B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Forestry, College of Forest Resources, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Box 9681, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
B Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email: anushashresthaa@gmail.com
International Journal of Wildland Fire 30(8) 625-635 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20114
Submitted: 25 July 2020 Accepted: 4 May 2021 Published: 14 June 2021
Abstract
Nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) landowners are a dominant forest landownership group in the south-eastern United States and play a crucial role in regular fuel management for effective landscape-level wildfire hazard reduction. However, little is known about their intentions to implement fuel reduction treatments in the future. This study estimated the likelihood that NIPF landowner will implement a fuel reduction treatment in the next 5 years using a binary logistic regression model. This likelihood was associated with landowner attitudes towards wildfires, forest landownership and socioeconomic characteristics, and forest location attributes. Approximately 30% of landowners were likely to implement a fuel reduction treatment and a majority were interested in treating pine plantations. Management of undesired vegetation, promotion of tree growth, wildlife habitat improvements and reduction of wildfire severity were primary motivations for implementing treatments. Past implementation of fuel reduction treatments, previous wildfire experiences, concern about wildfire-related property damage, familiarity with wildfire prevention programs, ecosystem service maintenance as an ownership objective, forest land area owned and implementation of fuel treatments by neighbouring landowners were positively associated with the likelihood of fuel reduction treatments. Findings will be helpful in developing more effective programs encouraging landowners to regularly treat hazardous fuels in their forests.
Keywords: chemical vegetation control, fuel treatment costs, fuel treatment objectives, liability concerns, mechanical vegetation control, pine plantations, prescribed burning.
References
Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.| Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA, Haiganoush P (2012) Analyzing wildfire exposure and source – sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape. Forest Ecology and Management 267, 271–283.
| Analyzing wildfire exposure and source – sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aguilar FX, Kelly MC (2019) US family forest management coupling natural and human systems: Role of markets and public policy instruments. Landscape and Urban Planning 188, 43–53.
| US family forest management coupling natural and human systems: Role of markets and public policy instruments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.
| The theory of planned behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Amacher GS, Malik AS, Haight RG (2005) Nonindustrial private landowners, fires, and the wildland-urban interface. Forest Policy and Economics 7, 796–805.
| Nonindustrial private landowners, fires, and the wildland-urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 396–402.
| Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bhuiyan TH, Moseley MC, Medal HR, Rashidi E, Grala RK (2019) A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for incentivizing fuel reduction treatment under uncertain landowner behavior. European Journal of Operational Research 277, 699–718.
| A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for incentivizing fuel reduction treatment under uncertain landowner behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2012) Trying not to get burned: Understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environmental Management 50, 1139–1151.
| Trying not to get burned: Understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23001246PubMed |
Busby G, Albers HJ (2010) Wildfire risk management on a landscape with public and private ownership: Who pays for protection? Environmental Management 45, 296–310.
| Wildfire risk management on a landscape with public and private ownership: Who pays for protection?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20087585PubMed |
Butler BJ, Wear DN (2013) Forest ownership dynamics of southern forests. In ‘The Southern Forests Future Projects Technical Report.’ (Eds DN Wear, JG Greis) USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, GTR SRS-178, pp. 103–121. (Ashville, NC, USA)
Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson BJ, Andrejczyk K, Butler SM, Markowski-Lindsay M (2016) Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: Findings from the USDA Forest Service’s National Woodland Owner Survey. Journal of Forestry 114, 638–647.
| Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: Findings from the USDA Forest Service’s National Woodland Owner Survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Butler BJ, Miles PD, Hansen MH (2019) National Woodland Owner Survey Table Maker web-application version 3.0. USDA, Forest Service, Northern Research Station (Amherst, MA, USA). Available at https://apps.fs.usda.gov/nwos/tablemaker.jsp
Canadas MJ, Novais A, Marques M (2016) Wildfires, forest management and landowners’ collective action: A comparative approach at the local level. Land Use Policy 56, 179–188.
| Wildfires, forest management and landowners’ collective action: A comparative approach at the local level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carroll MS, Cohn PJ, Blatner KA (2004) Private and tribal forest landowners and fire risk: A two-county case study in Washington State. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 2148–2158.
| Private and tribal forest landowners and fire risk: A two-county case study in Washington State.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Champ PA, Donovan GH, Barth CM (2013) Living in a tinderbox: Wildfire risk perceptions and mitigating behaviours. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 832–840.
| Living in a tinderbox: Wildfire risk perceptions and mitigating behaviours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Collins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles JJ (2010) Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry 108, 24–31.
Dahal RP, Henderson JE, Munn IA, Grala RK (2017) Forestry in Mississippi: The contribution of the industry to the Mississippi economy: an input-output analysis. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Research Bulletin FO464 (Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS)
Dillon GK (2015) Wildfire hazard potential (WHP) for the conterminous United States (270-m GRID), version 2014 classified. 1st edition. (Forest Service Research Data Archive: Fort Collins, CO)
Dupéy LN, Smith JW (2018) An integrative review of empirical research on perceptions and behaviors related to prescribed burning and wildfire in the United States. Environmental Management 61, 1002–1018.
| An integrative review of empirical research on perceptions and behaviors related to prescribed burning and wildfire in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29572559PubMed |
Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 117–128.
| A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finney MA, McHugh CW, Grenfell IC (2005) Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 1714–1722.
| Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer AP (2011) Reducing hazardous fuels on nonindustrial private forests: Factors influencing landowner decisions. Journal of Forestry 109, 260–266.
| Reducing hazardous fuels on nonindustrial private forests: Factors influencing landowner decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer AP, Charnley S (2012) Risk and cooperation: Managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes. Environmental Management 49, 1192–1207.
| Risk and cooperation: Managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22525987PubMed |
Fischer AP, Kline JD, Ager AA, Charnley S, Olsen KA (2014) Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners’ fuel reduction activities in Oregon’s (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 143–153.
| Objective and perceived wildfire risk and its influence on private forest landowners’ fuel reduction activities in Oregon’s (USA) ponderosa pine ecoregion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Floress K, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Koshollek A, Butler S, Allred SB (2019) Factors associated with family forest owner actions: A vote-count meta-analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 188, 19–29.
| Factors associated with family forest owner actions: A vote-count meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gan J, Jarrett A, Gaither CJ (2015) Landowner response to wildfire risk: Adaptation, mitigation or doing nothing. Journal of Environmental Management 159, 186–191.
| Landowner response to wildfire risk: Adaptation, mitigation or doing nothing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26074470PubMed |
Gordon JS, Matarrita-Cascante D, Stedman RC, Luloff AE (2010) Wildfire perception and community change. Rural Sociology 75, 455–477.
| Wildfire perception and community change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gordon JS, Luloff A, Stedman RC (2012) A multisite qualitative comparison of community wildfire risk perceptions. Journal of Forestry 110, 74–78.
| A multisite qualitative comparison of community wildfire risk perceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gordon JS, Willcox A, Hodges DA, Luloff AE, Finley JC (2018) Public perceptions of values associated with wildfire protection at the wildland-urban interface: A synthesis of national findings. In ‘Landscape reclamation –rising from what’s left’. (Ed. LC Loures) (Intech Open Publishing: London, UK)
Grala K, Cooke WH (2010) Spatial and temporal characteristics of wildfires in Mississippi, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 14–28.
| Spatial and temporal characteristics of wildfires in Mississippi, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grala K, Grala RK, Hussain A, Cooke WH, Varner JM (2017) Impact of human factors on wildfire occurrence in Mississippi, United States. Forest Policy and Economics 81, 38–47.
| Impact of human factors on wildfire occurrence in Mississippi, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Håbesland DE, Kilgore MA, Becker DR, Snyder SA, Solberg B, Sjølie HK, Lindstad BH (2016) Norwegian family forest owners’ willingness to participate in carbon offset programs. Forest Policy and Economics 70, 30–38.
| Norwegian family forest owners’ willingness to participate in carbon offset programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haines TK, Busby RL, Cleaves DA (2001) Prescribed burning in the South: Trends, purpose, and barriers. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 25, 149–153.
| Prescribed burning in the South: Trends, purpose, and barriers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hewes JH, Butler BJ, Liknes GC (2017) ‘Forest ownership in the conterminous United States circa 2014: Distribution of seven ownership types - geospatial dataset.’ (Forest Service Data Archive: Fort Collins, CO)
Howard JL, Liang S (2019) ‘U.S. timber production, trade, consumption, and price statistics, 1965–2017.’ Research Paper FPL-RP-701. USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (Madison, WI, USA)
Jacobson MG, Abt RC, Carter DR (2000) Attitudes toward joint forest planning among private landowners. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 11, 95–112.
| Attitudes toward joint forest planning among private landowners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jarrett A, Gan J, Johnson C, Munn IA (2009) Landowner awareness and adoption of wildfire programs in the southern United States. Journal of Forestry 107, 113–118.
| Landowner awareness and adoption of wildfire programs in the southern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Joshi S, Arano KG (2009) Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 118–125.
| Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kittredge DB (2005) The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics 7, 671–688.
| The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kobziar LN, Godwin D, Taylor L, Watts AC (2015) Perspectives on trends, effectiveness, and impediments to prescribed burning in the southern U.S. Forests 6, 561–580.
| Perspectives on trends, effectiveness, and impediments to prescribed burning in the southern U.S.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kolden CA (2019) We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the western United States to mitigate wildfire risk. Fire 2, 30
| We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the western United States to mitigate wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Maingi JK, Henry MC (2007) Factors influencing wildlife occurrence and distribution in eastern Kentucky, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 23–33.
| Factors influencing wildlife occurrence and distribution in eastern Kentucky, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martinuzzi S, Stewart SI, Helmers DP, Mockrin MH, Hammer RB, Radeloff VC (2015) The 2010 wildland-urban interface of the conterminous United States. USDA Forest Service, Research Map NRS-8, Northern Research Station (Newtown Square, PA, USA). Available at https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/data/wui/state_summary/
McIver JD, Stephens SL, Agee JK, Barbour J, Boerner REJ, Edminster CB, Erickson KL, Farris KL, Fettig CJ, Fiedler CE, Haase S, Hart SC, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, Lehmkuhl JF, Moghaddas JJ, Otrosina W, Outcalt KW, Schwilk DW, Skinner CN, Waldrop TA, Weatherspoon CP, Yaussy DA, Youngblood A, Zack S (2013) Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: Highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS). International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 63–82.
| Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: Highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meadows J, Herbohn J, Emtage N (2013) Supporting cooperative forest management among small-acreage lifestyle landowners in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Society & Natural Resources 26, 745–761.
| Supporting cooperative forest management among small-acreage lifestyle landowners in Southeast Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Melvin MA (2018) 2018 National prescribed fire use survey report. Technical Report 03-18 (Coalition of Prescribed Fire Council, Inc.: Washington, DC)
Mutandwa E, Grala RK, Grebner DL (2016) Family forest land availability for the production of ecosystem services in Mississippi, United States. Forest Policy and Economics 73, 18–24.
| Family forest land availability for the production of ecosystem services in Mississippi, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olsen CS, Kline JD, Ager AA, Olsen KA, Short KC (2017) Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland–urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes. Ecology and Society 22, 21
| Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland–urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oswalt SN (2015) Mississippi’s Forests, 2013. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station Resource Bulletin SRS-204 (Asheville, NC, USA)
Oswalt SN, Smith WB (2014) ‘U.S. forest resource facts and historical trends [FS-1035].’ (USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC)
Ottmar RD, Prichard SJ (2012) Fuel treatment effectiveness in forests of the upper Atlantic Coastal Plain - An evaluation at two spatial scales. Forest Ecology and Management 273, 17–28.
| Fuel treatment effectiveness in forests of the upper Atlantic Coastal Plain - An evaluation at two spatial scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Outcalt KW, Wade DD (2004) Fuels management reduces tree mortality from wildfires in southeastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 28, 28–34.
| Fuels management reduces tree mortality from wildfires in southeastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Radeloff VC, Helmers DP, Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Bar-Massada A, Butsic V, Hawbaker TJ, Martinuzzi S, Syphard AD, Stewart SI (2018) Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 3314–3319.
| Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29531054PubMed |
Reinhardt ED, Keane RE, Calkin DE, Cohen JD (2008) Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States. Forest Ecology and Management 256, 1997–2006.
| Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rummer B (2008) Assessing the cost of fuel reduction treatments: A critical review. Forest Policy and Economics 10, 355–362.
| Assessing the cost of fuel reduction treatments: A critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sánchez JJ, Loomis J, González-Cabán A, Rideout D, Reich R (2019) Do fuel treatments in U.S. national forests reduce wildfire suppression costs and property damage? Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 9, 42–73.
Schulte S, Miller KA (2010) Wildfire risk and climate change: The influence on homeowner mitigation behavior in the wildland-urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 23, 417–435.
| Wildfire risk and climate change: The influence on homeowner mitigation behavior in the wildland-urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schultz RP (1997) ‘Loblolly pine: The ecology and culture of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).’ Agriculture Handbook 713. (USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC)
Shrestha A, Grala RK, Grado SC, Roberts SD, Gordon JS (2021) Landowner concern about wildfires and implementation of fuel reduction treatments. Journal of Forestry 119, 251–265.
| Landowner concern about wildfires and implementation of fuel reduction treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stanturf JA, Wade DD, Waldrop TA, Kennard DK, Achtemeier GL (2002) Background paper: Fire in southern forest landscapes. In ‘The Southern Forests Resource Assessment.’ (Eds DM Wear, J Greis) pp. 608–630. (USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-53. (Asheville, NC, USA)
Stephens SL, Collins BM, Roller G (2012a) Fuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 285, 204–212.
| Fuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL, McIver JD, Boerner REJ, Fettig CJ, Fontaine JB, Hartsough BR, Kennedy PL, Schwilk DW (2012b) The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. Bioscience 62, 549–560.
| The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waldrop TA, Goodrick SL (2012) Introduction to prescribed fires in Southern ecosystems. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Science Update SRS-054. (Asheville, NC, USA)
Waldrop T, Phillips RA, Simon DA (2010) Fuels and predicted fire behavior in the southern Appalachian Mountains after fire and fire surrogate treatments. Forest Science 56, 32–45.
| Fuels and predicted fire behavior in the southern Appalachian Mountains after fire and fire surrogate treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker SH, Rideout DB, Loomis JB, Reich R (2007) Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland-urban interface areas. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 694–703.
| Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland-urban interface areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weatherspoon CP, Skinner CN (1996) Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37’. pp. 1471–1492. (University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: Davis, CA)
Wolcott L, O’Brien JJ, Mordecai K (2007) A survey of land managers on wildland hazardous fuels issues in Florida: A technical note. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 31, 148–150.
| A survey of land managers on wildland hazardous fuels issues in Florida: A technical note.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wyman M, Malone S, Stein T, Johnson C (2012) Race and wildfire risk perceptions among rural forestland owners in North-central Florida. Society & Natural Resources 25, 1293–1307.
| Race and wildfire risk perceptions among rural forestland owners in North-central Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Homer C, Gass L, Bendor SM, Case A, Costello C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Funk M, Grannemann B, Liknes GC, Rigge M, Xian G (2018) A new generation of the United States national land cover database: Requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146, 108–123.
| A new generation of the United States national land cover database: Requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhai Y, Munn IA, Evans DL (2003) Modeling forest fire probabilities in the South Central United States using FIA data. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 27, 11–17.
| Modeling forest fire probabilities in the South Central United States using FIA data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
