Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mapping fire regime ecoregions in California

Alexandra D. Syphard A B E and Jon E. Keeley C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Conservation Biology Institute, 136 SW Washington Ave., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.

B Sage Insurance Holdings, LLC, 600 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA.

C US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia-Kings Canyon Field Station, 47050 Generals Highway, Three Rivers, CA 93271, USA.

D Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 612 Charles E. Young Drive, South Los Angeles, CA 90095-7246, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: asyphard@sageunderwriters.com

International Journal of Wildland Fire 29(7) 595-601 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19136
Submitted: 5 September 2019  Accepted: 29 January 2020   Published: 4 March 2020

Abstract

The fire regime is a central framing concept in wildfire science and ecology and describes how a range of wildfire characteristics vary geographically over time. Understanding and mapping fire regimes is important for guiding appropriate management and risk reduction strategies and for informing research on drivers of global change and altered fire patterns. Most efforts to spatially delineate fire regimes have been conducted by identifying natural groupings of fire parameters based on available historical fire data. This can result in classes with similar fire characteristics but wide differences in ecosystem types. We took a different approach and defined fire regime ecoregions for California to better align with ecosystem types, without using fire as part of the definition. We used an unsupervised classification algorithm to segregate the state into spatial clusters based on distinctive biophysical and anthropogenic attributes that drive fire regimes – and then used historical fire data to evaluate the ecoregions. The fire regime ecoregion map corresponded well with the major land cover types of the state and provided clear separation of historical patterns in fire frequency and size, with lower variability in fire severity. This methodology could be used for mapping fire regimes in other regions with limited historical fire data or forecasting future fire regimes based on expected changes in biophysical characteristics.

Additional keywords: classification, ecosystems, fire frequency, fire history, global change, land cover, pyrogeography, scale.


References

Archibald S, Lehmann CER, Gómez-Dans JL, Bradstock RA (2013) Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 6442–6447.
Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23559374PubMed |

Bailey RG (1980) Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Misc. Publication 1931. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

Ball GH, Hall DJ (1965) ‘ISODATA, a novel method of data analysis and pattern classification.’ (Stanford Research Institute: Menlo Park, CA)

Barbour M, Keeler-Wolf T, Schoenherr AA (2007) ‘Terrestrial vegetation of California.’ (University of California Press: Oakland, CA)

Bond WJ, van Wilgen B (1996) ‘Fire and plants.’ (Chapman & Hall: London)

Bowman DM, Balch J, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries R, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Mack M, Moritz MA, Pyne S, Roos CI, Scott AC, Sodhi NS, Swetnam TW (2011) The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. Journal of Biogeography 38, 2223–2236.
The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22279247PubMed |

Bradstock RA (2010) A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19, 145–158.
A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis F, Borchert M (2006) Central Coast Bioregion. In ‘Fire California’s ecosystems’ (Eds NG Sugihara, JW van Wagtendonk, K Shaffer, J Fites-Kaufman, AE Thode) pp. 321–329. (University of California Press: Oakland, CA)

Davis KT, Dobrowski SZ, Higuera PE, Holden ZA, Veblen TT, Rother MT, Parks SA, Sala A, Maneta MP (2019) Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, 6193–6198.
Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30858310PubMed |

Falk DA, Miller C, McKenzie D, Black AE (2007) Cross-scale analysis of fire regimes. Ecosystems 10, 809–823.
Cross-scale analysis of fire regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franklin J, Serra-Diaz JM, Syphard AD, Regan HM (2016) Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 3725–3734.
Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26929338PubMed |

Keane RE, Cary GJ, Parsons R (2003) Using simulation to map fire regimes: an evaluation of approaches, strategies, and limitations. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 309–322.

Keane RE, Loehman RA, Holsinger LM (2019) Selecting a landscape model for natural resource management applications. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 4, 31–40.
Selecting a landscape model for natural resource management applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeley JE (1986) Resilience of Mediterranean shrub communities to fire. In ‘Resilience in Mediterranean-type ecosystems’. (Eds B Dell, AJM Hopkins, BB Lamont) pp. 95–112. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Keeley JE, Pausas JG (2019) Distinguishing disturbance from perturbations in fire-prone ecosystems. International Journal of Wildland Fire 28, 282–287.
Distinguishing disturbance from perturbations in fire-prone ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeley JE, Syphard AD (2017) Different historical fire-climate patterns in California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 253–268.
Different historical fire-climate patterns in California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecological Applications 19, 1003–1021.
Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19544740PubMed |

Moreno MV, Conedera M, Chuvieco E, Pezzatti GB (2014) Fire regime changes and major driving forces in Spain from 1968 to 2010. Environmental Science & Policy 37, 11–22.
Fire regime changes and major driving forces in Spain from 1968 to 2010.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morgan P, Hardy CC, Swetnam TW, Rollins MG, Long DG (2001) Mapping fire regimes across time and space: understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 329–342.
Mapping fire regimes across time and space: understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77, 118–125.
Ecoregions of the conterminous United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Omernik JM, Griffith GE (2014) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environmental Management 54, 1249–1266.
Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25223620PubMed |

Peters DPC, Pielke RA, Bestelmeyer BT, Allen CD, Munson-McGee S, Havstad KM (2004) Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 15130–15135.
Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 235–249.
LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Safford HD, Van de Water KM (2014) Using fire return interval departure (FRID) analysis to map spatial and temporal changes in fire frequency on national forest lands in California. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station Research Paper PSW-RP-266. (Albany, CA, USA)10.2737/PSW-RP-266

Syphard AD, Keeley JE (2016) Historical reconstructions of California wildfires vary by data source. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 1221–1227.
Historical reconstructions of California wildfires vary by data source.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Pfaff AH, Ferschweiler K (2017) Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 13750–13755.
Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29229850PubMed |

Syphard AD, Sheehan T, Rustigian-Romsos H, Ferschweiler K (2018) Mapping future fire probability under climate change: does vegetation matter? PLoS One 13, e0201680
Mapping future fire probability under climate change: does vegetation matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30192760PubMed |

Syphard AD, Brennan TJ, Keeley JE (2019) Drivers of chaparral type conversion to herbaceous vegetation in coastal Southern California. Diversity & Distributions 25, 90–101.
Drivers of chaparral type conversion to herbaceous vegetation in coastal Southern California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2010) ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33, 607–611.
ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wells ML, O’Leary JF, Franklin J, Michaelsen J, McKinsey DE (2004) Variations in a regional fire regime related to vegetation type in San Diego County, California. Landscape Ecology 19, 139–152.
Variations in a regional fire regime related to vegetation type in San Diego County, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitlock C, Higuera PE, McWethy DB, Briles CE (2010) Paleoecological perspectives on fire ecology: revisiting the fire-regime concept. The Open Ecology Journal 3, 6–23.
Paleoecological perspectives on fire ecology: revisiting the fire-regime concept.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |