Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimating canopy fuel characteristics for predicting crown fire potential in common forest types of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, USA

Anne G. Andreu A D , John I. Blake B and Stanley J. Zarnoch C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Washington, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Savannah River, PO Box 700, New Ellenton, SC 29809, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: agandreu@uw.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 27(11) 742-755 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18025
Submitted: 20 February 2018  Accepted: 9 September 2018   Published: 29 October 2018

Abstract

We computed four stand-level canopy stratum variables important for crown fire modelling – canopy cover, stand height, canopy base height and canopy bulk density – from forest inventory data. We modelled the relationship between the canopy variables and a set of common inventory parameters – site index, stem density, basal area, stand age or stand height – and number of prescribed burns. We used a logistic model to estimate canopy cover, a linear model to estimate the other canopy variables, and the information theoretic approach for model selection. Coefficients of determination across five forest groups were 0.72–0.91 for stand height, 0.36–0.83 for canopy base height, 0.39–0.80 for canopy cover, and 0.63–0.78 for canopy bulk density. We assessed crown fire potential (1) for several sets of environmental conditions in all seasons, and (2) with increasing age, density and number of prescribed burns using our modelled canopy bulk density and canopy base height variables and local weather data to populate the Crown Fire Initiation and Spread model. Results indicated that passive crown fire is possible in any season in Atlantic coastal plain pine stands with heavy surface fuel loads and active crown fire is most probable in infrequently burned, dense stands at low fuel moistures.

Additional keywords : allometric equations, canopy base height, canopy bulk density, CFIS, loblolly pine, longleaf pine.


References

Agca M, Popescu SC, Harper CW (2011) Deriving forest canopy fuel parameters for loblolly pine forests in eastern Texas. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41, 1618–1625.
Deriving forest canopy fuel parameters for loblolly pine forests in eastern Texas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Agee JK (1996) The influence of forest structure on fire behaviour. In ‘Proceedings of the 17th Annual forest vegetation management conference’, 16–18 January, 1996, Redding, CA, pp. 52–68. (University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources: Berkeley, CA, USA)

Alexander ME, Cruz MG (2011) Crown fire dynamics in conifer forests. In ‘Synthesis of knowledge of extreme fire behavior: Volume 1 for fire managers’. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-854, pp. 107–142. (Portland, OR, USA)

Alexander ME, Cruz MG, Lopes AMG (2006) CFIS: a software tool for simulating crown fire initiation and spread. Forest Ecology and Management 234S, S133
CFIS: a software tool for simulating crown fire initiation and spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barbero R, Abatzoglou JT, Larkin NK, Kolden CA, Stocks B (2015) Climate change presents increased potential for very large fires in the contiguous United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 892–899.

Bechtold WA (2003) Crown-diameter prediction models for 87 species of stand-grown trees in the eastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 27, 269–278.

Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (Eds) (2005) The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program – National sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-80. (Asheville, NC, USA)

Bedel AP, Mote TL, Goodrick SL (2013) Climate change and associated fire potential for the south-eastern United States in the 21st century. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 1034–1043.
Climate change and associated fire potential for the south-eastern United States in the 21st century.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bickford CA, Bull H (1935) A destructive fire and some of its implications. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, Occasional Paper 46. (New Orleans, LA, USA)

Bried JT, Gifford NA, Robertson KM (2015) Predicted crown fire risk adds incentive to restore open-canopy pine barrens at the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34, 147–167.
Predicted crown fire risk adds incentive to restore open-canopy pine barrens at the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brose P, Wade D (2002) Potential fire behavior in pine flatwood forests following three different fuel reduction techniques. Forest Ecology and Management 163, 71–84.
Potential fire behavior in pine flatwood forests following three different fuel reduction techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown JK (1978) Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-197. (Ogden, UT, USA)

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach’, 2nd edn. (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Clark JA, Iverson L, Woodall CW, Allen CD, Bell DM, Bragg DC, D’Amato AW, Davis FW, Hersh H, Ibanez I, Jackson ST, Matthews S, Pederson N, Peters M, Schwartz MW, Waring KM, Zimmermann NE (2016) The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States. Global Change Biology 22, 2329–2352.

Crookston NL, Stage AR (1999) Percent canopy cover and stand structure statistics from the Forest Vegetation Simulator. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-24. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Wakimoto RH (2003) Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 39–50.
Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Wakimoto RH (2004) Modelling the likelihood of crown fire occurrence in conifer forest stands. Forest Science 50, 640–658.

Dappen P (2011) Automated stand delineation for FORVIS: a case study in the El Malpais region of New Mexico. New Mexico Forest and Watershed Restoration Institute, New Mexico Highlands University. (Las Vegas, NM, USA)

Duveneck MJ, Patterson WA (2007) Characterizing canopy fuels to predict fire behavior in pitch pine stands. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 24, 65–70.

Eldredge IF (1935) Administrative problems in fire control in the longleaf–slash pine region of the South. Journal of Forestry 33, 342–346.

Finney MA (2004) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Finney MA (2006) An overview of FlamMap fire modelling capabilities. In ‘Fuels management – how to measure success: conference proceedings’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) pp. 213–220. (USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO, USA) Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/25948 [Verified 10 January 2018].

Florida Department of Community Affairs (2004) Wildfire mitigation in Florida. Land-use planning strategies and best development practices. Available at https://www.green.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Wildfire_Mitigation_in_FL.pdf [Verified 10 January 2018]

Freeman DR, Loomis RM, Roussopoulos PJ (1982) Handbook for predicting slash weight of trees in the Northeast. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-NC-75. (Saint Paul, MN, USA)

Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Cocke AE, Moore MM, Covington WW (2004) Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880–2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecological Modelling 175, 231–248.
Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880–2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gill SJ, Biging GS, Murphy EC (2000) Modelling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover. Forest Ecology and Management 126, 405–416.
Modelling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Goodrick SL, Shea D, Blake J (2010) Estimating fuel consumption for the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 34, 5–12.
Estimating fuel consumption for the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heinsch FA, Andrews PL (2010). BehavePlus fire modelling system, version 5.0: Design and Features. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-249. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Hulet A, Roundy BA, Peterson SL, Bunting SC, Jensen RR, Roundy DB (2014) Utilizing National Agriculture Imagery Program data to estimate tree cover and biomass of piñon and juniper woodlands. Rangeland Ecology & Management 67, 563–572.
Utilizing National Agriculture Imagery Program data to estimate tree cover and biomass of piñon and juniper woodlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jackson K. (2016) Case study of the 2015 Hidden Pines wildland-urban interface fire in Blastrop, Texas. Blastrop County Office of Emergency Management. (Blastrop, Texas). Available online at http://www.co.bastrop.tx.us/upload/page/0027/docs/HPF_Case_Study_final_03312016.pdf [Verified 8 October 2018]

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science 49, 12–35.

Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2015) Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications 6, 7537
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keane RE, Reinhardt ED, Scott J, Gray K, Reardon J (2005) Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 724–739.
Estimating forest canopy bulk density using six indirect methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kershaw JA, Jr, Ducey MJ, Beers TW (2016) ‘Forest mensuration.’ (John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Keyes CR, Varner JM (2006) Pitfalls in silvicultural treatment of canopy fuels. Fire Management Today 66, 46–50.

Kilgo JC, Blake JI (2005) ‘Ecology and management of a forested landscape: fifty years on the Savannah River Site.’ (Island Press: Covelo, CA, USA)

Kreye JK, Varner JM, Hiers JK, Mola J (2013) Toward a mechanism for eastern North American forest mesophication: differential litter drying across 17 species. Ecological Applications 23, 1976–1986.
Toward a mechanism for eastern North American forest mesophication: differential litter drying across 17 species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu Y, Goodrick SC, Stanturf JA (2013) Future US wildfire potential trends projected using a dynamically downscaled climate change scenario. Forest Ecology and Management 294, 120–135.
Future US wildfire potential trends projected using a dynamically downscaled climate change scenario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loomis RM, Blank RW (1981) Estimating northern red oak crown component weights in the north-eastern United States. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper NC-194. (Saint Paul, MN)

Loomis RM, Roussopoulos PJ (1978) Estimating aspen crown fuels in northern Minnesota. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Paper NC-RP-156. (Saint Paul, MN)

Marshall DJ, Wimberly M, Bettinger P, Stanturf J (2008) Synthesis of knowledge of hazardous fuels management in loblolly pine forests. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report GTR-SRS-110. (Asheville, NC, USA)

Martinson EJ, Omi PN (2008) Assessing mitigation of wildfire severity by fuel treatments – an example from the coastal plain of Mississippi. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 415–420.
Assessing mitigation of wildfire severity by fuel treatments – an example from the coastal plain of Mississippi.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mazdiyasni O, AghaKouchak A (2015) Substantial increase in concurrent droughts and heatwaves in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 11484–11489.
Substantial increase in concurrent droughts and heatwaves in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J (2005) Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. Forest Ecology and Management 218, 1–24.
Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mitchell RJ, Liu Y, O’Brien JJ, Elliott KJ, Starr G, Minit CF, Hiers JK (2014) Future climate and fire interactions in the south-eastern region of the United States. Forest Ecology and Management 327, 316–326.
Future climate and fire interactions in the south-eastern region of the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mutlu M (2010) Estimating canopy fuel parameters with in situ and remote sensing data. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. Available at http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/etd-tamu-2010-12-8810/mutlu-dissertation.pdf [Verified 10 January 2018]

Oosting HJ (1944) The comparative effect of surface and crown fire on the composition of a loblolly pine community. Ecology 25, 61–69.
The comparative effect of surface and crown fire on the composition of a loblolly pine community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE (2000) Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels. Volume VI: Longleaf pine, pocosin, and marshgrass types in the south-east United States. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, National Interagency Fire Center, Photo Series PMS 835. (Boise, ID, USA)

Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE, Mathey JW (2003) Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels. Volume VIa: sand hill, sand pine scrub, and hardwoods with white pine types in the south-east United States with supplemental sites for Volume VI. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, National Interagency Fire Center, Photo Series PMS 838. (Boise, ID, USA)

Outcalt KW, Wade DD (2004) Fuels management reduces tree mortality from wildfires in south-eastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 28, 28–34.

Parresol BR, Shea D, Ottmar RD (2006) Creating a fuels baseline and establishing fire frequency relationships to develop a landscape management strategy at the Savannah River site. In ‘Fuels management – how to measure success’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Comps PL Andrews, BW Butler). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, p. 351–366. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Parresol BR, Blake JI, Thompson AJ (2012) Effects of overstory composition and prescribed fire on fuel loading across a heterogeneous managed landscape in the south-eastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management 273, 29–42.
Effects of overstory composition and prescribed fire on fuel loading across a heterogeneous managed landscape in the south-eastern USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parresol BR, Scott DA, Zarnoch SJ, Edwards LA, Blake JI (2017) Modelling forest site productivity using mapped geospatial attributes within a South Carolina Landscape, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 406, 196–207.
Modelling forest site productivity using mapped geospatial attributes within a South Carolina Landscape, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Powell DC (2010) Estimating crown fire susceptibility for project planning. Fire Management Today 70, 8–15.

Price C, Rind D (1994) The impact of a 2 x CO2 Climate on Lightning-Caused Fires. Journal of Climate 7, 1484–1494.

Prichard SJ, Sandberg DV, Ottmar RD, Eberhardt E, Andreu A, Eagle P, Swedin K (2013) Fuel Characteristic Classification System Version 3.0: technical documentation. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-887. (Portland, OR, USA)

Prichard SJ, Karau EC, Ottmar RD, Kennedy MC, Cronan JB, Wright CS, Keane RE (2014) Evaluation of the CONSUME and FOFEM fuel consumptions models in pine and mixed hardwood forests of the eastern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44, 784–795.
Evaluation of the CONSUME and FOFEM fuel consumptions models in pine and mixed hardwood forests of the eastern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reinhardt E, Scott J, Gray K, Keane R (2006) Estimating canopy fuel characteristics in five conifer stands in the western United States using tree and stand measurements. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 2803–2814.

SAS Institute (2011) ‘Base SAS® 9.4 procedures guide.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA)

Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2001) Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-29. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2005) Stereo photo guide for estimating canopy fuel characteristics in conifer stands. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-145. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Siry JP (2002) Intensive timber management practices. In ‘Southern forest resource assessment’. (Eds DN Wear, JG Greis) USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report GTR- SRS-53, Ch. 14, pp. 327–340. (Asheville, NC, USA)

Snell JAK, Little SN (1983) Predicting crown weight and bole volume of five western hardwoods. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-151. (Portland, OR, USA)

South Carolina Forestry Commission (2010) Highway 31 Fire after action report. (Comp. D Jones) Available at https://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/bitstream/handle/10827/7362/SCFC_Highway_31_Fire_2010.pdf [Verified 10 January 2018]

South Carolina Forestry Commission (2018) Wildfire in South Carolina. Available at https://www.state.sc.us/forest/refwild.htm#season. [Verified 21 June 2018]

USDA Forest Service (2016) Boteler Fire and Nantahala Branch Fires update. Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/nfsnc/alerts-notices/?cid=fseprd523780 [10 January 2018]

Van Wagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 23–34.
Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang H, Wonkka CL, Grant WE, Rogers WE (2016) Range expansion of invasive shrubs: implication for crown fire risk in forestlands of the southern USA. AoB Plants 8, plw012. Available at https://academic.oup.com/aobpla/article/doi/10.1093/aobpla/plw012/2609522. [Verified 10 January 2018]10.1093/AOBPLA/PLW012

Zarnoch SJ, Blake JI, Parresol BR (2014) Are prescribed fire and thinning dominant processes affecting snag occurrence at a landscape scale? Forest Ecology and Management 331, 144–152.
Are prescribed fire and thinning dominant processes affecting snag occurrence at a landscape scale?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zscheischler J, Seneviratne SI (2017) Dependence of drivers affects risks associated with compound events. Science Advances 3, e1700263
Dependence of drivers affects risks associated with compound events.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |