Social acceptability of fuel management in the Australian Capital Territory and surrounding region
Melinda R. Mylek A C and Jacki Schirmer A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
B Health Research Institute and Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: melinda.mylek@anu.edu.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 25(10) 1093-1109 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15164
Submitted: 5 September 2015 Accepted: 19 July 2016 Published: 6 September 2016
Abstract
Managing fuel to reduce wildland fire risk often creates substantial public debate. Although the acceptability of various fuel management strategies has been explored in some regions, particularly North America, the social acceptability of fuel management is less well understood in other countries. This paper begins to address this knowledge gap by exploring acceptability by residents living in and near the Australian Capital Territory, Australia of three fuel management strategies (prescribed burning, livestock grazing and mechanical thinning) used to reduce wildland fire risk to life and property. All three were considered acceptable by most survey respondents. Acceptability did not vary substantially between strategies or by the location in which the strategy was undertaken. Acceptability of fuel management was associated with trust in fire management agencies, having knowledge of fuel management, feeling vulnerable to wildland fire and respondent characteristics such as previous effects of wildland fires, location of residence, gender, age, income and employment status.
Additional keywords: livestock grazing, mechanical thinning, prescribed burning.
References
ABS (2013) National regional profile: Australian Capital Territory. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@nrp.nsf/lookup/8Main+Features12007-2011 [Verified 7 June 2014]Absher J, Vaske J (2007) Modeling public support for wildland fire policy. In ‘Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science’. (Eds K Reynolds, A Thomson, M Shannon, M Kohl, D Ray, K Rennolls) pp. 159–170. (CAB International Press: Wallingford, UK).
Absher J, Vaske J (2011) The role of trust in residents’ fire wise actions. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 318–325.
| The role of trust in residents’ fire wise actions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
ACMA (2012) Communications report 2009–10 Report 2 – Take-up and use of voice services by Australian consumers, ISSN 1834–1519. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
Arno SF, Brown JK (1989) Managing fire in our forests – time for a new initiative. Journal of Forestry 87, 44–46.
Ashton DH, Williams RJ (1989) Dynamics of sub-alpine vegetation in the Victorian region. In ‘The scientific significance of the australian alps.’ (Ed. RB Good) pp. 143–168. (Australian Alps National Parks Liaison Committee and Australian Academy of Science: Canberra).
Bartlett MS (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 16, 296–298.
Birkman J (Ed) (2006) ‘Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies’ (United Nations University Press: New Delhi).
Blanchard B (2003) Community perceptions of wildland fire risk and fire hazard reduction strategies at the wildland–urban interface in the Northeastern United States. Master’s thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Blanchard B, Ryan RL (2004) Community perceptions of wildland fire risk and fire hazard reduction strategies at the wildland–urban interface in the Northeastern United States. In ‘Proceedings of the 2003 Northeast recreation research symposium’, 6–8 April 2003, Bolton Landing, NY. (Ed. J Murdy). USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-317, pp. 285–294. (Newtown Square, PA)
Blanchard B, Ryan RL (2007) Managing the wildland–urban interface in the northeast: perceptions of fire risk and hazard reduction strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 24, 203–208.
Brockway DG, Gatewood RG, Paris RB (2002) Restoring fire as an ecological process in shortgrass prairie ecosystems: initial effects of prescribed burning during the dormant and growing seasons. Journal of Environmental Management 65, 135–152.
| Restoring fire as an ecological process in shortgrass prairie ecosystems: initial effects of prescribed burning during the dormant and growing seasons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12197076PubMed |
Brooks ML, Deuser C, Matchett JR, Smith H, Bastian H (2006) Effects of fuel management treatments in piñon juniper vegetation at a site on the Colorado Plateau. Joint Fire Science Program, National Interagency Fire Center, Project Number 03–3-3–58 ID 83705–5354. (Boise, ID).
Brunson MW (1996) A definition of ‘social acceptability’ in ecosystem management. In ‘Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: a workshop proceedings’, 23–25 June 1992, Kelso, WA. (Eds M Brunson, L Kruger, C Tyler, S Schroeder) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-369, Pacific Northwest Research Station, pp. 7–16. (Portland, OR)
Brunson MW, Evans J (2005) Badly burned? Effects of an escaped prescribed burn on social acceptability of wildland fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry 103, 134–138.
Brunson MW, Shindler BR (2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the Western United States. Society & Natural Resources 17, 661–678.
| Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the Western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burrows ND (2008) Linking fire ecology and fire management in south-west Australian forest landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 2394–2406.
| Linking fire ecology and fire management in south-west Australian forest landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, Australian Fire Authorities Council (2006) The use of prescribed fire in bushfire control. Bushfire CRC and AFAC, Firenote No. 2. (Melbourne, Vic).
Cardona O (2003) The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In ‘Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people’. (Eds Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., Hillhorst, D.). (Earthscan Publishers: London, UK).
Carroll J, Bright A (2010) Integrative complexity of public beliefs toward wildfire management: development of a scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40, 344–359.
| Integrative complexity of public beliefs toward wildfire management: development of a scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carroll MS, Cohn PJ, Blatner KA (2004) Private and tribal forest land-owners and fire risk: a two-county case study in Washington state. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 2148–2158.
| Private and tribal forest land-owners and fire risk: a two-county case study in Washington state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Cohn PJ, Morgan T (2007) Managing fire danger in the forests of the US Inland Northwest: a classic ‘Wicked Problem’ in public land policy. Journal of Forestry 105, 239–244.
Cheney NP, Sullivan A (Eds) (1997) ‘Grassfires: fuel, weather and fire behaviour.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne).
Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1–13.
| Prediction of fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coalition of Prescribed Fire Councils 2015. 2015 National prescribed fire use survey report. Technical report 02–15. Available at http://www.fire.uni-freiburg.de/programmes/natcon/USA-2015-Prescribed-Fire-Use-Survey-Report.pdf [Verified 23 March 2016]
Conard SG, Hartzell T, Hilbruner MW, Zimmerman GT (2001) Changing fuel management strategies – the challenge of meeting new information and analysis needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 267–275.
| Changing fuel management strategies – the challenge of meeting new information and analysis needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Data Analysis Australia (2012) Sampling design and weighting for Australian household/consumer and business surveys – a better practice guide: an Australian market and social research society initiative and resource. Available at http://www.daa.com.au/analytical-ideas/sampling-and-weighting/ [Verified 1 February 2016]
Devine-Wright P (2005) Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy (Chichester, England) 8, 125–139.
| Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Devine-Wright P (2009) Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19, 426–441.
| Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (Eds) (2014) ‘Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method’ 4th edn. (John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY)
Dorrough J, Yen A, Turner V, Clark SG, Crosthwaite J, Hirth JR (2004) Livestock grazing management and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 279–295.
| Livestock grazing management and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Esplin B, Gill M, Enright N (2003) Report for the inquiry into the 2002–2003 Victorian Bushfires. Victorian Government, ISBN: 0731114884. (Melbourne, Vic).
Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 117–128.
| A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Flint CG (2007) Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska. Risk Analysis 27, 1597–1608.
| Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18093055PubMed |
Friedel MH, James C (1995) How does grazing of native pastures affect their biodiversity? In ‘Conserving biodiversity: threats and solutions’. (Eds RA Bradstock, TD Auld, DA Keith, R Kingsford, D Lunney, D Sivertsen) pp. 249–259. (Surrey Beatty and Sons: Sydney)
Gill M (2008) Underpinnings of fire management for biodiversity conservation in reserves: fire and adaptive management. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Report 73 ISBN: 978–1-74208–869–3 (Melbourne, Vic).
Gill M, Stephens SL, Cary GJ (2013) The worldwide ‘wildfire’ problem. Ecological Applications 23, 438–454.
| The worldwide ‘wildfire’ problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grande ED, Taylor AW (2010) Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. BMC Medical Research Methodology 10, 77
| Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gunderson K, Watson A (2007) Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Society & Natural Resources 20, 705–721.
| Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Institute of Foresters Australia (IFA) (2006) Managing fire in Australian forests and woodlands. Institute of Foresters Australia Forest Policy Statement No. 3.2. (Canberra, ACT).
Kaiser HF (1970) A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika 35, 401–415.
| A second generation Little Jiffy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P (2005) The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod. Coastal Management 33, 119–149.
| The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lachapelle PR, McCool SF, Patterson ME (2003) Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a ‘messy’ world. Society & Natural Resources 16, 473–490.
| Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a ‘messy’ world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lijeblad A, Borrie WT, Watson AE (2009) Determinants of trust for public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest. Environmental Management 43, 571–584.
| Determinants of trust for public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19034563PubMed |
Lunt ID, Eldridge DJ, Morgan JW, Witt GB (2007) Turner Review No. 13. A framework to predict the effects of livestock grazing and grazing exclusion on conservation values in natural ecosystems in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 401–415.
| Turner Review No. 13. A framework to predict the effects of livestock grazing and grazing exclusion on conservation values in natural ecosystems in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Manfredo MJ, Fishbein M, Haas GE, Watson AE (1990) Attitudes towards prescribed fire policies. Journal of Forestry 88, 19–23.
McCaffrey S (2002) For want of defensible space a forest is lost: homeowners and the wildfire hazard and mitigation in the residential wildland intermix at Incline Village, Nevada. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
McCaffrey S (2004) Fighting fire with education: what is the best way to reach out to homeowners? Journal of Forestry 102, 12–19.
McCaffrey S (2006) Prescribed fire: what influences public approval? In ‘Fire in eastern oak forests: delivering science to land managers, proceedings of a conference’, 15–17 November 2005, Newtown Square, PA. (Ed. Dickinson MB) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-P-1, pp. 192–198. (Newtown Square, PA)
McCaffrey S, Moghaddas J, Stephens S (2008) Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 224–233.
| Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Schindler B (2013) Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 15–24.
| Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXit1egtLY%3D&md5=9a2c005e7bae15e8c4b5ba5fcf079de9CAS |
McLeod R (2003) Inquiry into the operational response to the January 2003 bushfires in the ACT. Department of Urban Services, ISBN 0 642 602166 (Canberra, ACT).
Mylek M, Schirmer J (2012) Reducing bushfire risk: public perceptions about fuel management strategies in the ACT and surrounds. CRC for Forestry, Technical Report 221. (Hobart, Tas).
Nakamura G (2004) Biomass thinning for fuel reduction and forest restoration – issues and opportunities. University of California Cooperative Extension Report (Redding, CA).
Native Vegetation Framework Review Task Group (2010) Australia’s native vegetation framework consultation draft of ‘Australia’s native vegetation framework’. (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts: Canberra, ACT).
Nelson TC (1979) Fire management policy in the national forests: a new era. Journal of Forestry 77, 723–725.
O’brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41, 673–690.
| A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paveglio TB, Carroll MS, Absher J, Robinson W (2010) Symbolic meanings of wildland fire: a study of residents in the U.S. Inland Northwest. Society & Natural Resources 24, 18–33.
| Symbolic meanings of wildland fire: a study of residents in the U.S. Inland Northwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) ‘Introduction to wildland fire.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY).
Ryan KC, Knapp EE, Varner M (2013) Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, e15–e24.
| Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schirmer J (2009) Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders. Journal of Academic Ethics 7, 125–139.
| Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shindler BA, Toman E (2003) Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities: a longitudinal analysis of public support. Journal of Forestry 101, 8–15.
Shindler BA, Brunson M, Stankey GH (2002) Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices, a problem analysis. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. (Portland, OR)
Shindler BA, Leahy JE, Toman EL (2003) Public acceptance of forest conditions and fuel reduction practices: a survey of citizens in communities adjacent to national forests in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. (Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR)
Shindler BA, Brunson MW, Cheek KA (2004) Social acceptability in forest and range management. In ‘Society and natural resources: a summary of knowledge’. (Eds M Manfredo, J Vaske, B Bruyere, D Field, P Brown) pp. 147–157. (Modern Litho Press: Jefferson, MO).
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G (2000) Perceptions of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 20, 713–720.
| Perceptions of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11110217PubMed |
Stankey GH, Shindler B (2006) Formation of social acceptability judgement and their implications for management of rare and little-known species. Conservation Biology 20, 28–37.
| Formation of social acceptability judgement and their implications for management of rare and little-known species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16909656PubMed |
Stephens S, Moghaddas J (2005) Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behaviour, and predicted tree mortality in a mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 21–36.
| Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behaviour, and predicted tree mortality in a mixed conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (Eds) (2007) ‘Using multivariate statistics’ 5th edn. (Pearson: Boston, MA).
Toman E, Shindler B, Brunson M (2006) Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities. Society & Natural Resources 19, 321–336.
| Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Toman E, Stidham M, Schindler B, McCaffrey S (2011) Reducing fuels in the wildland–urban interface: community perceptions of agency fuels treatments. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 340–349.
| Reducing fuels in the wildland–urban interface: community perceptions of agency fuels treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Upreti B (2004) Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales. Energy Policy 32, 785–800.
| Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
US Fish and Wildlife Service (2009) Management methods: prescribed burning. Available at http://www.fws.gov/invasives/staffTrainingModule/methods/burning/introduction.html [Verified 23 March 2016]
US Department of Agriculture 2009. Prescribed burning: Iowa Job Sheet Conservation Practice 338. Available at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1077267.pdf [Verified 23 March 2016]
Vaske JJ, Absher JD, Bright AD (2007) Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review 14, 223–232.
Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission (2010) Final report. Parliament of Victoria. (Melbourne, Vic.)
Vining J, Merrick MS (2008) The influence of proximity to a national forest on emotions and fire-management decisions. Environmental Management 41, 155–167.
| The influence of proximity to a national forest on emotions and fire-management decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18004618PubMed |
Vogt C, Winter G, Fried J (2005) Predicting homeowners’ approval of fuel management at the wildland–urban interface using the theory of reasoned action. Society & Natural Resources 18, 337–354.
| Predicting homeowners’ approval of fuel management at the wildland–urban interface using the theory of reasoned action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warnecke RB, Johnson TP, Chavez N, Sudman S, O’Rourke DP, Lacey L, Horm J (1997) Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Annals of Epidemiology 7, 334–342.
| Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2szpt1eqtA%3D%3D&md5=b79b5a2f476464d3ead8329862a54852CAS | 9250628PubMed |
Weible C, Sabatier P, Nechodom M (2005) No sparks fly: policy participants agree on thinning trees in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Journal of Forestry 103, 5–9.
Weisshaupt BR, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Robinson WD, Jakes PJ (2005) Acceptability of smoke from prescribed forest burning in the northern Inland West: a focus group approach. Journal of Forestry 103, 189–193.
Weisshaupt BR, Jakes PJ, Carroll MS, Blatner KA (2007) Northern inland west land/homeowner perceptions of fire risk and responsibility in the wildland–urban interface. Human Ecology Review 14, 177–187.
Williams RJ, Wahren CH, Bradstock RA, Muller WJ (2006) Does alpine grazing reduce blazing? A landscape test of a widely-held hypothesis. Austral Ecology 31, 925–936.
| Does alpine grazing reduce blazing? A landscape test of a widely-held hypothesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winter G, Fried JS (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 13, 33–49.
| Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winter GJ, Vogt C, Fried JS (2002) Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100, 15–21.
Winter GJ, Vogt CA, McCaffrey S (2004) Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102, 8–15.
Winter G, Vogt C, McCaffrey SM (2005) Community views of fuels management on the Mark Twain National Forest and comparisons to other study sites. Survey data report. Prepared for USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station. (Evanstone, IL)
Woinarski JCZ, Risler J, Kean L (2004) Response of vegetation and vertebrate fauna to 23 years of fire exclusion in a tropical Eucalyptus open forest, Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecology 29, 156–176.
| Response of vegetation and vertebrate fauna to 23 years of fire exclusion in a tropical Eucalyptus open forest, Northern Territory, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wolsink M (1994) Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting. Urban Studies 31, 851–866.
| Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Xanthopoulos G, Caballero D, Galante M, Alexandrian D, Rigolot E, Marzano R (2006) Forest fuels management in Europe. In ‘Fuels management – how to measure success: conference proceedings’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 29–46. (Fort Collins, CO)
Zaksek M, Arvai J (2004) Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Analysis 24, 1503–1514.
| Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15660607PubMed |
