Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The likelihood of ignition of dry-eucalypt forest litter by firebrands

P. F. M. Ellis
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Ecosystem Science and CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, PO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: peter.ellis@csiro.au

B Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, Level 5, 340 Albert Street, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.

International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(2) 225-235 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14048
Submitted: 4 April 2014  Accepted: 4 September 2014   Published: 12 February 2015

Abstract

Ignition probability of litter of dry-eucalypt forest by standard flaming and glowing firebrand samples was tested in a wind tunnel. Standard flaming firebrands were sections of bamboo sate stick 50 mm long, and flamed for ~9 s in still air. Standard glowing samples were sections of shed bark of Eucalyptus globulus 50 mm long, 15 mm wide and ~2 mm in thickness. These were burnt at their terminal velocities and at deposition had a mean mass of 0.2 g and would remain glowing for 2.5 min in wind. Ignition was tested using air speeds of zero, 1 and 2 m s–1, and oven-dried fuel moisture contents between 4 and 21%. For flaming samples, ignition probability was insensitive to variation in fuel and airflow characteristics and was a function of wind (no wind or wind) and fuel moisture content. For glowing samples, ignition probability was a function of fuel moisture content and wind speed. The models confirm the dominating influence of fuel moisture, are consistent with expert observations in the field and provide a practical measure of ignition likelihood by firebrands. It is argued that airflow turbulence and relative humidity are potentially significant for ignition by glowing firebrands.


References

Albini FA (1979) Spotfire distance from burning trees, a predictive model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-56. (Ogden, UT)

Alexander ME, Cruz MG (2006) Evaluating a model for predicting active crown fire rate of spread using wildfire observations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 3015–3028.
Evaluating a model for predicting active crown fire rate of spread using wildfire observations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blackmarr WH (1972) Moisture content influences ignitibility of slash pine litter. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experimental Station, Research Note SE-173. (Asheville, NC)

Boonmee N, Quintiere JG (2002) Glowing and flaming autoignition of wood. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 29, 289–296.
Glowing and flaming autoignition of wood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bunting SC, Wright HA (1974) Ignition capabilities of non-flaming firebrands. Journal of Forestry 72, 646–649.

Butler BW (2006) The effect of solar irradiation on the spread rate of fires burning over a horizontal fuel array. In ‘Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, 2006, Figueira da Foz, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas).

Byram GM (1959) Forest Fire Behaviour. In ‘Forest Fire: Control and Use’. (Eds KP Davis, GM Byram and WR Krumm) pp. 95–99. (McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York)

Cheney NP, Bary GAV (1969) The propagation of mass conflagrations in a standing eucalypt forest by the spotting process. In ‘Mass Fire Symposium’, February 1969. Canberra. (Defence Standards Laboratories: Maribyrnong, Vic.)

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1–13.
Prediction of fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Countryman CM (1980) Some physical characteristics of cigarettes as firebrands. Pacific South West Forest and Range Experimental Station, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Riverside, CA).

Countryman CM (1983) Ignition of grass fuels by cigarettes USDA Forest Service Fire Management Notes 44, 3–7.

Cruz MG, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Sims NC, Bannister AJ, Hollis JJ, Hurley RJ (2012) The anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 284, 269–285.
The anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drysdale D (2002) ‘An Introduction to Fire Dynamics’, 2nd edn. (John Wiley and Sons: Guildford, UK)

Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark – a firebrand study. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Ellis PFM (2010) The effect of aerodynamic behaviour of flakes of jarrah and karri bark on their potential behaviour as firebrands. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 93, 21–27.

Ellis PFM (2011) Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringybark’ for intense spotting. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 897–907.
Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringybark’ for intense spotting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis PFM (2013) Firebrand characteristics of the stringy bark of messmate (Eucalyptus obliqua) investigated using non-tethered samples. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 642–651.
Firebrand characteristics of the stringy bark of messmate (Eucalyptus obliqua) investigated using non-tethered samples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finney MA (2004) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator, model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fons WL, Stromberg RW (1941) Fire ignition progress report 1. US Forest Service, California Forest and Range Experimental Station.

Foote EID, Liu J, Manzello SL (2011) Characterizing firebrand exposure during wildland–urban interface (WUI) fires. In ‘Proceedings of Fire and Materials 2011 Conference’, 31 January–2 February 2011, San Francisco, CA. pp. 479–491. (Interscience Communications: San Francisco, CA).

Ganteaume A, Lampin-Maillet C, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Jappiot M, Fonturbel T, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Vega JA (2009) Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 951–969.
Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFaqtLzO&md5=0bce6ce0481ffe345ccc99129294f31dCAS |

Ganteaume A, Jappiot M, Lampin-Maillet C, Curt T, Borgniet L (2011a) Effects of vegetation type and fire regime on flammability of undisturbed litters in south-eastern France. Forest Ecology and Management 261, 2223–2231.
Effects of vegetation type and fire regime on flammability of undisturbed litters in south-eastern France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ganteaume A, Guijarro M, Jappiot M, Hernando C, Lampin-Maillet C, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Vega JA (2011b) Laboratory characterization of firebrands involved in spot fires. Annals of Forest Science 68, 531–541.
Laboratory characterization of firebrands involved in spot fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hines F, Tolhurst KG, Wilson AG, McCarthy GJ (2010) Overall fuel hazard assessment guide, 4th edn. Fire and Adaptive Management, Report no. 82. (Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment: Melbourne, Vic.)

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) ‘Applied Logistic Regression (2nd edn).’ (Wylie Interscience: New York)

Keetch JJ (1941) Smoker fires and fire brands. USDA Forest Service, Appalachian Forest Experimental Station, Technical Note no. 49. (Asheville, NC)

Keith DA (2004) ‘Ocean Shores to Desert Dunes. The Native Vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT.’ (Department of Environment and Conservation NSW: Hurstville, NSW)

Koo E, Pagni PJ, Weise DR, Woycheese JP (2010) Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 818–843.
Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawson BD, Armitage OB, Dalrymple GN (1993) Ignition probabilities for simulated people-caused fires in British Columbia’s lodgepole pine and white spruce–subalpine fir forests. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 26–28 October 1993, Jekyll Island, GA. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

Lin CC (2005) Influences of temperature, relative humidity and heat sources on ignition: a laboratory test. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 20, 89–93.

Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bushfires in Australia.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

MacAulay AJ, Tolhurst KG (2001) Using computer simulation to determine the effects of short-distance spotting on head fire rate of spread. In ‘Proceedings, 2001 Australasian Bushfire Conference’, 3–6 July 2001, Christchurch, New Zealand. (Eds G Pearce, L Lester) New Zealand Forest Research Institute, pp. 334–338. (Rotorua, New Zealand)

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC (2006) Ignition of mulch and grasses in wildland–urban interface fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 427–431.
Ignition of mulch and grasses in wildland–urban interface fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Maranghides A, Mell WE (2007) Firebrand generation from burning vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 458–462.
Firebrand generation from burning vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Thomas GC, Shields JR, Maranghides A, Mell W, Yang JC (2008) Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuelbeds. Fire Safety Journal 43, 226–233.
Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuelbeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktlejtrY%3D&md5=7966bbdb937da4565982387ecea077d1CAS |

Matthews S (2005) The water vapour conductance of Eucalyptus litter layers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135, 73–81.
The water vapour conductance of Eucalyptus litter layers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet No. 107. (Canberra, ACT)

McArthur AG (1969a) The fire control problem and fire research in Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 1966 Sixth World Forestry Congress’, June 1969, Vol, 2, pp. 1986–1991. (Spanish Minister of Agriculture: Madrid, Spain)

McArthur AG (1969b) The Tasmanian bushfires of 7th February, 1967, and associated fire behaviour characteristics. In ‘Mass Fire Symposium’, February 1969, Canberra, p. 7. (Defence Standards Laboratories: Maribyrnong, Vic.)

McCarthy GJ, Tolhurst KG (1998) Effectiveness of firefighting first attack operations 1991/92–1994/95. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Fire Research, Centre for Forest Tree Technology, Research Report No. 45. (Melbourne, Vic.)

Muraszew A, Fedele JB, Kuby WC (1976) Investigation of firewhirls and firebrands. Aerospace Report ATR-76(7509)-1. The Aerospace Corporation. (El Segundo, CA)

Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692.
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Fire Danger Rating System (rev.) (1974) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-84. (Fort Collins, CO)

Pagni P (1993) Causes of the 20th October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration. Fire Safety Journal 21, 331–339.
Causes of the 20th October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parrott RT, Donald CM (1970) Growth and ignitability of annual pastures in a Mediterranean environment. 2. Ignitability of swards of various annual species. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 76–83.
Growth and ignitability of annual pastures in a Mediterranean environment. 2. Ignitability of swards of various annual species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Perryman HA, Dugaw CJ, Varner JM, Johnson DL (2013) A cellular automata model to link surface fires to firebrand lift-off and dispersal. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 428–439.
A cellular automata model to link surface fires to firebrand lift-off and dispersal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pitts WM (2007) Ignition of cellulosic fuels by heated and radiative surfaces. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technical Note 1481. (Boulder, Colorado)

Plucinski MP, Anderson WR (2008) Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 628–637.
Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Development Team (2010) ‘The R Project for Statistical Computing’. Available at www.r-project.org. [Verified November 2010]

Rissel S, Ridenour K (2013) Ember production during the Bastrop Complex fire. Fire Management Today 72, 7–13.

Sakuma H, Munakata S, Sugawara S (1981) Volatile products of cellulose pyrolysis. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 45, 443–451.
Volatile products of cellulose pyrolysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXhvVyrtrY%3D&md5=f72fdd16752a008ad4c141d367a0609eCAS |

Sullivan A, Ball R (2012) Thermal decomposition and combustion chemistry of cellulosic biomass. Atmospheric Environment 47, 133–141.
Thermal decomposition and combustion chemistry of cellulosic biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1KrtbzI&md5=deb9f64c7a847d07c3ccc9a18c9f5690CAS |