Impediments to prescribed fire across agency, landscape and manager: an example from northern California
Lenya N. Quinn-Davidson A B C and J. Morgan Varner BA Environment and Community Graduate Program, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA.
B Wildland Fire Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA.
C Corresponding author. Email.lenyaqd@gmail.com
International Journal of Wildland Fire 21(3) 210-218 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11017
Submitted: 30 January 2011 Accepted: 12 July 2011 Published: 20 December 2011
Abstract
Though the need for prescribed fire is widely recognised, its use remains subject to a range of operational and social constraints. Research has focussed on identifying these constraints, yet past efforts have focussed disproportionately on single agencies and geographic regions. We examined constraints on prescribed fire by surveying a wide variety of organisations (including six state and federal agencies and several tribes, non-governmental organisations and timber companies) in northern California, a fire-prone region of the western United States. Across the region, prescribed burning annually covered only 38% of the area needed to fulfil land-management objectives, and 66% of managers indicated dissatisfaction with levels of prescribed fire activity. The highest-ranked impediments were narrow burn window, regulations, lack of adequate personnel and environmental laws. Impediment ratings differed among entities, with legal and social impediments of greater concern in the private sector than in the public, and economic impediments of greater concern in the state and private sectors than in the federal. Comparisons with the south-eastern United States, where similar research has taken place, point to important regional constraints on prescribed fire activity. These findings suggest further need for research spanning geographic and ownership boundaries, as prescribed fire impediments can vary by context.
Additional keywords: air quality, burn window, constraints, fire management, Forest Service.
References
Anderson MK (2005) ‘Tending the Wild.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)Biswell H (1989) ‘Prescribed Burning in California Wildlands Vegetation Management.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Brennan LA, Engstrom RT, Palmer WE, Hermann SM, Hurst GA, Burger LW, Hardy CL (1998) Whither wildlife without fire? In ‘Transactions of the Sixty-third North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference,’ 20–24 March 1998, Orlando, FL. pp. 402–414. (Wildlife Management Institute: Washington, DC)
Cleaves DA, Haines TK (1997) Regulation and liability risk: their influence on the practice and price tag of burning. In ‘Environmental Regulation and Prescribed Fire, Legal and Social Challenges.’ (Ed. D Bryan) pp. 165–183. (Florida State University: Tallahassee, FL)
Cleaves DA, Martinez J, Haines TK (2000) Influences on prescribed burning activity and costs in the national forest system. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-37. (Asheville, NC)
Cortner HJ, Taylor JG, Carpenter EH, Cleaves DA (1990) Factors influencing forest service fire managers’ risk behavior. Forest Science 36, 531–548.
Craig JN (1990) Regulation of prescribed fire. In ‘Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests’. (Eds JD Walstad, DV Sandberg) pp. 261–267. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)
Dillman DA (2000) ‘Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)
Engber EA, Varner JM, Arguello LA, Sugihara NG (2011) The effects of conifer encroachment and overstory structure on fuels and fire in an oak woodland landscape. Fire Ecology 7, 32–50.
| The effects of conifer encroachment and overstory structure on fuels and fire in an oak woodland landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fernandes P, Botehlo H (2004) Analysis of the prescribed burning practice in the pine forest of north-western Portugal. Journal of Environmental Management 70, 15–26.
| Analysis of the prescribed burning practice in the pine forest of north-western Portugal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3is1Kqsw%3D%3D&md5=e55f89a2f0efb9f6475a02e69b301a1cCAS |
Haines TK, Busby RL, Cleaves DA (2001) Prescribed burning in the South: trends, purpose, and barriers. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 25, 149–153.
Hanson CT, Odion DC, DellaSala DA, Baker WL (2009) Overestimation of fire risk in the Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan. Conservation Biology 23, 1314–1319.
| Overestimation of fire risk in the Northern Spotted Owl Recovery Plan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hiers JK, Laine SC, Bachant JJ, Furman JH, Green WW, Compton V (2003) Simple spatial modeling tool for prioritizing prescribed burning activities at the landscape scale. Conservation Biology 17, 1571–1578.
| Simple spatial modeling tool for prioritizing prescribed burning activities at the landscape scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Husari SJ, McKelvey KS (1996) Fire-management policies and programs. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress (Volume 2).’ pp. 1101–1114. (University of California, Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources: Davis, CA)
Keyser PD, Ford WM (2006) Influence of fire on mammals in eastern oak forests. In ‘Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers.’ pp. 180–191. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-P1. (Newtown Square, PA)
Knapp EE, Estes BL, Skinner CN (2009) Ecological effects of prescribed fire season: a literature review and synthesis for managers. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Research Paper PSW-GTR-224. (Albany, CA)
Knotek K, Watson AE, Borrie WT, Whitmore JG, Turner D (2008) Recreation visitor attitudes towards management-ignited prescribed fires in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, Montana. Journal of Leisure Research 40, 608–618.
Laband D, Hussain A, Gonzalez-Caban A (2008) The impact of forest service litigation success on administrative appeals of proposed fuels reduction actions. Forest Policy and Economics 10, 444–449.
| The impact of forest service litigation success on administrative appeals of proposed fuels reduction actions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lazaro A, Montiel C (2010) Overview of prescribed burning policies and practices in Europe and other countries. In ‘Toward Integrated Fire Management – Outcomes of the European Project Fire Paradox.’ (Eds J Sande Silva, F Rego, P Fernandes, E Rigolot) pp. 137–150. (European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland)
McCaffrey S (2006) Prescribed fire: what influences public approval? In ‘Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers.’ pp. 192–199. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-P1. (Newtown Square, PA)
McKenzie D, Littell J (2011) Climate change and wilderness fire regimes. International Journal of Wilderness 17, 22–27.
Miller C, Abatzoglou J, Brown T, Syphard AD (2011) Wilderness fire management in a changing environment. In ‘The Landscape Ecology of Fire (Ecological Studies Vol. 213).’ (Eds D McKenzie, D Falk, C Miller) pp. 269–294. (Springer, London)
Shindler B, Toman E (2003) Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities: a longitudinal analysis of public support. Journal of Forestry 101, 8–15.
Spies TA, Miller JD, Buchanan JB, Lehmkuhl JF, Franklin JF, Healey SP, Hessburg PF, Safford HD, Cohen WB, Kennedy RSH, Knapp EE, Agee JK, Moeur M (2010) Underestimating risks to the Northern Spotted Owl in fire-prone forests: response to Hanson et al. Conservation Biology 24, 330–333.
| Underestimating risks to the Northern Spotted Owl in fire-prone forests: response to Hanson et al.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecological Applications 15, 532–542.
| Federal forest-fire policy in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sugihara NG, Barbour MG (2006) Fire and California vegetation. In ‘Fire in California’s Ecosystems.’ (Eds N Sugihara, J Van Wagtendonk, KE Shaffer, J Fites-Kaufman, AE Thode) pp. 1–9. (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA)
Swezy DM, Agee JK (1991) Prescribed-fire effects on fine-root and tree mortality in old-growth ponderosa pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 626–634.
| Prescribed-fire effects on fine-root and tree mortality in old-growth ponderosa pine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Varner JM, Gordon DR, Putz FE, Hiers JK (2005) Restoring fire to long-unburned Pinus palustris ecosystems: novel fire effects and consequences for long-unburned ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 13, 536–544.
| Restoring fire to long-unburned Pinus palustris ecosystems: novel fire effects and consequences for long-unburned ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wade DD, Lunsford JD (1989) A guide for prescribed fire in southern forests. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-11. (Asheville, NC)
Walstad JD, Radosevich SR, Sandberg DV (1990) ‘Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests.’ (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)
Williamson MA (2007) Factors in United States Forest Service district rangers’ decision to manage a fire for resource benefit. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 755–762.
| Factors in United States Forest Service district rangers’ decision to manage a fire for resource benefit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yoder J, Tilley M, Engle D, Fuhlendorf S (2003) Economics and prescribed fire law in the United States. Review of Agricultural Economics 25, 218–233.
| Economics and prescribed fire law in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
