Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF08124
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 19(1)

Assessing ignition probability and moisture of extinction in a Mediterranean grass fuel

A. P. Dimitrakopoulos A B , I. D. Mitsopoulos A and K. Gatoulas A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratory of Forest Protection, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, PO Box 228, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

B Corresponding author. Email: alexdimi@for.auth.gr

In memoriam: Professor Nikolaos H. Athanasiadis

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(1) 29-34 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08124
Submitted: 14 July 2008  Accepted: 15 July 2009   Published: 5 February 2010

Abstract

The objective of this study was the assessment of the probability of ignition and moisture of extinction of the annual herbaceous species Slender Oat (Avena barbata Pott. ex Link) in Greece. Multiple ignition tests were conducted in situ with a drip torch during two fire seasons, with simultaneous monitoring of the weather conditions. Stepwise logistic regression was applied to assess the probability of ignition based on plant moisture content and meteorological parameters. Fuel moisture content was determined to be the only statistically significant (P < 0.0001) parameter and, therefore, it was the only variable kept in the analysis. The logistic model correctly predicted fire ignition in 93.6% of the tests and 50% ignition probability was determined at 38.5% oven-dried weight (ODW) plant moisture content. Moisture of extinction (i.e. probability of ignition at 1%) was calculated at 55.5% ODW. Furthermore, classification tree analysis was applied to determine the independent variables that explain the variability in ignition probability. Wind speed was found to have an effect on ignition probability only at relatively high (>30% ODW) fuel moisture contents. Assessment of the ignition potential and moisture of extinction of grass fuels is a prerequisite for reliable fire danger prediction.


Acknowledgements

This study is partly based on the MSc thesis by Mr K. Gatoulas, submitted at the School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Part of the work was financially supported by the FIRE PARADOX project (FP6–018505).


References


Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA (1993) Dynamics and modelling of vegetation fires: observations. In ‘The Ecological, Atmospheric and Climate Importance of Vegetation Fires’. (Eds PJ Crutzen, GJ Goldammer) pp. 39–52. (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT)

Beverly JL , Wotton BM (2007) Modelling the probability of sustained flaming in Canadian fuel types: predictive value of fire weather index components compared with observations of site weather and fuel moisture conditions. International Journal of Wildland Fire  16, 161–173.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bradshaw LS, Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1983) The 1978 National Fire Danger Rating System: technical documentation. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report INT-169. (Ogden, UT)

Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) ‘Classification and Regression Trees.’ (Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA)

Brown JK (1972) Field test of a rate-of-spread model in slash fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Research Paper INT-116. (Ogden, UT)

Burgan RE (1979) Estimating live fuel moisture for the 1978 National Fire Danger Rating System. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Research Paper INT-226. (Ogden, UT)

Burgan RE, Rothermel RC (1984) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system–fuel subsystem. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report INT-167. (Ogden, UT)

Burrows N, Ward B , Robinson A (1991) Fire behaviour in spinifex fuels on the Gibson Desert Nature Reserve, Western Australia. Journal of Arid Environments  20, 189–204.
Catchpole WR (2001) Fire properties and bum patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. In ‘Flammable Australia: The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds RA Bradstock, JE Williams, AM Gill) pp. 49–75. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Cheney NP (1981) Fire Behaviour. In ‘Fire and the Australian Biota’. (Eds AM Gill, RH Groves, IR Noble) pp. 151–175. (Australian Academy of Sciences: Canberra)

Cheney NP, Sullivan A (1997) ‘Grassland Fires, Fuel, Weather and Fire Behaviour.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Cruz MG, Alexander ME , Wakimoto RH (2004) Modeling the likelihood of crown fire occurrence in conifer forest stands. Forest Science  50, 640–658.
Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1977) The National Fire Danger Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report INT-39. (Ogden, UT)

Dimitrakopoulos AP (2001) PYROSTAT – a computer program for forest fire data inventory and analysis in Mediterranean countries. Environmental Modelling & Software  16, 351–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Drysdale D (1998) ‘An introduction to fire dynamics.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Fernandes P, Botelho H, Rego F , Loureiro C (2008) Using fuel and weather variables to predict sustainability of surface fire spread in maritime pine stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  38, 190–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire area simulator-model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fosberg MA, Schroeder MJ (1971) Fine herbaceous fuels in fire-danger rating. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note RM-185. (Fort Collins, CO)

Gillon D, Gomendy V, Houssard C, Marechal J , Valette JC (1995) Combustion and nutrient losses during laboratory burns. International Journal of Wildland Fire  5, 1–12.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) ‘Applied logistic regression.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley: New York)

Larjavaara M, Kuuluvainen T, Tanskanen H , Venäläinen A (2004) Variation in forest fire ignition probability in Finland. Silva Fennica  38, 253–266.
Lawson BD, Armitage OB, Dalrymple GN (1994) Ignition probabilities for simulated people-caused fires in British Columbia lodgepole pine and white spruce-subalpine fir forests. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 26–28 October 1993, Jekyll Island, GA, USA. pp. 493–505. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

Mak EH (1988) Measuring foliar flammability with the Limiting Oxygen Index method. Forest Science  34, 523–529.
Nelson RMJr (2001) Water relations of forest fuels. In ‘Forest Fires: Behavior and Ecological Effects’. (Eds EA Johnson, K Miyanishi) pp. 79–150. (Academic Press: San Diego)

Norusis MJ (1997) ‘SPSS Professional Statistics.’ (SPSS Inc.: Chicago)

Papanastasis VP (1999) Grasslands and woody plants in Europe with special reference to Greece. In ‘Grasslands and woody plants in Europe’. (Eds VP Papanastasis, J Frame, AS Nastis) pp. 15–24. (European Grassland Federation: Thessaloniki, Greece)

Piñol J, Terradas J , Lloret F (1998) Climate warming, wildfire hazard, and wildfire occurrence in coastal eastern Spain. Climatic Change  38, 345–357.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Plucinski M (2003) The investigation of factors governing ignition and development of fires in heatland vegetation. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Pompe V , Vines RG (1966) The influence of moisture on the combustion of leaves. Australian Forestry  30, 231–241.
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Ryan KC , Reinhardt ED (1988) Predicting postfire mortality of seven western conifers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  18, 1291–1297.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behaviour fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report GTR-153. (Fort Collins, CO)

Tanskanen H, Venäläinen A, Puttonen P , Granström A (2005) Impact of stand structure on surface fire ignition potential in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris forests in southern Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  35, 410–420.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tunstall B (1988) Live fuel water content. In ‘Proceedings of the Conference on Bushfire Modelling and Fire Danger Rating Systems’, 11–12 July 1988, Canberra, Australia. (Eds NP Cheney, AM Gill) pp. 127–137. (CSIRO: Australia)

Van Wagner CE (1987) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Canadian Forest Service, Technical Report 25. (Ottawa, ON)

Viegas D, Viegas P , Ferreira A (1992) Moisture content of fine forest fuels and fire occurrence in central Portugal. International Journal of Wildland Fire  2, 69–85.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilson RA (1990) Reexamination of Rothermel’s fire spread equations in no-wind and no slope conditions. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Research Paper INT-434. (Ogden, UT)

Wilson RA (1985) Observations of extinction and marginal burning states in free burning porous fuel beds. Combustion Science and Technology  44, 179–194.

| Crossref |

Wilson AG , Ferguson IS (1986) Predicting the probability of house survival during bushfires. Journal of Environmental Management  23, 259–270.


Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise D (2005) Modelling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral live fuels. Combustion and Flame  143, 183–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |