Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effect of ash on runoff and erosion after a severe forest wildfire, Montana, USA

Scott W. Woods A B and Victoria N. Balfour A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Montana, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: scott.woods@umontana.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(5) 535-548 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07040
Submitted: 22 February 2007  Accepted: 22 July 2008   Published: 3 October 2008

Abstract

Ash formed by the combustion of vegetation and the litter and duff layers may affect runoff and erosion rates in the period immediately following wildfires, but only a handful of studies have specifically measured its effect. Approximately 1 month after the 2005 Tarkio Fire in western Montana, we applied simulated rainfall for 1 h at a mean intensity of 7.5 cm h–1 to six pairs of 0.5-m2 plots in an area burned at high severity and with a continuous 1-cm to 3.5-cm ash layer on the surface. The ash was retained in one plot per pair and removed from the other plot with a fine brush. The ash layer provided an additional 1.5 cm of water storage capacity and protected the underlying mineral soil from surface sealing, so that the time of ponding in the ash-covered plots was 12 ± 10 min longer, the final runoff rate was 2.1 ± 0.4 cm h–1 lower and the total infiltration was 2.0 ± 1.2 cm higher than in the plots without ash. The reduced runoff from the ash-covered plots in combination with reduced rainsplash detachment resulted in a 74% reduction in sediment yield relative to the plots without ash. Nine months after the fire, the ash was patchy and just a few millimetres thick, and a second set of simulations showed no significant differences in the time of ponding, final runoff rate, total infiltration or sediment yield between plots with and without ash. Ash may significantly reduce the runoff and erosion from severely burned areas in the period shortly after a fire. Consequently, the largest post-fire hydrogeomorphic hazard will occur after the ash layer has been removed by wind and water erosion, but before there has been substantial vegetative regrowth.

Additional keywords: infiltration, overland flow, sediment yield, soil erosion.


Acknowledgements

The present research was funded by a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service, Watershed Processes Program (Award No. 2004–35102–15012). The USDA Forest Service, Ninemile Ranger District and Plum Creek Timber Co. facilitated access to the study site. Matt Wotherspoon, Jason Sappington, Carl Lanz, and Eric Sims assisted with field data collection. Two anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved the paper.


References


Agassi M , Bradford JM (1999) Methodologies for interrill soil erosion studies. Soil and Tillage Research  49, 277–287.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Balfour VN (2007) The effects of forest fires on runoff rates: the role of duff removal and surface sealing by vegetative ash, western Montana. MSc(Forestry) thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.

Ben-Hur M, Shainberg I, Keren R , Gal M (1985) Effect of water quality and drying on soil crust properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal  49, 191–196.
Bookter A (2006) Erosional processes after wildfires: the impact of vegetative ash and the morphology of debris flows. MSc thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.

Borselli L, Torri D, Poesen J , Salvador Sanchis P (2001) Effects of water quality on infiltration, runoff and interrill erosion processes during simulated rainfall. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms  26, 329–342.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Bubenzer GD (1979) Rainfall characteristics important for simulation. In ‘Proceedings of the Rainfall Simulator Workshop’, 7–9 March 1979, Tucson, AZ. USDA Science and Education Administration, Agricultural Reviews and Manuals ARM-W-10/July 1979, pp. 22–34. (Denver, CO)

Campbell RE, Baker MB, Fiolliott PF, Larsen FR, Avery CC (1977) Wildfire effects on a ponderosa pine ecosystem: an Arizona case study. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-191. (Fort Collins, CO)

Cannon SH, Bigio ER , Mine E (2001) A process for fire-related debris flow initiation, Cerro Grande fire, New Mexico. Hydrological Processes  15, 3011–3023.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Danielson RE, Sutherland RL (1986) Porosity. In ‘Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 443–460. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

DeBano LF (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellence in wildland environments: a review. Journal of Hydrology  231, 195–206.

Crossref | Klute A, Dirksen C (1986) Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In ‘Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1’. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 687–732. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Leighton-Boyce G, Doerr SH, Shakesby RA , Walsh RPD (2007) Quantifying the impact of soil water repellency on overland flow generation and erosion: a new approach using rainfall simulation and wetting agent on in situ soil. Hydrological Processes  21, 2337–2345.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McLean EO (1982) Soil pH and lime. In ‘Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties’, 2nd edn. (Eds AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keaney) pp. 199–224. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Megahan WF (1974) Erosion over time: a model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Paper INT-156. (Ogden, UT)

Mein RG , Larsen CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resources Research  9, 384–394.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Neary DG, Ryan KC, DeBano LF (Eds) (2005) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soil and water. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- Volume 4. (Ogden, UT)

Onda Y, Dietrich WE , Booker F (2008) Evolution of overland flow after a severe forest fire, Point Reyes, California. Catena  72, 13–20.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Parrett C (1987) Fire related debris flows in the Beaver Creek drainage, Lewis and Clark County, Montana. US Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2330, pp. 57–67. (Denver, CO)

Parrett C, Cannon SH, Pierce KL (2004) Wildfire-related floods and debris flows in Montana in 2000 and 2001. United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation Report 03–4319. (Reston, VA)

Prosser IP , Williams L (1998) The effects of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest. Hydrological Processes  12, 251–265.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rawls WJ, Ahuja LR, Brakensiek DL, Shirmohammadi A (1992) Infiltration and soil water movement. In ‘Handbook of Hydrology’. (Ed. DR Maidment) Ch. 5, pp. 5.1–5.51. (McGraw Hill: New York)

Rhoades JD (1982) Soluble Salts. In ‘Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties’, 2nd edn. (Eds AL Page, RH Miller, DR Keaney) pp. 167–179. (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI)

Ryan KC, Noste NV (1985) Evaluating prescribed fires. In ‘Proceedings – Symposium and Workshop on Wilderness Fire’, 15–18 November 1983, Missoula, MT. (Eds JE Lotan, BM Kilgore, WC Fischer, RW Mutch) USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Research Station, General Technical Report INT-182, pp. 230–238. (Ogden, UT)

Sasich J, Lamotte-Hagen K (1989) Lolo National Forest land systems inventory. USDA Forest Service, Lolo National Forest. (Missoula, MT)

Scott DF , van Wyk DB (1990) The effects of wildfire on soil wettability and hydrological behaviour of an afforested catchment. Journal of Hydrology  121, 239–256.

Crossref | SPSS Inc. (1999) ‘SPSS for Windows, Release 10.0.5 (27 November 1999).’ (SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL)

Swanson FJ (1981) Fire and geomorphic processes. In ‘Fire Regime and Ecosystem Properties’. (Eds HA Mooney, TM Bonnicksen, NL Christiansen, JE Lotan, WA Reiners) USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-26, pp. 401–421. (Washington, DC)

Ulery AL, Graham RC , Amrhein C (1993) Wood-ash composition and soil pH following intense burning. Soil Science  156, 358–364.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | USDA (1994) ‘Soil Survey Manual.’ USDA Handbook No. 18. (Washington, DC)

Valentin C , Bresson LM (1992) Morphology, genesis and classification of crusts in loamy and sandy soils. Geoderma  55, 225–245.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Walsh RPD, Boakes DJ, Coelho COA, Goncalves AJB, Shakesby RA, Thomas AD (1994) Impacts of fire-induced water repellency and post-fire forest litter on overland flow in northern and central Portugal. In ‘Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Forest Fire Research’, November, 1994, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) Vol. II, pp. 1149–1159. (Association for the Development of Industrial Aerodynamics: Coimbra, Portugal)

Wells WG (1987) The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California. In ‘Reviews in Engineering Geology VII: Debris Flows/Avalanches, Process, Recognition, and Mitigation’. (Eds JE Costa, GF Wieczorek) pp. 105–114. (Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO)

Wells WG, Campbell RE, DeBano LF, Lewis CE, Fredrikson RL, Franklin EC, Froelich RC, Dunn PH (1979) Effects of fire on soil: a state of knowledge. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-7. (Washington, DC)

Wondzell SM , King JG (2003) Post-fire erosional processes in the Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain regions. Forest Ecology and Management  178, 75–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woods SW, Birkas A , Ahl RS (2007) Spatial variability of soil hydrophobicity after wildfires in Montana and Colorado. Geomorphology  86, 465–479.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |