Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Landscape-scale changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behaviour following ponderosa pine restoration treatments

John P. Roccaforte A C , Peter Z. Fulé A B and W. Wallace Covington A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ecological Restoration Institute, Box 15017, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

B School of Forestry, Box 15018, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: john.roccaforte@nau.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(2) 293-303 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06120
Submitted: 28 August 2006  Accepted: 13 June 2007   Published: 18 April 2008

Abstract

We evaluated canopy fuels and potential fire behaviour changes following landscape-scale restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine forest at Mt Trumbull, Arizona, USA. The goal of the project was to restore historical forest structure by thinning and burning, thereby reducing canopy fuels and minimising active crown fire potential. We measured 117 permanent plots before (1996–97) and after (2003) treatments. The plots were evenly distributed across the landscape and represented an area of ~1200 ha, about half of which was an untreated control. We compared canopy fuel estimates using three different methods to assess whether fire behaviour modelling outputs were sensitive to the choice of canopy fuel equation. Treatments decreased canopy fuel load by 43–50% from 0.77–1.83 kg m–2 to 0.44–0.91 kg m–2 (the range of values reflects the different canopy fuel equations) and decreased canopy bulk density by 42–61% from 0.038–0.172 kg m–3 to 0.022–0.067 kg m–3 in the treated area, while slight increases occurred in the control. We applied two fire models to estimate potential fire behaviour: FlamMap and NEXUS. These models differ in several important features but predicted outcomes were consistent: under extreme drought and wind conditions, the proportion of the landscape susceptible to active crown fire decreased in the treated area while little change occurred in the control.

Additional keywords: Arizona, canopy bulk density, canopy fuel load, crown fire, FlamMap, modelling, Mt Trumbull, NEXUS.


Acknowledgements

Thanks to Margaret Moore, John Bailey and Joe Scott for their comments and insight; the staff and students at the Ecological Restoration Institute, especially Jon Bakker, Scott Curran, and Joe Crouse; and to the BLM Arizona Strip District, especially Ken Moore, Tim Duck, and Aaron Wilkerson. The present research was funded by the US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.


References


Alexander ME, Stefner CN, Mason JA, Stocks BJ, Hartley GR, Maffey ME, Wotton BM, Taylor SW, Lavoie N, Dalrymple GN (2004) Characterizing the jack pine–black spruce fuel complex of the International Crown Fire Modeling Experiment (ICFME). Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-393. (Edmonton, AB)

Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M , Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of south-western ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecological Applications  12, 1418–1433.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT)

Applequist MB (1958) A simple pith locator for use with off-center increment cores. Journal of Forestry  56, 141..
Barger RL, Ffolliott PF (1972) Physical characteristics and utilization of major woodland tree species in Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RM-83. (Fort Collins, CO)

Brown JK (1978) Weight and density of crowns of Rocky Mountain conifers. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-197. (Ogden, UT)

Clary WP , Teidemann AR (1986) Distribution of biomass within small tree and shrub form Quercus gambelii stands. Forest Science  32, 234–242.
Cram DS, Baker TT (2003) ‘Inventory and Classification of Wildland Fire Effects in Silviculturally Treated vs. Untreated Forest Stands of New Mexico and Arizona.’ New Mexico State University, College of Agriculture and Home Economics, Cooperative Extension Service, Annual Report. (Las Cruces, NM)

Cruz MG, Alexander ME , Wakimoto RH (2003) Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America. International Journal of Wildland Fire  12, 39–50.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Faiella SM (2005) Fire, fuel, and structural dynamics in treated and untreated ponderosa pine forests of Northern Arizona. MS Thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.

Fiedler CE, Keegan CE (2003) Reducing crown fire hazard in fire-adapted forests of New Mexico. In ‘Proceedings of the Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration Conference’, 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO. (Eds PN Omi, LN Joyce) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Report RMRS-P-29. pp. 39–48. (Fort Collins, CO)

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire area simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Finney MA, McHugh CW , Grenfel IC (2005) Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  35, 1714–1722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fulé PZ, McHugh C, Heinlein TA, Covington WW (2001a) Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments. In ‘Proceedings of the Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems Restoration and Conservation: Steps toward Stewardship Conference’, 25–27 April 2000, Flagstaff, AZ. (Eds RK Vance, WW Covington, CB Edminster, JA Blake) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-P-22. pp. 28–35. (Ogden, UT)

Fulé PZ, Waltz AEM, Covington WW, Heinlein TA (2001b) Measuring forest restoration effectiveness in reducing hazardous fuels. Journal of Forestry 99, 24–29.

Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Smith HB, Springer JD, Heinlein TA, Huisinga KD , Moore MM (2002a) Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management  170, 19–41.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Graham RT (2003) Hayman Fire case study. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-114. (Ogden, UT)

Grier CC, Elliot KJ , McCullough DG (1992) Biomass distribution and productivity of Pinus edulis–Juniperus monosperma woodlands of north-central Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management  50, 331–350.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Keane RE, Mincemoyer SA, Schmidt KM, Long DG, Garner JL (2000) Mapping vegetation and fuels for fire management on the Gila National Forest Complex, New Mexico. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-46 CD. (Fort Collins, CO)

Lynch DL, Romme WH , Floyd ML (2000) Forest restoration in south-western ponderosa pine. Journal of Forestry  98, 17–24.
Martinson E, Omi PN (2003) Performance of fuel treatments subjected to wildfires. In ‘Proceedings of the Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration Conference’, 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO. (Eds PN Omi, LN Joyce) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Report RMRS-P-29. pp. 7–14. (Fort Collins, CO)

Mast JN, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, Covington WW , Waltz AEM (1999) Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecological Applications  9, 228–239.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Moore K, Davis B, Duck T (2003) Mt Trumbull ponderosa pine ecosystem restoration project. In ‘Proceedings of the Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration Conference’, 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO. (Eds PN Omi, LN Joyce) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Report RMRS-P-29. pp. 117–132. (Fort Collins, CO)

Moore MM, Covington WW , Fulé PZ (1999) Reference conditions and ecological restoration: a south-western ponderosa pine perspective. Ecological Applications  9, 1266–1277.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | National Park Service (2003) ‘Western Region Fire Monitoring Handbook.’ (USDI National Park Service, Fire Management Program Center, National Interagency Fire Center: Boise, ID)

Pollet J , Omi PN (2002) Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 1–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) ‘Introduction to Wildland Fire.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley: New York)

Reeberg P (1995) The western region fire monitoring handbook. In ‘Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire in Wilderness and Park Management’, 30 March–1 April 1993, Missoula, MT. (Eds JK Brown, RW Mutch, CW Spoon, RH Wakimoto) USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-320. pp. 259–260. (Ogden, UT)

Rogers JJ, Prosser JM, Garrett LD, Ryan MG (1984) ECOSIM: a system for projecting multiresource outputs under alternative forest management regimes. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Administrative Report. (Fort Collins, CO)

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Sackett SS, Haase SM, Harrington MG (1996) Lessons learned from fire use for restoring south-western ponderosa pine ecosystems. In ‘Conference on Adaptive Ecosystem Restoration and Management: Restoration of Cordilleran Conifer Landscapes of North America’. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-GTR-278. (Tech. Coords WW Covington, PK Wagner) pp. 53–60. (Fort Collins, CO)

Savage M , Mast JN (2005) How resilient are south-western ponderosa pine forests after crown fires? Canadian Journal of Forest Research  35, 967–977.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Scott JH (1998a) Fuel reduction in residential and scenic forests: a comparison of three treatments in a western Montana ponderosa pine stand. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-5. (Ogden, UT)

Scott JH (1998b) Sensitivity analysis of a method for assessing crown fire hazard in the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Forest Fire Research; 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 16–20 November 1998, Luso, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) Vol. II, pp. 2517–2532. (ADAI, University of Coimbra: Coimbra, Portugal)

Scott JH (1999) NEXUS: a system for assessing crown fire hazard. Fire Management Notes  59, 20–24.
Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2001) Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-29. (Fort Collins, CO)

Scott JH , Reinhardt ED (2002) Estimating canopy fuels in conifer forests. Fire Management Today  62, 45–50.
Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2004) ‘NEXUS 2.0.’ Software program. (Systems for Environmental Management: Missoula, MT)

Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2005) Stereo photo guide for estimating canopy fuel characteristics in conifer stands. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-145. (Fort Collins, CO)

Stephens SL (1998) Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatment on potential fire behavior in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management  105, 21–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1968) ‘An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago)

Stratton RD (2004) Assessing the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatments on fire growth and behavior. Journal of Forestry  102, 32–40.
Stratton RD (2006) Guidance on spatial wildland fire analysis: models, tools, and techniques. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-183. (Fort Collins, CO)

Strom BA , Fulé PZ (2007) Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics. International Journal of Wildland Fire  16, 128–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Thomas JW, Anderson RG, Maser C, Bull EL (1979) Snags. In ‘Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests – The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington’. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 553, pp. 60–77. (Washington, DC)

Van Wagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  7, 23–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Western Regional Climate Center (2005) Western US climate historical summaries. Remote Automated Weather Station (RAWS). Available at http://www.wrcc.dri.edu [Verified 20 April 2005]

White AS (1985) Presettlement regeneration patterns in a south-western ponderosa pine stand. Ecology  66, 589–594.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |