Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Meteorologically influenced wildfire impacts on urban particulate matter and visibility in Tucson, Arizona, USA

Erika K. Wise
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona, Harvill Building, Box #2, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. Email: ekwise@email.arizona.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(2) 214-223 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06111
Submitted: 15 July 2006  Accepted: 18 October 2007   Published: 17 April 2008

Abstract

Fire managers must consider air-quality impacts when planning prescribed burns or devising wildfire containment strategies. Particulate matter (PM) is the primary pollutant of concern: it is the major component of smoke and has known detrimental influences on human health and the environment. The present study examines wildfire–weather–PM interactions and the resulting impacts on urban air quality and visibility in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Few violations of air-quality standards were recorded during large wildfire events in the study area. When examined at a higher-resolution time scale, the impacts of the fires on urban air quality are apparent. The present study also found that extreme PM values were linked to humid and windy conditions, wildfires appear to have a greater impact on PM10 concentrations than PM2.5 concentrations, and PM10 is more closely tied to visibility degradation during fire events than PM2.5. Comparison of actual PM concentrations to those predicted by a regulatory model indicates that the model overestimates standard exceedances, with resulting implications for prescribed burn planning.

Additional keywords: air pollution, climate, smoke, south-western USA, wildland fire.


Acknowledgements

Dr Andrew Comrie, Dr Mike Crimmins and Dr Stephen Yool provided helpful comments on this research. Gregg Townsend provided the webcam images. Meteorological data were provided by the USA National Climatic Data Center, visibility data were provided by the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments program, and PM data were supplied by the Pima Department of Environmental Quality. This work was supported by the Climate Assessment for the South-west project, a Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessment initiative funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.


References


Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2006) ‘Instruction guide for completing the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality ADEQ Burn Plan form.’ Available at http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/smoke/download/burn_inst.pdf [Verified February 2006]

Bravo AH, Sosa ER, Sánchez AP, Jaimes PM , Saavedra RMI (2002) Impact of wildfires on the air quality of Mexico City, 1992–1999. Environmental Pollution  117, 243–253.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Environmental Protection Agency (1999) ‘Regional haze fact sheet.’ Available at http://www.epa.gov/air/visibility/facts.pdf [Verified March 2003]

Henderson DE, Milford JB , Miller SL (2005) Prescribed burns and wildfires in Colorado: Impacts of mitigation measures on indoor air particulate matter. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association  55, 1516–1526.
Kachigan SK (1982) ‘Multivariate statistical analysis.’ (Radius Press: New York)

Malm WC (1999) ‘Introduction to visibility.’ (Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere: Fort Collins, CO) Available at http://www.epa.gov/air/visibility/pdfs/introvis.pdf [Verified February 2006]

Phuleria HC, Fine PM, Zhu Y , Sioutas C (2005) Air quality impacts of the October 2003 Southern California wildfires. Journal of Geophysical Research  110, D07S20..
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sammis T, Mexal J (2002) ‘Where there’s fire, there’s smoke!’ (New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM) Available at http://weather.nmsu.edu/News/fall2002/news2002.pdf [Verified March 2003]

Sandberg DV, Ottmar RD, Peterson JL, Core J (2002) Wildland fire on ecosystems: effects of fire on air. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Report RMRS-GTR-42. (Ogden, UT)

Sheridan SC (2002) The redevelopment of a weather-type classification scheme for North America. International Journal of Climatology  22, 51–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere (1996) The Southern Appalachian Assessment Atmospheric Technical Report. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Report 3 of 5. (Atlanta, GA)

Stocker RA (2000) Methodology for determining wildfire and prescribed fire air quality impacts on areas in the Western United States. Journal of Sustainable Forestry  11, 311–328.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Western Regional Air Partnership (2005) ‘2002 fire emission inventory for the WRAP region – Phase II.’ Project no. 178-6. (Air Sciences Inc.: Denver, CO)

Yokelson RJ, Goode JG, Ward DE, Baker SP, Susott RA, Hao WM (2000) The chemistry of fire and smoke: the composition, amount, and fate of smoke from residual smoldering combustion. In ‘Proceedings from the joint fire science conference and workshop’, 15–17 June 1999, Boise, ID. (Eds LF Neuenschwander, KC Ryan, GE Gollberg, JD Greer) pp. 112–113. (University of Idaho: Moscow, ID)