Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of FARSITE simulator in Mediterranean maquis

Bachisio Arca A C D , P. Duce A , M. Laconi B , G. Pellizzaro A , M. Salis B and D. Spano B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CNR-IBIMET, Institute of Biometeorology, Sassari, Italy.

B DESA, Department of Economics and Woody Plant Ecosystems, University of Sassari, Italy.

C Present address: CNR-IBIMET, via Funtana di lu Colbu 4/a, I-07100 Sassari, Italy.

D Corresponding author. Email: b.arca@ibimet.cnr.it

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(5) 563-572 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06070
Submitted: 16 May 2006  Accepted: 17 February 2007   Published: 26 October 2007

Abstract

In the last two decades, several models were developed to provide temporal and spatial variations of fire spread and behaviour. The most common models (i.e. BEHAVE and FARSITE) are based on Rothermel's original fire spread equation and describe fire spread and behaviour taking into account the influences of fuels, terrain and weather conditions. The use of FARSITE on areas different from those where the simulator was originally developed requires a local calibration to produce reliable results. This is particularly true for Mediterranean ecosystems, where plant communities are characterised by high specific and structural heterogeneity and complexity. To perform FARSITE calibration, an appropriate fuel model or the development of a specific custom fuel model is needed. In this study, FARSITE was employed to simulate three fire events in Mediterranean areas using different fuel models and meteorological input data, and the accuracy of results was analysed. A custom fuel model designed and developed for shrubland vegetation (maquis) provided realistic values of rate of spread, when compared with estimated values obtained using standard fuel models. Our results confirm that the use of both wind field data and appropriate custom fuel models are crucial to obtain reasonable simulations of wildfire events occurring on Mediterranean vegetation during the drought season.

Additional keywords: behaviour, fire modelling, fuel models, Mediterranean forest areas, shrubland vegetation.


Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the personnel of the Sardinian Agrometeorological Service for providing weather data, and the Sardinian Forestry Corps (Cooperative agreement 27.12.2005) for providing GIS data and most of the information about the fire events. This work was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Scientific Research (MIUR), Grant N. 165-DM 1105/2002.


References


Albini FA, Baughman RG (1979) Estimating windspeeds for predicting wildland fire behavior. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-221. (Ogden, UT)

Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system-BURN subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-194. (Odgen, UT)

Andrews PL , Queen LP (2001) Fire modeling and information system technology. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 343–352.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Butler BW, Forthofer JM, Stratton RD, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS (2005) Fire growth simulations of the Price Canyon, Thirtymile and Storm King Mountain fires using high resolution wind simulation tools and FARSITE. In ‘Procedings of Sixth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’ and ‘19th Interior West Fire Council Meeting’. 24–27 October 2005, Canmore, AB, Canada. P1.2. (CD-ROM) (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA) Available at http://ams.confex.com/ams/6FireJoint/techprogram/paper_97589.htm [Verified 10 September 2007]

Colliver DG (1991) Techniques of estimating incident solar radiation. In ‘Solar Energy in Agriculture’. (Ed. BF Parker) pp. 1–66. (Elsevier: Amsterdam)

Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment  37, 35–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Congalton RG, Green K (1999) ‘Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices.’ (Lewis Publishers: New York)

Congalton RG , Mead RA (1983) A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photointerpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing  49, 69–74.
EEA (2002) ‘Corine land cover update 2000 ­– Technical guidelines.’ European Environment Agency, Technical Report 89. (European Environment Agency: Copenhagen) Available at http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2002_89/en [Verified 10 September 2007]

Fernandes PM (2001) Fire spread prediction in shrub fuels in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management  144, 67–74.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Hanson HP, Bradley MM, Bossert JE, Linn RR , Younker LW (2000) The potential and promise of physics-based wildfire simulation. Environmental Science & Policy  3, 161–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) ‘Numerical Ecology.’ (Elsevier: Amsterdam)

Lopes AMG (2003) WindStation – a software for the simulation of atmospheric flows over complex topography. Environmental Modelling & Software  18, 81–96.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) ‘Statistical Ecology: a primer on methods and computing.’ (Wiley: New York)

Miller JD , Yool SR (2002) Modeling fire in semi-desert grassland/oak woodland: the spatial implications. Ecological Modelling  153, 229–245.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pellizzaro G, Cesaraccio C, Asunis C, Caria C (2003) Analysis of fuel type and vegetation structure for fire risk index development. In ‘Proceedings 5th Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’ and ‘2nd International Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress’. 16–20 November 2003, Orlando, FL. P1.9. (CD-ROM) (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA) Available at http://ams.confex.com/ams/FIRE2003/techprogram/paper_67131.htm [Verified 10 September 2007]

Pellizzaro G, Ventura A, Zara P (2005) Influence of seasonal weather variations on fuel status for some shrubs typical of Mediterranean Basin. In ‘Proceedings 6th Fire and Forest Meteorology Symposium’ and ‘19th Interior West Fire Council Meeting’. 24–27 October 2005, Canmore, AB, Canada. P1.16. (CD-ROM) (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA) Available at http://ams.confex.com/ams/6FireJoint/techprogram/paper_97607.htm [Verified 10 September 2007]

Perry GLW, Sparrow AD , Owens JF (1999) A GIS-supported model for the simulation of the spatial structure of wildland fire, Cass Basin, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology  36, 502–518.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pyne SJ (1984) ‘Introduction to Wildland Fire.’ (Wiley: New York)

Richards GD (1990) An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering  30, 1163–1179.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-115. (Odgen, UT)

Sauvagnargues-Lesage S, Dusserre G, Robert F, Dray G , Pearson DW (2001) Experimental validation in Mediterranean shrubs fuels of seven wildland fire rate of spread models. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 15–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. (Fort Collins, CO)

Sun L, Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise DR (2006) Comparison of burning characteristics of live and dead chaparral fuels. Combustion and Flame  144, 349–359.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | van Wagtendonk JW (1996) Use of a Deterministic Fire Growth Model to Test Fuel Treatments. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress’. Vol. II, Ch 43, University of California – Davis, Wildland Resources Center Report 37. (Davis, CA)

van Wilgen BW, le Maitre DC , Kruger FJ (1985) Fire modelling in South African fynbos (macchia) vegetation and predictions from Rothermel’s fire model. Journal of Applied Ecology  22, 207–216.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Weise DR, Regelbrugge JC (1997) Recent chaparral fuel modeling efforts. Chaparral Fuel Modeling Workshop. 11–12 March 1997, Riverside, CA. (USDA Forest Service: Missoula, MT) Available at http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~complex/research/hfire/fuels/fuels_dev_seq.html [Verified 10 September 2007]

Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – go or no go? International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilson R (1985) Observation of extinction and marginal burning states in free-burning porous fuelbeds. Combustion Science and Technology  44, 179–193.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise D (2005a) Modeling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral shrub fuel bed. Combustion and Flame  143, 183–198.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhou X, Weise D , Mahalingamn S (2005b) Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of marginal burning in live chaparral fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute  30, 2287–2294.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |