Evaluation of FARSITE simulator in Mediterranean maquis
Bachisio Arca A C D , P. Duce A , M. Laconi B , G. Pellizzaro A , M. Salis B and D. Spano BA CNR-IBIMET, Institute of Biometeorology, Sassari, Italy.
B DESA, Department of Economics and Woody Plant Ecosystems, University of Sassari, Italy.
C Present address: CNR-IBIMET, via Funtana di lu Colbu 4/a, I-07100 Sassari, Italy.
D Corresponding author. Email: b.arca@ibimet.cnr.it
International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(5) 563-572 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06070
Submitted: 16 May 2006 Accepted: 17 February 2007 Published: 26 October 2007
Abstract
In the last two decades, several models were developed to provide temporal and spatial variations of fire spread and behaviour. The most common models (i.e. BEHAVE and FARSITE) are based on Rothermel's original fire spread equation and describe fire spread and behaviour taking into account the influences of fuels, terrain and weather conditions. The use of FARSITE on areas different from those where the simulator was originally developed requires a local calibration to produce reliable results. This is particularly true for Mediterranean ecosystems, where plant communities are characterised by high specific and structural heterogeneity and complexity. To perform FARSITE calibration, an appropriate fuel model or the development of a specific custom fuel model is needed. In this study, FARSITE was employed to simulate three fire events in Mediterranean areas using different fuel models and meteorological input data, and the accuracy of results was analysed. A custom fuel model designed and developed for shrubland vegetation (maquis) provided realistic values of rate of spread, when compared with estimated values obtained using standard fuel models. Our results confirm that the use of both wind field data and appropriate custom fuel models are crucial to obtain reasonable simulations of wildfire events occurring on Mediterranean vegetation during the drought season.
Additional keywords: behaviour, fire modelling, fuel models, Mediterranean forest areas, shrubland vegetation.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the personnel of the Sardinian Agrometeorological Service for providing weather data, and the Sardinian Forestry Corps (Cooperative agreement 27.12.2005) for providing GIS data and most of the information about the fire events. This work was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Scientific Research (MIUR), Grant N. 165-DM 1105/2002.
Andrews PL , Queen LP (2001) Fire modeling and information system technology. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 343–352.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37, 35–46.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Congalton RG , Mead RA (1983) A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photointerpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 49, 69–74.
Fernandes PM (2001) Fire spread prediction in shrub fuels in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management 144, 67–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hanson HP, Bradley MM, Bossert JE, Linn RR , Younker LW (2000) The potential and promise of physics-based wildfire simulation. Environmental Science & Policy 3, 161–172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lopes AMG (2003) WindStation – a software for the simulation of atmospheric flows over complex topography. Environmental Modelling & Software 18, 81–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miller JD , Yool SR (2002) Modeling fire in semi-desert grassland/oak woodland: the spatial implications. Ecological Modelling 153, 229–245.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perry GLW, Sparrow AD , Owens JF (1999) A GIS-supported model for the simulation of the spatial structure of wildland fire, Cass Basin, New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 36, 502–518.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards GD (1990) An elliptical growth model of forest fire fronts and its numerical solution. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 30, 1163–1179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sauvagnargues-Lesage S, Dusserre G, Robert F, Dray G , Pearson DW (2001) Experimental validation in Mediterranean shrubs fuels of seven wildland fire rate of spread models. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 15–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sun L, Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise DR (2006) Comparison of burning characteristics of live and dead chaparral fuels. Combustion and Flame 144, 349–359.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Wilgen BW, le Maitre DC , Kruger FJ (1985) Fire modelling in South African fynbos (macchia) vegetation and predictions from Rothermel’s fire model. Journal of Applied Ecology 22, 207–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – go or no go? International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 99–106.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wilson R (1985) Observation of extinction and marginal burning states in free-burning porous fuelbeds. Combustion Science and Technology 44, 179–193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou X, Mahalingam S , Weise D (2005a) Modeling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral shrub fuel bed. Combustion and Flame 143, 183–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhou X, Weise D , Mahalingamn S (2005b) Experimental measurements and numerical modeling of marginal burning in live chaparral fuel beds. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 30, 2287–2294.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |