Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF06060
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 16(6)

Comparing landscape-based decision rules for placement of fuel treatments in the boreal mixedwood of western Canada

Marc-André Parisien A C D , David R. Junor A and Victor G. Kafka B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 122nd Street, Edmonton, AB T5H 3S5, Canada.

B Parks Canada Agency, Quebec Service Centre, National Fire Centre, 3 Passage du Chien d’Or, Québec, QC G1R 4V7, Canada.

C Present address: University of California, Berkeley, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 137 Mulford Hall 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: parisien@nature.berkeley.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(6) 664-672 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06060
Submitted: 18 May 2006  Accepted: 6 September 2007   Published: 17 December 2007

Abstract

The present study used a rule-based approach to prioritise locations of fuel treatments in the boreal mixedwood forest of western Canada. The analysis, which was conducted in and around Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan, was based on burn probability (BP) mapping using the Burn-P3 (Probability, Prediction, and Planning) model. Fuel treatment locations were determined according to three rule-sets and five fuel treatment intensities. Fuel treatments were located according to BP only; jurisdictional boundaries and BP; and non-flammable landscape features, BP, and fuel treatment orientation. First, a baseline BP map was created from the original (i.e. unmodified) fuels grid. Fuel treatments were then added to the selected areas and BP maps produced for each combination of rule-set and treatment intensity. BP values for the treated landscapes were compared with those of the baseline BP map. Results varied substantially among scenarios. Locating fuel treatments as a function of the jurisdictional boundaries and BP yielded the lowest reduction in BP. Results suggest that clumping fuel treatments within a limited area or using landscape features to maximise the large-scale spatial benefits of the fuel treatments can significantly reduce landscape-level BP. Although these two strategies may produce similar overall reductions in BP, their appropriateness and utility depend on management objectives.

Additional keywords: Burn-P3 model, burn probability, landscape features, strategically placed areas of treatments (SPLATs).


Acknowledgements

The present study was made possible by the Prince Albert Model Forest Science and Technology Fund. We are grateful to Jen Beverly, Paul Maczek, Diana Stralberg, Nicole Vaillant, and Jeff Weir for their ideas and comments. Alan Frank and Dave Wieder provided geospatial data, and Daniel Poirier and Richard Carr provided weather data. We thank Cordy Tymstra for his project-long assistance with Prometheus and Peter Englefield for helping with the geographic information system analysis.


References


Agee JK , Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management  211, 83–96.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Environment Canada (2005) Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. (Ottawa, ON) Available at http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/climate/climate_normals/index_e.cfm [Verified 15 September 2005]

Finney MA (2001) Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. Forest Science  47, 219–228.
Finney MA, Cohen JD (2003) Expectation and evaluation of fuel management objectives. In ‘Conference on Fire, Fuel Treatments and Ecological Restoration: Proceedings’. 16–18 April 2002, Fort Collins, CO. pp. 353–366. RMRS-P-29. (USFS, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Fort Collins, CO)

Finney MA, McHugh CW , Grenfell IC (2005) Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  35, 1714–1722.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Forestry Canada, Information Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

He H, Shang BZ, Crow TR, Gustafson EJ , Shifley SR (2004) Simulating forest fuel and fire risk dynamics across landscapes – LANDIS fuel module design. Ecological Modelling  180, 135–151.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hirsch KG, Kafka V, Todd JB (2004) Using forest management techniques to alter forest fuels and reduce wildfire size: an exploratory analysis. In ‘22nd Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: Fire in Temperate, Boreal, and Montane Ecosystems: Proceedings’. 15–18 October 2001, Kananaskis, AB. (Eds RT Engstrom, WJ de Groot) pp. 175–184. (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL)

Loehle C (2004) Applying landscape principles to fire hazard reduction. Forest Ecology and Management  198, 261–267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Miller C (2003) The spatial context of fire: a new approach for predicting fire occurrence. In ‘First National Congress on Fire Ecology and Preventive Management: Proceedings. Vol. 13’. 27 November–1 December 2000, San Diego, CA. (Eds KEM Galley, RC Klinger, NG Sugihara) pp. 27–34. (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL)

Miller C , Urban DL (2000) Connectivity of forest fuels and surface fire regimes. Landscape Ecology  15, 145–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Parisien M-A, Kafka VG, Todd BM, Hirsch KG, Lavoie SG (2003) The peripheral reduction in burn probability around recent burns in the boreal forest. In ‘2nd International Wildland Fire Ecology and Management Congress’. 16–20 November 2003, Orlando, FL. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Parisien M-A, Hirsch KG, Lavoie SG, Todd BM, Kafka VG (2004) Saskatchewan fire regime analysis. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-394. (Edmonton, AB)

Parisien M-A, Kafka VG, Hirsch KG, Todd BM, Lavoie SG, Maczek PD (2005) Using the Burn-P3 simulation model to map wildfire susceptibility. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-405. (Edmonton, AB)

Pollet J , Omi PN (2002) Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 1–10.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sanchez-Guisandez M, Cui W, Martell DL (2002) FireSmart management of flammable wildland urban interface landscape. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety: Proceedings’. 18–23 November 2003, Luso, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) pp. 121–130. (Millpress: Rotterdam, Netherlands)

Stephens SL (1998) Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behavior in the Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management  105, 21–35.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tymstra C, Bryce RW, Wotton BM, Armitage OB (in press) Development and assessment of the Prometheus fire growth simulation model. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report. (Edmonton, AB)

Van Wagner CE (1987) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Canadian Forest Service, Technical Report 35. (Ottawa, ON)

van Wagtendonk JW (1996) Use of a deterministic fire model to test fuel treatments. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress. Vol. 2’. pp. 1155–1167. (University of California, Davis, Center for Water and Wildland Resources: Davis, CA)

Weir JMH , Johnson EA (1998) Effects of escaped settlement fires and logging on forest composition in the mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  28, 459–467.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Weir JMH, Pidwerbeski A (2000) Prince Albert National Park fire management plan. Parks Canada, internal report. (Prince Albert, SK)

Weir JMH, Johnson EA , Miyanishi K (2000) Fire frequency and the spatial age mosaic of the mixed-wood boreal forest in western Canada. Ecological Applications  10, 1162–1177.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zuuring HR, Chew JD, Jones JG (2000) Sequential use of simulation and optimization in analysis and planning. In ‘Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project Symposium: What We Have Learned: Proceedings’. 18–20 May 1999, Missoula, MT. (Ed. HY Smith) pp. 97–103. RMRS-P-17. (USDA, Forest Service: Ogden, UT)