Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Small mammal communities in a pyrogenic habitat mosaic

Karl W. Larsen A B F , Ian T. Adams A C and Diane L. Haughland D E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Alberta Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Box 8000, Boyle, AB, T0A 0M0, Canada.

B Present address: Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, V2C 5N3, Canada.

C Present address: Corvus Communications, 3396 Simms Road, Cranbrook, BC, V1C 6T1, Canada.

D Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, V2C 5N3, Canada.

E Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.

F Corresponding author. Email: klarsen@tru.ca

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(6) 728-740 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF05106
Submitted: 30 November 2005  Accepted: 8 May 2007   Published: 17 December 2007

Abstract

We studied the small mammal community across a mosaic of habitats created by a large wildfire in the mixed-wood boreal forest of Alberta, Canada, 5 years after the fire occurred. We focussed on four habitat types within this landscape mosaic, namely burnt stands, stands of unburnt forest within the burn, unburnt forest on the periphery of the fire, and areas harvested before the fire (and subsequently burnt). The abundance of the two most common species – red-backed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) – often differed inside v. outside the burn’s perimeter; however, reproduction, survival and abundance showed little to no correlation with habitat. Year-to-year changes in the relative abundance of these two species appeared greater within the burn’s periphery; the heterogeneity of the burnt landscape also supported a higher diversity of small mammal species than seen at the periphery. Comparison of our results with those collected by a coincidental study of forest harvesting suggests that the responses of the communities and populations of the animals to the two disturbance types were relatively similar. The value of long-term and chronosequence studies notwithstanding, detailed study of the wildlife communities shaped by individual wildfires improves our overall understanding of the ecological effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances.

Additional keywords: Alberta, boreal forest, Canada, Clethrionomys, habitat patch, landscape ecology, Peromyscus, rodents, wildfire.


Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial and in-kind support provided by Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. Special thanks are due to Dr Daryll Hebert. Industrial Undergraduate Student Research Awards from the Natural Sciences & Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada helped support some of the students involved with the collection of the data. The 1995 field crew was Rhabindra Mahabeer, Ramona Maraj, Riley Speers, and Melanie Daniels; the 1996 crew was Stephen Hanus, Paula Matthews, Joanne Wilson, and Dan Wein. Hiroki Currie also helped in data collection and field logistics. Drs Rich Moses and Shane Rollans provided statistical advice during the preparation of the manuscript.


References


Alder GH , Wilson ML (1989) Demography of the meadow vole along a simple habitat gradient. Canadian Journal of Zoology  67, 772–774.
Baker RH (1968) Habitats and distribution. In ‘Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia)’. Special Publication No. 2. (Ed. JA King) pp. 98–126. (American Society of Mammalogists: Lawrence, KS)

Bayne EM , Hobson KA (1998) The effects of habitat fragmentation by forestry and agriculture on the abundance of small mammals in the southern boreal mixedwood forest. Canadian Journal of Zoology  76, 62–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fox JF (1983) Post-fire succession of small-mammal and bird communities. In ‘The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems’. (Eds RW Wein, DA MacLean) pp. 155–179. (Wiley, New York)

Fuller AK, Harrison DJ , Lachowski HJ (2004) Stand-scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management  191, 373–386.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Greenlee JM (Ed.) (1996) Ecological implications of fire in Greater Yellowstone. (International Association of Wildland Fire: Fairfield, WA)

Getz LL (1985) Habitats. In ‘Biology of New World Microtus’. Special Publication No. 8. (Ed. RH Tamarin) pp. 286–309. (American Society of Mammalogists: Lawrence, KS)

Gliwicz J (1980) Island populations of rodents: their organization and functioning. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society  55, 109–138.
Hunter ML, Jr, (1990) ‘Wildfire, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forest for Biological Diversity.’ (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ)

Hunter ML (1993) Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biological Conservation  65, 115–120.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pearson OP (1985) Predation. In ‘Biology of New World Microtus’. Special Publication No. 8. (Ed. RH Tamarin) pp. 535–566. (American Society of Mammalogists: Lawrence, KS)

Reich LM (1981) Microtus pennsylvanicus. Mammalian Species  159, 1–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Roy LD, Stelfox JB, Nolan JW (1995) Relationships between mammal biodiversity and stand age and structure in aspen mixedwood forests in Alberta. In ‘Relationships between Stand Age, Stand Structure, and Biodiversity in Aspen Mixedwood Forests in Alberta’. (Ed. JB Stelfox) pp. 153–182. (Canadian Forest Service and Alberta Environmental Centre: Edmonton, Canada)

Salvatori VF, Egunyu F, Skidmore AK, de Leeuw J , van Gils HAM (2001) The effects of fire and grazing pressure on vegetation cover and small mammal populations in the Maasai Mara National Reserve. African Journal of Ecology  39, 200–204.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | SAS Institute Inc. (2005) SAS 9.1 Software. (Cary, NC)

Schmiegelow FKA, Stepnisky DP, Stambaugh CA , Koivula M (2006) Reconciling salvage logging of boreal forests with a natural-disturbance management model. Conservation Biology  20, 971–983.

PubMed | Swanson FJ, Jones JA, Wallin DO, Cissel JH (1993) Natural variability – implications for ecosystem management. In ‘Eastside Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment. Volume 2. Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications’. (Eds ME Jensen, PS Bourgeron) pp. 89–104. (USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: Portland, OR, USA)

Tinker DB , Knight DH (2000) Coarse woody debris following fire and logging in Wyoming lodgepole pine forests. Ecosystems  3, 472–483.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Whelan R (1995) ‘The Ecology of Fire.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

White GC , Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study  46((Suppl.)), 120–138.
White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture–recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Report LA-8787-NERP. (Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM)