Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Got to burn to learn: the effect of fuel load on grassland fire behaviour and its management implications

Miguel G. Cruz A B , Andrew L. Sullivan A , James S. Gould A , Richard J. Hurley A and Matt P. Plucinski A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: miguel.cruz@csiro.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 27(11) 727-741 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18082
Submitted: 6 June 2018  Accepted: 5 September 2018   Published: 1 October 2018

Abstract

The effect of grass fuel load on fire behaviour and fire danger has been a contentious issue for some time in Australia. Existing operational models have placed different emphases on the effect of fuel load on model outputs, which has created uncertainty in the operational assessment of fire potential and has led to end-user and public distrust of model outcomes. A field-based experimental burning program was conducted to quantify the effect of fuel load on headfire rate of spread and other fire behaviour characteristics in grasslands. A total of 58 experimental fires conducted at six sites across eastern Australia were analysed.

We found an inverse relationship between fuel load and the rate of spread in grasslands, which is contrary to current, untested, modelling assumptions. This result is valid for grasslands where fuel load is not a limiting factor for fire propagation. We discuss the reasons for this effect and model it to produce a fuel load effect function that can be applied to operational grassfire spread models used in Australia. We also analyse the effect of fuel load on flame characteristics and develop a model for flame height as a function of rate of fire spread and fuel load.

Additional keywords: fire behaviour modelling, fire danger, fire experiments, flame height, grassfires, headfire, rate of spread.


References

Alexander ME (1982) Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities. Canadian Journal of Botany 60, 349–357.
Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alexander ME (2008) ‘Proposed revision of fire danger class criteria for forest and rural areas in New Zealand.’ (National Rural Fire Authority: Wellington, New Zealand).

Alexander ME (2009a) Are we abusing our use of models and modeling in wildland fire and fuel management? Fire Management Today 69, 23–26.

Alexander ME (2009b) Wildland fire behavior and ‘The Course of Science’ flowchart: is there a connection? Fire Management Today 69, 44–46.

Alexander ME, Cruz MG (2012) Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 95–113.
Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alexander ME, Lanoville RA (2004) The International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment fuel treatment trials. In ‘22nd Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: Fire in temperate, boreal, and montane ecosystems’, Tallahassee, FL. (Eds RT Engstrom, KEM Galley, WJ de Groot) Vol. 15. pp. 222. (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL, USA)

Alexander ME, Stefner CN, Beck JA, Lanoville RA (2001) New insights into the effectiveness of fuel reduction treatments on crown fire potential at the stand level. In ‘Bushfire 2001 proceedings, Australasian bushfire conference’, Christchurch, New Zealand, 3–6 July 2001. (Eds G Pearce, L Lester) p. 318. (New Zealand Forest Research Institute: Rotorua, New Zealand)

Anderson TW, Darling DA (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness-of-fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23, 193–212.
Asymptotic theory of certain ‘goodness-of-fit’ criteria based on stochastic processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson WR, Pastor E, Butler B, Catchpole EA, Dupuy JL, Fernandes PM, Guijarro M, Mendes-Lopes JMC, Ventura JMP (2006) Evaluating models to estimate flame characteristics for free-burning fires using laboratory and field data. In ‘V International conference on forest fire research’, Figueira da Foz, 27–30 November 2006. (Ed. DX Viegas) (CD-ROM) paper S77. (Elsevier BV: Amesterdam, The Netherlands)

Anderson WR, Cruz MG, Fernandes PM, McCaw L, Vega JA, Bradstock RA, Fogarty L, Gould J, McCarthy G, Marsden-Smedley JB, Matthews S, Mattingley G, Pearce HG, van Wilgen BW (2015) A generic, empirical-based model for predicting rate of fire spread in shrublands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 443–460.
A generic, empirical-based model for predicting rate of fire spread in shrublands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bolker BM (2008) ‘Ecological models and data in R.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton)

Burgan RE (1987) Concepts and interpreted examples in advanced fuel modeling. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-238. (Ogden, UT)

Byram GM (1959a) Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest fire: control and use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–89. (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA)

Byram GM (1959b) Forest fire behaviour. In ‘Forest fire: control and use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 90–123. (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA)

Catchpole EA, Catchpole WR, Rothermel RC (1993) Fire behavior experiments in mixed fuel complexes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 45–57.
Fire behavior experiments in mixed fuel complexes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Butler BW, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology 131, 1–37.
Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney P, Sullivan A (2008) ‘Grassfires, fuel, weather and fire behaviour.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Hutchings PT (1989) ‘Prediction of fire spread in grassland.’ (CSIRO: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 31–44.
The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1–13.
Prediction of fire spread in grasslands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR (2012) Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 280, 120–131.
Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clements HB, Ward DE, Adkins CW (1983) Measuring fire behavior with photography. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 49, 213–217.

Cruz MG, Alexander ME (2013) Uncertainty associated with model predictions of surface and crown fire rates of spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 47, 16–28.
Uncertainty associated with model predictions of surface and crown fire rates of spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Fernandes PM (2008) Development of fuel models for fire behaviour prediction in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 194–204.
Development of fuel models for fire behaviour prediction in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Matthews S, Gould J, Ellis P, Henderson M, Knight I, Watters J (2010) Fire dynamics in mallee-heath; fuel weather and fire behaviour prediction in South Australian semi-arid shrublands. Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre Technical Report A.10.01. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at http://www.bushfirecrc.com/sites/default/files/firedynamicsinmalleeheathreport.pdf [verified June 2018]

Cruz MG, Gould JS, Kidnie S, Bessell R, Nichols D, Slijepcevic A (2015) Effects of curing on grassfires: II. Effect of grass senescence on the rate of fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 838–848.
Effects of curing on grassfires: II. Effect of grass senescence on the rate of fire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Sullivan AS, Kidnie S, Hurley R, Nichols S (2016) The effect of grass curing and fuel structure on fire behaviour – Final report. CSIRO Client Report No. EP 166414. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Cruz MG, Sullivan AL, Hurley RJ, Plucinski MP, Gould JS (2017) The effect of fuel load and structure on grassland fire behaviour and fire danger. Report EP178976. (CSIRO: Canberra).

Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Sullivan AL, Gould JS, Kilinc M (2018) Assessing improvements in models used to operationally predict wildland fire rate of spread. Environmental Modelling & Software 105, 54–63.
Assessing improvements in models used to operationally predict wildland fire rate of spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1977) The National Fire Danger Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, General Technical Report INT-39. (Odgen, UT, USA)

Fernandes PM (2001) Fire spread prediction in shrub fuels in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management 144, 67–74.
Fire spread prediction in shrub fuels in Portugal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandes PM (2015) Empirical support for the use of prescribed burning as a fuel treatment. Current Forestry Reports 1, 118–127.

Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 117–128.
A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandes PM, Botelho HS, Rego FC, Loureiro C (2009) Empirical modelling of surface fire behaviour in maritime pine stands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 698–710.
Empirical modelling of surface fire behaviour in maritime pine stands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finney MA, Cohen JD, Forthofer JM, McAllister SS, Gollner MJ, Gorham DJ, Saito K, Akafuah NK, Adam BA, English JD (2015) Role of buoyant flame dynamics in wildfire spread. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 9833–9838.
Role of buoyant flame dynamics in wildfire spread.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garland JJ (1988) My chance: a modeler’s day in court. Journal of Forestry [inside back cover.]

Gill AM, King KJ, Moore AD (2010) Australian grassland fire danger using inputs from the GRAZPLAN grassland simulation model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 338–345.
Australian grassland fire danger using inputs from the GRAZPLAN grassland simulation model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Groves RH (1994) ‘Australian vegetation.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Hough WA, Albini FA (1978) Predicting fire behavior in palmetto–gallberry fuel complexes. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Research Station, Research Paper SE-174. (Asheville, NC, USA)

Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bushfires in Australia.’ (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Marino E, Dupuy JL, Pimont F, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Linn R (2012) Fuel bulk density and fuel moisture content effects on fire rate of spread: a comparison between FIRETEC model predictions and experimental results in shrub fuels. Journal of Fire Sciences 30, 277–299.
Fuel bulk density and fuel moisture content effects on fire rate of spread: a comparison between FIRETEC model predictions and experimental results in shrub fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Matthews S (2010) Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 800–802.
Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McArthur AG (1960) Fire danger rating tables for annual grasslands. Forestry and Timber Bureau. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)

McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grassland fire behaviour. Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet 100. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Nelson RM (1993) Byram’s derivation of the energy criterion for forest and wildland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 3, 131–138.
Byram’s derivation of the energy criterion for forest and wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson RM (2003) Power of the fire – a thermodynamic analysis. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 51–65.
Power of the fire – a thermodynamic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Noble JC (1991) Behaviour of a very fast grassland wildfire on the Riverine Plain of south-eastern Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 1, 189–196.
Behaviour of a very fast grassland wildfire on the Riverine Plain of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Noble IR, Bary GAV, Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire danger meters expressed as equations. Australian Journal of Ecology 5, 201–203.
McArthur’s fire danger meters expressed as equations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ott RL, Longnecker MT (2015) ‘An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis.’ (Nelson Education: Belmont, CA, USA)

Plucinski MP (2013) Modelling the probability of Australian grassfires escaping initial attack to aid deployment decisions. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 459–468.
Modelling the probability of Australian grassfires escaping initial attack to aid deployment decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Purton C (1982) ‘Equations for the McArthur Mark 4 Grassland Fire Danger Meter.’ (Bureau of Meteorology: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

R Development Core Team (2016) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)

Rossa CG, Fernandes PM (2017) Fuel-related fire-behaviour relationships for mixed live and dead fuels burned in the laboratory. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47, 883–889.
Fuel-related fire-behaviour relationships for mixed live and dead fuels burned in the laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT, USA)

Rothermel RC, Rinehart GC (1983) Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Repport INT-142. (Ogden, UT, USA).

Setterfield SA, Rossiter-Rachor N, Douglas MM, McMaster D, Adams V, Ferdinands K (2014) The impacts of Andropogon gayanus (gamba grass) invasion on the fire danger index and fire management at a landscape scale. In ‘19th Australasian Weeds Conference’, 1–4 April 2004, Hobart, Tasmania. (Ed. M. Baker.) pp. 125–128. (Tasmanian Weed Society: Hobart)

Simard AJ, Blank RW, Hobrla SL (1989) Measuring and interpreting flame height in wildland fires. Fire Technology 25, 114–133.
Measuring and interpreting flame height in wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Lanoville RA (2004) Overview of the International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment (ICFME). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 1543–1547.
Overview of the International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment (ICFME).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tolhurst K, Shields B, Chong D (2008) Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23, 47–54.

Victoria Police (2014) Lessons learnt from the Black Saturday bushfires. Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63, 1309–1313.
Some comments on the evaluation of model performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |