Towards improving wildland firefighter situational awareness through daily fire behaviour risk assessments in the US Northern Rockies and Northern Great Basin
W. Matt Jolly A B and Patrick H. Freeborn AA US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 Highway 10 W, Missoula, MT 59808, USA
B Corresponding author. Email: mjolly@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(7) 574-586 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16153
Submitted: 10 August 2016 Accepted: 22 April 2017 Published: 10 July 2017
Abstract
Wildland firefighters must assess potential fire behaviour in order to develop appropriate strategies and tactics that will safely meet objectives. Fire danger indices integrate surface weather conditions to quantify potential variations in fire spread rates and intensities and therefore should closely relate to observed fire behaviour. These indices could better inform fire management decisions if they were linked directly to observed fire behaviour. Here, we present a simple framework for relating fire danger indices to observed categorical wildland fire behaviour. Ordinal logistic regressions are used to model the probabilities of five distinct fire behaviour categories that are then combined with a safety-based weight function to calculate a Fire Behaviour Risk rating that can plotted over time and spatially mapped. We demonstrate its development and use across three adjacent US National Forests. Finally, we compare predicted fire behaviour risk ratings with observed variations in satellite-measured fire radiative power and we link these models with spatial fire danger maps to demonstrate the utility of this approach for landscape-scale fire behaviour risk assessment. This approach transforms fire weather conditions into simple and actionable fire behaviour risk metrics that wildland firefighters can use to support decisions that meet required objectives and keep people safe.
Additional keywords: fire danger, safety, weather.
References
Abatzoglou JT (2013) Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. International Journal of Climatology 33, 121–131.| Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Agresti, A (1984) ‘Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data.’ (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA)
Alexander ME (1982) Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities. Canadian Journal of Botany 60, 349–357.
| Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Andrews PL, Bradshaw LS, Bunnell D, Curcio GM (1998) Fire danger rating pocket card for firefighter safety. In ‘Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 11–16 January 1998, Phoenix, AZ, USA. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA, USA) Available at http://www.ncforestservice.gov/fire_control/pdf/fdpocket_cards.pdf [Verified 28 June 2017]
Andrews PL, Loftsgaarden DO, Bradshaw LS (2003) Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis. International Journal of Wildland Fire 12, 213–226.
| Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowman DMJS, Balch J, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries R, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Mack M, Moritz MA, Pyne S, Roos CI, Scott AC, Sodhi NS, Swetnam TW (2011) The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. Journal of Biogeography 38, 2223–2236.
| The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bradshaw LS, McCormick E (2000) FireFamily Plus user’s guide. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-67-WWW. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)
Bradshaw LS, Deeming J, Burgan R, Cohen J (1983) The 1978 NFDRS: technical documentation. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-169, (Ogden, UT, USA)
Countryman CM (1972) The fire environment concept. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, PMS-433. (Boise, ID, USA)
Eidenshink JC, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu Z-L, Quayle B, Howard SM (2007) A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecology 3, 3–21.
| A project for monitoring trends in burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finney MA (2005) The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 97–108.
| The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garvey PR, Lansdowne ZF (1997) Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks. US Air Force Logistics Journal XXII, 18–21.
Giglio L, Randerson JT, van der Werf GR, Kasibhatla PS, Collatz GJ, Morton DC, DeFries RS (2010) Assessing variability and long-term trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products. Biogeosciences 7, 1171–1186.
| Assessing variability and long-term trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hirsch KG (1996) Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System: user’s guide. Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre number Special Report 7. (Edmonton, AB, Canada)
Holden ZA, Jolly WM (2011) Modeling topographic influences on fuel moisture and fire danger in complex terrain to improve wildland fire management decision support. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 2133–2141.
| Modeling topographic influences on fuel moisture and fire danger in complex terrain to improve wildland fire management decision support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Horel JD, Ziel R, Galli C, Pechmann J, Dong X (2014) An evaluation of fire danger and behaviour indices in the Great Lakes Region calculated from station and gridded weather information. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 202–214.
| An evaluation of fire danger and behaviour indices in the Great Lakes Region calculated from station and gridded weather information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Iglewicz, B, Hoaglin, D (1993) Vol. 16: how to detect and handle outliers. In ‘The ASQC Basic Reference in Quality Control: Statistical Technique’. (ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, USA)
Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2015) Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications 6, 7537
| Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtlCjsb7P&md5=c20a7260b3c89806d90170efa90d2fc6CAS |
Kaufman YJ, Justice CO, Flynn LP, Kendall JD, Prins EM, Giglio L, Ward DE, Menzel WP, Setzer AW (1998) Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS. Journal of Geophysical Research – D. Atmospheres 103, 32215–32238.
| Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXovVWitA%3D%3D&md5=a7e7995a7c1528476a384ebabde742cbCAS |
Koenker R (2005) ‘Quantile Regression.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Lolo NF (2015) Northern Rockies Southwest Zone fire danger operating plan. Available at https://www.wfas.net/resources/docs/LoloNFDRSplan2015_2016Final.pdf [Verified 24 May 2017]
Mesinger F, DiMego G, Kalnay E, Mitchell K (2006) North American regional reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 87, 343–360.
| North American regional reanalysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Interagency Fire Center (2015) Wildland fire fatalities by year. Available at https://www.nifc.gov/safety/safety_documents/Fatalities-by-Year.pdf [Verified 23 May 2017]
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2014) Incident response pocket guide. Number PMS-461. (Boise, ID, USA)
Riley KL, Abatzoglou JT, Grenfell IC, Klene AE, Heinsch FA (2013) The relationship of large fire occurrence with drought and fire danger indices in the western USA, 1984–2008: the role of temporal scale. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 894–909.
| The relationship of large fire occurrence with drought and fire danger indices in the western USA, 1984–2008: the role of temporal scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 235–249.
| LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stocks BJ, Lynham TJ, Lawson BD, Alexander ME, Wagner CEV, McAlpine RS, Dubé DE (1989) Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: an overview. Forestry Chronicle 65, 258–265.
| Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor SWP, Pike RG, Alexander ME (1997) Field guide to the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre number Special Report 11. (Edmonton, AB, Canada)
Wooster M, Zhukov B, Oertel D (2003) Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products. Remote Sensing of Environment 86, 83–107.
| Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |