Archetypes and change in wildfire risk perceptions, behaviours and intentions among adults in Tasmania, Australia
Sharon L. Campbell
A * , Grant J. Williamson B , Fay H. Johnston A C and David M. J. S. Bowman B
A
B
C
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change globally increases wildfire risk. Understanding how wildfire threats impact community-wide risk perceptions and response options will critically inform resilience education strategies.
To gain an increased understanding of wildfire risk perceptions and self-evacuation intentions among residents in the wildfire-prone state of Tasmania, Australia.
We co-designed survey questions with stakeholders from emergency management, health and community recovery, using a computer-aided telephone interview to survey residents over 18 years of age. Numerical classification analysis, linear regression and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey data.
We identified four archetypes – the ‘immediate leaver’, ‘prepared stayer’, ‘unprepared leaver’ and ‘informed leaver’, each with distinct sociodemographic characteristics. Key variables were gender, age, location and income, with women most likely to leave and lower-income householders from rural areas most likely to stay. Previous wildfire experience and owning a home were significantly associated with increased preparedness actions. Compared to 2016, we found a significant increase in the proportion of residents intending to leave their property, with rural men least likely and urban women most likely to leave.
Recent education campaigns have likely driven increases in wildfire threat-related self-evacuation, yet the existence of distinct archetypes argues for more tailored messaging and education programs.
Keywords: bushfire, evacuation, preparation, risk, smoke, social geography, social survey, wildfire.
References
Ahmed I, Ledger K (2023) Lessons from the 2019/2020 ‘Black Summer Bushfires’ in Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 96, 103947.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (2019) Bushfires and Community Safety. Available at https://www.afac.com.au/insight/doctrine/article/current/bushfires-and-community-safety [accessed 19 January 2024]
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) ‘Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 5 - Remoteness Structure. Vol. 1270.0.55.005’. Available at www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1270.0.55.005 [accessed 30 September 2018]
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2022) National, state and territory population. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release. [accessed 1 December 2023]
Blanchi R, Leonard J, Haynes K, Opie K, James M, de Oliveira FD (2014) Environmental circumstances surrounding bushfire fatalities in Australia 1901–2011. Environmental Science & Policy 37, 192-203.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bowman DM, Kolden CA, Abatzoglou JT, Johnston FH, van der Werf GR, Flannigan M (2020) Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1(10), 500-515.
| Google Scholar |
Bowman DM, Kolden CA, Williamson GJ (2022) Bushfires in Tasmania, Australia: an introduction. Fire 5(2), 33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Campbell SL, Williamson GJ, Johnston FH, Bowman DMJS (2024) Social and health factors influence self-reported evacuation intentions in the wildfire-prone island of Tasmania, Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 111, 104712.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Commonwealth of Australia (2011) National Strategy for Disaster Resilience. (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra) Available at https://nema.gov.au/sites/default/files/national-strategy-disaster-resilience.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia (2018) National Disaster Risk Reduction Framework. (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra) Available at https://nema.gov.au/sites/default/files/national-disaster-risk-reduction-framework.pdf
Cooper V, Fairbrother P, Elliott G, Walker M, Ch’ng H-Y (2020) Shared responsibility and community engagement: Community narratives of bushfire risk information in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 80, 259-272.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Cunningham CX, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2024) Increasing frequency and intensity of the most extreme wildfires on Earth. Nature Ecology & Evolution 8(8), 1420-1425.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Dominici G, Tullio V, Siino G, Tani M (2016) Marketing Archetypes: applying Jungian psychology to marketing research. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change 13(2), 109-122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fire Services Commissioner Victoria (2013) Review of the community response in recent bushfires Emergency Management Victoria. Available at https://files.emv.vic.gov.au/2023-08/Community%20response%20to%20bushfires%20during%202012-13%20fire%20season.pdf [accessed 15 May 2024]
Fox-Hughes P, Harris R, Lee G, Grose M, Bindoff N (2014) Future fire danger climatology for Tasmania, Australia, using a dynamically downscaled regional climate model. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23(3), 309-321.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Haghani M, Kuligowski E, Rajabifard A, Kolden CA (2022) The state of wildfire and bushfire science: temporal trends, research divisions and knowledge gaps. Safety Science 153, 105797.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hazlett C, Mildenberger M (2020) Wildfire exposure increases pro-environment voting within Democratic but not Republican areas. American Political Science Review 114(4), 1359-1365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Howe AA, Blomdahl EM, Smith-Eskridge E, Pinto DR, Brunson MW, Howe PD, Huntly NJ, Klain SC (2024) Worldviews more than experience predict Californians’ support for wildfire risk mitigation policies. Environmental Research Letters 19(5), 054025.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hudson P, Thieken AH, Bubeck P (2020) The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain. Journal of Risk Research 23(5), 642-663.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ingalsbee T (2017) Whither the paradigm shift? Large wildland fires and the wildfire paradox offer opportunities for a new paradigm of ecological fire management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(7), 557-561.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022) Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. In ‘Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. (IPCC: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA) 10.1017/9781009325844.
Koksal K, McLennan J, Every D, Bearman C (2019) Australian wildland-urban interface householders’ wildfire safety preparations: ‘Everyday life’ project priorities and perceptions of wildfire risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 33, 142-154.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Koksal K, McLennan J, Bearman C (2020) Living with bushfires on the urban-bush interface. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 35(1), 21-28.
| Google Scholar |
Love PT, Fox-Hughes P, Remenyi TA, Harris RMB, Bindoff N (2017) Impact of climate change on weather related fire risk in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Climate Change and Bushfire Research Initiative. Technical Report. (Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre: Hobart, Tasmania)
Lucas CH, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2022) Neighbourhood bushfire hazard, community risk perception and preparedness in peri-urban Hobart, Australia. International Journal of Wildland Fire 31(12), 1129-1143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McDonald J, McCormack PC (2022) Responsibility and Risk-Sharing in Climate Adaptation: a Case Study of Bushfire Risk in Australia. Climate Law 12(2), 128-161.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McLennan J, Elliott G, Wright L (2014) Bushfire survival preparations by householders in at-risk areas of south-eastern Australia. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 29(2), 11-17.
| Google Scholar |
McLennan J, Ryan B, Bearman C, Toh K (2019) Should we leave now? Behavioral factors in evacuation under wildfire threat. Fire Technology 55(2), 487-516.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
National Emergency Management Agency (2024) Australian Fire Danger Rating System, Australian Government. Available at https://afdrs.com.au/
Paton D, Burgelt PT, Prior T (2008) Living with bushfire risk: social and environmental influences on preparedness. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 23(3), 41-48.
| Google Scholar |
Paveglio TB, Moseley C, Carroll MS, Williams DR, Davis EJ, Fischer AP (2014) Categorizing the social context of the wildland urban interface: adaptive capacity for wildfire and community “Archetypes”. Forest Science 61(2), 298-310.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
R Core Team (2021) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at www.R-project.org
Ruane S (2018) Using a worldview lens to examine complex policy issues: a historical review of bushfire management in the South West of Australia. Local Environment 23(8), 777-795.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
State Growth Tasmania (2021) Migration by age. Available at https://profile.id.com.au/tasmania/migration-by-age [accessed 15 May 2024]
Strahan K, Whittaker J, Handmer J (2018) Self-evacuation archetypes in Australian bushfire. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 27, 307-316.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tasmania Fire Service (2022a) Bushfire-Prone Areas. Available at https://www.fire.tas.gov.au/Show?pageId=colBushfireProneAreas [accessed 5 April 2023]
Tasmania Fire Service (2022b) Bushfire Safety Guide. Available at https://bushfire.tas.gov.au/documents/bushfire-survival-plan/download [accessed 14 February 2024]
Teague B, McLeod R, Pascoe S (2010) Final Report 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission, Victorian Government: Victoria, Australia. Available at http://royalcommission.vic.gov.au/finaldocuments/summary/PF/VBRC_Summary_PF.pdf
Wright K (2021) corrgram: Plot a Correlogram, V1.14 edn. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corrgram
