High wildfire damage in interface communities in California
Heather Anu Kramer
A D , Miranda H. Mockrin B , Patricia M. Alexandre C and Volker C. Radeloff A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
B Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 5523 Research Park Drive Suite, 350 Baltimore, MD 21228, USA.
C Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.
D Corresponding author. Email: hakramer@wisc.edu
International Journal of Wildland Fire 28(9) 641-650 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18108
Submitted: 14 July 2018 Accepted: 24 June 2019 Published: 30 July 2019
Journal compilation © IAWF 2019 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Globally, and in the US, wildfires pose increasing risk to people and their homes. Wildfire management assumes that buildings burn primarily in the wildland–urban interface (WUI), where homes are either ignited directly (especially in intermix WUI areas, where houses and wildland fuels intermingle), or via firebrands, the main threat to buildings in the interface WUI (areas with minimal wildland fuel, yet close to dense wildland vegetation). However, even urban areas can succumb to wildfires. We examined where wildfire damages occur among urban, rural and WUI (intermix and interface) areas for approximately three decades in California (1985–2013). We found that interface WUI contained 50% of buildings destroyed by wildfire, whereas intermix WUI contained only 32%. The proportion of buildings destroyed by fires among classes was similar, though highest in interface WUI areas (15.6%). Our results demonstrate that the interface WUI is where most buildings were destroyed in California, despite less wildland fuel. Continued advancement of models, mitigation and regulations tailored for the interface WUI, both for California and elsewhere, will complement the prior focus on the intermix WUI.
Additional keywords: destruction, hazard, housing loss, plan, policy, wildland–urban interface.
References
Alexandre PM, Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Hammer RB, Radeloff VC (2015) Rebuilding and new housing development after wildfire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 138–149.| Rebuilding and new housing development after wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-122. (Ogden, UT).
Balch JK, Bradley BA, Abatzoglou JT, Nagy RC, Fusco EJ, Mahood AL (2017) Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 2946–2951.
| Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28242690PubMed |
Boulianne S, Minaker J, Haney TJ (2018) Does compassion go viral? Social media, caring, and the Fort McMurray wildfire. Information Communication and Society 21, 697–711.
| Does compassion go viral? Social media, caring, and the Fort McMurray wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowman DM, Williamson GJ, Abatzoglou JT, Kolden CA, Cochrane MA, Smith AM (2017) Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 0058
| Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire eventsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burby RJ (2001) Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 3, 111–122.
| Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAL FIRE (2017) Fire-resistant landscaping. Available at http://www.readyforwildfire.org/prepare-for-wildfire/get-ready/fire-resistant-landscaping/ [Verified 1 July 2019]
CAL FIRE, Kephart A (2018) Tubbs fire spatial data. CAL FIRE.
CAL FIRE (2018a) Incident information. Available at http://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/ [Verified 01 07 2019]
CAL FIRE (2018b) Top 20 deadliest California wildfires. Available at https://calfire.ca.gov/communications/downloads/fact_sheets/Top20_Deadliest.pdf [Verified 27 11 2018].
CAL FIRE (2018c) Top 20 most destructive California wildfires. Available at http://www.fire.ca.gov/communications/downloads/fact_sheets/Top20_Destruction.pdf [Verified 27 11 2018]
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2017) Emergency fund fire suppression expenditures. Available at http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_protection/downloads/SuppressionCostsOnepage.pdf [Verified 27 11 2018]
California State Assembly (1992) California State Assembly Bill 337. (Sacramento, CA, USA).
Cohen J (2008) The wildland–urban interface fire problem. Forest History Today Fall 2008, 20–26.
Cruz M, Sullivan A, Gould J, Sims N, Bannister A, Hollis J, Hurley R (2012) Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 284, 269–285.
| Anatomy of a catastrophic wildfire: the Black Saturday Kilmore East fire in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davis G, Nichols MD, Tuttle AE, Allshouse W (2000) Fire hazard zoning field guide. University of California Berkeley Forest Products Laboratory. (Berkeley, CA, USA).
Dietenberger MA, Boardman CR (2017) EcoSmart Fire as structure ignition model in wildland–urban interface: predictions and validations. Fire Technology 53, 577–607.
| EcoSmart Fire as structure ignition model in wildland–urban interface: predictions and validations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
FAC Learning Network (2016) Fire-Adapted Communities self-assessment tool. Available at http://fireadaptednetwork.org/resources/fac-assessment-tool/ [Verified 1 July 2019]
Fire-Adapted Communities Coalition (2014) Guide to Fire-Adapted Communities. Available at http://www.fireadapted.org/~/media/Fire%20Adapted/Files/FAC%20Reference%20Guide%202014%20FINAL% 20reduced%202.pdf [Verified 19 April 2017].
Fischer AP, Spies TA, Steelman TA, Moseley C, Johnson BR, Bailey JD, Ager AA, Bourgeron P, Charnley S, Collins BM (2016) Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 276–284.
| Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gibbons P, Gill AM, Shore N, Moritz MA, Dovers S, Cary GJ (2018) Options for reducing house losses during wildfires without clearing trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning 174, 10–17.
| Options for reducing house losses during wildfires without clearing trees and shrubs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Godoy M, Martinuzzi S, Kramer H, Defossé G, Argañaraz J, Radeloff V (2019) Rapid WUI growth and wildfires in a natural-amenity rich region in central-western Patagonia, Argentina. International Journal of Wildland Fire
| Rapid WUI growth and wildfires in a natural-amenity rich region in central-western Patagonia, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gómez-González S, Ojeda F, Fernandes PM (2018) Portugal and Chile: longing for sustainable forestry while rising from the ashes. Environmental Science and Policy 81, 104–107.
| Portugal and Chile: longing for sustainable forestry while rising from the ashes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Google Inc. (2016) Google Earth Pro, 7.1.7.2606. Available at https://www.google.com/earth/http://theconversation.com/why-were-californias-wine-country-fires-so-destructive-86043 [Verified 15 October 2016]
Gude PH, Jones K, Rasker R, Greenwood MC (2013) Evidence for the effect of homes on wildfire suppression costs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 537–548.
| Evidence for the effect of homes on wildfire suppression costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Haas JR, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2013) A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into wildland–urban interface risk assessments within the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 119, 44–53.
| A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into wildland–urban interface risk assessments within the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hand MS, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2016) Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data. Journal of Forest Economics 22, 80–102.
| Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jin Y, Goulden ML, Faivre N, Veraverbeke S, Sun F, Hall A, Hand MS, Hook S, Randerson JT (2015) Identification of two distinct fire regimes in southern California: implications for economic impact and future change. Environmental Research Letters 10, 094005
| Identification of two distinct fire regimes in southern California: implications for economic impact and future change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keeley JE (2017) Why were California’s wine country fires so destructive? The Conversation. Available at http://theconversation.com/why-were-californias-wine-country-fires-so-destructive-86043 [Verified 25 June 2019]
Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Stewart SI, Radeloff VC (2018) Where wildfires destroy buildings in the US relative to the wildland–urban interface and national fire outreach programs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27, 329–341.
| Where wildfires destroy buildings in the US relative to the wildland–urban interface and national fire outreach programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mahmoud H, Chulahwat A (2018) Unraveling the complexity of wildland–urban interface fires. Scientific Reports 8, 9315
| Unraveling the complexity of wildland–urban interface fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29915287PubMed |
Maranghides A, Mell W (2012) Framework for addressing the national wildland–urban interface fire problem – determining fire and ember exposure zones using a WUI hazard scale. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1748
McCaffrey SM, Stidham M, Toman E, Shindler B (2011) Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk? Environmental Management 48, 475–488.
| Outreach programs, peer pressure, and common sense: what motivates homeowners to mitigate wildfire risk?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21706380PubMed |
Mell WE, Manzello SL, Maranghides A, Butry D, Rehm RG (2010) The wildland–urban interface fire problem – current approaches and research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 238–251.
| The wildland–urban interface fire problem – current approaches and research needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (2016) Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS). Available at http://www.mtbs.gov/ [Verified 19 April 2017].
Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Handmer J, Hessburg PF, Leonard J, McCaffrey S, Odion DC, Schoennagel T (2014) Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515, 58–66.
| Learning to coexist with wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25373675PubMed |
Nagy R, Fusco E, Bradley B, Abatzoglou JT, Balch J (2018) Human-related ignitions increase the number of large wildfires across US ecoregions. Fire 1, 4
| Human-related ignitions increase the number of large wildfires across US ecoregions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Fire Protection Association (2016) Firewise communities. Available at http://www.firewise.org/ [Verified 24 February 2017].
Obama B (2016) Executive Order No. 13728 – wildland–urban interface Federal risk mitigation. (The White House: Washington, DC, USA).
Oliveira S, Zêzere JL, Queirós M, Pereira JM (2017) Assessing the social context of wildfire-affected areas. The case of mainland Portugal. Applied Geography 88, 104–117.
| Assessing the social context of wildfire-affected areas. The case of mainland Portugal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Platt RV (2010) The wildland–urban interface: evaluating the definition effect. Journal of Forestry 108, 9–15.
Platt RV (2014) Wildfire hazard in the home ignition zone: an object-oriented analysis integrating LiDAR and VHR satellite imagery. Applied Geography 51, 108–117.
| Wildfire hazard in the home ignition zone: an object-oriented analysis integrating LiDAR and VHR satellite imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Radeloff V, Helmers DP, Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Bar-Massada A, Butsic VA, Hawbaker T, Martinuzzi S, Syphard AD, Stewart S (2018) Rapid growth of the US wildland–urban interface increases wildfire risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 3314–3319.
| Rapid growth of the US wildland–urban interface increases wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29531054PubMed |
Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland–urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15, 799–805.
| The wildland–urban interface in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schoennagel T, Balch JK, Brenkert-Smith H, Dennison PE, Harvey BJ, Krawchuk MA, Mietkiewicz N, Morgan P, Moritz MA, Rasker R (2017) Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 4582–4590.
| Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwarzenegger A (2004) California Public Resources Code (PRC) 4291 – The requirement of a defensible space is mandated by California state law, Public Resources Code (PRC) 4291. (Sacramento, CA, USA).
Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s Surface Fire Spread Model. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-153. (Fort Collins, CO, USA).
Skowronski NS, Haag S, Trimble J, Clark KL, Gallagher MR, Lathrop RG (2016) Structure-level fuel load assessment in the wildland–urban interface: a fusion of airborne laser scanning and spectral remote-sensing methodologies. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 547–557.
| Structure-level fuel load assessment in the wildland–urban interface: a fusion of airborne laser scanning and spectral remote-sensing methodologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (2018) Cartographic Building Footprints. Available at https://sonomaopenspace.egnyte.com/dl/1IkmiWqACl/ [Verified 5 February 2018]
Steelman T (2016) US wildfire governance as social-ecological problem Ecology and Society 21, 3
| US wildfire governance as social-ecological problemCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Hawbaker TJ (2007) Defining the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Forestry 105, 201–207.
Sugihara NG, Van Wagtendonk J, Fites-Kaufman J, Shaffer K, Thode A (2006) ‘Fire in California’s ecosystems.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA)
Syphard AD, Radeloff VC, Keeley JE, Hawbaker TJ, Clayton MK, Stewart SI, Hammer RB (2007) Human influence on California fire regimes. Ecological Applications 17, 1388–1402.
| Human influence on California fire regimes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17708216PubMed |
Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Massada AB, Brennan TJ, Radeloff VC (2012) Housing arrangement and location determine the likelihood of housing loss due to wildfire. PLoS One 7, e33954
| Housing arrangement and location determine the likelihood of housing loss due to wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22623955PubMed |
Syphard AD, Brennan TJ, Keeley JE (2014) The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 1165–1175.
Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Pfaff AH, Ferschweiler K (2017) Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 13750–13755.
| Human presence diminishes the importance of climate in driving fire activity across the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29229850PubMed |
Syphard AD, Rustigian-Romsos H, Mann M, Conlisk E, Moritz MA, Ackerly D (2019) The relative influence of climate and housing development on current and projected future fire patterns and structure loss across three California landscapes. Global Environmental Change 56, 41–55.
| The relative influence of climate and housing development on current and projected future fire patterns and structure loss across three California landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas A, Leichenko R (2011) Adaptation through insurance: lessons from the NFIP. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 3, 250–263.
| Adaptation through insurance: lessons from the NFIP.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
United States Congress (2003) Healthy Forests Restoration Act. Committee on House Agriculture; House Resources; House Judiciary; Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; Senate Energy and Natural Resources; House Transportation and Infrastructure. 108th Congress, 1st session, 2003. Public Law no. 108–148. (Washington, DC, USA)
US Census Bureau (2018) 2010 census data. Available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/CA [Verified 25 February 2018]
USDA and USDI (2001) Urban–wildland interface communities within the vicinity of federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Federal Register 66, 751–777.
Wildland Fire Executive Council (2014) The National Strategy: the final phase in the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/documents/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf [Verified 23 May 2017]
Winter G, McCaffrey S, Vogt CA (2009) The role of community policies in defensible space compliance. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 570–578.
| The role of community policies in defensible space compliance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
