Forest fuel bed ignitability under marginal fire weather conditions in Eucalyptus forests
Jane G. Cawson A B and Thomas J. Duff A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Burnley Campus, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: jane.cawson@unimelb.edu.au
International Journal of Wildland Fire 28(3) 198-204 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18070
Submitted: 15 May 2018 Accepted: 17 December 2018 Published: 8 February 2019
Abstract
Fires burning under marginal fire-weather conditions tend to be patchy in terms of their spatial coverage. This patchiness is partially driven by variability in the ignitability of the fuel bed. An understanding of fuel-bed ignitability through space and time would help fire managers to more effectively carry out prescribed burns to achieve desired levels of burn coverage in Eucalyptus forests. We sought to identify the key fuel-bed attributes influencing ignitability under marginal weather conditions. We recorded ignition successes and failures at 45 points within 5 operational prescribed burns and used the data to build logistic regression models to predict the probability of ignition as a function of fuel-bed attributes. Models were ranked using an information theoretic approach. The four highest ranked models explained 48–54% of the variance in ignitability. Surface fine-fuel moisture content (FFMC) and overall fuel hazard (i.e. fuel arrangement) were the strongest predictors of ignitability, occurring in all four highest ranking models. Both surface FFMC and overall fuel hazard were negatively related to ignition likelihood, contradicting a commonly assumed positive relationship between fuel hazard and flammability. Our field method to measure ignition success could be applied across more prescribed burns to develop operationally useful models of ignitability.
Additional keywords: fire behaviour, fire management, flammability, forest management, fuel hazard, fuel moisture, mosaic, patchiness, prescribed burning, wildfire.
References
Anderson HE (1970) Forest fuel ignitibility. Fire Technology 6, 312–319.| Forest fuel ignitibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackmarr WH (1972) Moisture content influences ignitability of slash pine litter. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note SE-173. (Asheville, NC, USA)
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) ‘Model selection and inference. A practical information-theoretic approach.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA)
Calcagno V (2013) ‘Package ‘glmulti.’ Model selection and multimodel inference made easy. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glmulti/glmulti.pdf [Verified 22 January 2019]
Cawson JG, Sheridan GJ, Smith HG, Lane PNJ (2013) Effects of fire severity and burn patchiness on hillslope-scale surface runoff, erosion and hydrological connectiveity in a prescribed burn. Forest Ecology and Management 310, 219–233.
| Effects of fire severity and burn patchiness on hillslope-scale surface runoff, erosion and hydrological connectiveity in a prescribed burn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cheney NP, Gould JS, Knight I (1992) A prescribed burning guide for young regrowth forests of silvertop ash. Forestry Commission of New South Wales. (Sydney, NSW, Australia)
Cheney NP, Gould JS, McCaw WL, Anderson WR (2012) Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 280, 120–131.
| Predicting fire behaviour in dry eucalypt forest in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Environment Land Water and Planning (2016) Native vegetation – modelled 2005 ecological vegetation classes (with bioregional conservation status). (Victorian State Government: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Available at https://www.data.vic.gov.au/data/dataset/native-vegetation-modelled-2005-ecological-vegetation-classes-with-bioregional-conservation-status [Verified 1 February 2018]
Dickinson KJM, Kirkpatrick JB (1985) The flammability and energy content of some important plant species and fuel components in the forests of southeastern Tasmania. Journal of Biogeography 12, 121–134.
| The flammability and energy content of some important plant species and fuel components in the forests of southeastern Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaioannou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technology 37, 143–152.
| Flammability assessment of mediterranean forest fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dimitrakopoulos AP, Mitsopoulos ID, Gatoulas K (2010) Assessing ignition probability and moisture of extinction in a Mediterranean grass fuel. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 29–34.
| Assessing ignition probability and moisture of extinction in a Mediterranean grass fuel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis PFM (2015) The likelihood of ignition of dry-eucalypt forest litter by firebrands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 225–235.
| The likelihood of ignition of dry-eucalypt forest litter by firebrands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fernandes PM, Cruz MG (2012) Plant flammability experiments offer limited insight into vegetation-fire dynamics interactions. New Phytologist 194, 606–609.
| Plant flammability experiments offer limited insight into vegetation-fire dynamics interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22288940PubMed |
Forest Fire Management Victoria (2017) Bushfire management manual 3. Fuel management. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behaviour prediction system. Forestry Canada, Science and Sustainable Development Directorate. (Ottawa, ON, Canada)
Gill AM, Moore PHR (1996) Ignitability of leaves of Australian plants. Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)
Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP (2011) Quantifying fine fuel dynamics and structure in dry eucalypt forest (Eucalyptus marginata) in Western Australia for fire management. Forest Ecology and Management 262, 531–546.
| Quantifying fine fuel dynamics and structure in dry eucalypt forest (Eucalyptus marginata) in Western Australia for fire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hines F, Tolhurst KG, Wilson AAG, McCarthy GJ (2010) Overall fuel hazard assessment guide, 4th edn. Fire Management Branch, Department of Sustainability and Environment, report number 82. (Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) ‘Applied Logistic Regression.’ (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA)
Keane RE (2015) ‘Wildland Fuel Fundamentals and Application.’ (Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland)
Keetch JJ, Byram GM (1968) A drought index for forest fire control. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper SE-38. (Asheville, NC, USA)
Knapp EE, Keeley JE (2006) Heterogeneity in fire severity within early season and late season prescribed burns in a mixed-conifer forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 37–45.
| Heterogeneity in fire severity within early season and late season prescribed burns in a mixed-conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marsden-Smedley JB (2011) Planned burning in Tasmania. III. Revised guidelines for conductuing planned burning. Tasforests 19, 122–134.
Matthews S (2010) Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 800–802.
| Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matthews S (2014) Dead fuel moisture research: 1991–2012. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 78–92.
| Dead fuel moisture research: 1991–2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McArthur AG (1962) Control burning in Eucalypt forests. Commonwealth of Australia. Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet 80. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)
McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet 107. (Canberra, ACT, Australia)
McCaw WL, Gould JS, Cheney NP, Ellis PFM, Anderson WR (2012) Changes in behaviour of fire in dry eucalypt forest as fuel increases with age. Forest Ecology and Management 271, 170–181.
| Changes in behaviour of fire in dry eucalypt forest as fuel increases with age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pausas JG, Keeley JE, Schwilk DW (2017) Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver. Journal of Ecology 105, 289–297.
| Flammability as an ecological and evolutionary driver.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Penman TD, Kavanagh RP, Binns DL, Melick DR (2007) Patchiness of prescribed burns in dry sclerophyll eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 252, 24–32.
| Patchiness of prescribed burns in dry sclerophyll eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plucinski MP, Anderson WR (2008) Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shurbland vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 628–637.
| Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shurbland vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robinson NM, Leonard SWJ, Ritchie EG, Bassett M, Chia EK, Buckingham S, Gibb H, Bennett AF, Clarke MF (2013) REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 1321–1329.
| REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slijepcevic A, Anderson WR, Matthews S, Anderson DH (2015) Evaluating models to predict daily fine fuel moisture content in eucalypt forest. Forest Ecology and Management 335, 261–269.
| Evaluating models to predict daily fine fuel moisture content in eucalypt forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sneeuwjagt R, Peet GB (1985) ‘Forest Fire Behaviour Tables for Western Australia’, 3rd edn. (Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth, WA, Australia)
Sullivan AL (2017) Inside the inferno: fundamental processes of wildland fire behaviour. Part 2: Heat transfer and interactions. Current Forestry Reports 3, 150–171.
| Inside the inferno: fundamental processes of wildland fire behaviour. Part 2: Heat transfer and interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tolhurst, KG, Cheney, NP (1999) ‘Synopsis of the Knowledge used in Prescribed Burning in Victoria.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Fire Management: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Varner JM, Kane JM, Kreye JK, Engber E (2015) The Flammability of Forest and Woodland Litter: a Synthesis. Current Forestry Reports 1, 91–99.
| The Flammability of Forest and Woodland Litter: a Synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Viney NR (1991) A review of fine fuel moisture modelling. International Journal of Wildland Fire 1, 215–234.
| A review of fine fuel moisture modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wyse SV, Perry GLW, Curran TJ (2017) Shoot-level flammability of species mixtures is driven by the most flammable species: implications for vegetation-fire feedbacks favouring invasive species. Ecosystems 21, 886–900.
| Shoot-level flammability of species mixtures is driven by the most flammable species: implications for vegetation-fire feedbacks favouring invasive species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zylstra P, Bradstock RA, Bedward M, Penman TD, Doherty MD, Weber RO, Gill AM, Cary GJ (2016) Biophysical mechanistic modelling quantifies the effects of plant traits on fire severity: species, not surface fuel loads, determine flame dimensions in eucalypt forests. PLoS One 11, e0160715
| Biophysical mechanistic modelling quantifies the effects of plant traits on fire severity: species, not surface fuel loads, determine flame dimensions in eucalypt forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27529789PubMed |
