Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of wildfire on national park visitation and the regional economy: a natural experiment in the Northern Rockies

John W. Duffield A C , Chris J. Neher A , David A. Patterson A and Aaron M. Deskins B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Mathematical Sciences, Mathematics Building, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.

B Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive #1296, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: john.duffield@mso.umt.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(8) 1155-1166 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12170
Submitted: 11 October 2012  Accepted: 23 April 2013   Published: 26 August 2013

Abstract

Federal wildland fire management policy in the United States directs the use of value-based methods to guide priorities. However, the economic literature on the effect of wildland fire on nonmarket uses, such as recreation, is limited. This paper introduces a new approach to measuring the effect of wildfire on recreational use by utilising newly available long-term datasets on the location and size of wildland fire in the United States and observed behaviour over time as revealed through comprehensive National Park Service (NPS) visitor data. We estimate travel cost economic demand models that can be aggregated at the site-landscape level for Yellowstone National Park (YNP). The marginal recreation benefit per acre of fire avoided in, or proximate to, the park is US$43.82 per acre (US$108.29 per hectare) and the net present value loss for the 1986–2011 period is estimated to be US$206 million. We also estimate marginal regional economic impacts at US$36.69 per acre (US$90.66 per hectare) and US$159 million based on foregone non-resident spending in the 17-county Great Yellowstone Area (GYA). These methods are applicable where time-series recreation data exist, such as for other parks and ecosystems represented in the 397-unit NPS system.

Additional keywords: benefit–cost, non-market values, recreation, wildfire economics.


References

Bergstrom J, Cordell K, Watson A, Ashley G (1990) Economic impacts of state parks on state economies in the south. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22, 69–77.

Bowker J, Starbuck C, English D, Bergstrom J, Rosenberger R, McCollum D (2009) Estimating the net economic value of national forest recreation: an application of the National Visitor Use Monitoring database. University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics. (Athens, GA)

Boxall P, Englin J (2008) Fire and recreation values in fire-prone forests: exploring an intertemporal amenity function using pooled RP-SP data. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 33, 19–33.

Cameron A, Trivedi P (1998) ‘Regression Analysis of Count Data.’(Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (2003) ‘A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation.’(Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, the Netherlands)

Dillman D (2000) ‘Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method.’ (Wiley: New York)

Duffield JW (1989) RPA values for recreation: theory and practice. Public Land Law Review 10, 105–129.

Duffield JW, Neher CJ, Patterson D (2006) Wolves and people in Yellowstone: impacts on the regional economy. Yellowstone Park Foundation. (Missoula, MT)

Duffield JW, Neher CJ, Patterson D (2008) Economics of wolf recovery in Yellowstone. Yellowstone Science 16, 20–25.

Englin J, Shonkwiler J (1995) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 104–112.
Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Englin J, Boxall P, Chakraborty K, Watson D (1996) Valuing the impacts of forest fires on backcountry forest recreation. Forest Science 42, 450–455.

Englin J, Loomis J, González-Cabán A (2001) The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1837–1844.
The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Englin J, McDonald J, Moeltner K (2006) Valuing ancient forest ecosystems: an analysis of backcountry hiking in Jasper National Park. Ecological Economics 57, 665–678.
Valuing ancient forest ecosystems: an analysis of backcountry hiking in Jasper National Park.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FEC (2009) Guidance for implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. (Fire Executive Council) Available at http://www.nifc.gov/policies/policies_documents/GIFWFMP.pdf [Verified 1 July 2013]

Heberling M, Templeton J (2009) Estimating the economic value of national parks with count data models using on-site, secondary data: the case of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve. Environmental Management 43, 619–627.
Estimating the economic value of national parks with count data models using on-site, secondary data: the case of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18506513PubMed |

Hellerstein D, Mendelsohn R (1993) A theoretical foundation for count data models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 604–611.
A theoretical foundation for count data models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hesseln H, Loomis JB, González-Cabán A, Alexander S (2003) Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study. Journal of Environmental Management 69, 359–368.
Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14680897PubMed |

Hesseln H, Loomis JB, González-Cabán A (2004) Comparing the economic effects of fire on hiking demand in Montana and Colorado. Journal of Forest Economics 10, 21–35.
Comparing the economic effects of fire on hiking demand in Montana and Colorado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hilger J, Englin J (2009) Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment: forest fire impacts on recreational values and use. Resource and Energy Economics 31, 287–298.
Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment: forest fire impacts on recreational values and use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leontief W (1941) ‘The Structure of the American Economy.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA)

Loomis J (2005) Updated outdoor recreation use values on national forests and other public lands. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-658. (Portland, OR)

Loomis JB, González-Cabán A, Englin J (2001) Testing for differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26, 508–522.

Love TG, Watson AE (1992) Effects of the Gates Park Fire on recreation choices. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Note INT-402. (Ogden, UT)

MIG (2010) ‘IMPLAN Software Package V3.’ (MIG, Inc: Stillwater, MN)

Miller R, Blair P (2009) ‘Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions’, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: New York)

Munn I, Hussain A, Spurlock S, Henderson J (2010) Economic impact of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation expenditures on the southeast US regional economy: an input–output analysis. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15, 433–449.
Economic impact of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation expenditures on the southeast US regional economy: an input–output analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Park Service (NPS) (2012) NPS public use statistics. Available at http://www.nature.nps.gov/stats/ [Verified 5 April 2010]

Neher C, Duffield J (2000) Economic analysis of national park issues: an assessment of the impacts of the 1997 floods in Yosemite National Park. Park Science 20, 21–23.

Shaw D (1988) On-site samples regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation and endogenous stratification. Journal of Econometrics 37, 211–223.
On-site samples regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation and endogenous stratification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sorg C, Loomis J (1984) Empirical estimates of amenity forest values: a comparative review. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report RM-107. (Fort Collins, CO)

Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60, 379–388.
Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stynes D, Propst D, Chang W, Sun Y (2000) Estimating regional economic impacts of park visitor spending: money generation model version 2 (MGM2). Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI)

Varian H (1992) ‘Microeconomic Analysis’ 3rd edn. (W.W. Norton and Company: New York)

Vaux H Jr, Gardner PD, Mills TJ (1984) Methods for assessing the impact of fire on fire and forest recreation. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PSW-79. (Berkeley, CA)

Venn TJ, Calkin DE (2011) Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 327–339.
Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilton JJ, Nickerson NP (2006) Collecting and using visitor spending data. Journal of Travel Research 45, 17–25.
Collecting and using visitor spending data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |