Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs

Sarah McCaffrey A D , Eric Toman B , Melanie Stidham C and Bruce Shindler C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1033 University Place, #360, Evanston, IL 60626, USA.

B School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 316C Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

C Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: smccaffrey@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(1) 15-24 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11115
Submitted: 11 August 2011  Accepted: 2 May 2012   Published: 12 July 2012

Abstract

As with other aspects of natural-resource management, the approach to managing wildland fires has evolved over time as scientific understanding has advanced and the broader context surrounding management decisions has changed. Prior to 2000 the primary focus of most fire research was on the physical and ecological aspects of fire; social science research was limited to a small number of studies. However, as more people moved into fire-prone areas interest grew in understanding relevant social dynamics. This growing interest was supported by increased funding for fire research overall with the creation of the Joint Fire Science Program in 1998 and the National Fire Plan in 2000. In subsequent years, a significant body of research has developed on the human dimensions of wildland fire covering diverse topics including: attitudes towards pre-fire mitigation, social acceptability of fire and fuels management, community preparedness, public response during fires, citizen–agency communications and post-fire recovery. This paper reports on two aspects of a Joint Fire Science Program project intended to take stock of the key social science lessons provided to date: a basic review of findings in the non-economic fire social science literature and identification of future research needs.

Additional keywords: citizen–agency interactions, communication and outreach, community preparedness, fuels management, homeowner mitigation, public acceptance, risk perception, trust.


References

Absher JD, Vaske JJ (2006) An analysis of homeowner and agency wildland fire mitigation strategies. In ‘Proceedings of the 2005 northeastern recreation research symposium’, 10–12 April 2005, Bolton Landing, NY. (Eds JG Peden, RM Schuster) USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, General Technical Report NE-GTR-341, pp. 231–236. (Newtown Square, PA)

Agrawal S, Monroe MC (2006) Using and improving social capital to increase community preparedness for wildfire. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GRT-1, pp. 163–167. (Newtown Square, PA)

Aplet GH (2006) Evolution of wilderness fire policy. International Journal of Wilderness 12, 9–13.

Arvai J, Gregory R, Ohlson D, Blackwell B, Gray R (2006) Letdowns, wake-up calls, and constructed preferences: people’s responses to fuel and wildfire risks. Journal of Forestry 104, 173–181.

Bier VM (2001) On the state of the art: risk communication to the public. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71, 139–150.
On the state of the art: risk communication to the public.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blanchard B, Ryan RL (2007) Managing the wildland–urban interface in the northeast: perceptions of fire risk and hazard reduction strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 24, 203–208.

Blatner KA, Carroll MS, Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Evaluating the application of collaborative learning to the Wenatchee fire recovery planning effort. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21, 241–270.
Evaluating the application of collaborative learning to the Wenatchee fire recovery planning effort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brenkert-Smith H (2006) The place of fire. Natural Hazards Review 7, 105–113.
The place of fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2006) Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland–urban interface residents. Society & Natural Resources 19, 759–768.
Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland–urban interface residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bright AD, Burtz RT (2006) Firewise activities of full-time versus seasonal residents in the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Forestry 104, 307–315.

Bright AD, Newman P (2006) How forest context influences the acceptability of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 47–52. (Newtown Square, PA)

Brown RNK, Rosenberger RS, Kline JD, Hall TE, Needham MD (2008) Visitor preferences for managing wilderness recreation after wildfire. Journal of Forestry 106, 9–16.

Brunson MW, Shindler BA (2004) Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States. Society & Natural Resources 17, 661–678.
Geographic variation in social acceptability of wildland fuels management in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burchfield J (2007) Community impacts of large wildfire events: Consequences of actions after the fire. In ‘People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science’. (Eds TC Daniel, MS Carroll, C Moseley, C Raish) pp. 124–140. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Burns M, Cheng AS (2007) Framing the need for active management for wildfire mitigation and forest restoration. Society & Natural Resources 20, 245–259.
Framing the need for active management for wildfire mitigation and forest restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burns MR, Taylor JG, Hogan JT (2008) Integrative healing: the importance of community collaboration in postfire recovery and prefire planning. In ‘Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 81–97. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)

Busenberg G (2004) Adaptive policy design for the management of wildfire hazards. The American Behavioral Scientist 48, 314–326.
Adaptive policy design for the management of wildfire hazards.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carpenter EH, Taylor JG, Cortner HJ, Gardner PD, Zwolinski MJ, Daniel TC (1986) Targeting audiences and content for forest fire information programs. The Journal of Environmental Education 17, 33–41.
Targeting audiences and content for forest fire information programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carroll MS, Cohn PJ, Blatner KA (2004) Private and tribal forest landowners and fire risk: a two-county case study in Washington state. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 2148–2158.
Private and tribal forest landowners and fire risk: a two-county case study in Washington state.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carroll MS, Cohn PJ, Seesholtz DN, Higgins LL (2005) Fire as a galvanizing and fragmenting influence on communities: the case of the Rodeo-Chediski fire. Society & Natural Resources 18, 301–320.
Fire as a galvanizing and fragmenting influence on communities: the case of the Rodeo-Chediski fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cohn PJ, Carroll MS, Kumagai Y (2006) Evacuation behavior during wildfires: results of three case studies. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 21, 39–48.

Cohn PJ, Williams DR, Carroll MS (2008) Wildland–urban interface residents’ views on risk and attribution. In ‘Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 23–43. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)

Collins TW (2005) Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community. Environmental Hazards 6, 23–37.
Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cortner HJ, Zwolinski MJ, Carpenter EH, Taylor JG (1984) Public support for fire-management policies. Journal of Forestry 82, 359–361.

Cvetkovich GT, Winter PL (2008) The experience of community residents in a fire-prone ecosystem: a case study on the San Bernardino National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Research Paper PSW-RP-257. (Albany, CA)

Dale L (2006) Wildfire policy and fire use on public lands in the United States. Society & Natural Resources 19, 275–284.
Wildfire policy and fire use on public lands in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Daniel TC (2007) Perceptions of wildfire risk. In ‘People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science’. (Eds TC Daniel, MS Carroll, C Moseley, C Raish) pp. 55–69. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Daniel TC, Weidemann E, Hines D (2002) Assessing public tradeoffs between fire hazard and scenic beauty in the wildland–urban interface. In ‘Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: science findings from the National Fire Plan, Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on society and resource management’, 2–5 June 2002, Bloomington, IN. (Ed. PJ Jakes) USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-GTR-231, pp. 36–44. (St Paul, MN)

Davenport MA, Anderson DH, Leahy JE, Jakes P (2007) Reflections from USDA Forest Service employees on institutional constraints to engaging and serving their local communities. Journal of Forestry 105, 43–48.

Davis C (2001) The West in flames: the intergovernmental politics of wildfire suppression and prevention. Publius 31, 97–110.
The West in flames: the intergovernmental politics of wildfire suppression and prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doane D, O’Laughlin J, Morgan P, Miller C (2006) Barriers to wildland fire use. International Journal of Wilderness 12, 36–38.

Downing JL, Hodgson RW, Taylor JG, Gillette SC (2008) Fire information for communities at risk in interface wildfires: lessons learned from the 2003 Southern California megafires. In ‘Fire social science research from the Pacific Southwest Research Station: studies supported by National Fire Plan funds’. (Eds DJ Chavez, JD Absher, PL Winter) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-209, pp. 135–152. (Albany, CA)

Englin J, Loomis J, González-Cabán A (2001) The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1837–1844.
The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fleeger WE (2008) Collaborating for success: community wildfire protection planning in the Arizona White Mountains. Journal of Forestry 106, 78–82.

Fleeger WE, Becker ML (2010) Decision processes for multi-jurisdictional planning and management: community wildfire protection planning in Oregon processes. Society & Natural Resources 23, 351–365.
Decision processes for multi-jurisdictional planning and management: community wildfire protection planning in Oregon processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flint CG (2007) Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska. Risk Analysis 27, 1597–1608.
Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flint CG, Haynes R (2006) Managing forest disturbances and community responses: lessons from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Journal of Forestry 104, 269–275.

Flint CG, Luloff AE (2007) Community activeness in response to forest disturbance in Alaska. Society & Natural Resources 20, 431–450.
Community activeness in response to forest disturbance in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner PD, Cortner HJ, Widaman KF, Stenberg KJ (1985) Forest-user attitudes toward alternative fire management policies. Environmental Management 9, 303–311.
Forest-user attitudes toward alternative fire management policies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) ‘The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.’ (Aldine Publishing: Chicago)

González-Cabán A (2007) Human factors in fire management. In ‘Fire social science research – selected highlights’. (Eds A González-Cabán, RW Haynes, S McCaffrey, E Mercer, A Watson) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-736, pp. 35–39. (Portland, OR)

Gunderson K (2006) Understanding place meanings for wilderness: personal and community values at risk. International Journal of Wilderness 12, 27–31.

Gunderson K, Watson A (2007) Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Society & Natural Resources 20, 705–721.
Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2001) Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10, 389–403.
Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hesseln H, Loomis J, González-Cabán A, Alexander S (2003) Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study. Journal of Environmental Management 69, 359–368.
Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hodgson RW (2007) Emotions and sense making in disturbance: community adaptation to dangerous environments. Human Ecology Review 14, 233–242.

Holmes TP, Abt KL, Huggett RJ Jr, Prestemon JP (2007) Efficient and equitable design of wildfire mitigation programs. In ‘People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science’. (Eds TC Daniel, MS Carroll, C Moseley, C Raish) pp. 143–156. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Hull RB, Goldstein BE (2006) Barriers to community-directed fire restoration. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report GTR-NRS-1, pp. 77–85. (Newtown Square, PA)

Jacobson SK, Monroe MC, Marynowski S (2001) Fire at the wildland interface: the influence of experience and mass media on public knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 929–937.

Jakes P, Burns S, Cheng A, Saeli E, Brummel K, Rachel N, Grayzeck S, Sturtevant V, Williams D (2007) Critical elements in the development and implementation of Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs). In ‘The fire environment: innovations, management, and policy, conference proceedings’, 26–30 March 2007, Destin, FL. (Eds BW Butler, W Cook) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-46CD, pp. 613–624. (Fort Collins, CO)

Jensen SE (2006) Policy tools for wildland fire management: principles, incentives, and conflicts. Natural Resources Journal 46, 959–1003.

Kent B, Gebert K, McCaffrey S, Martin W, Calkin D, Schuster E, Martin I, Bender HW, Alward G, Kumagai Y, Cohn PJ, Carroll M, Williams D, Ekarius C (2003) Social and economic issues of the Hayman Fire. In ‘Hayman fire case study’. (Ed. RT Graham) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-114, pp. 315–395. (Odgen, UT)

Knotek K, Watson A (2006) Organizational characteristics that contribute to success in engaging the public to accomplish fuels management at the wilderness/non-wilderness interface. In ‘Fuels management – how to measure success’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 703–713. (Fort Collins, CO)

Kumagai Y, Daniels SE, Carroll MS, Bliss JC, Edwards JA (2004) Causal reasoning processes of people affected by wildfire: implications for agency-community interactions and communication strategies. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 19, 184–194.

Liljeblad A, Watson A, Borrie WT (2009) Determinants of trust on public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest. Environmental Management 43, 571–584.
Determinants of trust on public lands: fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liou G, Vogt C, Winter G, McCaffrey S (2008) Residents’ values and fuels management approaches. In ‘Proceedings of the 2007 northeastern recreation research symposium’, 15–17 April 2007, Bolton Landing, NY. (Eds C LeBlanc, C Vogt) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Proceedings NRS-P-23, pp. 77–83. (Newtown Square, PA)

Loomis J, González-Cabán A, Englin J (2001) Testing for differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26, 508–522.

Manfredo MJ, Fishbein M, Haas GE, Watson AE (1990) Attitudes toward prescribed fire policies: the public is widely divided in its support. Journal of Forestry 88, 19–23.

Martin IM, Bender H, Raish C (2007) What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis 27, 887–900.
What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: the case of wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCaffrey S (2004a) Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard. Society & Natural Resources 17, 509–516.
Thinking of wildfire as a natural hazard.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCaffrey SM (2004b) Fighting fire with education: what is the best way to reach out to homeowners? Journal of Forestry 102, 12–19.

McCaffrey S (2006) Prescribed fire: what influences public approval? In ‘Fire in eastern oak forests: delivering science to land managers, Proceedings of a conference’, 15–17 November 2005, Columbus, OH. (Ed. MB Dickinson) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Proceedings NRS-P-1, pp. 192–198. (Newtown Square, PA)

McCaffrey S (2008) Understanding public perspectives of wildfire risk. In ‘Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 11–22. (Resources for the Future: Washington, DC)

McCaffrey S, Moghaddas JJ, Stephens SL (2008) Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 224–233.
Different interest group views of fuels treatments: survey results from fire and fire surrogate treatments in a Sierran mixed conifer forest, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCool SF, Burchfield JA, Williams DR, Carroll MS (2006) An event-based approach for examining the effects of wildland fire decisions on communities. Environmental Management 37, 437–450.
An event-based approach for examining the effects of wildland fire decisions on communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGee TK (2005) Completion of recommended WUI fire mitigation measures within urban households in Edmonton, Canada. Environmental Hazards 6, 147–157.
Completion of recommended WUI fire mitigation measures within urban households in Edmonton, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGee TK (2007) Urban residents’ approval of management measures to mitigate wildland–urban interface fire risks in Edmonton, Canada. Landscape and Urban Planning 82, 247–256.
Urban residents’ approval of management measures to mitigate wildland–urban interface fire risks in Edmonton, Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGee TK, Russell S (2003) ‘It’s just a natural way of life…’ an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 5, 1–12.
‘It’s just a natural way of life…’ an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller C, Landres P (2004) Exploring informational needs for wildland fire and fuels management. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-127. (Fort Collins, CO)

Monroe MC, Nelson KC (2004) The value of assessing public perceptions: wildland fire and defensible space. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 3, 109–117.
The value of assessing public perceptions: wildland fire and defensible space.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monroe MC, Long AJ, Marynowski S (2003) Wildland fire in the Southeast: negotiating guidelines for defensible space. Journal of Forestry 101, 14–19.

Monroe M, Nelson KC, Payton M (2006) Communicating with homeowners in the interface about defensible space. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 99–109. (Newtown Square, PA)

Moseley C (2007) Class, ethnicity, rural communities, and the socioeconomic impacts of fire policy. In ‘People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science’. (Eds TC Daniel, MS Carroll, C Moseley, C Raish) pp. 171–186. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Nelson KC, Monroe MC, Johnson JF (2005) The look of the land: homeowner landscape management and wildfire preparedness in Minnesota and Florida. Society & Natural Resources 18, 321–336.
The look of the land: homeowner landscape management and wildfire preparedness in Minnesota and Florida.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Laughlin J (2005) Policy issues relevant to risk assessments, balancing risks, and the National Fire Plan: needs and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 3–14.
Policy issues relevant to risk assessments, balancing risks, and the National Fire Plan: needs and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsen CS, Shindler BA (2007) Citizen–agency interactions in planning and decisionmaking after large fires. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-715. (Portland, OR)

Ostergren DM, Lowe KA, Abrams JB, Ruther EJ (2006) Public perceptions of forest management in north central Arizona: the paradox of demanding more involvement but allowing limits to legal action. Journal of Forestry 104, 375–382.

Parkinson TM, Force JE, Smith JK (2003) Hands-on learning: its effectiveness in teaching the public about wildland fire. Journal of Forestry 101, 21–26.

Rodriguez-Mendez S, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Findley AJ, Walker GB, Daniels SE (2003) Smoke on the hill: a comparative study of wildfire and two communities. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 18, 60–70.

Ryan R, Hamin E (2006) Engaging communities in post-fire restoration: forest treatments and community–agency relations after the Cerro Grande Fire. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 87–96. (Newtown Square, PA)

Ryan RL, Hamin E (2008) Wildfires, communities, and agencies: stakeholders’ perceptions of postfire forest restoration and rehabilitation. Journal of Forestry 106, 370–379.

Ryan RL, Wamsley MB, Blanchard BP (2006) Perceptions of wildfire threat and mitigation measures by residents of fire-prone communities in the Northeast: survey results and wildland fire management implications. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 11–17. (Newtown Square, PA)

Shindler B (2007) Public acceptance of wildland fire conditions and fuel reduction practices: challenges for federal forest managers. In ‘People, fire, and forests: a synthesis of wildfire social science’. (Eds TC Daniel, MS Carroll, C Moseley, C Raish) pp. 37–54. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Shindler B, Toman E (2003) Fuel reduction strategies in forest communities. Journal of Forestry 101, 8–15.

Shindler BA, Toman E, McCaffrey SM (2009) Public perspectives of fire, fuels, and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: a survey of citizens in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 157–164.
Public perspectives of fire, fuels, and the Forest Service in the Great Lakes Region: a survey of citizens in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shiralipour HJ, Monroe MC, Nelson KC, Payton M (2006) Working with neighborhood organizations to promote wildfire preparedness. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-1, pp. 151–162. (Newtown Square, PA)

Stankey GH (1976) Wilderness fire policy: an investigation of visitor knowledge and beliefs. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-RP-180. (Ogden, UT)

Steelman TA (2008) Addressing the mitigation paradox at the community level. In ‘Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications’. (Eds W Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 64–80. (Washington, DC)

Steelman TA, Burke CA (2007) Is wildfire policy in the United States sustainable? Journal of Forestry 105, 67–72.

Steelman TA, Kunkel G, Bell D (2004) Federal and state influence on community responses to wildfire threats: Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico. Journal of Forestry 102, 21–27.

Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Hawbaker TJ (2007) Defining the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry 105, 201–207.

Sturtevant V, Jakes P (2008) Collaborative planning to reduce risk. In ‘Wildfire risk: human perceptions and management implications’. (Eds WE Martin, C Raish, B Kent) pp. 44–63. (Washington, DC)

Sturtevant V, McCaffrey SM (2006) Encouraging wildland fire preparedness: lessons learned from three wildfire education programs. In ‘The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 125–136. (Newtown Square, PA)

Sturtevant V, Moote MA, Jakes P, Cheng AS (2005) Social science to improve fuels management: a synthesis of research on collaboration. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-GTR-257. (St Paul, MN)

Sutton J, Palen L, Shklovski I (2008) Backchannels on the front lines: emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California wildfires. In ‘5th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2008’, 5–7 May 2008, Washington, DC. (Eds F Fiedrich, B Van de Walle) pp. 624–631. (ISCRAM) Available at http://www.iscram.org/dmdocuments/ISCRAM2008/papers/ISCRAM2008_Sutton_etal.pdf [Verified 4 July 2012]

Taylor JG, Mutch RW (1986) Fire in wilderness: Public knowledge, acceptance, and perceptions. In ‘Proceedings for the national wilderness research conference: current research’. (Ed. RC Lucas) USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-212, pp. 49–59. (Ogden, UT)

Taylor JG, Gillette SC, Hodgson RW, Downing JL, Burns MR, Chavez DJ, Hogan JT (2007) Informing the network: improving communication with interface communities during wildland fire. Human Ecology Review 14, 198–211.

Thapa B, Holland SM, Absher JD (2004) The relationship between wildfires and tourist behaviors in Florida: An exploratory study. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th social aspects and recreation research symposium’, 4–6 February 2004, San Francisco, CA. (Eds PT Tierney, DJ Chavez) pp. 154–161. (San Francisco State University: San Francisco)

Toman E, Shindler B (2006) Communicating the wildland fire message: influences on knowledge and attitude change in two case studies. In ‘Fuels management – how to measure success, Conference proceedings’, 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. (Eds PL Andrews, BW Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 715–728. (Fort Collins, CO)

Toman E, Shindler B, Brunson M (2006) Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities. Society & Natural Resources 19, 321–336.
Fire and fuel management communication strategies: citizen evaluations of agency outreach activities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Toman E, Shindler B, Olsen C (2008a) Communication strategies for post-fire planning: lessons learned from forest communities. In ‘Fire social science research from the Pacific Southwest Research Station: studies supported by National Fire Plan Funds’. (Eds DJ Chavez, JD Absher, PL Winter) USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-209, pp. 165–179. (Albany, CA)

Toman EL, Shindler B, Absher J, McCaffrey S (2008b) Post-fire communications: The influence of site visits on local support. Journal of Forestry 106, 25–30.

Vaske JJ, Absher JD, Bright AD (2007) Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. Human Ecology Review 14, 223–232.

Vining J, Merrick MS (2008) The influence of proximity to a National Forest on emotions and fire-management decisions. Environmental Management 41, 155–167.
The influence of proximity to a National Forest on emotions and fire-management decisions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walker SH, Rideout DB, Loomis JB, Reich R (2007) Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland-urban interface areas. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 694–703.
Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland-urban interface areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weible C, Sabatier P, Nechodom M (2005) No sparks fly: policy participants agree on thinning trees in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Journal of Forestry 103, 5–9.

Weisshaupt BR, Carroll MS, Blatner KA, Robinson WD, Jakes PJ (2005) Acceptability of smoke from prescribed forest burning in the northern inland west: a focus group approach. Journal of Forestry 103, 189–193.

Weisshaupt BR, Jakes PJ, Carroll MS, Blatner KA (2007) Northern inland west land/homeowner perceptions of fire risk and responsibility in the wildland–urban interface. Human Ecology Review 14, 177–187.

Williamson MA (2007) Factors in United States Forest Service district rangers’ decision to manage a fire for resource benefit. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 755–762.
Factors in United States Forest Service district rangers’ decision to manage a fire for resource benefit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winter G, Fried JS (2000) Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface. Society & Natural Resources 13, 33–49.
Homeowner perspectives on fire hazard, responsibility, and management strategies at the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winter GJ, Vogt C, Fried JS (2002) Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: common concerns in diverse regions. Journal of Forestry 100, 15–21.

Winter G, Vogt CA, McCaffrey S (2004) Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102, 8–15.

Winter G, Vogt C, McCaffrey S (2006) Residents warming up to fuels management: homeowners’ acceptance of wildfire and fuels management in the WUI. In ‘The Public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers’. (Ed. SM McCaffrey) USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General Technical Report NRS-GTR-1, pp. 19–32. (Newtown Square, PA)

Zaksek M, Arvai JL (2004) Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Analysis 24, 1503–1514.
Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |