Airtankers and wildfire management in the US Forest Service: examining data availability and exploring usage and cost trends
Matthew P. Thompson A B , David E. Calkin A , Jason Herynk A , Charles W. McHugh A and Karen C. Short A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Rocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, Missoula, MT, USA.
B Corresponding author. Email: mpthompson02@fs.fed.us
International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(2) 223-233 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11041
Submitted: 22 March 2011 Accepted: 24 April 2012 Published: 10 August 2012
Abstract
Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft is a crucial component of strategic wildfire management and planning. In this manuscript, we focus on the economics of fire and aviation management within the US Forest Service. Substantial uncertainties challenge comprehensive analysis of airtanker use, prompting calls from federal oversight agencies for improved aerial firefighting data collection and analysis. Here, we explore the availability and sufficiency of agency aviation data to track airtanker use and cost trends, and to categorise airtanker use by mission type and fire size class. Although the primary intended use of the airtanker fleet is for initial attack of wildfires, our results indicate that the use of these aircraft tends to occur for extended attack or large- fire support, with a significant number of flights associated with very large fires greater than 4047 ha (10 000 acres). Our results highlight apparent trends in airtanker use that challenge our ability to evaluate cost-effectiveness of airtankers. Data quality and availability issues limited our analysis, leading to a recommendation for improved data collection on flight objective and drop location. We conclude by offering suggested avenues of future research that may help address informational and analytical shortcomings.
Additional keywords: aviation, cost–benefit analysis, suppression.
References
Alexandridis A, Russo L, Vakalis D, Bafas GV, Siettos CI (2011) Wildland fire spread modelling using cellular automata: evolution in large-scale spatially heterogeneous environments under fire suppression tactics. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 633–647.| Wildland fire spread modelling using cellular automata: evolution in large-scale spatially heterogeneous environments under fire suppression tactics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Amorim JH (2011a) Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of firefighting agents by fixed-wing aircraft. Part I: model development. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 384–393.
| Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of firefighting agents by fixed-wing aircraft. Part I: model development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Amorim JH (2011b) Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of firefighting agents by fixed-wing aircraft. Part II: model validation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 394–406.
| Numerical modelling of the aerial drop of firefighting agents by fixed-wing aircraft. Part II: model validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blue Ribbon Panel (2002) Federal aerial firefighting: assessing safety and effectiveness. Blue Ribbon Panel Report to the Chief, USDA Forest Service and Director, USDI Bureau of Land Management. Available at http://www.wildlandfire.com/docs/2003_n_before/BRP_Final12052002-1.pdf [Verified 1 November 2011]
Cart J, Boxall B (2008) Air tanker drops in wildfires are often just for show. Los Angeles Times 29 July 2008. Available at http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-wildfires29-2008jul29,0,5666042.story [Verified 24 February 2012]
Donovan GH, Brown TC (2005) An alternative incentive structure for wildfire management on National Forest Land. Forest Science 51, 387–395.
Donovan GH, Brown TC, Dale L (2008) Incentives and wildfire management in the United States. In ‘The Economics of Forest Disturbance’. (Eds TP Holmes,JP Prestemon, and KL Abt) pp. 323–340. (Springer Science + Business Media BV: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
Finney MA, Grenfell IC, McHugh CW (2009) Modeling containment of large wildfires using generalized linear mixed-model analysis. Forest Science 55, 249–255.
Fire Program Solutions (2005) Wildland Fire Management Aerial Application Study. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/publications/aviation/nats3_wfmaas_report_final.pdf [Verified 2 July 2012]
Fried JS, Gilles JK, Spero J (2006) Analysing initial attack on wildland fires using stochastic simulation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 137–146.
| Analysing initial attack on wildland fires using stochastic simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ganewatta G, Handmer J (2009) The cost-effectiveness of aerial firefighting in Australia. Bushfire CRC, Technical Report A.09.01. (Melbourne)
George CW (1985) An operational retardant effectiveness study. Fire Management Notes 46, 18–23.
Greulich FE, O’Regan WG (1975) Allocation model for air tanker initial attack in firefighting. USDA Forest Service, Research Note PSW-301. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. (Berkeley, CA)
Greulich FE, O’Regan WG (1982) Optimum use of air tankers in initial attack: selection, basing, and transfer rules. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper PSW-163. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. (Berkeley, CA)
Hodgson MJ, Newstead RG (1978) Location-allocation models for one-strike initial attack of forest fires by airtanker. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 8, 145–154.
| Location-allocation models for one-strike initial attack of forest fires by airtanker.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hof J, Omi PN, Bevers M, Laven RD (2000) A timing-oriented approach to spatial allocation of fire management effort. Forest Science 46, 442–451.
Islam KMS, Martell DL (1998) Performance of initial attack airtanker systems with interacting bases and variable initial attack ranges. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28, 1448–1455.
| Performance of initial attack airtanker systems with interacting bases and variable initial attack ranges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacLellan JI, Martell DL (1996) Basing airtankers for forest fire control in Ontario. Operations Research 44, 677–686.
| Basing airtankers for forest fire control in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martell DL (2007) Forest fire management. In ‘Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources’. (Eds A Weintraub, C Romero, T Bjørndal, R Epstein and J Miranda) (Springer: New York)
McCarthy GJ (2003) Effectiveness of aircraft operations by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment and the Country Fire Authority 1997–1998. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria, Research Report Number 52. (Melbourne)
McKinney E (2004) Learning by fire: the learning challenges facing US Forest Service aviation. Government Information Quarterly 21, 86–98.
| Learning by fire: the learning challenges facing US Forest Service aviation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mees R, Strauss D (1992) Allocating resources to large wildland fires: a model with stochastic production rates. Forest Science 38, 842–853.
Mees R, Strauss D, Chase R (1994) Minimizing the cost of wildland fire suppression: a model with uncertainty in predicted flame length and fire-line width produced. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24, 1253–1259.
| Minimizing the cost of wildland fire suppression: a model with uncertainty in predicted flame length and fire-line width produced.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2011) Interagency aerial supervision guide, Interagency Aerial Supervision Guide PMS 505, NFES 2544. Available at http://www.nwcg.gov/pms/pubs/pms505.pdf [Verified 1 November 2011]
Pérez Y, Pastor E, Plana E, Plucinski M, Gould J (2011) Computing forest fires aerial suppression effectiveness by IR monitoring. Fire Safety Journal 46, 2–8.
| Computing forest fires aerial suppression effectiveness by IR monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Plucinski MP (2010) ‘Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the 10 Tanker Air Carrier DC-10 Airtanker, Victoria 2010.’ (Bushfire CRC: Melbourne)
Plucinski M, Gould J, McCarthy G, Hollis J (2007) The effectiveness and efficiency of aerial firefighting in Australia, Part 1. Bushfire CRC, Technical Report A0701. (Melbourne)
Plucinski MP, McCarthy GJ, Hollis JJ, Gould JS (2011) The effect of aerial suppression on the containment time of Australian wildfires estimated by fire-management personnel. International Journal of Wildland Fire
| The effect of aerial suppression on the containment time of Australian wildfires estimated by fire-management personnel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Podur JJ, Martell DL (2007) A simulation model of the growth and suppression of large forest fires in Ontario. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 285–294.
| A simulation model of the growth and suppression of large forest fires in Ontario.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rey M, Scarlett L (2004) Statement before Senate Commerce Committee concerning firefighting aircraft safety. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/congress/108/senate/oversight/rey/060204.html [Verified 1 November 2011]
US General Accounting Office (2007) Wildland fire management: lack of clear goals or a strategy hinders Federal Agencies’ efforts to contain the costs of fighting fires. GAO-07-655. Available at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-655 [Verified 2 July 2012]
US General Accounting Office (2009) Wildland fire management: Federal Agencies have taken important steps forward, but additional action is needed to address remaining challenges. GAO-09-906T. Available at http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-906T [Verified 2 July 2012]
USDA Forest Service (2011) National exclusive use airtanker service contract, Section C-1A. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC) Available at www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/airtankers/airtanker_contract.pdf [Verified 1 November 2011]
USDA Forest Service (2012) Large airtanker modernization strategy. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/aviation/airtanker_modernization_strategy.pdf [Verified 26 February 2012]
USDA Forest Service and DOI (1995) National study of airtankers to support initial attack and large fire suppression. Final Report Phase 1. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/publications/aviation/nats1_report.pdf [Verified 2 July 2012]
USDA Forest Service and DOI Bureau of Land Management (1996) National study of large airtankers to support initial attack and large fire suppression. Final Report Phase 2.
USDA Office of Inspector General (2009) Audit report: Forest Service’s replacement plan for firefighting aerial resources. Report Number 08601–53-SF. Available at http://www.usda.gov/oig/webdocs/08601-53-SF.pdf [Verified 1 November 2011]
Wei Y, Rideout DB, Hall TB (2011) Toward efficient management of large fires: a mixed integer programming model and two iterative approaches. Forest Science 57, 435–447.
Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (2007) Air operations on the fireline: lessons learned. Scratchline 2007(21). Available at http://wildfirelessons.net/documents/Scratchline_Issue21.pdf
