Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate ‘stringybark’ for intense spotting

P. F. M. Ellis
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences and CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Email: peter.ellis@csiro.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 20(7) 897-907 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF10052
Submitted: 12 May 2010  Accepted: 9 March 2011   Published: 20 September 2011

Abstract

In south-eastern Australia, bark of the ‘stringybark’ eucalypt group, and notably that of messmate (Eucalyptus obliqua L’Hér.), is notorious for intense spotting and it is likely that firebrands of this type contribute significantly to loss of life and property during major wildfires. The fuelbed ignition potential by glowing samples was laboratory tested on excised sections of Pinus radiata D. Don litterbed at moisture contents between 2 and 8% and for ‘no-wind’ or for ‘wind’ of 1 m s–1. Prepared samples of outer bark between 0.5 and 1.6 g were combusted until they attained ~20% of initial mass before placement. For ‘no-wind’, flaming ignition did not occur and the probability of glowing ignition appeared to depend on the chance of contact with needles. For ‘wind’, the probability of flaming ignition was a function of sample glowing mass and fuelbed moisture content. Its ignition probability, weight-for-weight, appears to exceed that reported for other forest firebrands, including bark of E. globulus Labill. However, it is likely that the notoriety of messmate bark is also due, in part, to its morphology and in-flight behaviour. It is argued that firebrand laboratory tests to date may poorly reflect the ignition potential of similar samples after flight.

Additional keywords: candlebark, gumbark, mass spotting, terminal velocity.


References

Albini FA (1979) Spotfire distance from burning trees, a predictive model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-56. (Ogden, UT)

Babrauskas V (2003) ‘Ignition handbook.’ (Fire Science Publishers: Issaquah, WA)

Barrow GJ (1945) A survey of houses affected in the Beaumaris fire, January 14, 1944. Journal of Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research 18, 27–37.

Boonmee N, Quintiere JG (2002) Glowing and flaming autoignition of wood. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 29, 289–296.
Glowing and flaming autoignition of wood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Byram GM (1959) Chapter 4: Forest fire behaviour. In ‘Forest fire: control and use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 90–123. (The Maple Press Company: York, PA)

Chandler CC, Williams D, Trabaud LV, Thomas P, Cheney P (1983) ‘Fire in forestry. Vol. 1: Forest fire behavior and effects.’ (Wiley: New York)

Cheney NP, Bary GAV (1969) The propagation of mass conflagrations in a standing eucalypt forest by the spotting process. In ‘Mass fire symposium: collected papers’, 10–12 February 1969, Canberra. Vol. 1. Paper A6. (Commonwealth of Australia, Defence Standard Laboratories: Melbourne)

Countryman CM (1983) Ignition of grass fuels by cigarettes. Fire Management Notes 44, 3–7.

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaionnou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technology 37, 143–152.
Flammability assessment of mediterranean forest fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark – a firebrand study. PhD thesis. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Ellis PFM (2010) The effect of aerodynamic behaviour of flakes of jarrah and karri bark on their potential behaviour as firebrands. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 93, 21–27.

Ellis P, Sullivan A (2003) Assessment of ACT suburban house loss from the 18 January 2003 bushfires. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products Report 1326 for the Australian Capital Territory Planning and Land Authority. (Canberra, ACT)

Fairbanks JP, Bainer RR (1934) Spark arrestor for motorized equipment. University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 577. (Berkeley, CA)

Filippov AV (1974) The pyrological properties of some combustible forest materials. In ‘Problems in combustion and extinguishment – collection of articles’. (Eds IV Ryabov, AN Baratov, II Petrov) National Technical Information Service, Report TT-71–58001, pp. 96–106. (Springfield, VA)

Ganteaume A, Lampin-Maillet C, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Jappiot M, Fonturbel T, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Vega JA (2009) Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 951–969.
Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFaqtLzO&md5=5309d6a893b31ed53474a648a495f3daCAS |

Harrison RT (1970) Danger of ignition of ground cover fuels by vehicle exhaust systems. US Forest Service, Equipment Development Center, ED&T Project 1337. (San Dimas, CA)

Hodgson A (1968) Control burning in eucalypt forest in Victoria, Australia. Australian Journal of Forestry 66, 601–605.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) ‘Applied logistic regression’, 2nd edn. (Wiley Interscience: New York)

Linton M (1962) Report on moisture variation in forest fuels – prediction of moisture content. CSIRO Division of Physical Chemistry. Report on prediction of moisture content. (Melbourne)

Luke RH, McArthur AG (1978) ‘Bushfires in Australia.’ (CSIRO Division of Forest Research, Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC (2006) Ignition of mulch and grasses in wildland-urban interface fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 427–431.
Ignition of mulch and grasses in wildland-urban interface fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Thomas GC, Shields JR, Maranghides A, Mell W, Yang JC (2008) Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuelbeds. Fire Safety Journal 43, 226–233.
Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuelbeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktlejtrY%3D&md5=6898c3d95cc8444d51df01ed3c5c0a41CAS |

Matthews S (2010) Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 800–802.
Effect of drying temperature on fuel moisture content measurements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McArthur AG (1967) Fire behaviour in eucalypt forests. Commonwealth of Australia, Forestry and Timber Bureau Leaflet 107. (Canberra)

McArthur AG (1969) The Tasmanian bushfires of 7th February, 1967, and associated fire behaviour characteristics. In ‘Mass fire symposium: collected papers’, 10–12 February 1969, Canberra. Vol. 1. Paper A7. (Commonwealth of Australia, Defence Standard Laboratories: Melbourne)

McCarthy GJ, Tolhurst KG (1998) Effectiveness of firefighting first attack operations 1991/92–1994/95. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Fire Research, Centre for Forest Tree Technology, Research Report 45. (Melbourne)

Muraszew A (1974) Firebrand phenomena. The Aerospace Corporation, Aerospace Report ATR-74(8165–01)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Muraszew A, Fedele JB, Kuby WC (1975) Firebrand investigation. The Aerospace Corporation, Aerospace Report ATR-75(7470)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692.
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neal JE, Smith RH, McCaw WL (1996) Evaluation – Neosystems forest fuel moisture meter pre-production prototype. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Science and Information Division, report prepared for CALMfire – December 1996. (Manjimup, WA)

O’Connell AM, Menagé PMA (1982) Litter fall and nutrient cycling in karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) forest in relation to stand age. Australian Journal of Ecology 7, 49–62.
Litter fall and nutrient cycling in karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) forest in relation to stand age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXksFeqtrc%3D&md5=ebb9077ec20f4da77993a4ead0b61929CAS |

Pagni P (1993) Causes of the 20th October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration. Fire Safety Journal 21, 331–339.
Causes of the 20th October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plucinski MP, Anderson WR (2008) Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 628–637.
Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Development Team (2011) ‘The R project for statistical computing.’ Available at http://www.r-project.org [Verified 9 August 2011]

Ramsay GC, McArthur NA (1995) Building in the urban interface: lessons from the January 1994 Sydney bushfires. In ‘Presented Papers Australian Bushfire Conference’, 27–30 September 1995, Hobart, TAS.

SALTUS (2001) Spotfires: mechanisms analysis and modelling. Cemagref, EU Project ENV98–CT98–0701. Thematic final report probabilistic model WP100. (Aix en Provence, France)

Stockstad DS (1975) Spontaneous and piloted ignition of pine needles. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Sullivan AL (2007) Competitive thermokinetics and non-linear bushfire behaviour. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Moreno FG (1965) On the flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 10, 1021–1037.

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Moreno FG, Villa AR (1967) Transport and combustion of firebrands. USDA Forest Service, Final Report of Grants FG-SP-114 and FG-SP 146, Vol 2. Aeronautical Institute of Madrid.

Teague B, McLeod R, Pascoe S (2009) Fire Behaviour. In ‘The Victorian Bushfires Commission – Interim Report: The February 2009 Fires’. pp. 45–82. (State Government of Victoria) Available at http://www.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/Documents/PF-Chapters/Chapter1_PF.pdf [Verified 13 September 2011]

Tolhurst KG, Flinn DW, Loyn RH, Wilson AAG, Foletta IJ (1992) Ecological effects of fuel reduction burning in a dry sclerophyll forest: a summary of principal research findings and their management implications. Department of Conservation and Environment. (Melbourne)

US Fire Administration (1991) The East Bay Hills fire. US Fire Administration Technical Report USFA-TR-060/October. (Oakland–Berkeley, CA)

Wright JG (1932) Forest fire hazard research as developed and conducted at the Petawawa Forest Experiment Station. Forest Fire Research Institute, Information Report FF-X-5. (Ottawa, ON)