Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Modelling firebrand transport in wildfires using HIGRAD/FIRETEC

Eunmo Koo A D , Rodman R. Linn A , Patrick J. Pagni B and Carleton B. Edminster C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA.

B Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

C Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: koo_e@lanl.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 21(4) 396-417 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09146
Submitted: 25 December 2009  Accepted: 23 August 2011   Published: 9 March 2012

Abstract

Firebrand transport is studied for disc and cylindrical firebrands by modelling their trajectories with a coupled-physics fire model, HIGRAD/FIRETEC. Through HIGRAD/FIRETEC simulations, the size of possible firebrands and travelled distances are analysed to assess spot ignition hazard. Trajectories modelled with and without the assumption that the firebrands’ relative velocities always equal their terminal velocities are. Various models for the flight and combustion of disc- and cylindrical-shaped firebrands are evaluated. Eight simulations are performed with surface fuel fires and four simulations are performed with combined surface and canopy fuels. Firebrand trajectories without terminal velocity are larger than those from models with terminal velocity. Discs travel further than cylinders, as discs are aerodynamically more favourable. Thin discs burning on their faces and tall cylinders burning around their circumference have shorter lifetimes than thin discs burning from their circumference or longer cylinders burning from their ends. Firebrands from canopy fires, with larger size and potential to ignite recipient fuel, travel further than firebrands from surface fires. In the simulations, which included a line fire ignition in homogeneous fuels on flat terrain, the firebrand launching patterns are very heterogeneous, and the trajectories and landing patterns are dominated by the coupled fire–atmosphere behaviour.

Additional keywords: coupled-physics fire model, spotting, WUI fires.


References

Albini FA (1979) Spot fire distance from burning trees: a predictive model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-56. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA (1981) Spot fire distance from isolated sources: extensions of a predictive model. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note RN-INT-309. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA (1982) Response of free-burning fires to non-steady wind Combustion Science and Technology 29, 225–241.
Response of free-burning fires to non-steady windCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Albini FA (1983a) Potential spotting distance from wind-driven surface fires. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper RP-INT-309. (Ogden, UT)

Albini FA (1983) Transport of firebrands by line thermals. Combustion Science and Technology 32, 277–288.
Transport of firebrands by line thermals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anderson HE (1983) Predicting wind-driven wildland fires size and shape. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-305. (Ogden, UT)

Baum HR, McCaffrey BJ (1989) Fire induced flow field – theory and experiment. In ‘The Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science’, 13–17 June 1988, Tokyo, Japan. (Ed. T Wakamatsa) pp. 129–148. (International Association for Fire Safety Science: London, UK)

Cunningham P (2007) Idealised numerical simulations of the interactions between buoyant plumes and density currents. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64, 2105–2115.
Idealised numerical simulations of the interactions between buoyant plumes and density currents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drysdale D (1999) ‘An Introduction to Fire Dynamics.’ (Wiley: New York)

Ellis PF (2000) The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark – a firebrand study. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Ellis PFM (2010) The effect of the aerodynamic behaviour of flakes of jarrah and karri bark on their potential as firebrands. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 93, 21–27.

Emmons H (1956) The film combustion of liquid fuel. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 36, 60–71.
The film combustion of liquid fuel.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandez-Pello AC (1982) Analysis of the forced convective burning of a combustible particle. Combustion Science and Technology 28, 305–313.
Analysis of the forced convective burning of a combustible particle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3sXlvFyk&md5=0cc554a9045767ceb17f171590c40009CAS |

Fons WL (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. Journal of Agricultural Research 72, 93–121.

Gould JS, McCaw WL, Cheney NP, Ellis PF, Knight IK, Sullivan AL (2009) ‘Project Vesta – Fire Behaviour in Dry Eucalypt Forest: Fuel Structure, Fuel Dynamics and Fire Behaviour.’ (Ensis–CSIRO: Canberra ACT; and Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth, WA)

Hanley DE, Cunningham P, Goodrick SL (2012) Interaction between a wildfire and the sea-breeze front. In ‘Remote Sensing and Modeling Applications to Wildland Fire’. (Eds Qu JJ, Riebau AR, Yang RX, Sommers WT), pp. 78–95. (Springer–Verlag)

Himoto K, Tanaka T (2005) Transport of disk-shaped firebrands in a turbulent boundary layer. In ‘The Eighth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science’, 18–23 September 2005, Beijing, China. (Eds DT Gottuk, BY Lattimer) pp. 433–444. (International Association for Fire Safety Science: Baltimore, MD)

Hoerner SF (1958) ‘Fluid-dynamic Drag; Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance.’ (Hoerner Fluid Dynamics: Midland Park, NJ)

Kinoshita CM, Pagni PJ, Beier RA (1981) Opposed flow diffusion flame extensions. In ‘The Eighteenth Symposium on Combustion’, 16–22 August 1980, Waterloo, ON, Canada. pp. 1853–1860. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Koo E (2008) ‘Wildfire Modeling.’ (VDM Verlag: Saarbrücken, Germany)

Koo E, Pagni PJ, Linn RR (2007) Using FIRETEC to describe firebrand behavior in wildfires. In ‘The Tenth International Symposium of Fire and Materials’, 29–31 January 2007, San Franscisco, CA. (Interscience Communications: London)

Koo E, Pagni PJ, Weise DR, Woycheese JP (2010) Firebrands and spotting ignitions in large-scale fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 818–843.
Firebrands and spotting ignitions in large-scale fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kortas S, Mindykowski P, Consalvi JL, Mhiri H, Porterie B (2009) Experimental validation of a numerical model for the transport of firebrands. Fire Safety Journal 44, 1095–1102.
Experimental validation of a numerical model for the transport of firebrands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee SL, Hellman JM (1969) Study of firebrand trajectories in a turbulent swirling natural convection plume. Combustion and Flame 13, 645–655.
Study of firebrand trajectories in a turbulent swirling natural convection plume.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee SL, Hellman JM (1970) Firebrand trajectory study using an empirical velocity-dependent burning law. Combustion and Flame 15, 265–274.
Firebrand trajectory study using an empirical velocity-dependent burning law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linn RR (1997) A transport model for prediction of wildfire behavior. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Technical Report LA-13334-T. (Los Alamos, NM)

Linn RR, Cunningham P (2005) Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, D13107
Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linn RR, Reisner J, Colman JJ, Winterkamp J (2002) Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire 11, 233–246.
Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linn RR, Winterkamp J, Colman JJ, Edminster C, Bailey JD (2005) Modeling interactions between fire and atmosphere in discrete-element fuel beds. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 37–48.
Modeling interactions between fire and atmosphere in discrete-element fuel beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Linn RR, Winterkamp J, Weise DR, Edminster C (2010) A numerical study of slope and fuel structure effects on coupled wildfire behaviour. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 179–201.
A numerical study of slope and fuel structure effects on coupled wildfire behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC (2006) Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 427–431.
Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC (2006) On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire and Materials 30, 77–87.
On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhslOnu70%3D&md5=3f49b2697bd2a237db507b14c996b0caCAS |

Manzello SL, Maranghides A, Mell WE (2007) Firebrand generation from burning vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 458–462.
Firebrand generation from burning vegetation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Maranghides A, Mell W, Yang JC (2008) Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuel beds. Fire Safety Journal 43, 226–233.
Experimental investigation of firebrands: generation and ignition of fuel beds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktlejtrY%3D&md5=1d2dcecd953377dafac3edd5e6aa45ebCAS |

Manzello SL, Shields JR, Cleary TG, Maranghides A, Mell WE, Yang JC, Hayashi Y, Nii D, Kurita T (2008b) On the development and characterization of a firebrand generator. Fire Safety Journal 43, 258–268.
On the development and characterization of a firebrand generator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millán MM, Estrela MJ, Badenas C (1998) Meteorological processes relevant to forest fire dynamics on the Spanish Mediterranean coast. Journal of Applied Meteorology 37, 83–100.
Meteorological processes relevant to forest fire dynamics on the Spanish Mediterranean coast.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muraszew A (1974) Firebrand phenomena. The Aerospace Corporation, Report ATR-74(8165–01)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Muraszew A, Fedele JB (1976) Statistical model for spot fire hazard. The Aerospace Corporation, Report ATR-77(7588)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Muraszew A, Fedele JB (1977) Trajectory of firebrands in and out of fire whirls. Combustion and Flame 30, 321–324.
Trajectory of firebrands in and out of fire whirls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muraszew A, Fedele JB, Kuby WC (1975) Firebrand investigation. The Aerospace Corporation, Report ATR-75(7470)-1. (El Segundo, CA)

Nielsen HJ, Tao LN (1965) The fire plume above a large free-burning fire. In ‘Tenth Symposium on Combustion’, 17–21 August 1964, Cambridge, UK. pp. 965–972. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Pagni PJ (1981) Diffusion flame analyses. Fire Safety Journal 3, 273–285.
Diffusion flame analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXltlGhsbk%3D&md5=19c848999a6ef8f6365104aa45053eaeCAS |

Pagni PJ (1993) Causes of the 20 October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration. Fire Safety Journal 21, 331–339.
Causes of the 20 October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pimont F, Dupuy JL, Linn RR, Dupont S (2009) Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 775–790.
Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Porterie B, Consalvi JL, Kaiss A, Loraud JC (2005) Predicting wildland fire behavior and emissions using a fine-scale physical model. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A: Applications 47, 571–591.
Predicting wildland fire behavior and emissions using a fine-scale physical model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Porterie B, Zekri N, Clerc J-P, Loraud J-C (2007) Modeling forest fire spread and spotting process with small world networks. Combustion and Flame 149, 63–78.
Modeling forest fire spread and spotting process with small world networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjs1Cksbo%3D&md5=3c306eaef8cab086d1816ac21b5b780aCAS |

Reisner JM, Bossert J, Winterkamp J (1998) Numerical simulation of two wildfire events using a combined modeling system (HIGRAD/BEHAVE). In ‘Second Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology of the American Meteorology Society’, 11–16 January 1988, Phoenix, AZ. pp. 6–12. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Reisner J, Wynne S, Margolin L, Linn R (2000) Coupled atmospheric–fire modeling employing the method of averages. Monthly Weather Review 128, 3683–3691.
Coupled atmospheric–fire modeling employing the method of averages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sardoy N, Consalvi JL, Porterie B, Fernandez-Pello AC (2007) Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees. Combustion and Flame 150, 151–169.
Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnsVSrtrY%3D&md5=c59c0dbc0489f684b84267b78f165fcfCAS |

Sardoy N, Consalvi JL, Kaiss A, Fernandez-Pello AC, Porterie B (2008) Numerical study of ground-level distribution of firebrands generated by line fires. Combustion and Flame 154, 478–488.
Numerical study of ground-level distribution of firebrands generated by line fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpt1alsbY%3D&md5=ba09c03000857f4a689f477c85c96b05CAS |

Schaefer VJ (1957) The relationship of jet streams to forest wildfires. Journal of Forestry 55, 419–425.

Sharples JJ (2009) An overview of mountain meteorological effects relevant to fire behaviour and bushfire risk. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 737–754.
An overview of mountain meteorological effects relevant to fire behaviour and bushfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spalding DB (1953) The combustion of liquid fuels. In ‘Fourth Symposium on Combustion’, 1–5 September 1952, Cambridge, MA. pp. 847–864. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Moreno FG (1965a) On flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. In ‘Tenth Symposium on Combustion’, 17–21 August 1964, Cambridge, UK. pp. 1021–1037. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Villa AR, Martinez L, Perez O (1965b) Open fires and transport of firebrands. Instituto Nacional de Tecnica Aeroespacial, Annual Technical Report, Grants FG-SP-114. (Madrid, Spain)

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Moreno FG, Villa AR (1967) Transport and combustion of firebrands. Instituto Nacional de Tecnica Aeroespacial, Final Technical Report, Grants FG-SP-114, FG-SP-146. (Madrid, Spain)

Tse SD, Fernandez-Pello AC (1998) On the flight paths of metal particles and embers generated by power lines in high winds – a potential source of wildland fires. Fire Safety Journal 30, 333–356.
On the flight paths of metal particles and embers generated by power lines in high winds – a potential source of wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turns SR (2000) ‘An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications.’ (McGraw Hill: Boston, MA)

Wang H-H (2011) Analysis on downwind distribution of firebrands sourced from a wildland fire. Fire Technology 47, 321–340.
Analysis on downwind distribution of firebrands sourced from a wildland fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

White FM (1999) ‘Fluid Mechanics.’ (WCB/McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA)

Wilson R (1962) ‘The Devil Wind and Wood Shingles: the Los Angeles Conflagration of 1961.’ (National Fire Protection Association: Boston, MA)

Woycheese JP (1996) Brand lofting in large scale fires. MSc thesis, University of California Berkeley, CA.

Woycheese JP (2000) Brand lofting and propagation from large-scale fires. PhD thesis, University of California Berkeley, CA.

Woycheese JP (2001) Wooden disk combustion for spot fire spread. In ‘The Ninth International Fire Science and Engineering Conference (INTERFLAM)’, 17–19 September, Edinburgh. pp. 101–112. (Interscience Communications: London)

Woycheese JP, Pagni PJ, Liepmann D (1998) Brand propagation from large-scale fires. In ‘The Second International Conference of Fire Research and Engineering (ICFRE2)’, 10–15 August 1997, Gaithersburg, MD. pp. 137–150. (Society of Fire Protection Engineers: Boston, MA)

Woycheese JP, Pagni PJ, Liepmann D (1999) Brand propagation from large-scale fires. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering 10, 32–44.
Brand propagation from large-scale fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |