Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of fire severity using pre- and post-fire LiDAR data in sagebrush steppe rangelands

Cheng Wang A and Nancy F. Glenn A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Idaho State University – Boise Center Aerospace Laboratory, 322 E Front Street Suite 240, Boise, ID 83702, USA. Email: wangchengcn@hotmail.com

B Corresponding author. Email: glennanc@isu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(7) 848-856 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08173
Submitted: 18 April 2008  Accepted: 23 April 2009   Published: 27 October 2009

Abstract

Reflectance-based indices derived from remote-sensing data have been widely used for detecting fire severity in forested areas. Rangeland ecosystems, such as sparsely vegetated shrub-steppe, have unique spectral reflectance differences before and after fire events that may not make reflectance-based indices appropriate for fire severity estimation. As an alternative, average vegetation height change ( dh ) derived from pre- and post-fire Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data were used in this study for fire severity estimation. Theoretical deductions were conducted to demonstrate that LiDAR-derived dh is related to biomass combustion and thus can be used for fire severity estimation in rangeland areas. The Jeffreys–Matusita (JM) distance was calculated to evaluate the separability for each pair of fire severity classes, with an average JM distance of 1.14. Thresholds for classifying the level of fire severity were determined according to the mean and standard deviation of each class. A fire-severity classification map with 84% overall accuracy was obtained from the LiDAR dh method. Importantly, this method was sensitive to the difference between the moderate and high fire-severity classes.


Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Grant NA06OAR4600124. The authors thank Jill Norton for the use of her field measurements and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.


References


Abdel Malak D , Pausas G (2006) Fire regime and post-fire Normalized Difference Vegetation Index changes in the eastern Iberian peninsula (Mediterranean basin). International Journal of Wildland Fire  15, 407–413.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bobbe T , Finco M , Sohlberg R (2001) Field measurements for the training and validation of burn severity maps from spaceborne remotely sensed imagery. USDA Joint Fire Science Program Final Project Report JSP RFP-2001–2. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/baer/jfs.html [Verified 9 September 2008]

Bortolot ZJ , Wynne RH (2005) Estimating forest biomass using small footprint LiDAR data: an individual tree-based approach that incorporates training data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing  59(6), 342–360.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Congalton RG , Green K (1999) ‘Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices.’ (Lewis Publishers: New York)

Epting J, Verbyla D , Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing fire severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment  96, 328–339.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Key CH , Benson NC (2006). Landscape assessment. In ‘FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System’. (Eds DC Lutes, RE Keane, JF Caratti, CH Key, NC Benson, S Sutherland, LJ Gangi) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-164-CD, LA1-LA51. (Ogden, UT)

Kim K, Treitz P, Baldwin K, Morrison L , Green L (2003) Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing  29(5), 658–678.
Matusita K (1966) A distance and related statistics in multivariate analysis. In ‘Multivariate Analysis’. (Ed. PR Krishnaiah) pp. 187–200. (Academic Press: New York)

Means JE, Acker SA, Harding DJ, Blair JB, Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Harmon ME , McKee WA (1999) Use of large-footprint scanning airborne Lidar to estimate forest stand characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon. Remote Sensing of Environment  67, 298–308.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pyne SJ , Andrews PL , Laven PD (1996) ‘Introduction to Wildland Fire.’ pp. 22–45. (Wiley: New York)

Riaño D, Chuvieco E, Ustin SL, Salas J, Rodriguez-Perez JR, Ribeiro LM, Ciegas DX, Moreno JM , Ferandez H (2007) Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging. International Journal of Wildland Fire  16, 341–348.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | USDI National Park Service (2003) ‘Fire Monitoring Handbook.’ (Fire Management Program Center, National Interagency Fire Center: Boise, ID).

van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR , Key CH (2004) Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment  92, 397–408.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | West NE , Young JA (2000) Intermountain valleys and lower mountain slopes. In ‘North American Terrestrial Vegetation’. (Eds MG Barbour, WD Billings) pp. 255–284. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

White JD, Byan KC, Key CC , Running SW (1996) Remote sensing of forest fire severity and vegetation recovery. International Journal of Wildland Fire  6, 125–136.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zhang K , Whitman D (2005) Comparison of three algorithms for filtering airborne Lidar data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 71(3), 313–324. Available at http://www.asprs.org/publications/pers/2005journal/march/2005_mar_313-324.pdf [Verified 19 September 2009]