Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF08143
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 18(7)

Flame interactions and burning characteristics of two live leaf samples1

Brent M. Pickett A , Carl Isackson A , Rebecca Wunder A , Thomas H. Fletcher A D , Bret W. Butler B and David R. Weise C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Fire Laboratory, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: tom_fletcher@byu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(7) 865-874 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08143
Submitted: 12 August 2008  Accepted: 22 December 2008   Published: 27 October 2009

Abstract

Combustion experiments were performed over a flat-flame burner that provided the heat source for multiple leaf samples. Interactions of the combustion behavior between two leaf samples were studied. Two leaves were placed in the path of the flat-flame burner, with the top leaf 2.5 cm above the bottom leaf. Local gas and particle temperatures, as well as local oxygen concentrations, were measured along with burning characteristics of both leaves. Results showed that the time to ignition of the upper leaf was not significantly affected by the presence of the lower leaf. The major difference observed was that the time of flame duration of the upper leaf was significantly affected by the presence of the lower leaf. Causes for the prolonged flame were found to be the consumption of oxygen by the burning lower leaf and the obstruction provided by the lower leaf, causing a wake effect, thus altering the combustion behavior of the upper leaf.


Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the USDA/USDI National Fire Plan administered through a Research Joint Venture Agreement (No. 01-CR-11272166–060) with collaboration with the Forest Fire Laboratory, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Riverside, CA, and the Forest Fire Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT. Special thanks to Joey Chong from the Riverside Forest Fire Laboratory, who helped with the collection of chaparral samples.


References


Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL (1986) BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system–BURN subsystem, Part 1. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, INT-194. (Ogden, UT)

Butler BW, Cohen J, Latham DJ, Schuette RD, Sopko P, Shannon KS, Jimenez D , Bradshaw LS (2004a) Measurements of radiant emissive power and temperatures in crown fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  34, 1577–1587.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Byram GM (1959) Chapter 3: Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest Fire: Control and Use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–89. (Maple Press Company: York, PA)

Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Tate AG, Butler BW, Rothermel RC (2002) ‘A Model for the Steady Spread of Fire through a Homogeneous Fuel Bed.’ (Millpress: Rotterdam)

Coleman JR , Sullivan AL (1996) A real-time computer application for the prediction of fire spread across the Australian landscape. Simulation  67, 230–240.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Deeming JE, Lancaster JW, Fosberg MA, Furman RW, Schroeder MJ (1972) National Fire-Danger Rating System. RM-84. (Fort Collins, CO)

Dimitrakopoulos AP , Papaioannou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technology  37, 143–152.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Forestry Canada Information Report ST-X 3. (Ottawa, ON)

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: fire area simulator – model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, RMRS-RP-4.

Fletcher TH, Pickett BM, Smith SG, Spittle GS, Woodhouse MM, Haake E , Weise DR (2007) Effects of moisture on ignition behavior of moist California chaparral and Utah leaves. Combustion Science and Technology  179, 1183–1203.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Fosberg MA, Deeming JE (1971) Derivation of the 1- and 10-hour timelag fuel moisture calculations for fire danger rating. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note RM-207. (Fort Collins, CO)

Lu H (2006) Experimental and modeling investigations of biomass particle combustion. PhD thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Pagni PJ, Woycheese JP (2000) Fire spread by brand spotting. In ‘Proceedings: Fifteenth Meeting of the UJNR Panel on Fire Research and Safety. March 1–7, 2000. Volume 2’. (Ed. SL Bryner) National Institute of Standards and Technology, Information Report NISTIR 6588, pp. 373–380. (Gaithersburg, MD) Available at http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire00/PDF/f00131.pdf [Verified 30 September 2009]

Pickett BM (2008) Effects of moisture on combustion of live wildland forest fuels. PhD thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Smith SG (2005) Effects of moisture on combustion characteristics of live California chaparral and Utah foliage. MSc thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Tarifa CS, del Notario PP, Moreno FG (1965) On the flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. In ‘10th Symposium (International) on Combustion’, 1964, Cambridge, UK. pp. 1021–1037. (The Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Van Wagner CE (1973) Height of crown scorch in forest fires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  3, 373–378.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weise DR, White RH, Beall FC , Etlinger M (2005) Use of the cone calorimeter to detect seasonal differences in selected combustion characteristics of ornamental vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 321–338.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |




1 Part of this manuscript was prepared by US Government employees on official time and with government funding and is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright in the US.

2 Source for common and scientific plant names – USDA plants database: http://plants.usda.gov, accessed 29 September 2009.